140°

3DS - No, This Changes Everything

Mucu from GamesOnSmash.com gives a rundown of the final day of E3 2010. In addition to Portal 2 and Move, he discusses why he believes the 3DS is not solely going to be a massive product for the video game market. Rather, it’s going to be a massive product the entire tech market. This changes everything.

Read Full Story >>
gamesonsmash.com
pkb795720d ago

I don't think I would trust this kid to get my order right at McD's. Why am I suppose to think he is some sort of gaming authority?
I doubt he is old enough to have played on the PS1. He vast experience must give him great insight to the future of gaming.

Mucudadada5720d ago

Haha, you people who say this make me laugh. You haven't even gone hands-on with the device, but you trust your own opinion over mine simply based on my age. And that's fine. Your opinion is your opinion. Just know that unless there is a major problem that can't be detected without prolonged usage (such as as massive eye-strain, etc) then the 3DS is going to be hugely popular and important. And that's just not my opinion. That's was the general consensus on the floor as well. But, you know. You can go on judging it without ever experiencing it, that's fine.

And, yes, I did love my PS1. You know what else I love? The fact that I'm a USC Cinematic Arts student who has done tons of research on the history and trends of the gaming culture and been able to attend a vast amount of discussions with leading industry individuals on video games. I'm not saying I'm right all the time, but I do know what I'm talking about - more than most people double my age.

MysticStrummer5720d ago (Edited 5720d ago )

I'm still not interested in having a 3DS so it changes nothing for me. Sorry but portable gaming is secondary to home gaming for me and many others. That's not to say that the 3DS won't do well, because I think there's no question it will, but... "important"? It will be important to NIntendo stock holders, I'll give you that. I don't know what would make me interested in a portable gaming device with such a small screen, but this isn't it. Gaming in general has spread to an older and older demographic but I think portable gaming, other than cell phone games, is still stuck in a relatively young age group. That's the main problem with your assertion that the 3DS will be "important". I may be wrong, but like I said I don't give a damn about it. I actually got into an exchange with someone on N4G the other day about the 3DS. They posted the list of games that I'm supposed to be drooling over and I laughed at it. The only titles I was interested in were games that already had versions available for my home console. Better graphics, better sound, better controls, bigger screen... end of story.

raztad5720d ago

@Mucu

Nice you had a good experience on E3.

Watched your video and while I dont doubt 3DS was amazing, I think you are blowing things out of proportions. The very same Nintendo honcho said the tech only works for very small screens. Dont expect amazing TVs out of this anytime soon. For some reason not only Sony but the rest of the industry is pushing stereoscopic 3D using lenses

Mucudadada5720d ago

@raztad

Oh, I totally agree. We won't see this tech be put on a large screen for years. However, I'm just saying that when people see this, they will see the possibility of glassesless 3D. And, honestly, that will be enough for some consumers to want to hold off like 5 years before they plop down some cash to upgrade to something that could be updated very soon. But, yes, it will be a while before it is translated to consumer based TV's.

jmare5720d ago

Just because you say that you're a USC student, doesn't make it so. Just like the fact that you saying the 3DS is the greatest thing, doesn't make it so. The only reason the the technology in the 3DS hasn't made it to 3DTVs yet is because of the shitty viewing angle that the technology allows. Which is why manufacturers produce the TVs with the glasses.

Also, after finishing your vapid, narcissistic diatribe about the 3DS, your opinion holds even less weight. You may be a USC student, but I would wager that you just finished your first year or maybe are pre-frosh. Not that that makes a difference in anything you were babbling about, but you can barely string together a sentence without resorting to ridiculous ejaculations about how wonderful the 3DS is. One would think that a Cinematic Arts student would be effective at expressing ideas, seeing as how that's the whole point of Cinematic Arts.

Your CV is unimpressive. Anyone your age who claims to have had a "vast amount of discussions with leading industry individuals on video games" is full of shit. First of all, it should be numerous discussions; and second, what bar do you measure the vastness of your amount of discussion? Two, ten, one hundred? Hyperbole doesn't aid your case as to why we should respect your opinion.

And no offense, but what the fuck is up with the back of your hair? I understand personal style but it looks like you tried to Kingdom Hearts mullet kind of thing: Business in the front, spiky in the back.

R2D25720d ago (Edited 5720d ago )

Every one is saying that one of the reason that 3D cant work with out glass is because you cant view it at an angle - if this is the case why not make the TV a little more oval than just flat. Another thing they can do is build a screen for the TV (Somthing like what you put on your monitors for glare) made out of the same stuff the the 3D glasses are made out of, you can even add a battery to it.

Mucudadada5720d ago

@jmare

I'm sorry that you feel that way, but how was any of that narcissistic? I think you confused passion with narcissism. God forbid I get excited over anything. I forgot that I have to inject negativity in everything I do in order to appear mature.

And, yes, it's not a perfectly structured argument. That is the point of Reaction Time. I give my immediate reaction to things. SO, sometimes I am excited when I do it. That's the passion coming out. I write my well worded and thought out comments later with articles.

Maybe you are just a negative people. Your comments about my hair (while I don't care at all what you opinion on it is) confirm that.

Thanks for the comment and have a great day!

jmare5720d ago

Your article is narcissistic in the way that all unsolicited opinions on the internet are narcissistic. It's subtle but the sheer fact that you think so much of yourself that you have to share your poorly worded thoughts like we should be thanking you for gracing us with your pearls of wisdom. And negativity isn't maturity, maybe if you were a little more mature you would know that.

Passion is no excuse for shoddy work. It's ridiculous that you think it is. Passion is supposed to elevate your work, not make it worse.

I may be a negative person, but that's neither here nor there, I was simply asking about your hair. It's an odd style to intentionally go for, to me. Whatever, blows your skirt up is cool for you, but it seems weird.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5720d ago
Sheikh Yerbouti5720d ago

He's right, though.

We've been talking alot about innovation this E3 with 3D, Move and Kinect, but the truest, most forward innovation at E3 was 3DS.

It is different, more advance than what Sony is doing. It is not stereoscopic, which is older than television itself. It is autostereoscopic. Eventually Sony's 3DTV's will be autostereoscopic. When, I don't know, but Nintendo has it now on the DS.

The ability to bring this is the most truly revolutionary thing at this E3. It will take some time for this to become apparent, but 3DS is going to open the door to a lot.

MysticStrummer5720d ago (Edited 5720d ago )

Call me when that tech is applied to a television with a 50+ inch screen.

blipboy745720d ago

Mucu these comments scream jealousy because you were at E3 getting hands-on, while they were at home only able to form hateful opinions to post on N4G.

Raf1k15720d ago

3DS is great but 3D tech that doesn't need glasses still has a long way to go. The 3DS requires you to view it from a certain angle which won't work for household TVs since they're viewed from many different angles. Not just horizontal angles but vertical too since some people have their TVs below eye level and some above when sat down.

It seems to work amazingly well in a hand-held device so I'll probably get one.

RAM MAGNUMS5720d ago (Edited 5720d ago )

Do you like DS games better than PSP games?

Why?

Im really interested to find out.
Im 32 by the way.

Mucudadada,
You can do all the research in a classroom but you still dont know whats up unless you lived it. Thats like being a world war 2 history buff and preaching to a world war 2 vet how it used to be on the battlefield.

Thats not a opinon. Thats a fact. Fact is youre young. Youve got something sticky on the Back of youre head.
3DS? We dont expect you to aprreciate the progression of gaming because you didnt live the atari 2600 or arcades era. You just heard about it understand?

There is a skill level we respect that comes from decades of experience. Im not hating on the nintendo DS because its Fun. Im surprised at the excitement for what is generally a christmas, birthday present for small children.

& YEs IM JEALOUS You Went TO E3.
Ha HA Ha! Have Fun and Good Luck!

thief5720d ago (Edited 5720d ago )

I am sure smart young guys like him recommended telecom stocks in 2000 and touted CDOs as the best thing evar in 2006.
Though I agree with his views and I think it was rude to rubbish his opinion just because he is young, imho degrees and research can never substitute for experience. This may be great, but even the wii seemed like something awesome at first. I think this technology would need some more refinement - and its probably going to be some other company that does it, not Ninty

Mucudadada5720d ago

No, I wouldn't say that. Honestly, I've probably had the same amount of playtime on both systems. I love the PSP because it gives me a more visceral playing experience with titles such as God of War, Ratchet, and Metal Gear. The DS, on the other had, is a more portable system I feel like. The games are more passive and can be played in shorted burst. With the PSP, I generally play that at home.

But, I think I know where you are going with this. The PSP does give me a more standard and "hardcore" experience, which is fantastic! The DS is a different experience where a lot of the games are again, passive. However, the 3DS will bring in a lot more core experiences. You have already seen that there is going to be a Metal Gear, Street Fighter, and Resident Evil on it. The library is looking like it will offer tons more diversity than the DS.

Show all comments (37)
130°

10 Legendary Games That Still Absolutely Crush It in 2025

Discover 10 timeless video games from the past that remain absolutely playable today. From Chrono Trigger to DOOM, these classics have aged like fine wine!

Read Full Story >>
gamegeeked.com
anast280d ago

Simon's Quest is better than Symphony.

djl3485280d ago

If you're gonna troll, at least make a legitimate attempt.

Levii_92280d ago

Hot damn that's a good list. The only one i never played is AOE2 and i never finshed Chrono Trigger but it was damn good.

Speaking of what's old but holds up amazingly well and plays like a dream.. i played Symphony of the Night for the first time in 2019.. yep that's right. It became one of my favourite games of all time that i replay almost every year. I couldn't believe how good it was. That is almost impossible for me with newer games let alone older ones. Truly a special gem.

LG_Fox_Brazil280d ago

That's a pretty fucking great list

__y2jb280d ago (Edited 280d ago )

The only one I’d disagree with is doom. It shows its age badly I think. After 5 minutes of play these days you put it down.

Show all comments (8)
120°

Steam's highest-rated game is now less than a dollar in the Spring Sale

Jack writes: "Yet again browsing the latest offers in the Steam Spring Sale has led us to track down the very best. In terms of price to quality, we don’t think that it gets much better than this. Portal 2 is now less than a dollar, and if you haven’t got it already, now is the time to pick it up."

TheEroica697d ago

Portal deserves to be one of steams highest rated games... It's almost tetris levels of perfect game design.

TheEnigma313696d ago

It's a great game, but highly overrated. But for $1, it's an amazon deal.

Friendlygamer696d ago

Valve should bring their games to ps5

Kados696d ago (Edited 696d ago )

Gotta love Steam. Just got Portal 2 for .97 cents CAD. Should have been $1.29, selected the bundle with Portal 1 and 2, which gets a 25% discount, already have Portal 1, so it removes the cost of that, and still applies the full 25% bundle discount to Portal 2. 90% + 25% discount.

Friendlygamer695d ago

That's sweet, I've been thinking about building a modest pc to play some oldies

230°

All the Essential Video Games Everyone Needs To Play At Least Once

Given the medium's wild diversity, this primer of the essential video games everyone should try is a good place to start.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein704d ago

.... from the 2000s (mostly).

shinoff2183704d ago

I can't fk with this list. They missed on alot of games probably before the writers times. Also I know people loved some portal but I was never a fan.

Cacabunga704d ago

Tomb Raider 1
Driver 1
Abe’s Odyssey
FF6
King of Fighters 94
Mortal Kombat OG
LINK 2 the past
Street Fighter 2
Resident Evil 1

Inverno703d ago

Infinite but not the first two games? Witcher 3 but not the first two games?? GTA V but not literally any of the games before it??? Portal 2 but not the first? Also if you're going to play Shadow of The Colossus play the remaster and not the remake. Can't say I disagree with the list but my man it's all over the place.

Name Last Name703d ago

I mean some sequels are objectively better and you don’t need to play the whole series.

Inverno703d ago

But most of these games have a story to follow, sure you can catch up with a YouTube vid but where's the fun in that?

LucasRuinedChildhood703d ago (Edited 703d ago )

A list like this isn't telling you not to play the previous games if you want to. It's just giving you legendary games to play.

But tbh, you don't always have to force yourself to play every entry in a franchise to get to the better ones.

- The vast majority of Witcher 3 players never played the first 2 and had a great time. The first 2 games aren't in the same league.
- The GTA games are self-contained with the odd fun reference. You can easily jump into any of them.
- The Shadow Of The Colossus remake looks and controls better than the original (plus it has a 60fps option while the remaster is just 30fps). New players will enjoy it more.
- Portal 2 is a lot better than Portal 1 and takes the concept much further gameplay-wise. Storywise, Portal 1 is fairly light too. Not that you shouldn't play it but realistically ... you'd love Portal 2 whether you play it or not (at lot of Portal 2 players have never played 1).

Bioshock 1 is the only one I agree with you on simply because it's one the best games of all time and arguably better than Infinite. No other setting like Rapture.

Looking at the list, I'd recommend playing Uncharted 1 before 2 but no doubt, 2 is the legendary one you have to play.

Inverno703d ago

I get it, but that's just my opinion on his opinion. I just think that before you play a sequel you should still play what came before it. Maybe it's just me but i find it fascinating playing through the first game in a series and seeing how it has evolved through its sequels. Like I said I don't disagree with the list, other than SoTC which I strongly believe the remaster of the original should be played above the remake.

AuraAbjure703d ago

Awesome list! Hot take on Fear (and it's hard af expansion Persaus Mandate!) Bioshock Infinite is stellar, so is the Witcher 3 and you nailed it by having Ocarina of Time. So many fantastic games! Gotta play 'em all! Next one on my list is Prey after I beat Dead Space 2 and Splinter Cell Conviction.

Show all comments (11)