All Channels
Popular
410°

Kinect is not even good enough for DDR

Stuffwelike.com shows us why Kinect is not good enough for DDR,
Move and wii shows the best at launch party.

Read Full Story >>
madaboutgaming.com
Gray-Fox5760d ago

Kinnect? I'm not trying to defend Kinect here... but you spelled it wrong.

zeeshan5760d ago

M$ are sooo busy hyping the tech behind Kinect but the problem is that even if Kinect is what they say it is, we are YET to see something that's going to shock and awe us. On the other hand, SONY have already shown some SOLID kick ass AAA that are going to utilize MOVE such as Killzone 3, Socom 4, LBP2 and what not. SONY is doing it right when it comes to software support. They have got it all covered! The casuals, the hardcore, they are doing a great job BUT... Sony has been very VERY lazy with advertising MOVE. I keep seeing MACY's Kinect ad so very damn often and I have YET to see a MOVE ad.

SONY NEEDS to up their advertising game. This is where M$ can draw a solid line. Their advertising budget is huge and that can really do some wonders. MOVE will sell great on word of mouth but Sony needs to back up this great tech that has an amazing software support by advertising the hell out of Move! Word mouth can only go so far!

GWAVE5760d ago

I don't care about advertising or which one sells more.

But it simply amazes me how the 360 fanbase is so passionately defending Kinect - something that isn't even aimed at them, something that delivers on 1/10th of the things Micosoft promised it would do. You'd think gamers would have higher standards...

bustamove5760d ago

Trust me, anything that has Microsoft's name on it...they will defend it like a newborn.

SIdepocket5759d ago

You'd think GWAVE would have something better to do than troll Kinetic articles all day long or create alt accounts like __crissy to give himself agrees. You must be really threatened by Microsoft.

AndrewRyan5759d ago

I don't think it deserves triple A status. It's just another American Generic Shooter. Bunch of tough American soldiers in the desert doing missions... Seen it 10 times already.

We will see my friends maybe it will impress.

Killzone 3 however, does deserve the triple A status . With a story I have never seen before you become immersed in the game.

ukilnme5759d ago

@ crissy

On the flip side of that, anything with Microsoft's name on it is attacked like crazy by the SDF suicide bombers. If you dare say anything bad about Sony or anything Playstation you had better be prepared to go in to hiding.

It simply amazes me how the SDF are so passionate about their attacks on Kinect and the 360 for that matter. It is just plain pathetic.

fooltheman5759d ago

At andrew Ryan;
hmm socom is situated in asia... and they didn't show any desert landscapes...
^^

insomnium5759d ago

Because the x360 fanbrats were the ones who started it. That's why.

ARBitrator5759d ago

As said in the past, it all about how the devs decide that want to code the game for that particular peripheral does "LAZY DEVS" ring any bells SDF?

Had the makers of DDR used the same style of body tracking as Dance Central, their game would have played better and thus been more appealing to the masses. Don't blame Kinect here, blame Konami.

rdgneoz35759d ago

@ARBitrator Sure its about whether devs are lazy or not. But there's also the part of the limits to the technology. And seeing Kinect isn't the most responsive thing in the world, trying to do a fast past level would be hell. You'd have to be as fast as the pre-E3 demo of the SW Kinect game... http://cache.gawker.com/ass...

Also, dance dance central, from the demos and videos, does not seem at all like it has to be as fast and accurate as a DDR game. You have a few seconds to do the move / gesture that is required, where as with DDR games, you need to be quick as hell and any lag will kill you.

ARBitrator5758d ago (Edited 5758d ago )

You folks never seem to disapoint with your bullsh!t spins on EVERYTHING. First off, It's not "dance dance central" second, the game shows you what's coming next, you still need to keep up with the avatar or you'll get feedback letting you know that you are done.

DDR requires a footpad using move and wiimotes with it is simply just to say they they are using it. The moves being done with those controllers are completely pointless and you could see for yourself.

Besides, the dude said that the Kinect game was in beginner mode, perhaps you should wait to see what the final game looks like before you pass judgement. Or perhaps konami saw dance central and just threw in the towel knowing that their game was going to get it's a$$ kicked anyway who know.

If you look at a person playing DDR, do they look like they are dancing to you?

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5758d ago
outrageous5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

The guy claims they are ALL very buggy, the Wii being the best of the worst...lol. Sounds like DDR is a fail.

As for the comparisons between the various motion controllers, MTV's Dance Central has had rave reviews, is a Kinect exclusive and utilizes the still in development Kinect tech very well. Many have called it and Ubisoft Kinect exclusive Your shape fitness game a killer app for Kinect. No reason to hate on it. Don't like it, don't buy or play it.

Here's a sample of Dance central:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

DelbertGrady5759d ago (Edited 5759d ago )

He says the Kinect version was hard to play cause he didn't know what to do. Sounds more like the problem is with the software.

Then again, it doesn't matter to the PS3 fanboys if the bashing is legit or not. They take every chance they get to bash now that release is drawing nearer.

gamingdroid5759d ago (Edited 5759d ago )

I don't know. It seems Dance Central has no issue tracking people, so it sounds like people are pulling at straws in an unfinished product based on a guys experience of a portion of a game. He even mentions it in the video, that this might just be in the early part of the game for beginners.

Nobody on the other hand is saying, "Oh, my god! Kinect works. Check out Dance Central!" Instead we get, "Oh my god! Kinect DOES NOT work. Check out this guys experience of a part of a buggy game."

Anyone see a problem there?

I find it ironic as posting this comment, another article has a positive experience of Kinect. SHOCK!

http://n4g.com/news/584160/...

fooltheman5759d ago

indeed it's easier for the system to not display you as tracking...
than the lag isn't visible...
If you think about it, for dance games this is very good...

jut4205759d ago

Actually Soda, he said that it's more like you're striking a pose rather than actually dancing. Don't know how you missed that since you obviously heard him say he didn't know what to do at first since he says that right before he says it's not actually like dancing. Funny how you call out PS3 fanboys, yet can't admit your own bias.

niceguywii605759d ago

You know the 360 is starting to do well and its offerings are starting to appeal to the masses when PS3 fanboys start writing anti 360/Kinect articles themselves or radically changing the title and and description of stories.

Obama5759d ago

You know with Dance Central you just do poses whatever the screen tells you which for kinect is not hard to accomplish at all. It's not like you do whatever dance moves you like and kinect is tracking all of them.

JakemanPS319945759d ago

i actully think dance central looks cool! if it does come to the move like they said they wer looking in to, i might actully buy it

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5759d ago
bustamove5759d ago

Um...excuse you? Most PS3 fans can admit that Sony *has* made mistakes. But most of us can also acknowledge that they made up for their mistakes. Microsoft on the other hand constantly makes mi8stakes and don't learn from them.

Welcome to my ignore list. I don't know why the mods haven't done something about your comment yet.

pixelsword5759d ago

If you saw a penis, then... yes :D

jay25760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

Well it's Dis-Kinect, what'd you expect.

Myst5760d ago

Can't wait for the PS3 version of DDR to come out :D. Already have it paid off! Also if that is the pad that will be given out it [that is showcased in the video at the 0:44 mark] looks nice.

Lightel0s5760d ago ShowReplies(4)
Optical_Matrix5760d ago

"Strike a pose rather than Dance". Says it all to me really. Says it all.

pixelsword5759d ago

Not the same vibe, not at all:

The Wii version is the simplest, which it good; but not using the pad is kind of a crock.

The PS3 version seems the most complicated, which is also good only because the game is kinda complicated: using the pad keeps it true to form.

The 360 version feels kinda gumpy, but like the dude said it might be because it's on a low setting.

Show all comments (114)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia1582d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1581d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1581d ago
CrimsonWing691581d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1581d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791581d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1581d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1581d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1581d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1581d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1581d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1580d ago (Edited 1580d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1580d ago
Aloymetal1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101581d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1581d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101581d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1581d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101581d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721581d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1581d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1581d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1581d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1581d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721758d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1758d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1758d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901758d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1758d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1758d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1758d ago
TheEnigma3131758d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1758d ago (Edited 1758d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1758d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1758d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1758d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771758d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1758d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901758d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1758d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901758d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1757d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)