
PC World: Intel researchers have published the results of a performance comparison between their latest quad-core Core i7 processor and a two-year-old Nvidia graphics card, and found that the Intel processor can't match the graphics chip's parallel processing performance.
On average, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 -- released in June 2008 -- was 2.5 times faster than the Intel 3.2GHz Core i7 960 processor, and more than 14 times faster under certain circumstances.

It’s a little mind-boggling how many elements the developers at Fumi Games are packing into the upcoming Mouse: P.I. For Hire. It’s blending an old school shooter inside a black and white noir thriller, mixed with a chunk of cartoon violence, complimented by a catchy big band soundtrack, and tons of hand-drawn animation in a world dominated by mice and rats. Yeah, it’s a lot.

World of Warcraft: Midnight is an excellent follow-up to The War Within and refines all that makes WOW great.

Still dealing well after all these years.
Wow that's cool. Any software out there that actually uses the video card like a cpu?
so, what about GTX 480? :D
GPU's dont calculate like a General CPU. Its different; extremely different. A cpu does so much work in so many different ways in a very effective manner compared to gpus.
Some software does use Nvidia cards, like Adobe.
Personally; that isnt very impressive, it should of done better being GTX 280.
This really isn't surprising. The chips in most graphics cards have the ability to put out more computing power than any cpu on the market, today.
This is one of the reasons why F@H gpu client can get much more done(quicker too) than the F@H cpu client.
This is off-topic, but my fav CPU is Pentium 4.