All Channels
Popular
560°

The First HD Gaming Console

High Definition hit the planet only a few years ago with the arrival of Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. But more than a decade ago, Sega had proclaimed that Sega Genesis had “High Definition Graphics”. Wonder what Microsoft and Sony have to say about the same.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
halocursed5793d ago

Marketeers will do anything to sell stuff

hatchimatchi5793d ago

Turbo Grafx CD came about before the Sega CD. Most kids didn't know this though so Hudson made a comic book to inform kids of "sega's lies". The attached photo is 100% real.

Proxy5792d ago

With all that power it could display over 480 colors! Sony later tried to one up them with the PS3, hoping for 8 working SPUs, but failed. Even so, the PS3 still retains the ability to display over 480 colors!

AngryTypingGuy5792d ago

Genesis did have HD graphics...for the time, considering it was twice as powerful as the NES. The Genesis actually helped SEGA beat Nintendo for a brief period, because for a while it was considered the cool system to own. This was despite the fact that the Super NES had better specs almost across the board, with the exception of the processor. I wonder how many of you on this board are old enough to remember SEGA's "blast processing" commercials for the Genesis?

dabri55792d ago

"I wonder how many of you on this board are old enough to remember SEGA's "blast processing" commercials for the Genesis? "

IDO! I remember having an NES and the next Christmas, everyone got Sega Genesis and I was all sad. I never got a Genesis or SNES until after their time. I totally missed out on that boat even though I was still completely in the gaming scene. I played at friends houses and owned stuff via proxy. I then got the Saturn when it came out with the 3 game bundle and then the PS1 the year after. Early adopter for everything else since then.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5792d ago
specialguest5793d ago

I still have that Johnny Turbo comic book somewhere. I was one of the few that supported the TG16/Turbo Duo till the untimely end.

Lightsaber5793d ago

Sega seems to do just about everything thing 1st. HD gaming is just another in long line of 1st for them. They made the 1st widescreen game (V. Racing). 1st to do 3D gaming V. Raing in the arcade and for gensis, Saturn was the 1st home sysem to do 3D gaming. They even made an arcade way back in 1991 that was 3D with a game called Time travler. They called it a holgram game but it was still in 3D and you didnt need any glass.

CobraKai5792d ago

I also believe the Dreamcast was the first console with a modem and online RPG. I could be wrong though

jivah5792d ago

yea it wasnt sega it was ninty...look up "xband" and "satellaview" when you have a chance..first established online for a console..so nope sega loses that. but i do believe they have first online rpg

ahhh sega needs to come back..maybe as a handheld?

Theonik5792d ago (Edited 5792d ago )

@jivah
No Sega still holds that one. The Megadrive was the first console to achieve Multiplayer to another console over the internet with the "Sega Meganet" add-on. The serviced also allowed to download games.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
Besides that the Dreamcast was the first console to offer a built-in modem and multiplayer as part of their core features as well as a web browser.
I really would much rather have Sega in the console market to MS. :(

ThatArtGuy5792d ago (Edited 5792d ago )

was the first to do 3D gaming back in 1983. Look up I,Robot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Theonik5792d ago (Edited 5792d ago )

Sega was the first to bring 3D gaming to home consoles. I, robot was the first 3D game but was only on arcades. They also made the first 3D fighting game and first 3D racing game. You're right though. 3D as in polygons was not a sega invention.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5792d ago
TengkuAmir105792d ago (Edited 5792d ago )

Maybe HD at that time but compare it to a powerhorse like the PS3 and 360, it is nothing but a console 1000 times weaker. But, I think it is unfair to compare the Genesis to something that was released just a mere 4 years ago.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5792d ago
Nitrowolf25793d ago

HD was not the same as it was back then
it won't be the same later on also, higher resolution will come out better TV tech will be released
at the time that was HD

iceman28855793d ago

Back when the Genesis was released there wasn't actual technology known as "High Definition", rather it was just a term to describe that the graphics were "good".

Demonsdown5793d ago

Actually the term "High Definition" has been around to describe new T.V.s since the 30tys what we call HD merely changes over the years.

Red-Dead-Roar5793d ago

63" Plasma 4096p is available.

;)

ProjectVulcan5793d ago (Edited 5793d ago )

True, HD is just marketing speak. But the Genesis could manage higher maximum resolutions compared to the NES at that time. Obviously when the SNES launched with slightly better capabilities, Sega appeared to drop the moniker probably for fear of a nintendo marketing backlash. The console wars were like that even way back when.

Genesis does what nintendont. Everyone surely remembers that campaign?

Theonik5792d ago

It's all about the blast processing!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
But yeah there is even Quad-HD in the works now 4096p resolution.

Sidewinder-5793d ago

Mine says
"High Definition Graphics - Stereo Sound" booyah

SaiyanFury5793d ago

The Genesis/Mega Drive rules!

RageAgainstTheMShine5793d ago (Edited 5793d ago )

The Old Sega owns Today's Sega any day.
Good Times!

StitchJones5793d ago

I bought my Genesis from Toys 4 Joy in Clifton Park NY. I remember plugging my headphones into that 'stereo' port and I played Altered Beast into the wee hours of the morning. GOOD TIMES!

awi59515793d ago (Edited 5793d ago )

When you came from mario on nes and jumped to sonic the hedge hog you were like wow this game looks crazy. On christmas morning even my mom was like wow this game and the colors look way better than the nintendo and my mom knew nothing about games. From nintendo to the sega genesis there was a huge jump in graphics at that time.

hatchimatchi5793d ago

yea, playing sonic for the first mind was mind blowing.

cool cole5792d ago

Ya playing Sonic the first mind, was mind blowing, you're right.

Show all comments (73)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio11d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing11d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9211d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit11d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing11d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9211d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
14d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted14d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8513d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele13d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk13d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay13d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 13d ago
Athlon10114d ago (Edited 14d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit13d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg13d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10113d ago (Edited 13d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14913d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay13d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn214d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn213d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown13d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay13d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay13d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac13d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger13d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300013d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde13d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde13d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)