160°

Sony: Almost All Sony Developers Looking Into 3D

Sony is making a big push for 3D with 3D televisions and a 3D ready game console. But Sony isn't alone, the company says.

According to Sony Worldwide Studios honcho Shuhei Yoshida, "Almost all WWS developers are researching how they can incorporate stereoscopic 3D technology into their games."

dangert125736d ago

sony are forcing it abit 2much imo but hey if they don't who will,can some one tell me if the 3d version be its own game or is it a setting in the 2d game?

Cloudberry5736d ago

---------------------------
it would be both in the future, possibly.

But most of the future games are the latter of what you just said, in my opinion.

GWAVE5736d ago

How many Microsoft developers are looking into Kinect?

See, as gamers, we can all agree that games are what matters, right? And with Rare and Lionhead working on games like Milo and river rafting, who is left to make the hardcore games?

Why o why5736d ago

that's a rhetorical question right ;)

sikbeta5736d ago

3D is an Option, If you don't have a 3DTV, you still can play 3D Games on a HDTV/SDTV, so there is no problem with that...

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5736d ago

Yes, and PS3 and PC are the only platforms to make Native 3D.

n4gno5736d ago

3D on pc is a gimmick compared to bluray 3D and real 3D games.

YourFlyness5736d ago

Developers with have a regular and 3D version on one disc, taking advantage of the BD disc space

siyrobbo5736d ago

that makes no sense, the games use the same assets for rendering, they just render the same assets from 2 slightly different perspectives so they wouldnt need 2 different sets of files, the 3d effect is done in the renderer by the gpu

Anon19745736d ago (Edited 5736d ago )

You're 100% correct and developers have commented saying the exact same thing. The image just needs to be taken from a slightly different perspective to make the 3D image, and the Cell is apparently perfect for the type of mathematical calculations needed to make this adjustment on the fly. I can't remember which developer I was reading but he commented that the software that Sony provided does all the work for you without needing to render the image twice - which would understandably suck up huge processing power. I don't pretend to understand it myself (I don't take my real time rendering class until the fall) but certainly it sounds like they have it figured out.

I think what YourFlyness is talking about is Move games. I did hear and E3 that new games, because of the size of Blu-Ray would be able to have both the standard version and Move version available on the same disk. Perhaps YourFlyness was referring to those comments.

duplissi5736d ago (Edited 5736d ago )

...

you dont have to recreate the whole game in 3d.... all the assets(basically the stuff that fills up the disk): levels, sound, textures, character models are the same. but there might be a different executable for 3d and 2d, or at least different settings.

so uh what extra space is needed?

edit: damn you guys for saying what i was typing...

BeaArthur5736d ago

They're forcing it because of all the 3D TV's they are releasing.

FACTUAL evidence5736d ago

Too bad I won't be able to enjoy 3D.. =(

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5736d ago
Iamback5736d ago

God no, stop killing Playstation brand by forcing crap from other SOny divisions.

sikbeta5736d ago

Why is that?

Blu-Ray was Pushed to Help SPE + The Bravia Division, but you complain about that, sorry but that's what Sony do, they use the Playstation Brand as Way To Push their Tech, there is nothing wrong about that when you know you get Better Stuff...

siyrobbo5736d ago

yeah, they arent forcing it, you dont have to play in 3d, the games will stil lwork without it. I dont see why adding extra features for free is a bad thing, even if you would never use them

PHOSADRA5736d ago

Even companies like Panasonic, and Philips are creating 3d tvs and they don't even have a game console to sell.

It may take a while but eventually 3d enabled tvs will become the new standard much like hd tv have.

I mean really... who has experienced 3d and hasn't said to themselves "I wish I had this at home."

Topshelfcheese5736d ago

I haven't. In fact I was getting extremely annoyed with the large irritating glass you have to wear for almost 3 hours for avatar. I play games to have fun, not to give myself a migraine. After watching avatar in 3d, i doubt i will ever do that again.

sikbeta5736d ago (Edited 5736d ago )

Electronic Manufacturers will Ditch HDTVs and FULLY Support 3DTVS cos With 3DTVS people can use them as 2D-HDTVs if they don't want to use the glasses or crap like that, it'll be pretty much the same thing that happened to SDTVs when Electronic Manufacturers decide to Go Fully on HDTVs...

tunaks15736d ago

thats wonderful for all 3 people who have 3d tvs.

n4gno5736d ago

yeah sure, like "bluray was wonderfull for the 3 people who have a lcd/plasma tv" and today, look around you :)

Show all comments (31)
90°

PS5 Sales Pass 92.2 Million Units, Beating Nintendo Switch 2 in the Holiday Quarter

Sony announced its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2025, alongside the traditional update on PS5 shipments.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
29d ago Replies(5)
italiangamer29d ago

Sony and Nintendo are both thriving and I'm happy, thank goodness for them or otherwise the whole gaming industry would be in shambles if they only had PC to rely on!

dveio29d ago

• Total G&NS revenue: 10.5 billion USD
• Operating profit: 900 million USD
• Hardware sales: 8M units shipped
• Software sales: 97M units
• PSN MAU: 132M

vs. Xbox:

• Total gaming revenue: 5.96 billion USD
• nothing else gets reported

__y2jb29d ago

Xbox operating costs are without a doubt eye wateringly high, way way way higher than Sony. GP is costing them an absolute fortune to operate.

Tapani28d ago

That is a very solid operating profit. It's not net, obviously, but still a very healthy amount of cash you make after cost of debt and taxes (+ other expenses), and can invest into R&D and future endeavours. And give back to your shareholders or buy back shares.

DivineHand12529d ago

It would be in Sony's beat interest to not rush next generation. Let 2029 or 2030 be the start of next generation. There is clearly plenty of demand for the PS5 and gamers are not asking for more at this time.

S2Killinit29d ago

Yup especially with the price of tech going up. They already have the PRO to hold them over.

__y2jb29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Exactly this. Let Xbox wither on the vine for a couple more years and there will be nothing left.

fr0sty29d ago

I fully agree for 2 reasons:

1. Microsoft seems to be in a hurry to release the new Xbox, if they do at all... AMD speculates a 2027 release. This will hurt them in the long run, because:

2. Datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM, and some RAM manufacturers have stopped making RAM for consumer products entirely, while the other remaining ones are scared to ramp up their production capacity to make more RAM because they're worried this whole AI thing is a bubble that is about to pop, and they don't want to be caught holding the bag when it does pop. So, for now, it costs $300-400 for 32GB of DDR5. That's the MSRP for some entire consoles.

If Microsoft drops the new Xbox now, it's going to cost them a fortune. If Sony holds their cards a moment and lets PS5 cook for a while, as it's showing no signs whatsoever of slowing down in sales, then by the time PS6 is ready to drop, RAM prices should have stabilized, allowing Sony to devote much more of their budget towards making PS6's CPU and GPU more powerful, in addition to the tech itself maturing and the available CPU and GPU parts being much more powerful for the same price point than they would be if released today. So, we'd get a super powerful PS6 in say, 2029, that won't have to cost $700-800. They speculate, based on the current specs, that the new Xbox will cost north of $1,000, and that was before the RAM shortage came into the picture. It's definitely going to be even higher now that RAM costs so much.

MS will be shooting themselves in the foot (again) if they try to drop a new Xbox now, and Sony would be wise to capitalize on that mistake by holding their cards a while longer, raking in more of those PS5 profits, and then dropping a new console as soon as the hardware market stabilizes from this AI datacenter BS.

darthv7229d ago

7 years is a hurry...? Its the same amount of time between XBO and series. The same amount of time between PS3 to PS4 and PS4 to PS5. The 360 was 8 years between it and XBO.

If they do release first, and then Sony a year or two later... is it not possible for prices to come down in that time?

repsahj29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I think Switch 2 beat PS5 during December 2025 that is why the gap decrease to 1m units. Because during black friday, I know PS5 sales is 2:1 against the Switch 2.

And I just want to add that the PlayStation 5 is currently 1.94 million units BEHIND the PlayStation 4 when you align launches. While Switch 2 is 10M ahead against the Switch 1 when you aligned covering it's first 7 months.

S2Killinit29d ago

I think you are forgetting to mention the chip shortages for PS5.

salis84429d ago (Edited 29d ago )

No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly.

PS5 being less than 2m behind PS4 is not a big deal; PS5 had to deal with COVID and ongoing supply and pricing struggles that clearly still exist today. Sales of software are incredibly strong, and the size of the community is bigger than its ever been.

PS5 is well on pace to exceed its early (2021) estimates of 110m by end of life even if that's 2027. PS5 will hit 100m before November and then sell another 6-8M in November + December.

PS5 is doing great, and so is Switch 2, it's good for everyone that they succeed, pitting the two against each other is more damaging than anything related to the sales of the two consoles individually.

repsahj29d ago

"No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly."

majority on this site tells otherwise.

Dexterio29d ago

@repsahj
Yup because they’ve been the anti consumer they are for so long and needs to be humbled 😆

CrashMania29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I'd be lying if I said I didn't regret my purchase a bit. I mainly bought it for Mario Kart World, but I find it pales in comparison to 8. I'm annoyed that Nintendo charged money for a super barebones 'upgrade' to Jamboree, no new minigames? No new boards? Just some gimmicky low res camera mode. Oh and Midtroid Prime 4 let me down as well, yet to go back and finish it.

I don't want the Switch 2 to fail, it's contributing to a healthier console market with the death of xbox consoles. I'll get use out of mine long term, but some of Nintendo's decisions like the ones above just annoy me lol.

jznrpg29d ago

@respahj the only thing I want Nintendo to badly is the 80$ games so they lower the price.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 29d ago
Show all comments (37)
50°

Sony Patents AI-Generated Podcasts Using PlayStation Character Voices

A new patent registered by Sony suggests the company is exploring the idea of personalized podcasts on PS5, hosted by PlayStation characters.

Eonjay30d ago

Okay this is actually really cool too. What is being proposed here is that the AI will generate you a podcast that is focused on the games tht you play or have wihlisted. This means you always get topic relevant to your tastes. Just don't screw it up with a bunch of ads.

PapaBop29d ago

AI is very cool, it's just all the real cool stuff is being drowned out by companies exploiting it as a marketing buzzword, generative AI slop and companies using it to cut corners and save money.

Sciurus_vulgaris29d ago

This is a terrible idea. Firstly the characters voices originate from real voice work. Secondly, the ai could end up saying questionable things. Thirdly, some voice actors use their regular voice when acting.

Juancho5129d ago

I know it's cool to hate AI, but we only hate AI because of idiots that misuse it or exploit it to take away peoples jobs. THIS is a GREAT application of AI, instead of having a human being voice actor sitting there for hours talking in character while having people writing scripts or coming up with topics etc, it can all just get POOFd into thin air and you can enjoy unique and entertaining content that harms no one.

PapaBop29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Not sure if intentionally being funny lol. isn't this like quite literally taking away people's jobs? I think SAG-AFTRA may disagree about this harming no one.,

Juancho5126d ago

The thing is that this isn't even something that's necessary to create as a job. Without AI it just wouldn't exist period, it wouldn't be worth the effort. So what I mean to say is, having AI utilize the voice actors (with their consent of course) to create unlimited "podcast-style" content is not only super lucrative (which people will call exploitation), but it creates an entire form of entertainment that requires a "Set it and forget it" mechanism where you don't have to babysit it or hire and fire or train or anything.

TLDR: Without AI this wouldn't even be considered at all, so I'd rather have this than not have it at all.

gold_drake29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

i hate this

i hate all of this. dont just use peoples voices for AI slob that u dont pay for

Show all comments (11)
80°

RAM Price Increases Could See Next-Generation Console Releases Delayed

Insider Gaming has learned that the ongoing price increases in RAM due to the rise in AI could delay the next generation of console releases.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
66d ago
slate9166d ago

What is even the incentive of upgrading to the next-gen after this console generation we've had? Graphics are plateauing, prices at an all time high, studios skipping entire generations or simply releasing just one game for it...
Its a mess

Jin_Sakai66d ago

Been gaming all my life. This is the worst generation ever.

jznrpg66d ago

How do you gauge each generation? There has been a lot of really good games this gen. I only care about the games. First party hasn’t been the best but the generation isn’t over yet

DarXyde66d ago (Edited 66d ago )

jznrpg,

Thing is, every generation before this one has had something that defined console identity. Very little beyond bigger/more detailed games and performance modes are really there.

I feel the last generation that cared very much was gen 7; Capcom's darkest era, but I have to give them props for being really experimental at the time. We saw plenty of new games that still tried to do something new. Outside of Metaphor and Clair Obscur, this gen has been pretty forgettable if you ask me. I'm sure a lot of it is the corporatization of the industry and the creative talent has to keep making sequels and spiritual successors because the cost of development is out of control. But even then, plenty of these experiences are experiences we've had already. And the thing is. Switch 2 and PSVR2 could really be doing incredible things, but it's just not there. Xbox I just don't see the value or point anymore but that's just me.

anast66d ago

Why has is been the worst? I've been gaming all my life and this gen. has been one of the best.

Vits66d ago

Not to mention that just like this generation, the next one will also be shared between the current and next gen console at least for a couple of years. So the few titles that it will had, just like this one, will run on the console you already have.

franwex65d ago

We will be getting games on PS4, PS5, and PS6, haha.

Extermin8or3_65d ago

I think people have to remember the pandemic at start of this gen and how it effected game development. This next gen we will see the PS4 etc support dropped and truly see the full utilisation of SSD's improvements to ray and path tracing and the impact of AI upscaling etc will be where the biggest improvements will come from.

isarai_lee65d ago

My sentiments exactly, next gen has got to prove it's worth before i buy into it this time. This has been the weakest generation in my 30yrs of gaming. From the drawn out cross gen garbage, to so many games getting stuck in development hell or canceled, to the ABSURD levels of trend chasing to the point of self destruction, this gen just wasn't worth it

thorstein65d ago

I'm pretty sure I've already read a story that said Playstation is only halfway through this console's generation and that PS6 is a way off.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 65d ago
darthv7266d ago

Im good with next gen being pushed back to 27/28. It feels like this gen has only just begun.

Melankolis66d ago

Covid-19 held back everything at least 2 years worth. Although many people disliked, i think only UE5 can generally distinguish this gen from the previous one.

DarXyde65d ago

UE5 is definitely impressive, but I would also give the nod to the current version of Decima, at least the way it looks for Death Stranding 2.

CornholioX65d ago

That's normal how you think. Time goes faster when you're older and i bought my PS5 since day 1 release and now it's 5 years old. I don't mind a year delay to release PS6 in holiday 2028.

DoubleYourDose65d ago

Tomorrow isn't promised to any of us.

Eonjay65d ago

I was under the impression that next gen wasn't coming till 2027.z u9gsq

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 65d ago
victorMaje66d ago

Regardless of RAM price increases, I strongly believe there’s still a lot of potential left for the current gen. I’d be fine with at least 3 more years.

jznrpg66d ago

Whenever it comes out is fine with me. I still have backlog for the next year at least

Show all comments (38)