All Channels
Popular
230°

Blizzard Wins $88M Judgment Against WoW Private Server Owner

Blizzard Entertainment last week won a default judgment worth tens of millions of dollars against the operator of an unauthorized World of Warcraft server.

A U.S. District Court judge awarded Blizzard $88 million from defendant Alyson Reeves, operator of Scapegaming, according to court documents obtained by Gamasutra. Blizzard originally filed the lawsuit in October last year.

Blizzard accused Reeves of copyright infringement, unfair competition and circumvention of copyright protection systems, among other allegations. The company said Scapegaming was "well aware" that its actions were unauthorized.

Read Full Story >>
gamasutra.com
Newtype5772d ago

haha, man...reminds me of the time Diablo 2 went through purging of items cuz of hackers.

rroded5772d ago

The order also said that Blizzard submitted satisfactory evidence that showed Reeves' website (Scapegaming.com, currently down) hosted 32,000 users on a given day in June 2008. That same month, there were over 427,000 members of the Scapegaming community, and Reeves, who goes by a number of aliases including "Peyton," said that 40,000 people play on Scapegaming's servers every day.

The court took the size of the community, 427,000, and multiplied that figure by $200 "per act of circumvention" of a copyright security system, and came to the statutory damages amount of over $85 million. It's unclear if Reeves, who didn't respond to the suit, would be able to pay the award to fulfillment, or if the defendant would appeal the ruling.

88 mil for hosting a pserver what a joke the United States Justice system is.

Biggunz5772d ago

do the crime, pay the fine.

GodsHand5772d ago

"It's unclear if Reeves, who didn't respond to the suit, would be able to pay the award to fulfillment"

Why would he not be able to pay that? Everyone has billions just setting in a bank somewhere, hell I could work at burger king, and make 88 million in a year.

If I were him, I would appeal the judgement, even though it will not help him in this case, as he never responded to the first hearing. Why would I appeal, for the fact that he bought the game leagaly, he never made illegal copies, and distributed them around, he made his own server, and gave other's who bought the game their choice of weather to pay to play, or play to play. He did not force anyone to pay, it was a donation, that gave prizes as awards, which is not all that uncommon.

SilentNegotiator5772d ago (Edited 5772d ago )

The person only made 3 million from the servers, shouldn't the judgment be $3 million?

I understand the attorney fees, but $85.4 million in statutory damages?!
What??

dabri55772d ago

The point it to shut him down. To make it impossible for him to do it again, and to send a message to others not to try it. Not to seriously get 88 mil.

AssassinHD5772d ago (Edited 5772d ago )

The statutory damages are preset by law. The court actually awarded the bare minimum amount to Blizzard, probably because it was a default judgment since the defendant did not show up. The maximum statutory damages ($150,000 per work) could have been just over $64 billion.

mrv3215772d ago

Ironically it's about unfair competition, while it's perfectly fair to ask for $88 million.

AssassinHD5772d ago (Edited 5772d ago )

The bulk of that was statutory damages. Those are pre-established values. Title 17, Section 504 of the U.S. Code sets the value at $200 per work in cases where the defendants could show that they were not aware that they were infringing on a copyright. If the court had found that she was aware (and let's face it, she was) then they could have awarded up to $150,000 per work.

Edit: If the court had found that she knew she was committing the offense, they could have awarded just over $64 billion to Blizzard in statutory damages.

The $88 million was actually the bare minimum the court could have awarded. I suspect the court awarded the minimum because it was a default judgment.

OneSneakyMofo5772d ago

Most of the time when you play a game, you abide by their Terms of Service and an Agreement clause. You bought the game, but you can only use it for playing the game; not for hosting your own server, etc.

If the guy hadn't made any money from this at all, then he'd have a good chance at winning the appeal.

TheIneffableBob5772d ago (Edited 5772d ago )

Yeah... calling it a "donation" isn't fooling anyone, especially when you're required to "donate" specific amounts to receive specific items in return.

They profited off of someone else's work and they are being punished for it.

skrug5772d ago (Edited 5772d ago )

Just like how Gamestop, EB games profit from other peoples work from selling used games?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5772d ago
pcgia5772d ago

ouch for him, that is an unreal amount.

dirthurts5772d ago

The judge though it was fair. He must have brought in a ton of cash, and did some pretty major financial damage to the company in the process to have warranted that amount.

Trunkz5772d ago

He got greedy, he should of taken what he had and just left everything before this could of happened.

Apotheosize5772d ago

While it was a pretty douche move to charge for something you didnt create, 88 million is just...mind boggling. This guys life is over now

Show all comments (26)
60°

Blizzard Wants Faster Diablo Releases and More Expansions

Blizzard reveals plans to speed up Diablo releases with more frequent expansions and updates as the franchise moves toward a live-service future.

QuantumMechanic98d ago

All I want is a physical disc release of remastered D2 that doesn't require online check-ins.

VonAlbrecht98d ago

Ah, more and fast - the antithesis of careful and good

Christopher98d ago (Edited 98d ago )

I've lost complete interest. Too much FOMO with seasons as it is, now it's expansions? No thanks.

Michiel198998d ago

what fomo? everything gets reset each season and you start new characters unless you're playing on the regular servers and then you're already maxxed anway and just need to participate in the new season stuff.

Michiel198997d ago

i played only during launch and i found the ones in that battlepass to be absolute dogwater, the only ones that looked somewhat cool were the paid ones in the store and i wont bother with either. The game itself was just so hollow, there were no cool builds cause every synergy was just "x or y skills does more dmg or has this extra effect" almost no experimentation needed, couldnt give a rats ass about armor if the core of the game is boring af.

Show all comments (12)
40°

Blizzard Quality Assurance Workers Ratify Video Game Union Contract With Microsoft

A strong majority of quality assurance workers at Blizzard’s Albany and Austin locations overwhelmingly voted to ratify a union contract at Microsoft, ensuring lasting protections in the workplace.

Read Full Story >>
cwa-union.org
30°

Blizzard Reveals Their 2026 Showcases

Blizzard has revealed their showcase schedule for 2026.