150°

Codemasters F1 developer not interested in Kinect

F1 2010 developer says they are not interested in a product that's not fully researched.

Read Full Story >>
msxbox-world.com
MaximusPrime5676d ago (Edited 5676d ago )

obviously.

GWAVE5676d ago (Edited 5676d ago )

But let's be fair here:

It's not like the F1 devs are the movers and shakers in the industry. It would be like "Professor Layton devs not interested in Kinect". Whoop-dee-doo. It's a bigger piece of news when devs like Bungie, EPIC, and Lionhead Studios aren't using Kinect....oh wait.

@ below "Lionhead is the studio behind Milo"

...which Molyneux admitted was nothing more than a tech demo. He has also said that Fable III will not have Kinect support at launch but will maybe implement it through DLC.

So...you were saying?

T9X695676d ago (Edited 5676d ago )

Trolling again? FYI Lionhead is the studio behind Milo.

EDIT: You saying they are not interested in Kinect is just you trolling, they are because they are doing Milo, tech demo or not. Also there is Kinect support for Fable 3, its already been confirmed multiple times, just not at launch. Which would be stupid seeing how Fable 3 launches in October and Kinect launches in November.

So..you were saying?

siyrobbo5676d ago

actually he said that milo was part of a bigger game, which they havent revealed yet

Si-Fly5676d ago

Err, Lionshead made Milo because they're on Microsofts payroll you muppet! The fact that they haven't put it into Fable suggests that Kinect isn't suited to traditional games. And I'm really happy they didn't ruin Fable by trying to squeeze Kinect support into it!

The Maxx5676d ago

I have seen Milo applications implemented in Kinectimals.

Even Molyneux confirmed that it's in there as well.

Gwave why all the hate for something you have no intentions of buying? Why this brigade to constantly trash Kinect? Are you trying to convince people that may be interested in it that they shouldn't buy it because you don't like it.

Noctis Aftermath5676d ago

I couldn't imagine myself(or anyone) holding their hands in front of them holding an imaginary steering wheel for the entire duration of a formula one race, i'm not trying to start any arguments but holding your arms out like that for 1hour+ would hurt.

Kinect in a F1 game just wouldn't work well enough to be worth the effort it would take to implement it into the game.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5676d ago
blackbeld5676d ago

Yeah it may not work with Kinect but lets be honest. F1 game is not as good as it was with they're first F1 game. Since PSone game F1 1996 it only go worse.

Wow F1 1996 is still the best F1 experience I had.

andrewsqual5676d ago

The F1 devs are fools not to implement this though. Because Microsoft even debuted Kinect with a piece that showed accurate racing and being able to take off wheels in the pit lanes. OH WAIT, in that actual racing game you can't even brake or stop the vehicle or steer the steering wheel like you do, oh I don't know, in real life. THAT is why the devs say it isn't researched.
People like this Xbox site need to start whining when a game is not using Kinect. Kinect was never shown to be able to do anything practical in real games, just that stupid fake trailer with the "scanning objects in" and "sitting and playing" support. Microsoft "The hardcore games are coming". Eh no. Can we see some tech demos of what a hardcore game is going to look like on Kinect please Microsoft? Then developers will have an idea what it can do. Move debuted E3 2009 showing how strategy games, a create game like lbp and shooting games would work on the tech. THAT is why it is getting more and more support every day.

DelbertGrady5676d ago

What they meant is that they are not interested until they've researched it themselves. Nice spin though.

Here's the full quote:

What do you guys think about Kinect? Could you imagine building an F1 game for it?

It's certainly interesting tech, but for the sort of racing game we are creating you need that precise control and feedback that only a steering wheel or to a lesser extent, a pad can give you. So F1 as we're creating it wouldn't really work. There may be other applications for Kinect in the game, aside from the racing, that could be implemented to compliment the traditional input methods. Otherwise it's a case of designing a game from the ground up to take advantage of the Kinect feature set. We're not into the business of retro-fitting features or ticking boxes – if it's not fully researched and we're not convinced it will enhance the core gameplay experience, we're not interested in it really, so there are no plans at the moment.

Inside_out5676d ago

Everybody wants to say something, like gwave, but reading and facts are hard to understand for the PS3 kids. Facts and reading causes there head to hurt.

mac_sparrow5676d ago

Interesting, because apparently spelling and grammar have much the same effect on you.

Sorry I couldn't resist, not when you're trying so hard.

Oh, and everyone else should feel free to point out any mistakes I may have made. I'm not infallible like Cez after all.

RedDragan5676d ago (Edited 5676d ago )

No, they meant that Kinect it not going anywhere... like your propect in life.

TheMART5676d ago

Which is all fine by me, whats more interesting is this quote:

""There may be other applications for Kinect in the game, aside from the racing, that could be implemented to compliment the traditional input methods."

If Kinect compliments the traditional controller or wheel, its always a win situation IMO and thats where Kinect can do stuff over motion controllers like Wiimote and Move, because they REPLACE your current controller.

Thus I'm interested what they can add with core games like this when they can't/won't replace the normal input but just add stuff.

DlocDaBudSmoka5676d ago

is that what kinect is all about, getting rid of the confusing controller? i thought kinect was about getting ppl to play games that normally wouldnt because the controller lay-out is too confusing.

I dont get how kinect is controller free gaming*( *you are the controller) if it compliments the actual controller.

anyone care to explain?

mcstorm5676d ago

I can help explain it.

Kinect at the start has been put out with the slogan you are the controller because this is how MS are trying to get all the none gamers interested in Kinect and MS have said once the first few months are over you will start to see games that are Kinect + a controller compatable.
This could add things like forza using a controller to control the car but your head movements move your head around the cockpit or for a FPS game to track head movements ect.

I really don't know what type of games they will bring out but there will be games for the gamers that will use kinect with the controller.

MS have never said Kinect will replace the controller just some games like the 1st gen games we are seeing for it.

DlocDaBudSmoka5676d ago

because i wanted to know more info. typical. thanks MCSTORM bubs+

mcstorm5676d ago

No problem there are alot of people on here how dont read and just act on impulse.

That is why so many people are slagging Kinect off because they just see what it dose now and not what it can do.

Alot of people think MS owes them alot because they have bought there console and because Kinect (in the beginning) is being aimed at the none gamer that they are not thinking of them but if you look at the games coming out before the end of the year like fable 3 and halo reach ect why would they bring a game out for kinect that could have an impact on the sales of the big games of this year and also they want to take the 360 to a wider market abit like the ps3 is at the moment. But they will all see games next year that uses Kinect with a controller and think wow. Before every one starts I don't know how they will do this but the tech is there and so is the money.

MS are being smart at the moment because they have lost so much ground in so many different departments phone software ect that they are bringing really good tech out at the moment windows phone 7 windows 7 and Kinect will be one too MS have been shown that if they bring something bad out people are not going to buy it just like Vista and windows mobile 6.5 and they are really starting to show what they can do again.

claterz5676d ago

Would you really pay $150 just to navigate the menu though?
if it doesn't work for the actual game then what's the point? they may as well just use it for PC's not game consoles.

kerrak5676d ago

Hey, they could use kinect to track your head movement while you race. If you move your head left, first person view moves to left and so on...

...oh wait....

is this the same thing done with pseye and gt?

oops...

TheMart: you have to ask yourself honestly if you really need an expensive device just to add a small aditional functionality easily attainable with a simple webcam, or motion controller a la sixaxis.

negative5676d ago

Sony Fanboy^^ "The first of many"

LOL

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5676d ago

RUSE, another example why is not on Kinect.

badz1495676d ago

I remember there's already several games including RE5 will only support MOVE but not Kinect. the others are yet to be released games though but I'm too lazy to look for the links

Show all comments (42)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia1493d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1493d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161493d ago (Edited 1493d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1493d ago
CrimsonWing691493d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1493d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791493d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1492d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1493d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1493d ago (Edited 1493d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1493d ago (Edited 1493d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1492d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1492d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1492d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1491d ago (Edited 1491d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1491d ago
Aloymetal1493d ago (Edited 1493d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1492d ago (Edited 1492d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101493d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1493d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101493d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1493d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101493d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721493d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1493d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1493d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1493d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1493d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721670d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1670d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1670d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901670d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1669d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1669d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1669d ago
TheEnigma3131669d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1669d ago (Edited 1669d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1669d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1669d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1669d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771669d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1669d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901669d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1669d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901669d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1669d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)