All Channels
Popular
220°

Microsoft's Kinect - victim of misperception

GMG writes: "Hello, Mr Hardcore, sorry to butt in on your triple-decker cheeseburger/serial masturbation session/Battlestar Galactica marathon/24 hour silent vigil for your bro’s banhammered World of Warcraft account. Green Man Gaming got a confession to make – I’ve been seeing someone else. You know who I’m talking about. That’s right. ‘Her’."

Read Full Story >>
blog.greenmangaming.com
Lord_Doggington5773d ago

What a fantastic article. Someone who has been skeptical of Kinect who writes (really well), about his experiences and how he legitimately sees it as a viable gaming experience.

I think I will keep this writer on my radar... very well written.

GWAVE5773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

When Wii supporters were screaming "Leave the Wii alone!" Chris Crocker style, they got their wish: hardcore devs and hardcore gamers largely left the Wii alone, just as they left the Powerglove, the Eyetoy, and the Eye alone.

If Kinect supporters want the hardcore to "leave Kinect alone!", that's exactly what will happen. There will be no more outcry against Kinect's simplicity and casual focus, and with dollar signs in Microsoft's glossy eyes, the focus of Kinect will never ever change.

History speaks clearly. Don't be a fanboy. Just examine how this exact same Kinect situation has repeated itself again and again over the past 30 years. The fact that we have an unprecedented number of Kinect-related articles on N4G that have to "explain" its focus is something to think about.

Omega45773d ago

Why does Kinect need hardcore games when halos,fables and gears are still being made and a mountain of third party games?

Kinect finally allows some diversity for the xbox and people are complaining.

btk5773d ago

So "diversity" is the new word to use for the Kinect Hype train.
The reason why the XBox needs a motion controller that work with hardcore games is simple:
- You buy Kinect and get a laggy controller that does not work with hard core games
- In the meantime, hard core games, including multi platforms implement motion control from the start
- The Wii version works OK, the PS3 version is stellar, and the XB360 version is awkward, laggy and a pain to use, or even worse, not motion control enabled at all
- MS can try to pay devs to either support motion control when Kinect is competitive or drop motion control totally if Kinect sucks. But that will only work for a while. In the end the reviews, even Eurogamer is going to lament the inferior XB360 versions and then the running and screaming begins.

So no - it is not Kinect that needs hardcore games - it is the XB360 that needs a motion controller that supports hardcore games like its competition.

You can spin the facts all you like - this will still the outcome after a year.

Lord_Doggington5773d ago

"XB360 version is awkward, laggy and a pain to use, or even worse, not motion control enabled at all "

This is from the article:
"Because jumping into a whitewater raft, leaning to steer and leaping to drag the thing upward is something you ‘get’ in a second. Because there’s nothing more intuitive than kicking a ball, or punching a block. That the implementation is a trifle dodgy makes no difference at all providing the activities are simple and sociable and their objective, fun."

So in the end, whose opinion am I going to respect? Yours or his?

His.

btk5773d ago

Read my comment again.
Eyetoy had some great games. There is games that works really nice with the tech. But then you accept that it has lag. For the Eyetoy type games, Kinect will work, and may even work better than Eyetoy - but that remains to be proven.

Now a fps is something different.
I am giving you the scenario after one year:
- Crysis, COD6, Battlefield Bad Company 4.7 etc released - with motion controls. Works OK on Wii, works stellar on PS3. Due to Kinect XB360 is standard controller only - or frustrating due to lag / control scheme to fit Kinect motion capabilities.
- At this point even Eurogamer starts lamenting the inferior XB360 version after downplaying the motion controls for the first two games that the XB360 missed out on - because by now the gaming community is raising eyebrows (again) on their obvious spinning / downplaying.

The bottomline?
The XB360 needs a motion controller that supports games like the above scenario - and that controller is not Kinect. No amount of spinning how cool the dancing and rafting game is is going to change this.

And now for the real kicker. MS will have to come up with their own version of Wiimote / Move. But now - they will either have to drop Kinect - or to stay on par with PS3+PSeye+Move without dropping the Kinect - they will have to give you XB360+Kinect+XBwaggle - and by the time that is ready the next gen will be upon us. MS dropped the ball. They betted the wrong way.

BeaArthur5773d ago

hahaha, GWAVE says don't be a fanboy yet he is one of the biggest fanboys on this site, classic.

Nitrowolf25773d ago

Omega because they have a large market of Hardcore gamers
Pretty much what they are offering now, i would rather buy a Wii since it would be cheaper is i was a player who like those type of games.

Look at the eyetoy, the PS2 had many hardcore games, but because the audience was mainly about hardcore gamers eyetoy did not do well and was forgotten.

If you can supply hardcore games for Kinect then it will sell great and live, but if its all about just kiddy games then it will live short and be forgotten, Same with PS MOVE, both of these need large support considering their audience is Hardcore gamers, casual gamers already have the Wii what would Kinect offer them more if they have it on the Wii?

Bigpappy5773d ago

Kinect is a 3D camera. It can read and execute your moves as you intended (1 to 1). I would give Eyetop props for bringing camera gaming to console first, but by no meads is it in the same league as Kinect. Any how, enough waisting time on nitwits. PS3 fanboy will never give a M$ product is just due.
I look any where that take pre-orders, and all I see is money being placed on Kinect to win! You can get on N4G and cry till Christmas, but the fact is Kinect is already succeeding and the same can't be said for the Move. The sounds even worst when you look at the fact that the Move will be on store shelves in about 6-7 weeks. May be you guys could buy up all the Eyetops and sell the for $89 to undercult M$. Makes sense no? I mean, if you are so sure that they are the same think, why let M$ get away with ripping people off? You can go near evey Macy's and setup a stall to demo PS-EYE and Eyetoy on your PS3.

IdleLeeSiuLung5773d ago

"Eyetoy failed because is was 2D and slow"

That is exactly why I think Eyetoy had to fail. It was lacking that last dimension that was soo oh, important to making it accessible. Instead of it being intuitive, it is now a gimped intuitive which in turn means it is no longer really intuitive, but seem more like a gimmick.

With that said, I don't really think 10 million sold is a failure unless it wasn't profitable for Sony....

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5773d ago
Poseidon5773d ago

Victim of Lies, False Promises at a price that rips off the consumer.

Lord_Doggington5773d ago

Then he tried it and had fun.

Why is this so difficult for people to understand?

Games are for fun.

ThanatosDMC5773d ago

Lord_Doggington, are you the author?

ER-AM5773d ago

We have a WINNER!!!!!

Jockamo5773d ago

you shouldn't troll people like that.

btk5773d ago

It is called spinning. Since Kinect demo's became a bit more public, there is a lot of articles trying to justify Kinect.

It is a very expensive PSeye with cool tech - but does not make games possible that the PSeye can not do.

No one denies that some of those games are fun. My kids still play Eyetoy games on my launch PS3 and still enjoy it.

The point is that PSeye did not cost $150 for the camera and $59 per game. Games are for fun - but the price must be reasonable. Kinect is not reasonably priced for what it does. So what if the engine in my car magnetizes the fuel, ionizes it, x-rays it - but the car still handles the same with no more than 2% performance increase. It is not a good value proposition for the casual gamer to pay $150 for a controller scheme that does not do more than a $30 one.

The storm around Kinect is that it offers very little if anything that the gamer will get more than from a PSeye / Eyetoy for quite a bit more cash - and then the MS PR spinning tries to convince us that it is somehow a generation ahead of Move. All the PR waffle of "better value proposition" and price comparisons to try and convince the market that a PSeye equivalent is better than the PSeye + Move. And to convince us that Kinect is the equivalent of 4 Move controllers to justify its price. MegaFail.

ChronoJoe5773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

But the author of the article, isn't the same consumer as the people here, or the people who like Gears and Halo 3. He is a casual, that's the difference Lord Doggington.

He might have been Skeptical previously, but what you don't understand. Even irrespective, of if the technology worked well (you took 'under a second' as working well before, when even over 0.1s is an completely unacceptable level of lag within video gaming) the hardcore gamer, would not be able to enjoy what Kinect has to offer.

The problem at the moment is, that there are two key things wrong with kinect

a) Lag, the tech simply doesn't work properly. It's fine for the casual games, but completely incompotent for hardcore games.
b) No hardcore games.

Now the problem Microsoft are in here. Is that they can't provide the one, without the other. What good is having hardcore games, that are going to frustrate the players to control? What good is having casual games, that aren't suffering from lag, the hardcore Halo Player (the very core of the XBOX brand) does not want to be playing Dance Central, entirely irrespective of if it's lagging, or not.

So what we're going to have is over half of the 360 consumer base, dissatisfied with Microsofts new product direction, because from there perspective it offers nothing for them.

From there they have two options

a) Deal with it. Halo & Gears, and they're content. Some people are happy with this.
b) Look elsewhere, why suffer with inferiority. (PC/PS3)
c) Force themself into championing the new product, as a fanboy, and change exactly who they are. Simply so they can be content with the decisions that they've made previously. This person will in most cases, turn to b overtime.

Bottomline is, Microsoft could have addressed casuals, and hardcore players. It's kind of ironic, really. By trying to make there system accessible, for a different consumer base, they manage to alienate there own existing, consumer base.

IHateYouFanboys5773d ago

"The problem at the moment is, that there are two key things wrong with kinect

a) Lag, the tech simply doesn't work properly. It's fine for the casual games, but completely incompotent for hardcore games.
b) No hardcore games. "

a) the tech works. it doesnt matter if it doesnt offer the precision needed for "hardcore games" because ITS NOT MADE FOR HARDCORE GAMES!

b) see point a.

Kinect is NOT made for 'hardcore gamers'. its made for casual gamers. you know, the HUGE segment of the population that currently has no interest in the xbox/ps3 because they DONT LIKE 'HARDCORE' GAMES? they want casual fun little games. Kinect gives them these.

you idiot sony fanboys just dont seem to get what Kinect is all about lol.

aaron58295773d ago

I dont know... i still feel whatever that's been shown was already done on the PS2 already, with the PS eye...

remember that combat game ? for the PS2 ?

Also.. what good does a "3D" camera gives, when i cant really move around my living room.. because you know.. i got a couch... coffee table...

I dont mean to sound like a fanboy... but someone please sell me the idea of kinect.... because as of now, i dont care about it.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5773d ago
Christopher5773d ago

First of all, Lord_Doggington, that was the worst suck-up first post ever. You should get a job with a big corporation doing marketing and posting on forums to promote their products!

Second, this line is about as subtle as a bowling ball to the head: "A more conventional understanding of the word would include the obese, balding social rejects who first put the Xbox brand in the black, to say nothing of the waspish, badly coordinated editors who prey on them."

Really, insulting the user base that you are a part of and going with the old and annoying 'If yer a gamer, you must be obese, a virgin, and socially undesirable!'

GTFO with those type of statements. The current gamers are the ones who have set the trend of games we have now. They're the ones that lead to the best games developed and even to many of the Nintendo franchises that are milked on the Wii.

What a BS article that refuses to recognize that Microsoft just wasn't honest with their tool and that instead of growing their first-party potential they've been wasting money on making games for consumers that haven't been supporting them so far.

ActionBastard5773d ago

I have to agree, Lord_Doggington needs to wipe his chin...christ.

Count5773d ago

He's not the only one that needs to wipe off his chin.

ActionBastard5773d ago

Nobody's stopping you Anomen.

MNicholas5773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

I agree with the title but not the "article." It reads like cleverly worded propoganda.

As for the booth babe video, that's nothing new. Booth babes were doing exactly the same thing with the PS2 Eyetoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Bigpappy5773d ago

Dude, why link to so much Eyetoy footage? The stuff is so boring, and you can npot even see the screen in most cases. That just shows why eyetoy failed: It was very boring and looks really stupid. Atleast Kinect game are fun.

frameflip5773d ago

I will never forget that "BAM, there it is..." Truly an EPIC FAIL. I almost cried with laughter, classic.

MNicholas5772d ago (Edited 5772d ago )

Which Kinect games look fun? They all look like rip-offs of the most boring Eyetoy games. At least some of the Eyetoy games were fun and there was something for almost everyone.

The only Kinect game that doesn't look completely, mind numbingly boring, is the one that teaches you to dance.

Boody-Bandit5773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

You're kidding, right?
The person that wrote this article has a poor perception of gamers so why would anyone care about his opinion of a gaming device?

n4gno5773d ago

Lord doggy, is it your blog ? :)

(how can that kind of "non-existent" source can be approved ? we can also approve facebook opinions soon ?)

air15773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

@btk

talk abut contradicting your self...

'it remains to be proven if kinect works better than eye toy"

yet you wanna talk about a year later and assume that move will work stellar with cod6? how do you know this? from the youtube vids of socom?how do you know that the move will be so stellar? cause it has buttons? doesnt the 360 controller have more buttons on top of being able to do gestures to throw a grenade or reach out to open a door. what control scheme do you need to come up with for kinect if all you need to do is gestures and a standard controller for every ones favorite genre fps i think that the devs have quite a good handle on standars controllers dont you?

i really wish i can understand your mentality. i just dont get it, you want buttons the 360 controller has more than the move, yet you cant grasp the fact kinect works with the controller those are your buttons and that gets rid of the lag mumbo jumbo you speak of, i would imagine that the standard controller has even less lag than the move. what are you going to complain about now? that kinect wasnt marketed with the controller so it makes it moot that it can be done? or what are you going to say that you could of opened that door a second faster with move gestures?

and do you really think kinect wasnt programed for other controllers if need be? you ppl have such a tunnel vision..

i just dont get it cause most the time you ppl are saying motion controls are a gimmick yet the only console that can provide the least of it (gestures and controller) gets the most hate.

if anything has lag its the sony fanatics. you ppl just cant grasp the fact on what kinect can really do, bunch of slow mo's

stuna15773d ago

You fit the name! Hot air1, that rant makes you sound angry about something. The same questions that you ask can be applied to you. You act as if they have run their plans by you and are awaiting your stamp of approval! All anyone can do is go on the here and now as far as the technology that is kinect is concerned, and what it is and isn't showing. The consumer whether it you or me, have the right to critique any products that are produced or in the process of being produced for consumer consumption. I for one would prefer that the product is able to perform the way it was advertised to perform.

air15773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

Seriously stuna? Did you even bother to read the guys post that I was responding to? He's going into the future like Kevin b and " assuming" that move is going to be stellar on cod6, but thats cool, thats ok I guess. What question am I asking that can be applies to me? and I for one do not plan on consuming my kinect or move when I get it I plan on having fun, something many of you forgot about cause everything has to technically perfect in your little world. I'm fine with criticizing but at least be fair about it and most importantly don't go miss informing ppl just cause you are full of hate

Nothing that I said bashes the move or more importantly miss inform ppl. I am not angry it seems like I struck your nerve though. I too want to play it the way it was advertised, however im not going to ignore all the possiblities it has just cause micro didn't say enough times that kinect works with the controller. That's like buying a new car you test drive it but the sales man doesn't tell you about the Kick as$ ac does that mean you will never use it? (assuming you don't live in Aspen or something.

Yea... Hot air blowing in your direction, Sony fanatic....

N4g_null5773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

Yeah this truly is incredible. These guys are trying to protect the kinect?

Weird they are trying to say people stopped pick on the wii, since when and also the wii did not need protection because it does work.

I know I know you all believe the move is superior lol that's fine. Kinect does not deserve a free past if it truely is fun to many people then it will be fine.

On top of all of this xbox fans helped creat this attitude that motion controls suck. The karma of the situation is hilarious.

Of course ps3 play insist that Sony made any thing is better lol. Yet none of you have played it and every one ignores the lag that has been displayed although out E3. Yet I don't think the supports will buy the thing. It just another way to sell ps3 to the sheep just so we can finaly say yay the ps3 is now 2nd lol.

stuna15773d ago

Question????
Are you talking about yourself?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5772d ago
Blaine5773d ago

and I'm gonna start it off by insulting the shit out of them."

That's what the author was thinking. Great idea, huh?

"[...]sorry to butt in on your triple-decker cheeseburger/serial masturbation session/Battlestar Galactica marathon/24 hour silent vigil for your bro’s banhammered World of Warcraft account."

Yup, you really won me over with that intro. Not to mention there isn't an ounce of insight in there, it's just a pointless waste of words.

Jockamo5773d ago

to deny that many hardcore gamers fit that description is pretty naive.

the article is well written. he didn't think it was good, then he honestly wrote about how he liked it.

honestly, it kinda makes me excited for kinect

Blaine5773d ago

to accept that many gamers fit that description is actually the naive position.

I'd bet my gym membership that, compared to the average population, there is a lower percentage of gamers that are fat and, also, a higher percentage of gamers have an exercise routine.

Seraphemz5773d ago

you excited to play a laggy game? Cause he basically admits that Kinect is laggy...but..its ok..cause it's FUN lag.

typical 360 fan...settling for less.
ok with a console that breaks down.
ok with Kinect being laggy...

no wonder Micro doesn't try to improve....they don't need to.

Jockamo5773d ago

Well, no, I'm excited to have fun.

I agree with doggington, if it's fun, what's the problem?

I'll stand by that.

Anyone who disagrees that fun is the purpose of gaming has lost their way...

yippiechicken5773d ago

Man, no kidding. I'm always amazed at all the posts I see about people worrying how they look while playing GAMES. Heck, I'm 46 and I couldn't care less if I look like an idiot while having FUN. My family and friends are the same and we can have a hell of a good time when we all get together for a gaming session. Good times! I feel sorry for the ones who aren't able to experience that because they are too worried about how they look to other people.

ocnkng5773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

First of all you agree with that guy who insult the millions of people who play games like Halo, Uncharted and others. That sort of stupid generalization belongs either to 4th grade or a fascist camp. Sorry I can't take people who think like that seriously. You talk about having FUN. Let me ask you, what exactly is FUN? Could it be measured or categorized? No, FUN is a subjective concept, what is fun for someone might not be so for another. LAG on the other hand is an absolutely measured objective phenomena which truly exists for everyone. There is another truth here: You FAIL.

yippiechicken5773d ago

Sounds like you need to have a little more fun!

:)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5773d ago
GusBricker5773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

Hey, you don't wanna be a fatass? Then buy Kinect, it'll melt the lard off your ass!

Really. Have you seen people play Kinect Adventures and Dance Central? They're gasping for air.

Of course, smoking and fried foods probably doesn't help.

C0MPUT3R5773d ago

....................
.
Kinect is a victim of Microsoft over promising, and hyping it to no end.
.
Of course if Microsoft takes away the smoke & mirrors, and presents it for what it really is, no one would buy it.
.
....................

rob60215773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

Xbox 360 rushed product to deflate Sony's new product Round 2.

Trroy5773d ago (Edited 5773d ago )

I agree that anyone, who likes the games offered for Kinect, should consider buying it. And if you don't like the games offered? You shouldn't buy it.

Can't really argue that.

Show all comments (60)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio18d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing18d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9218d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit18d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing18d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9218d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay20d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn221d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn220d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown21d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay20d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay20d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac20d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger21d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300021d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde21d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde20d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7522d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_20d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.