All Channels
Popular
170°

A Universal Console Might Kill The Industry As We Know It

So what happens if the console wars come to an end and we all get a universal gaming platform? What happens to the gaming community? ...do we NEED the fanboys?

Read Full Story >>
psxextreme.com
Pandamobile5854d ago

Yeah, a console monopoly. That'd go over like a lead balloon. It would cost a fortune and offer no innovation whatsoever because it wouldn't have anything competing with it.

An industry NEEDS competition to prosper.

Sarevok5854d ago

However...
It would put a end to the fanboy wars.

8800gtx5854d ago (Edited 5854d ago )

Inferior Technology would then get marketed as next gen for two decades instead of just one shhh...

8800gtx.

Sarevok5854d ago

8800gtx

I never said that would not happen. xP

Colonel-Killzone5854d ago

You think that fanboys are more important then innovation and competition between consoles ? All they would do is stick together and say gaming was better before a Universal console. That would just create new ones. Different day same old shit

Wrathman5854d ago

fanboys ehh.

we are now beginning to witness the biggest loser fanoys of all time.

THE APPLE FANBOY!

Boody-Bandit5854d ago (Edited 5854d ago )

Not even close. People on here argue all the time that are hardcore devoted to one console.

example
1st guy "Halo is better than Gears!"
2nd "GTFO Gears shits all over Halo in fun factor!"
3rd "You're both nuts. The COD series is the best, PERIOD!"
4th "No, you're all bat shit crazy! Battlefield is the real deal!"

There is one NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, etc...
Does that stop people from being fanatics and arguing to the end of time?

Fanatics will always be fanatics. Even though sports is completely different entity from gaming it supports the point that people have and will always argue. It's human nature to argue. Although I never argue with anyone. I think it's about as much a wasted of time as hate. Life is too short to waste it arguing. Especially on the net.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5854d ago
xHarvey5854d ago

You're right we need competition but imagine gaming with out fan boys, no exclusive titles for a particular console,servers for multiplayer games will always have someone to play with. Fun to think about but yeah then it will cost a fortune.

evrfighter5854d ago (Edited 5854d ago )

this is why fanboys are bad.

They don't realize that without competition. nothing progresses. There has to be an Apple and a M$, an intel and AMD, Nvidia and ATI, Sony and Samsung.

Yin and Yang. otherwise everything is gray.

One day I hope fanboys realize this.

Microsoft Xbox 3605854d ago

Competition cannot exist without fanboys. Who else is going to spread the word, point out the flaws of others, support the weaker team, and drive the industry?

nickjkl5854d ago

idk ps3 is pretty much competing with its self at the moment

Pistolero5854d ago

you are absolutely right pandamobile...competition is vital to the health of an industry....i mean would anybody want there to only be one dvd or bluray player to choose from...or only one model of hdtv to play our games and movies on?....of course not...competition is good.

sid4gamerfreak5854d ago

Agree with Pandaobile and he puts it very well. Competition is needed in any industry as the products keep rivaling and getting better. If there was one universal console, no improvements and innovation would be made.

No motivation factor to improve the product.

And no fanboy wars :(

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5854d ago
Anon73495854d ago

No, it won't.

There will never be a universal console, and the closest thing we'll ever get to that is PC gaming.

Substance1015854d ago

PC already kinda is that universal system. I had 2 friends who were console gamers. One of them a PS3 fan another a Xbox 360 fan. Both are really good friends and would like to play MP games together.

They recently made the shift to PC gaming. Both played Splinter Cell conviction. The X PS3 gamer played on his DS3 while the other used an Xbox controller. They said it felt like playing on super high powered console, however they could finally MP together and get to play on controller of choice.

Nihilism5854d ago (Edited 5854d ago )

"both played Splinter Cell conviction"

What a terrible game to convert to PC gaming over. Trade in your console for a DRM infested POS that requires a constant internet connection.

That sounds more like a horror story than a good one.

If it had read "both had squabbled over which version of BFBC2 was better, the 360 or PS3, but then they both bought gaming PC's and lived happily ever after in DX11 heaven" then it would be a good story.

O.T

I hope Apple and Sega bring out consoles next gen, or even another manufacturer....a Samsung based game console. That would be crazy awesome, there would be a $#!+ tonne of competition and maybe developers would really have to start making innovative games...there are only so many pointless peripherals that can come out in a short space of time before they start to look like jackasses.

@Chris399

Samsung TV's are the best, they are fairly overpriced though, I bought a Sony Bravia KDL-EX500 40" 100hz LCD because it looked great and the price was right.

There gets a point with every piece of technology where the price gets exponentially too expensive as you get up into the high end...if I had the money though, I would have bought a Samsung LED for sure.

Chris3995854d ago

Every television or monitor in my house is a Samsung (that makes three of them).

I think it's safe to say that if I had to pin myself as a "breed" of fanboy, I would be a Samsung fanboy.

Their image quality and price to performance ratio is unmatched. I recommend their sets to anyone who asks. Really the most beautiful displays I've ever owned. And not a dead pixel or glitch on any of them.

I heart Samsung.

Pistolero5854d ago

i have a 40 inch Samsung lcd and i love it...it's great....I also have an older Sony hdtv that still has a great picture....i'd say those two are some of the best tv makers....oh and panasonic is also pretty good in the plasma arena.

Chris3995854d ago (Edited 5854d ago )

Where are you from, dchalfont? Here in Canada, we always have sales and discounts on Samsung sets.

Best Buy is having a "Samsung Sale" atm. Gonna pick up a small monitor for my friend's b-day later today actually. Maybe I've just been lucky, but I've always gotten my Samsung stuff for cheap. And basic sticker price was always lower than a Sony set.

You can even pick up the 750 series 3D, 240 hz sets for under 2 grand. My God, the picture on this thing is smooth as butter. Got mine a month or so ago for $1999 WITH a very nice stainless steel/ black glass stand (after much bartering and finagling :P) I was going to go LED, but they were definitely more expensive than the set I settled on - and it had 3D (which, yes, is relatively superfluous atm :P) and the picture quality actually appeared about the same.

Either way, I'd agree that Sony and Samsung make the best sets - in my experience.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5854d ago
Knightofelemia5854d ago

It takes the fun out of the competion between Sony and Microsoft without those two trying to out do each. I like the new technology the companies bring out in their heated battles. A universal console would hinder the new technologies like Natal and Blu-Ray and the companies designing this new console will be fighting over the design of the console to the name of the console, to the launch titles. A universal console would wreck the gaming industry more than anything.

jneul5854d ago

This is one of my main reasons for encouraging everybody not to side with MS, look at what they have done to PC's and tell me that the innovation over there has not gone stagnant, at least sony and nintendo will always push for innovation and quality, so us gamer's always win

Pistolero5854d ago

i love windows 7 and i still prefer PCs over macs...so i honestly don't agree with you at all.
i also think microsoft has innovated some great stuff for gaming that the other companies have since copied....achievements to name one.

pinkyxyz5854d ago (Edited 5854d ago )

which one would you rather have designing a universal console

Sony?
Microsoft? - (inside joke?)
Nintendo?

jneul5854d ago

Sony they dominated for two gen's and managed to keep innovation, and lots of quality games coming in, nintendo is good too but I have outgown mario as he has been around since the 80's

Show all comments (38)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay68d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn268d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn268d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown68d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay68d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay68d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac67d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger68d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300068d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde68d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde68d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

44% of games industry professionals have considered leaving the industry as a result of redundancies

New report from Skillsearch found that 22% of those surveyed had been laid off within the past 12 months.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Cockney77d ago

Well if that 44% left im sure there would be a lot less redundancies

40°

Stop Killing Games on the latest European Commission public hearing

It's a step forward for Stop Killing Games.

Read Full Story >>
rockpapershotgun.com