210°

Top Game Company Screw Ups in 2010

Here is a list of some of the worst screw ups made this year by game companies, which in turn screw over the gamers and for some ultimately screw themselves in the process. Some of these decisions were solely made from game companies trying to squeeze every penny from gamers.

Read Full Story >>
gossipgamers.com
GWAVE5667d ago

Where's "Microsoft forgot that E3 was for gamers, not 7-year-old girls" on the list?

halocursed5667d ago

For me, #1 Infinity Ward and Activision

BeaArthur5667d ago

I was kind of surprised that one wasn't on the list myself. I guess it's not on there because we still don't know a lot about the details of the incident.

Jack Klugman5667d ago ShowReplies(2)
Darkfiber5667d ago

I see nothing wrong with EA "charging for multiplayer" as you put it. Buy the game new as you were intended and everything is fine.

Developers don't get a cent from used games, so all your $55 go directly to GameStop, a company almost every gamer universally hates. EA is a business and they have to get paid somehow, and if this is the only way then I say go for it. Screwing people who are too cheap to pay $5 for a new game is alright in my books. I'd rather my money go to the people who actually spent thousands of hours creating a game I enjoy rather than go to a heartless middleman who rips you off and has done absolutely nothing to earn that money.

It's not like they are charging you extra for the game if you buy it new, so just buy it new and you there's no complaint. It's not EA's fault that you're too god damn cheap to give the actual people who MADE the game any money.

Pennywise5667d ago

Tell Peter Moore hello if you see him walking in the hallways while you are on break.

I like to rent the yearly released sport games just to see if they are worth the $60.00 update charge. So now, I can't even know if those games have working online code worth a purchase. Wonderful. Yeah, you are right... good idea. All EA has done is make sure I won't be purchasing their games unless I am 100% sure I want it. Oh, they also saved me about $400.00 a year. Thanks EA!

Elven65667d ago

Even if you rent a sports game its not like they won't be making money off your purchase, most games use dynamic in-game advertising now in arenas and stuff don't they? So if you rent a game from Blockbuster for a week and play hours on end for that entire week you are still contributing *something* over nothing for revenue.

Pennywise5667d ago

Elven, I really don't mind contributing. I just think this is a bad move. Not because it will stop used game sales(I rarely buy used)... because of the mess this will lead to. This is just the beginning if they get away with it. Next it will be Single player code. If you don't buy the game first hand wrapped... you won't be able to play it. Just wait.

I don't care who you are... that is BS.

BeaArthur5667d ago

My issue with the EA online pass is that they claim it is to maintain servers but we all know that is a load of crap because they frequently shut down old servers and seem to maintain the active ones just fine. They just want more money and instead of being honest they hide behind the online pass and "server maintenance".

rdgneoz35667d ago

Some games don't deserve the full 60 dollar price tag. Paying $60 for a shitty game just for the money to go to the developers instead of a company selling it used is dumb. Think someone should pay full price for any Iron Man game, Rogue Warrior, Naughty Bear (had hoped this one would be good be sadly..) or such? Also, developers are charging for things that are already on the disk after it releases.

As for EA charging for multiplayer, hopefully the used game stores lower the prices for those games so it won't be too much of a price tag if you want to play it online.

Overall, I'll pay full price if the game has enough value to it and the developers aren't trying to rip you off for things that should have been free in the first place or charging like 15 for a map pack. If they don't care about their gamers, they why should we care about giving our money to them rather than getting it for a lot less used?

Show all comments (20)
50°

Kotick claims lawsuit objecting to MS-Activision deal was "tied to Embracer's desire to boost sales"

Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
OpenGL1d 7h ago

Yeah, the Microsoft deal has DEFINITELY worked out for everyone.

galgor1d 4h ago

Can this mother fucker just get lost already

PRIMORDUS1d 3h ago

He belongs in here ⚰️, hopefully sooner than later.

MrDead11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.

160°

Forza Horizon 5 PS5 port tops 5 million sales, securing $300m in additional sales for Xbox

Forza Horizon 5 has reportedly sold more than 5 million copies on PS5.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ocelot075d ago

I happily contributed during the Christmas sale.

Eonjay4d ago

All are winners here. Especially Microsoft who actually has a audience now that will buy their games. While I do miss the competition from Microsoft as a consumer, it is nice getting those games without having to buy another console and get another subscription. I just wish they released proper physical games.

ocelot074d ago

Yup fully 100% agree with you. On one hand I'm sad the way Xbox as a platform as gone. On another hand as you said one console is all you need really now for majority of games.

Wish they did release this physically as well as age of empires, flight sim, age of mythology.

Lightning774d ago

Xbox guys still buy games. Gotta kill this narrative.

fr0sty4d ago

It's a hard narrative to kill when MS confirms it by having to reach out to other platforms in order to get sales.

Lightning774d ago

@Frosty as usual you make no sense. With your logic then PS needs PC since those games are on there and HD2, deathstranding on Xbox. They're reaching out for sales because console is no longer enough.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
Agent755d ago

More reason for Microsoft to ditch Xbox and release on PS and PC. Imagine if Nintendo stopped faffing on with consoles, their games would reach eye popping sales, but they love control and that's losing them millions or billions a year. Mario Kart 8 and World on PS5 and PC, what sales would they hit?

Sgt_Slaughter5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

This comment makes absolutely zero sense. Nintendo is never leaving the console industry as a manufacturer; they have the second highest selling system of all-time, and some of the highest attachment rate of any developer ever. The PS5 won't even touch Switch 1 sales, so why would Nintendo even entertain the idea of this? MK8D sold 70 MILLION UNITS on the Switch. That is the "eye popping sales" you're going on about, if anything Sony wants that for their games that they never get.

Agent754d ago

What you're saying is, if Nintendo ditched consoles, it wouldn't make a bigger killing from releasing all of its games on PlayStation and PC, maybe even Xbox if Microsoft grows a backbone? Mario Kart 8 and Breath of the Wild as examples, what sales would Nintendo hit on PlayStation 5, PC and Xbox Series X? Nintendo could still bang on with controllers, joycons and cams etc. to bulk up its profits. Nintendo has been holding back its fans for years now when it comes to tech. Last time it was up there was with the GameCube and that generation, it was the second most powerful console, Xbox being top in terms of tech, followed by PlayStation 2 then Dreamcast. Average tech holds back AAA games, the Switch 2 is apparently up there with PlayStation 4 tech. I agree that the Switch has pulled off some amazing games, although some games were Wii U ports. I understand that Nintendo will never leave the console industry, but it most definitely has missed the boat when it comes to maximising game profits. Nintendo has only been on top (not handhelds) with the NES, Super NES, Wii and Switch, but the Switch is a handheld console, Nintendo skipped that generation and didn't release a home console and that's also the case with the Switch 2. The Switch isn't anything new to a certain extent, as SEGA's Nomad and Sony's PSP could be connected to a TV. Some gamers can't accept that Nintendo pulled out of the home console market with the release of the Switch, comparing to sales of home consoles is a pointless exercise. I don't care about PC gaming, but I hope Microsoft ditches consoles for PC and PlayStation. Most gamers are fed up with all these consoles and game sales at an all-time low, gaming does need a single format. One tech, we all choose which brand we want to buy and that's it. It has never done the likes of VHS, DVD and Blu-ray any harm and someone mentioned on here a number of years ago, owning a Sony DVD player, you could only watch Sony produced movies and play Sony produced music CDs.

5d ago Replies(6)
DivineHand1255d ago

I agree. Nintendo is leaving billions on the table. If they left console gaming behind and let us say released a mainline Pokémon game on android and IOS, in addition to console and PC, I cannot imagine the amount of profit they would enjoy.

Modern phones are good enough to play most Nintendo switch games so if they made a mobile controller that can interface with android and IOS phones, they could port games like Mario Kart 8 to mobile phones and other consoles. I am sure they would be enjoying sales from both their own unique controllers and the game sales itself.

The only thing they stand to lose is the 30% cut from all software sales being released on their system. Perhaps they believe they can earn more from that vs sales of their own IPs on other platforms.

Agent754d ago

Mario Kart 8 apparently hit just under 70 million sales on Wii U and Switch, although that figure includes the game packaged with the console, so I'm not sure on single game sales (disc, card and download). No Nintendo console out there, I think Mario Kart 8 would've hit bigger sales when you add Android and IOS, which is a good point. Nintendo's games don't exactly need ground breaking tech, but if that was there with a single format, Nintendo could then keep up. Don't get me wrong, I love the Switch and Switch 2, but PS4 tech games going into 2026 and onwards, again, it's a limited console from Nintendo.

BehindTheRows5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Nintendo games already reach eye popping sales. In fact, neither PlayStation nor Nintendo really HAVE to put their games on other systems. Even Sony's PC releases don't sell anything big (outsold of outliers like Helldivers II).

That said, I agree about Microsoft with Xbox. Outside of being a gateway to Game Pass, they should drop the platform and cut their losses. Stick it out as a 3rd Party pub and make bank that way.

5d ago
Neonridr4d ago

so what.. just have PlayStation in the console space? Great news for innovation and pushing each other to be better.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
neutralgamer19925d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Yeah it makes way too much business sense for these games not to be on PS and PC. If it's 300 million Sony got 90 million from simply allowing the sale of the game. MS need to get the development house in order so these games can come out at the same time that's when you make real big money

5d ago
Eonjay5d ago

This is correct. There is a lost sale aspect by not being available day and date on PlayStation. Halo is day and date so everything else should be too. This may not be possible all the times but they are not served at all by taking the Forza 6 route. No one is buying and Xbox or getting GamePass to play the next Forza. When the realize this they will just enforce day and date for all games.

5d ago
Eonjay4d ago

Halo is coming out after FH6...

VenomUK4d ago

@Wommens @Potdy Keep creating those alt accounts!
The truth is Forza, Gears and Halo and Starfield and the WHOLE SLATE will be going to PlayStation.
Microsoft has sold more copies of Forza on PS5 then it did on Xbox Series S/X.
The RAM price rise could lead to the 'Xbox PC' being delayed - if that happens Microsoft might not release it at all.

Stop running defence for a trillion-dollar company that doesn't know you exist.

maximusprime_5d ago

The way I see it, most racing gamers prefer playing on Playstation. It has been so since PS1.

As I said before, that Forza Horizon 5 would do well on PS5. So I was right

Sgt_Slaughter5d ago

Racing games have primarily been an arcade + PC endeavor in-terms of popularity. GT and Forza pale in comparison to the decades of arcade/PC simulator racing games that defined the genre. iRacing, Assetto Corsa, Rfactor, NR2003, Automobilista, GTR 2/GT Legends, GPL, GP4, Daytona USA, Richard Burns Rally, SEGA Rally, Virtua Racing, etc..

Console games have only just started on the path to comparing to them, but even then, the physics on PC are unmatched.

BehindTheRows5d ago

Again you don't know what you're talking about. Daytona/SEGA Rally, as examples, never sold ANYWHERE NEAR what GT has and has never been as popular either (particularly in EU). Put out a new Daytona and GT8 and watch the latter absolutely dog walk it in sales. On top of that, most of those games are very different from one another. They can co-exist. If you want to go there, the highest selling "racing" series is Mario Kart. Hint: console. It hasn't been an Arcade + PC > console for a very long time.

badz1495d ago

all those games combined didn't sell as much as Gran Turismo

5d ago
4d ago
4d ago
4d ago
4d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
5d ago
5d ago Replies(3)
Show all comments (108)
30°

CWA Canada vows to fight Ubisoft Halifax closure, defend workers

CWA Canada will “pursue every legal recourse” to protect our members at Ubisoft Halifax after the company announced today that it is shutting down the operation just three weeks after workers voted to unionize.

Read Full Story >>
cwacanada.ca