danthegardner5721d ago

Insane graphics, especially for multiplayer. Super Amazing

Trebius5721d ago

So i'm not surprised 3 will be the same.

Cevapi885721d ago

i just realized how the snipers will be badass assassins looking at the first photo...you cloak, pull out your knife, wait for the victim and BAM knife to the throat, eye, skull etc....

ABizzel15721d ago

WOW. Absolutely amazing.

Rumor5721d ago

Knifing!? MECHS!? OMFG!

DORMIN5721d ago

This game just looks so damn incredible. Can't wait!

5720d ago
ALFAxD_CENTAURO5719d ago (Edited 5719d ago )

''Looks good graphically but Reach will be twice the game''

You are saying Reach will have twice of Killzone 3?

Sigh, another Multiple Troll account.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5719d ago
NYPunkster5721d ago

Congrats Sony, you've won this holiday season and the rest of the year. Keep it going and don't stop.

ManGastaS5720d ago (Edited 5720d ago )

tell me why?

badz1495721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

and it's like PS3 Christmas!! SO MANY AWESOME NEWS! with new R&C, Resistance 3, inFAMOUS2 and there is KZ3 which is looking super awesome! ALL DAY 1 BUY! makes you wonder though, eventhough Sony is busy preparing for MOVE release, they're certainly in tacked with their GAMES which I really LOVE! the only thing I need now is more money to afford these games! no thanks to Sony my bank account is never looking like a keeper LOL! but whatever...I'm a happy gamer!

TheObserver5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

I see stabbing and MECHS.

I am going feed people a good length of steel for supper in Killzone 3.

nagato4life5721d ago

who doesnt man....who doesnt

Johandevries5721d ago ShowReplies(6)
MariaHelFutura5721d ago

Yes and the SABOTEUR is AWESOME.

Johandevries5721d ago

You're right. I'm just a normal PS3 owner between all the fanboy rages here, and I thought Killzone 2 was nothing more than than average game with superb graphics. I am not excited for the sequel, just some more graphical spectacle, but I still don't expect anything of the rest.

MariaHelFutura5721d ago

Look. I own a 360 and PS3. Killzone 1/2 are great games that unfortunately get ridiculous expectations put on them.

So just wondering if you think the game has superb graphics what from the screens made you say...."it`s ok"

Just wondering..

big_silky5721d ago

It's amazing how people can get so many disagrees for not creaming themselves over another friggin deathmatch mode that looks pretter than the million other deathmatch modes we've played this year.

Like yourself I thought KZ2 was decent but frankly it was a linear as F, stock standard fps that simply looked nicer than others. It didn't offer anything new over the 1000 other fps' I've played. Strip away the graphics and it would have been a 7 at best.

telekineticmantis5721d ago

youd know that wasn't deathmatch. but you don't...

nnotdead5721d ago

telekenticmantis beat me to it. that sly bastard.

hobo515721d ago

telekeneticmantis just pwned your ass warzone is just pure genius, if it werent for the crappy lag sometimes, killzone would have the greatest mp ever made, radic acadamy is still my favourite map out of any fps

Show all comments (77)
80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
2d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_2d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle1d 21h ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit1d 22h ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog2d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog2d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad2d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_2d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage2d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda1d 21h ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

2d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong28d ago

looks god awful on the base systems

90°

PS5 Sales Pass 92.2 Million Units, Beating Nintendo Switch 2 in the Holiday Quarter

Sony announced its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2025, alongside the traditional update on PS5 shipments.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
70d ago Replies(5)
italiangamer70d ago

Sony and Nintendo are both thriving and I'm happy, thank goodness for them or otherwise the whole gaming industry would be in shambles if they only had PC to rely on!

dveio70d ago

• Total G&NS revenue: 10.5 billion USD
• Operating profit: 900 million USD
• Hardware sales: 8M units shipped
• Software sales: 97M units
• PSN MAU: 132M

vs. Xbox:

• Total gaming revenue: 5.96 billion USD
• nothing else gets reported

__y2jb70d ago

Xbox operating costs are without a doubt eye wateringly high, way way way higher than Sony. GP is costing them an absolute fortune to operate.

Tapani69d ago

That is a very solid operating profit. It's not net, obviously, but still a very healthy amount of cash you make after cost of debt and taxes (+ other expenses), and can invest into R&D and future endeavours. And give back to your shareholders or buy back shares.

DivineHand12570d ago

It would be in Sony's beat interest to not rush next generation. Let 2029 or 2030 be the start of next generation. There is clearly plenty of demand for the PS5 and gamers are not asking for more at this time.

S2Killinit70d ago

Yup especially with the price of tech going up. They already have the PRO to hold them over.

__y2jb70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

Exactly this. Let Xbox wither on the vine for a couple more years and there will be nothing left.

fr0sty70d ago

I fully agree for 2 reasons:

1. Microsoft seems to be in a hurry to release the new Xbox, if they do at all... AMD speculates a 2027 release. This will hurt them in the long run, because:

2. Datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM, and some RAM manufacturers have stopped making RAM for consumer products entirely, while the other remaining ones are scared to ramp up their production capacity to make more RAM because they're worried this whole AI thing is a bubble that is about to pop, and they don't want to be caught holding the bag when it does pop. So, for now, it costs $300-400 for 32GB of DDR5. That's the MSRP for some entire consoles.

If Microsoft drops the new Xbox now, it's going to cost them a fortune. If Sony holds their cards a moment and lets PS5 cook for a while, as it's showing no signs whatsoever of slowing down in sales, then by the time PS6 is ready to drop, RAM prices should have stabilized, allowing Sony to devote much more of their budget towards making PS6's CPU and GPU more powerful, in addition to the tech itself maturing and the available CPU and GPU parts being much more powerful for the same price point than they would be if released today. So, we'd get a super powerful PS6 in say, 2029, that won't have to cost $700-800. They speculate, based on the current specs, that the new Xbox will cost north of $1,000, and that was before the RAM shortage came into the picture. It's definitely going to be even higher now that RAM costs so much.

MS will be shooting themselves in the foot (again) if they try to drop a new Xbox now, and Sony would be wise to capitalize on that mistake by holding their cards a while longer, raking in more of those PS5 profits, and then dropping a new console as soon as the hardware market stabilizes from this AI datacenter BS.

darthv7270d ago

7 years is a hurry...? Its the same amount of time between XBO and series. The same amount of time between PS3 to PS4 and PS4 to PS5. The 360 was 8 years between it and XBO.

If they do release first, and then Sony a year or two later... is it not possible for prices to come down in that time?

repsahj70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

I think Switch 2 beat PS5 during December 2025 that is why the gap decrease to 1m units. Because during black friday, I know PS5 sales is 2:1 against the Switch 2.

And I just want to add that the PlayStation 5 is currently 1.94 million units BEHIND the PlayStation 4 when you align launches. While Switch 2 is 10M ahead against the Switch 1 when you aligned covering it's first 7 months.

S2Killinit70d ago

I think you are forgetting to mention the chip shortages for PS5.

salis84470d ago (Edited 70d ago )

No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly.

PS5 being less than 2m behind PS4 is not a big deal; PS5 had to deal with COVID and ongoing supply and pricing struggles that clearly still exist today. Sales of software are incredibly strong, and the size of the community is bigger than its ever been.

PS5 is well on pace to exceed its early (2021) estimates of 110m by end of life even if that's 2027. PS5 will hit 100m before November and then sell another 6-8M in November + December.

PS5 is doing great, and so is Switch 2, it's good for everyone that they succeed, pitting the two against each other is more damaging than anything related to the sales of the two consoles individually.

repsahj70d ago

"No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly."

majority on this site tells otherwise.

Dexterio70d ago

@repsahj
Yup because they’ve been the anti consumer they are for so long and needs to be humbled 😆

CrashMania70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

I'd be lying if I said I didn't regret my purchase a bit. I mainly bought it for Mario Kart World, but I find it pales in comparison to 8. I'm annoyed that Nintendo charged money for a super barebones 'upgrade' to Jamboree, no new minigames? No new boards? Just some gimmicky low res camera mode. Oh and Midtroid Prime 4 let me down as well, yet to go back and finish it.

I don't want the Switch 2 to fail, it's contributing to a healthier console market with the death of xbox consoles. I'll get use out of mine long term, but some of Nintendo's decisions like the ones above just annoy me lol.

jznrpg70d ago

@respahj the only thing I want Nintendo to badly is the 80$ games so they lower the price.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 70d ago
Show all comments (37)