All Channels
Popular
130°

Microsoft: 'No Doubt' That 3D Gaming Will Take Off

While Sony is banking on 3D taking off for movies, televisions and games, Microsoft as a company has a much less vested interest in the technology. Microsoft insists that Xbox 360 is ready for 3D gaming right now, but the company also isn't pushing 3D since it believes it's going to take some time before consumers will embrace it.

Read Full Story >>
industrygamers.com
donniebaseball5740d ago

I think MS is taking the right approach on this. Most people don't care enough about 3D gaming now, and they're not going to spend thousands on a new TV plus 3D glasses. But I could see it taking off once the tech improves, glasses no longer needed and prices come down.

DA_SHREDDER5740d ago ShowReplies(3)
Omega45740d ago

So true. Once glasses aren't needed it could become standard, but until that happens only the super rich will bother with 3DTV.

AssassinHD5740d ago

What Omega4 meant to say is that only the "super rich" and people with salaries will bother with 3DTV. It's ok Omega. It is a common omission. I know you would thank me if you could, so I will just say that you are welcome.

Downtown boogey5740d ago

Can you BE any dumber? The glassless tech is way more expensive.

Thecraft19895740d ago

wow I did not no Iam rich thanks I only earn 23K year but Iam rich love your logic there.

Qui-Gon Jim5740d ago

Only the super rich will go out and buy a new TV just for 3D, but other people who are in the market for a new TV anyway will very likely look into it. I, for one, don't plan on upgrading my TV too soon, but when I do, I will definitely be looking at 3D.

SilentNegotiator5739d ago

"Once glasses aren't needed it could become standard, but until that
happens only the super rich will bother with 3DTV"

That is the most ironic, contradicting thing that I have read all year.
The technology used for glasses-less 3D is MUCH MORE expensive.
Not to mention that it has an absolutely TERRIBLE field of view. You have to be within 20 degrees of the screen to see it clearly.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5739d ago
Downtown boogey5740d ago

Maybe the right approach FOR THEM!
Screw THEM for all I care!

NYC_Gamer5740d ago

MS always flip flop on their words....

Jazz41085740d ago

Sony always flip flop on their words....EG. Motion controls, Rumble.....etc...

Time_Is_On_My_Side5740d ago

I have three words for you, Eye Toy, Law sue, lol?

madjedi5739d ago (Edited 5739d ago )

@jazz Yes just like microsoft did with 1080p resolution and the original 360's not having an hdmi connection, which they withheld till the elite came out.

But sony had both at launch, and the sixaxis was a motion controller that was out before the wii, so without specifying copying the wii mote, motion controls is a dumbass point because sony already had them.

But better than feeding people your body is the controller, and having limited gameplay options, at least move is actually practical vs natal.

No FanS Land5739d ago

sixaxis out before wii??? Are you kidding? It was only out before the wii because of the release date of the console.

Seriously, nintendo announced the wii remote at TGS 2005, then sony announces sixaxis at E3 2006 tring to steal nintendo's thunder since their motion controlled remote turned heads.

They created the sixaxis to play catch up. Developers weren't even aware of the 6axis 2 weeks prior to the E3 2006.

Why do you think they created a boomerang controller? They actually tested the audience, then from the overwhelming negative reaction, they "said" (read PR spin) that it was never the official controller.

If it never really was the official controller, then why did sony bother creating it?

Thinking that sixaxis was out before the wii, almost implying nintendo copied sony, is as dumb as believing microsoft really invented the avatars before the miis.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5739d ago
dabri55740d ago

I don't remember MS ever saying they weren't going to do 3d.

Matthew945740d ago

not in the sony fanboys mind

dabri55740d ago

People can disagree that's fine. I just don't remember them saying it. If you can provide a link to them stating 3d gaming is not in their future or they are not gonna do it, please provide it. I am not partial to either company so it won't upset me. :)

Matthew945740d ago

i was joking but...
never mind

NAGNEWS5740d ago

Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony need to work together to make 3d no glasses

jack_burt0n5740d ago

nintendo dont know anything about 3d tech they bought the 3ds screen tech, neither does MS.

wwm0nkey5740d ago (Edited 5740d ago )

Actually MS knows a lot jack. They are developing a glasses free tech now, whats cool about this tech is that people can see different things on the screen at once. Say I want to play a game but someone wants to watch a movie...well you can do both in 3D at the same time. I will find the link soon so just be patient :)

EDIT: NVM it projects 2D images to 4 people at once at its CURRENT state but here is the glasses free tech demo anyway http://www.physorg.com/news...

jack_burt0n5740d ago

hey we have a technology that is glasses free!!!!

but its limited to 2 people. pointless.

UP5740d ago

Yea I am tired of people saying that the 3DS will make 3D tvs look obsolete. Don't get me wrong the 3DS will be awesome but the thing will not make 3D tvs look obsolete. To the people that disagree with me try watching Toy Story 3 in 3d on the 3DS with your family and friends when the device comes out.

cryymoar5739d ago

@wwm0nkey

Sony is working on the same tech as well.
Glasses-3D is the most cost efficient method that they can push out at the moment.
You can go buy a glasses-free TV in the near future if not already, but good luck paying for it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5739d ago
MorganX5740d ago

It's not like 3D is new. Everytime it becomes popular at the Movies, everyone jumps on the bandwagon. It'll die down. It won't go away, but IMO it will remain niche for years to come.

jack_burt0n5740d ago

agreed its the new top market feature in LCD TV's just like 1080p was just like 24p was, 100hz, LED etc its all a part of the tv tech tree.

nothing new.

MorganX5739d ago

Actually all those things you mentioned were new and with the exception of 24p, pretty much are now desired standards.

3D is not new, been around since 50s. Only new ways to implement with better quality. The use and so far demand, has remained consistent thus far - niche.

metsgaming5740d ago

once the 3ds comes out we will see the capabilities and limitations of glassless 3d. Then we will see......

jack_burt0n5740d ago

It hurts your eyes surprisingly more than glasses do, and it has a viewing angle of 1 degree either you are in the sweetspot or it looks like crap.

OSU_Gamer5740d ago

I haven't tried the 3DS, but after trying th glasses at Best Buy my head was hurting. A lot more so than any multiple hour session of non 3D gaming.

Show all comments (47)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio12d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing12d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9212d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit12d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing12d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9212d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay14d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn214d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn214d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown14d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay14d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay14d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac13d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger14d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300014d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde14d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde13d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7515d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_13d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.