All Channels
Popular
280°

Kinect Limit at Two Players?

Microsoft simultaneously offers clarification and dodges the question.

Read Full Story >>
xbox360.ign.com
SupaGamer5785d ago

of course it's only 2 players. They will dodge the question until everybody learns the answer.

-Alpha5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

I doubt most people will buy Kinect for multiplayer. I don't care for local play with motion control, I'd much rather sit on a couch with friends and use a controller. The problem here though is price and limit. Of course the potential gets limited if there is a 2 player limit, and the price is still high.

It's funny because Xbox games have had a lot of local multiplayer support, especially for its hardcore games like Halo and Gears. Of course, I sincerely doubt Kinect is going to have games like Gears and I'd imagine it to be complete hell if four players in the same room are playing Gears of War with Kinect.

We have a clear picture of what Kinect is aiming for, and I don't think the audience cares or will even know about a 2 player limit. Hell, most don't know what the EyeToy did. I don't know why MS is being dodgy because I dont think it will affect the casual audience-- personally I'm more concerned about the pricing. I wonder if the casual audiences perceive $150 to be expensive. To us core gamers the combination of price and technology warrants a bad purchase, but to casuals I think they perceive the technology to be "cool" and advanced.

Remember also that these new audiences have to buy the whole 360 if they want Kinect, so it's way more than $150 for these guys.

Convas5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

Your Amount of Bubbles = Totally Ungodly

LMAO

Kyur4ThePain5785d ago

Why do you think that is?

Spenok5785d ago

Holy s... you are right, TONS OF BUBBLES!

gallospqra5785d ago

they'll never admit they haven't been able to actually do it.

"Oh, we're working on it. No, there are no 2+ players game at launch, but there might be in the future. In the meantime, buy it! And if we don't deliver what we made you believe, who cares: we got your money, that's what we care about."

kneon5785d ago

The XBox may very well be able to handle 4 players. But with the field of view of the camera how far back will these 4 people need to stand so they can all be seen and not run into each other?

J-Smith5785d ago

Kinect Limit at Two Brain-cells?

The Great Melon5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

I bet the Kinect can only process about 2 full players worth of data efficiently. That means it can track their arms, legs, head, etc. without running out of power. However, if it were to ignore maybe the lower half of the players' bodies then it might be able to track more people. Not every game needs every player roundhouse kicking the TV screen.

stuna15785d ago

It sounds like the cat is out the bag! 1} They are basically saying that kinect really does not have any online capabilities, sure one could argue, but it has an wifi port, but that could basically be used as a way to update kinect if need be. 2] What does this say for the new arcade model with the 4gb of memory? Sounds like it will be strictly devoted to kinect play only, because in the grand scheme of things, nowadays 4gb of memory is not really adequate considering how much space demos and, movies take up. My thoughtT is maybe it will be used for updates or, maybe even add ons. These are serious concerns, not a troll attempt, but more importantly something that needs to be addressed.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5785d ago
Omega45785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

I will say it again, how are you going to fit more than 2 people in a room to play a kinect game.

Edit:
At $150 kinect is still cheaper than Move for two players to get the full experience.

Strange_Evil5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

Way to spin the facts there... Weren't you the 1 dishing out the prices of Move if 4 people wanted to play and then comparing it with Kinects 150$ tag?? And now that Kinect can't recognize 4 players, then it's who owns a place big to fit 4 people right...

D4RkNIKON5785d ago

Strange owned you Omega. It's true, you will try to spin anything to justify your console purchase, or in this case your Kinect preorder. Why do you feel the need to convince others when it really seems like you are trying to convince yourself.

TotalPS3Fanboy5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

With Kinect, even if you only want a 1 player experience, you still have to pay the full $200 price of a 2 player experience.

With Move, you pay only what you want. You can pay for 1 player or 2 player. If you already have the EyeToy, then you don't have to pay for the EyeToy. The Nav-Controllers are optionsal and if you don't want them, you don't have to pay for it.

With Move, if you only want a cheaper 1 player experience, you are not forced to pay for an expensive 2 player experience like Kinect. How much you spent for Move is entirely up to you. However, with Kinect, the $200 2 player experience is forced upon you, even if you only want a cheaper 1 player experience.

Choices = Good
Move = Better
PS3 = Best

-Alpha5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

Kinect may be cheaper but how many times are you going to play Kinect with multiple people (especially if the limit is 2?) Add to the fact that we still don't have a really good list of games to justify the price (at least for me, and I assume you).

Move is expensive even for a single person, at least for me. I don't see the need to buy any of these products just yet, but I'd rather drop money on the Move first than on Kinect.

Now, I dont think 2 players will be the limit. If I remember it was an issue of tracking multiple players, in which case I'm sure they can find a way to switch players out and in depending on the game.

Also, I could have sworn this is old news. We've known this since a month now.

Mr_Bun5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

Cheaper doesn't mean "better". Move at least has core games in mind when it's released

Adva5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

Full experience? Get a starter pack, get another move for a total of $149/$150. Full experience is right there. The Nav controller? Optional because we can use the Dual Shock lol. Only hard core gaming uses the left side of the controller anyway.
We can pass the 2 MOVE controllers around too :D

mrv3215785d ago

Yes BUT Kinect isn't $150 it's 150 EUROS.

But for 3 player it'll cost...

A kinect and 4GB XBOX=£250 which is roughly $400 SO for THREE player it'll cost $800 dollars, Move is

One PS3=$300
One PS3eye=$30
Three move controllers$150
Three sub controllers=$90
$570

Wasn't 4 players ALL the rage when Natal was said to do it, EVERYONE compared the price of the two using 4 players. Now 2 players is suddenly the rage because that's Natal limit.

Some games don't even use a sub controller so It's $480.

And besides it's hardly likely you'll want to play Natal with ANYONE watching.

How about 3 PLAYERS? Or ONE?

So here's a question what happened to all the 4 player talk?

TheTeam065785d ago

No one ever said Kinect was $150....

Kinect - out of Microsoft's mouth, mind you - will be "€149.99". Even with a little Googling, you can figure out that it converts to $200 American.

You can get a Move bundle, an extra Move and a Nav for less than that.

Adva5785d ago

Things tend to be a little pricey in EU compared to North America. Kinect is $149.99.

Myze5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

You ma-mma-mma-m-mamake me happy.

"Damn, and I thought the movie was bad."
"Well, to the man's credit, he has eased up on the retard throttle."

Redempteur5785d ago

lol 4 people can play wii sports tennis so the place isn't a problem .
and 4 people in a room to play local multiplayer exist since what ? the N64 ?

ipe5785d ago

move is 50$ and navigational thing is optional, u can use ds. Also move pack with camera and game is 99$.

BTW. with move u can actually play with more people than 2.

So for party u need lets say 2 kinect thats what 300,400$ roflmao

Silly gameAr5785d ago (Edited 5785d ago )

You're so full of s****. Your sheepish ways are just as bad as the worst PS3 fanboy you guys think you're better than.

4 players were all the rage not even a month ago when Move and Kinect were being compared, now all of a sudden it doesn't matter? Now 2 player Kinect is the better value huh?

Da f*** out of here.

skip2mylou5785d ago

because ms makes it look like you can have 2 back up dancers http://www.youtube.com/watc...

skip2mylou5785d ago

also notice in the video the small space they re dancing in

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5785d ago
KILLERAPP5785d ago

If this is true then why all the videos of a family’s of four playing the game, they where selling natal like it was some second coming and now the truth is out and what are we left with?

Show all comments (44)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia1582d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1581d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1581d ago
CrimsonWing691581d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1581d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791581d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1581d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1581d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1581d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1581d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1581d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1580d ago (Edited 1580d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1580d ago
Aloymetal1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101581d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1581d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101581d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1581d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101581d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721581d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1581d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1581d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1581d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1581d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721758d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1758d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1758d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901758d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1758d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1758d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1758d ago
TheEnigma3131758d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1758d ago (Edited 1758d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1758d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1758d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1758d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771758d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1758d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901758d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1758d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901758d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1757d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)