All Channels
Popular
440°

Why Starcraft II would be better on 360

This week saw the release of Starcraft II : Wings of Liberty on the PC. At the moment it appears to be getting positive buzz, but we’re convinced that it could be even better on 360. Here’s why:

Read Full Story >>
x360magazine.com
Urmomlol5783d ago

This has to be one of the worst article I've ever read in my life.

Better controls? Are you effing kidding me? Pros play this game at like 500 APM --what the hell do you think console players are going to be able to do with their control pad?

Better visuals? Oh, alright. The xbox 360's outdated hardware is going to out perform the PC's progressively improving graphics cards and processors.

Better online? The whole entire idea of battle.net is to create an online community that interconnects Warcraft and StarCraft. The matchmaking is perfect, the support for custom maps is flawless. Do you think for even a second that Xbox Live would support this?

Jesus. If I could report this article for being abysmally awful I would.

callahan095783d ago (Edited 5783d ago )

It's. A. Joke.

Hahahaha. I thought this article was hilarious. It's clearly sarcasm/satire.

"Jerome B Braithwatewatewate at the London Institute for Enhanced Synthetics (L.I.E.S) maintained in his widely acknowledged white paper “Why people on the internet won’t read any of this and go straight to the comments (1986)”: “When we move our entire arms, our brain has a reaction called ‘HyperTensiveInternet-basedCry babying’. When we move an analogue stick with just our thumbs, endorphins are released to the brain, classified as Instinctive Reactionary Superiority Complexes"

Hahaha. Hysterical!

-Alpha5782d ago (Edited 5782d ago )

Very few read articles around here, but thanks for pointing it out.

@urmom

If it's a joke (and as callahan pointed out, it is) then there is no reason to deconstruct the article.

It's hard to detect sarcasm but I hope you can see how it wasn't meant to be taken seriously

5782d ago
Double Toasted5782d ago

As a 360 user, why would I give a flip about Star Craft? That's right, I don't. If I did, like many others, I would go buy it. Furthest thing from my mind after this sentence. As you were...

FarEastOrient5782d ago

The writer of the article needs to watch the Korean Starcraft Tournaments! Using Xbox Live and over regular internet with battle.net is never going to happen.

Plus Microsoft isn't going to be able to charge for the use of battle.net over their system.

Beating a mouse and keyboard yeah right!

CrimsonFox135782d ago

Don't know why people are disagreeing with you. One of the creators of Move stated a couple of times that he's played the original Starcraft with the Move controller (the team modded it to see if RTS could be done with it) and he said he could do it very well.

If not that, then you could use the mouse and keyboard support the PS3 has. Though I think only UT3 supports it at the moment...

Conloles5782d ago (Edited 5782d ago )

Ahahahahahahahahahaha I closed the link when I read the 'better controls'.

SonyPS3605782d ago

It's so true, as the very first post proved, and as many below this one will also.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5782d ago
Urmomlol5783d ago

It's only a joke if it's funny. It's not. It's clear flame bait and the writer, editor and entire staff of this god awful web site should be embarrassed that someone actually thought this was a good idea.

You're not clever and you're not funny.

-Alpha5782d ago

You originally didn't realize it was a joke did you? And now you are overreacting. If it wasn't funny to you then move on, no need to be so rude. You took the article way too seriously (looking at your first comment), and it's not.

evrfighter5782d ago

These guys are nobodies. Make a name for yourself then try your hand. This is a news site not a satirical humor site. The only guy that can get away with it is Jim sterling. He's been in the business since these guys were in diapers.

Jackobinen5782d ago

I actually thought it was kinda funny. I mean, not hilarious but worth a few chuckles here and there.
If you actually read the whole thing and not just the headings it's obvious that it's a joke.

SonyPS3605782d ago

Cry some more. Everything you people on N4G don't like is "Flame Bait".

Denethor_II5782d ago

The fact you read through the whole article, and then proceeded to de-construct it. Its okay, its not your fault.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5782d ago
callahan095783d ago

How is it flame-bait? Everything written is so obviously written in sarcasm with made-up words, made-up "facts", made-up names, not one bit of it is intended to be taken seriously. The only bit of flame-baiting I can see come from it is that if people don't read the article but instead the headline and headings, they would think this is a serious argument. That's the whole point. That's what's REALLY going on here. It's a jab at ignoramus internet dwellers who don't even read the article before complaining about it. If you read the article, there's nothing to complain about. It's just a joke. But it's also an experiment to trap people into making a point when they don't know what they're talking about. Like people who say it's poorly written and researched when they didn't even read the damn thing.

Urmomlol5783d ago (Edited 5783d ago )

Oh, so you're not merely stupid, you're also pretentious as hell.

No one gives a flying crap about your stupid publication. We go to N4G to read the news and be entertained, not to be subject to your half-assed social experiments.

Seriously, who the hell do you guys think you are? You're no one special, certainly not anyone who's fit to cast judgment on your GODDAMN READERS of all people. Is that what you guys do? Write BS articles in a pathetic attempt to critique the very people who get you guys paid?

Pedobear Rocks5782d ago

Bad Joystick..it shouldn't be on N4G.

Unicron5782d ago (Edited 5782d ago )

But top 10 lists, flamebait articles, versus articles, and editorials about how X system/game suck/are doomed ARE news to you Urmom?? Howabout people like HHG who use their friends to get the worst tripe admitted instantly?

Face it, N4G's submissions are a joke, and NEWS around here disappeared long, long ago. Yelling at one guy for it is silly when the whole site is a cesspool of pisspoor journalism.

I give this guy credit for making something funny.

distorted_reality5782d ago

Urmomlol has got to be one of the stupidest people i've encountered on N4G. And that's REALLY saying something.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5782d ago
Darkstorn5783d ago

Starcraft 2 is a PC game. It could technically come to PS3 if they required mouse and keyboard support.

ultramoot5782d ago

Maybe. But the more important fact is that it's NOT gonna. Do keep dreaming if you wish...

ico925782d ago (Edited 5782d ago )

1. gamepad's have and always will suck for RTS, End of story.

Matthew945782d ago

you are the biggest retard on the planet nay the entire universe

8thnightvolley5782d ago (Edited 5782d ago )

he cant be serious....is he
?

SonyPS3605782d ago

No.

This is why you read the article before you bolt for the comments section.

Nihilism5782d ago

Dude lighen up, I thought it was hilarious. I usually don't bother to read articles with headlines like this either, but after the heads up about it being a joke I couldn't stop laughing when I read it.

We need more comedy on N4G, the internet is serious business.

sid4gamerfreak5782d ago (Edited 5782d ago )

"Why Starcraft II would be better on 360"

LMAO the article was hilarious

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5782d ago
Newtype5783d ago (Edited 5783d ago )

"1. Better Controls.
2. Avatar Integration
3. Better Graphics.
4. Better Online."

It's like the person who wrote this has either:
-Never played a PC
-Has only a console and new to gaming
-Never played SC.
-Doesn't know that BNet is FREE (Why the hell would I pay to play on BNet if it's not WoW?

Something needs to be done about these pointless and brainless articles.

Edit: @disagree No I am NOT approving this article, why should I approve this rubbish? This is poorly researched and written.

callahan095783d ago

"poorly researched and written."

Funny how you can come to such a conclusion without actually reading the article. If you had read it, you'd have noticed the *extremely thick* sarcasm. The whole thing was a joke! Intentionally funny!

Newtype5783d ago

I just read that part, not at all funny. A waste of 10 secs.

SuperStrokey11235783d ago

Its only a waste cause you didnt read it all.

You are calling something pure researched when you are the one that is 100% off base... just silly.

Silly gameAr5782d ago

lol people keep saying it's a joke article lol point and laugh...lol.

Karooo5783d ago (Edited 5783d ago )

Battle.Net is pretty cool and all, but let’s get down to it: Live is a better service than any other. The fact that you had to pay for it should tell you something about its quality, because paying for something automatically makes it better than not. Also, it has been proven by that peer-to-peer gaming is better than dedicated servers
lol

2late5783d ago

get this guy on tv. He's hilarious.

SuperStrokey11235783d ago (Edited 5783d ago )

Its so funny how few of you actually read it. ITS A JOKE. Here are some qoutes.

London Institute for Enhanced Synthetics (L.I.E.S) maintained in his widely acknowledged white paper “Why people on the internet won’t read any of this and go straight to the comments (1986)”

"Imagine an army of Protosstates attacking, all the while armed with novelty lightsabers and Dont B Nervous Talking 2 Girls Backpacks! Or a Zerg rush comprised of $400 pieces of digital Barbie clothing?! "

"The 360 could make Starcraft even better than it already looks: with a 526Mb of RAM (remember, 526 is at least four times the size of the number 8, which is the recommended RAM for StarCraft PC). Imagine it: at 15 FPS and 640p, StarCraft could really fly."

"National Office of Totally Astounding Factually Accurate Computer Teachings (NOTAFACT) has even cleared this, and ex-Nintendo of America boss Julius H Poppycock even went on record as saying: “Don’t you think it’s suspicious that I would even be commenting on a PC game supposedly appearing on an rival’s console? Hmm?”

Then again is should have known better.

LOL at the disagrees, those are real qoutes and its really a joke. People here make me laugh so much at how blind they are.

Show all comments (78)
80°

'StarCraft: Remastered', 'StarCraft II' Now Available on PC Game Pass

This week, Blizzard Entertainment dropped both 'StarCraft: Remastered' and 'StarCraft II Campaign Collection' into PC Game Pass.

meganick565d ago

Hopefully these get released on Switch and Playstation, along with Age of Empires. There’s a severe lack of good RTS games on both those platforms.

waytoobad564d ago

if only they didn't raise the price 500% last year.

250°

Coming to Game Pass: Call of Duty: Black Ops 6, StarCraft & StarCraft II, and More

Happy spooky season to those who celebrate! We have a collection of scary games for you to enjoy with Game Pass, while hiding under the blankets (or maybe that’s just how I play). And if you want to do something slightly less scary, we have a whole list of games for you to start pre-installing including more day one additions like Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 and more! Let’s get to the games.

• South Park: The Fractured but Whole (Cloud, Console, and PC) – October 16
• Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 (Cloud, Console, and PC) – October 25
• Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III (Cloud) – October 25
Game Pass Ultimate
• Call of Duty: Warzone (Cloud) – October 25
Game Pass Ultimate
• Ashen (Cloud, Console, and PC) – October 29
• Dead Island 2 (PC) – October 31
• StarCraft: Remastered (PC) – November 5
• StarCraft II: Campaign Collection (PC) – November 5

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
589d ago
crazyCoconuts589d ago

Let the COD on GamePass experiment begin!
I would think their quarterly revenue will take a hit compared to a year ago, but will maybe make up for it throughout the year as the monthly GP subs keep coming in

pwnmaster3000589d ago

Was up with call of duty man?
I downloaded cod on gamepass and for some reason I cannot access the game.

darthv72589d ago

just curious what version? There are some that you can pre-load, but they wont work until their release date later this month.

pwnmaster3000589d ago

I have to redownload it again for the 3rd time to check.
I ended up just deleting it to make room for other games after the second time.

It was on Xbox game pass, I didn’t know there was other versions. I just downloaded everything, but sadly I couldn’t even access the game. Maybe 3rd time the charm. I’ll download it again.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH589d ago

It’s not out yet man unless you’re talking about MW3.

pwnmaster3000589d ago

I’m talking about mw3. For some reason I could not get it to work.

just_looken589d ago

On xbox there is the last gen/current gen versions pc though you could also get a xbox version.

When that new forza first came out for one day they had the xbox version on the pc store i was like ? what it was odd.

On xbox you can easily download the one version of a game instead of the series version so you run into issues on your series console.

pwnmaster3000588d ago

Because a game won’t run after I download it??
Man your kids must hate your @ss if that’s how you think.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 588d ago
dveio589d ago

It's going to be very interesting to follow up on how the new entry of CoD will perform at the box office, player numbers and distribution of Xbox, PC and PS versions this year.

589d ago
DivineHand125589d ago

I got excited thinking they ported StarCraft to consoles but it's just the PC version. Also, I thought Starcraft 2 was already free to play.

TheColbertinator589d ago

I'm certain it is going to be the Campaign Collection version.

Show all comments (25)
170°

$15 horse for WoW made more money than StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty

Jason Hall, currently an indie developer and former Blizzard employee, has been sharing some really interesting stories from his long career in the industry for a while now. Some of them are truly insightful, while others may seem depressing.

Read Full Story >>
gameworldobserver.com
Sciurus_vulgaris925d ago

I’m a little shocked that StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty sold only around 6 million copies. The original StarCraft did over 11 million. Maybe Blizzard was too leisurely in releasing StarCraft 2? Starcraft 2 came out 12 years after it’s predecessor.

Plague-Doctor27924d ago (Edited 924d ago )

Im surprised too. Starcraft was still a huge name in 2010. It was kinda the only new RTS around and other genres like MOBAs hadn't really kicked off yet. I do remember at the time sentiment around the game was
pretty angry the game was being split into 3 but I doubt that would have impacted sales to that degree

Sciurus_vulgaris924d ago

For a long time I believed StarCraft II sold on par or better than its predecessor. There was so much hype for the game. Plus it had a pretty strong E-Sports scene for a few years.

Myself and half a dozen friends all bought StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty and played it religiously for a full year. While I bought the expansions, most of my friends did not. RPGs seem to be a generally low selling genre.

Nerdmaster924d ago

I'm not shocked at all. This was an early example of Blizzard being greedy. Instead of releasing a complete experience, splitting Starcraft 2 in 3 parts so it could make us purchase it 3 times if we wanted to know the whole story and play story mode with the other races.

Sciurus_vulgaris924d ago

I originally had that stance. However, Wings of Liberty, was just as long, if not longer than StarCraft 1. The expansions were of decent length too and added a good amount of additional content.

il-JumperMT924d ago

and people wonder why we are having mtx in everything. i blame the people who actual buy them.

Nerdmaster924d ago

It's interesting he used Brazil as an example of the importance of regional pricing. Nowadays many companies on Steam are setting their prices in Brazil as high as, if not more than, their price in USA. I simply refused to buy a few games when I noticed that's the case.

Extermin8or3_924d ago

This right here is the fucking problem.

923d ago