There are quite a few on that game lol. Basically Any FPS on the PC has guaenteed some aimbotters.

1. We are not arguing if they use it now, go back and re-read what you and I said. You said it was originally used in house, and then migrated to the other meanings. It did not. Keep in mind what you said about the meaning in your 2nd post when used in house, that will be definition#1, big budget, ect..

2. The point is important because of what we have actually been arguing about, what AAA means in relationship to video games. I thought where the term came from originally would be of interest in the argument, as it lends credence to the fact that AAA is a borrowed term. Its especially important because even after I said it once, you still accused me of not knowing where the word came from.

3. My entire 1st post was the argument that the word has no set definition, and that you were being a dick to tiamat5 because you did not like his use of it. How the fuck do you not take as I don't like the word. If everyone uses it differently it does not mean anything. Hence, don't fucking use it. Why do you think I never defined it?

4. No you didn't tell me where it came from. You told me what you thought it meant in deffinition#1, that has no bearings on its origins. "A company" does not mean anything.

5. That was obviously in response to when you said I could use AAA to mean games I like(deffinition#2). Which I never used. It was what tiamat5 used. I am not tiamat5. That is why I said that.

6. So, that site itself gives definition#1 as well. Cliff gives us a deffinition#3: that it is all a PR term in the same vein as blockbuster.

7. You also said AAA can be defined as games over 90% score. Deffinition#4

8. You also said it could be defined as one that sells over 2 million. deffinition#5(2million, 1million, whatever the specific ammount is)

9. I did not provide a single one of these definitions. They all came from you, or from a site you linked me to. The only definition I gave for AAA was only how it is used in credit indexes.

10. My original post, I will remind you, was that you were an asshole for saying tiamat5 did not know what he was saying, because he used AAA incorrectly. You were an asshole because AAA does not have a standard definition when it comes to games. You yourself in an effort to respond to things I have said, have given me 5 definitions for the term, all vastly different.

11. This is the reason I ended my last 2 posts by thanking you for your support. You have argued my point. You are an asshole because there is no standard definition to AAA in relation to video games, just like I originally said.

PM didn't work for me either, I did get yours though, so you may get mine just delayed or something.

1.no where does is say they just started to use it now. you're wrong get over it.

2. again, man you're slow, credit ratings have nothing to do with the game industry, and that is where this discussion has always token place. WITHIN THE GAMING INDUSTRY.

3. no. you never stated your distaste for the term. i maid that clear last post.

4. yes i did tell. you called BS. again, wjust because you call BS doesn't magically make your point true. in 15 seconds of using google i found a link that reinforced my clam.

5.yes, because you said gamers can use it however they want. if you don't want to use that way fine by me.

6. which is prove of what i was saying!!! game companys used the term for big budget games!!!

7. i said it turned into that by gamers themselves.

8.again, from gamers.

9.yes because you asked where they came from within the gaming industry.

10.i gave you 3. stop lying. it does have a standard meaning(s). just because its used in different ways doesn't mean there isn't a standard. you continue to agree this, and that just shows you have an inability to accept you're wrong.

10 1/2. he was using the term incorrectly, and i told him. in no way was i an ass. you on the other hand respond with the belligerent post. instead of just asking for the standard use you go into some rage filled attack mode. which just shows who the real asshole is.

11.i answered this many times. look back through this post. you refuses to accepted that not only where you wrong, but u acted like the ass the entire time.

12. i see us just going in circles from this point on, so i no longer care to engage with this discussion any longer. i would like to ask one thing though, did you really know S&P started in 1860? i have a feeling you may have looked it up, but if not A+ for the useless knowledge.

Ok, just a few last things then. You gave me 3, tiamat5 gave one, which you later agreed with by saying it could be used like that, and you linked me to one, cliff. You gave me 5, I listed the 5 you gave me, saying exactly what the definition was, along with a definition#X. You said all of them/linked/agreed it was one. I don't see how you can say you only gave 3. But even if that is true, that you only gave 3, it would not change the overall theme of the objection, because it would still mean there was not a standard definition. Which would mean your insult to tiamat5 was not warranted.

I will give you the in house argument. You are right, they use it, and I am being to anal retentive about the exact details. I only submit that it is used in house with just as much confusion as it in on the net. Cliff essentially told us this when he had a different definition for it then the other developer answer. So still a not standard term.

In point 11 you said there is a standard definition, and that you had given it to me. But seeing as you have given me 3 definitions directly: Referring to big budget games; Over 90% review scores; High selling games; And have not shown favoritism to any of them, they were all mentioned only once, I still argue that you have not given me a standard definition.

You said you are done, that is fine, if you wish to reply, I will give you the final word, if not, I do not take it as a gesture of giving up, so don't worry. I give bubbs+, feel free to argue with me at any time, because I think we can both agree that it was fun. You were a worthy opponent, and was articulate about your point.

EDIT: yes I did know that off the top of my head :P I majored in econ so its not exactly useless knowledge for me ^^b