All Channels
Popular
830°

Sony, Seriously... WTF?

PSInsider Writes: Here we are going on year 4 of the PS3's life. It now enjoys a comfortable price point, a plethora of great gaming content, and an online service that has started to mature and offers much of what the competition does. However, after all this time, we're still lacking a key feature that you keep teasing us with, and we're getting sick of it.

Blaze9295808d ago

Yeah PSN+ is pretty ridiculous. Like a beefed up Qore. I was expecting features, not so much services.

apparently it might get cross-game chat though. Maybe it's some copyright stuff but I seriously doubt, and hope, that they did not need four years to figure out how to do cross game chat.

In fact, what PSN features has sony innovated on with the PS3 besides HOME?

One thing I like about LIVE is that LIVE truly is your dashboard. From offline and online - you get completely different dashboards and activity. With PSN it feels like I'm just restricted to the far right side of my friends list and PS store. Maybe a XMB redesign is due. That'd be cool

fr0sty5808d ago

I think the XMB works fine, though when you are online it could be reshuffled a bit so that the features you won't be using are put off to the side while friends list, etc. get priority. As for innovating with PSN, they do have the folding @ home, playstation life, game sharing, etc., so they do innovate just a bit here and there, but it's nothing like what MS has brought to the console realm. And this is coming from an AVID PlayStation fan.

Conloles5808d ago Show
Sheikh Yerbouti5808d ago

Microsoft is the go to guys for developing communities over a network as expansive as LIVE. Sony will always be playing a game of catch up on that front.

The author is correct that Sony builds up the expectation of certain features that eventually fail to materialize. Ironically, the use of the HDD in the PS2 was one of them, largely due to the lack of any online infrastructure to utilize. HOME is a failed experiment, that has its moments of brilliance every three months or so to bring me back.

The XMB is fine though. I like it better in many respects to the 360's. It just needs better organization features. I personally have had some issues with invites, but I doesn't happen that often to say "WTF!". Yet I'd be crazy to say cross-game chat wouldn't be welcomed, and even sharing media via HOME would be neat I guess.

So by and large, I'm happy. As a result I'm not that interested in PSN+, but I'll try it for $50 - cheap enough. There may be some feature I realize I can't live without after subscribing. Yeah,...I doubt it too.

FarEastOrient5808d ago

This article is failing to see what the PSN and Xbox Live is like over seas. The Playstation has all kinds of deals with TV programing partnerships, DVR Function, Yes a music / music video store. The Xbox is lacking in those departments internationally.

In the United States it is in reverse, Xbox 360 is dominating in deals with some United States properties because they have put more money here than internationally. That is the reason why it looks like Xbox Live is more robust than PSN in comparison if you only look through the lens over here.

NYPunkster5808d ago

Inexplicable. Bizarre. Is all I have to say about that.

Redgehammer5808d ago

is that image from Watership Down? That's Hazel isn't it?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5808d ago
deadreckoning6665808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

Yeah, I agree. PSN+ was a stupid idea. I'm glad we have the OPTION. But I believe EVERY PS3 should have the instant update feature.

@Disagree- U don't think that instant update(a basic feature IMO) should be free to ALL PS3 owners? WOW...that bad huh.

@Clowbelt- I'm not speaking for everyone, but I've NEVER bought a PSN game or PSN one classic, because frankly, I don't care about those things. PSN Plus just isn't worth it for me. I do buy loads of Rock Band DLC though.

ClownBelt5808d ago

If you're a guy who loves to buy stuff off PSN such as DLC and PSN games then this is a great feature since you'll get a discount. However, for me who detest DLC, No. I don't like it.

Jsynn75808d ago

Nice edit, dead. You and Blaze think it's stupid but think XBL is better when they make pay $50 for multiplayer ONLY? Yes, PSN+ is an option but there are some feature worth paying for. With XBL, you either pay to play MP or you don't pay and can't play MP. MP comes standard with most games these days there for it should be free to play. Wow, you guys are hilarious lmao. I bet you guys would defend M$ if they made you pay to turn on your systems lol

maddhatter1235808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

don't expect logic from the 360 fanbase to them a 54% failure rate wasn't a problem.

edit: exactly everyone complains about a few features missing in this but have no problem paying for stuff like playing online and laggy p2p servers and on top of that they get ads in a subscription service.

Sheikh Yerbouti5808d ago

Personally I don't want anything automatically updated for the PS3, unless I can program it like my DVR. Games might be cool, but not updates.

Jsynn75808d ago

I don't usually play in this "Fanboy War" nonsense but reading what these 2 said just blows my mind. I don't understand why they wouldn't think paying for something that the other 2 consoles are doing for free is a bad thing. Dead was right about 1 thing, PSN+ is an option so if you don't like it, don't subscribe and use the features given to, including MP, FOR FREE. If you want to play Halo/Gears MP on XBL, you have no choice but to pay. Just outrageous.

sikbeta5808d ago

Basically Some of you don't see the appeal on this because you have FREE PSN but the thing with PS+ got nothing to do with PSN, so you would see "Real Appeal" if they Charge you for Playing On-line, but again, This is another Service or whatever you name it that got nothing to do with PSN...

Montrealien5808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

Dont you guys find it a little Ironic.

Sony fans say.. XBL sucks, why pay for for this PSN lets you have for free.

Which is only online multiplayer, now which I agree is ahuge.

But now, it seesm paying for cross game chat is fine, a feature which is part of the XBL paying service. `

all the people defending and showing why PSN+ is worth it is just so so funny imho, most of these people ragged on XBL as Xbox fans defended the concept of paying for features on top of the online play which now sony think is worth charging for.

in the end PSN+ and XBL clearly offer great services and features, PSN+ will always win in the end though when compared since it has free online multiplayer. But I am glad that people are starting to understand that alot of the features and functions both service offer are clearly worth a yearly subscription.

Threesix5808d ago

"You and Blaze think it's stupid but think XBL is better when they make pay $50 for multiplayer ONLY? Yes, PSN+ is an option but there are some feature worth paying for. With XBL, you either pay to play MP or you don't pay and can't play MP."

I would say I have no problem paying only $4 a month for an online system that is moderated effectively, has a more accessible friend system, gives me access to XBL arcade deals/discounts, doesn't make me have to go out and set up a blue tooth headset to talk to anyone, especially considering if you include the cost of the Xbox headset in the 50 dollars, and of course has cross game party chat which lets me talk to my online friends whether we're on different games or the same game. 50 dollars for just multiplayer you say? I disagree.

PSN+ is an alright concept if you do plan on getting that many games in a year AND plan on being a long time subscriber, but the fact that once your subscription ends you won't have access to those games anymore puts a big damper on it. Not to mention, having to pay for PS1 games that could be played on the earliest version of the console if you owned the original game. Glad I still have one of those versions.

IdleLeeSiuLung5808d ago

I think people are missing the point. People aren't just paying XBL to play games online, they are paying to be part of the XBL community.

That is what MS has built, they have built a social gaming experience that PS never planned for. If Sony did, they would have included a headset in it.

Fact of the matter is, people complain why PS3 has more value in almost every aspect even online, yet a significant amount of people still choose the more expensive platform? It is because, the free option might be fine for a large portion of the people, but there are plenty of others who want what MS is offering.

It's like Apple is offering you a MacBook. It functions just like any PC, and in fact is just a PC underneath. Yet, people pay 3x as much for the same thing... Why?

With that said, PSN+ is a nice valued addition, but is just that an addition and not a necessity. I also don't think xross game chat at this point is a wise idea as it ensures a fragmented user base. You want a lot of people to have a headset to make it worthwhile. Overall, I think it is a little too late for Sony at this stage to be doing this and they should have followed the MS model from the start. It would have been better for Sony and in some ways for the consumer.

mastiffchild5808d ago

No idle. People feel they HAVE to pay because it's true. Community comes a distant second and, frankly, PSN+ has nothing whatsoever in common with a Gold sub apart from being around the same price. If your only console is a 360 you are BOUND to pay to play online as it's your only choice. It's like having a gun put to your head and if you want to play Halo/Gears on line with your mates you pay it. Sure there's a great community(in places) on Live but to say it wasn't born from MS making people pay unfairly is nonsense.

By the same yardstick PSN+ is a pile of crap , imo, because it's just not appealing feature wise for the price. If you crave the struff on offer good luck but at least the rest of us don't have to pay for it and can game on line for free without the terror of bloody XGC(which is the biggest single reason I gave up playing TF2 with my mates on 360 in actual fact and, to me, is just a sign of how impatient and rude we all are these days. Seriously, I'd rather wait a few minutes to talk top people outside my game and give those involved with the game OR the conversation the courtesy of my full attention. that way I don't ruin anyone's precious gaming time)-something which is only important because it's on one and not the other.

Whatever, PSN+ will live or die on it's own merits(or mack of) and has nothing to do with PSN or Live as it's a totally different concept to either right now. It may well be a bit crap but it's not a rip off and you don't HAVE to even think about it if you don't want.

HaVoK3085808d ago

Gaming is a privalage. Not a right. Vote with your dollars. Niether, Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, Publishers, or Developers owe you a damn thing. If you pay you choose to pay! It is as simple as that. You dont HAVE to play games you choose to.

IdleLeeSiuLung5808d ago

Havok above me got it right.

Nobody is forcing anyone to buy a 360 or a PS3. You can choose to NOT buy the 360, stop using the 360 or even sell/trade it in for a PS3 anytime you want. Clearly there are a significant amount of people that prefer the 360 as well as there are people that prefer the PS3.

Nothing wrong with that! The only thing wrong is thinking your subject idea of value should be applied to everyone else!!!

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5808d ago
5808d ago Replies(9)
DA_SHREDDER5808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

The xbox live blades are fugly, and confusing to new comers. Anyone who says different obviously rather go through menus than have a simplified and gorgeous experience. My Wipeout HD Dynamic Theme makes the 360 Blades look majorly obsolete.

digoutyoursoul85808d ago

i've read some of your stuff on thebitbag.com. it doesnt have blades, the nxe doesnt have blades.

the wipeout hd theme is great and even better because it was free :-)

Eiffel5808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

Actually it does have blades. Hit the guide button then tada.

I personalty found it easier to navigate through NXE than the XMB. Never was a fan of the XMB.

Raf1k15808d ago

The XMB is designed as an interface to be used in most of Sony's products for improved interconnectivity. If it was designed solely for the PS3 they'd have probably changed it quite a bit already.

insomnium5808d ago

can be considered difficult to navigate? WOW!

duplissi5808d ago

eiffel, did you know that aesthetics aside both the xmb and nxe are almost the same?

xmb: you can navigate left or right to find a category then up and down within that category.

nxe: you can navigate up or down to find a category then left and right within that category.

for me personally though when it comes to stuff like music and videos on the xbox... well it sucks you have to press a like 4 times and have to wait for the stupid zune bullshit to show up before you can play anything... the xmb is sooo much quicker and better for that.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5808d ago
extermin8or5808d ago

I agree with you I love my ps3 and will probably get this as I will use the features however a XMB redesign is due and was rumoured (maybe its a suprise? I can hope lol) anyway guys he is right and if a ps3 fansite is having ago at sony well.... I like the psn but I want more I want it to have the ps3 feel all these brilliant and awesome exclusives but to win this sony need a online service ad GUI (graphical user interface) more like the 360. Well part of me thinks this new psn+ could be a guise for steam? I mean valve sure changed their tune fast didn't they? hmm im sure psn+ will evolve over the next few months into something much better

Dee_915808d ago

"There is nothing more annoying than seeing a friend playing another game on PSN, and hoping he has his/her message notifications turned on so they'll see the text message i just sent them to join me in a game of Warhawk, when i could just give them a voice call and be done with it before I could have had half of that text messaged dialed up on the PS3 keypad."

Well i thought thats what the chat-room was for ?

FACTUAL evidence5808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

with this article. People have been waiting and waiting for features, and sony keeps beating around the bush with these poo-put updates. It's really abysmal waiting for a firmware update just to find out it has NOTHING useful for your gaming experiences. I'm through waiting. Sony I'm done with you this gen, not trying to boycott or anything, but IMO you did not really deliver in the online part this gen. The games were good though.

I guess I'm going to buy XBL again. Sony, no doubt I'll be getting the PS4, but for now I'm going to put more into the wii, and 360 for the next 2 years. It's been a good run. Sad to say but I have no hope for you guys this gen. I'm sick of waiting for something that's probably not going to happen for the next few years.

Monk3y5808d ago

but i PERSONALLY like XMB, its simple, clean and haves nothing i dont need cuz tbh.. consoles are for gaming not to chill out in Dashboard/XMB

strickers5808d ago

XMB is superb.Show me a menu that efficient,that covers such a large amount of content.It's super fast and has fully customisable icon/wallpaper with 1000s available free.360 dash is slow and convoluted and most of it unnecessary.The other thing PSN does is free content including browser and iplayer and larger player counts in games(32 +).It also has less lag in my experience and I've has less disconnects in proportion to time spent on it.It's good enough that I now know 5 people(including me)who've cancelled Live and just play on PSN.
As for cross game chat,I wouldn't mind it but waaay too much fuss over it.Between that and the 32 player count,I choose players.When I play Warhawk,Killzone or any shooter,I play with maximum players,it's just better.I've tried the smaller games/levels and I enjoy it less.
I don't want PSN+ either but if you look at what you get it's much,much better value than Live,which basically charges you for free services on PSN/PC.

willie325808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

I was pumped for the service. Now, I do feel it is lacking because of one major problem. What actual games will we be allowed to download for free? I bet it will be the bottom of the barrel games that no one really wants, or already owns. What about the free DLC? Will the stuff that people want, such as, COD map packs, Killzone 3 packs, be the actual DLC offered to us? If these packs were given with the service, it would be a day one purchase. However, I highly doubt it the more I read about the service. Sony is going to hand pick what they will give to us. I am curious if the "Stranglehold" online pack will be offered for free...lol.

Edit-I would rather see one free game a month of our choice.

Christopher5808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

[see below]

Christopher5808d ago

Honestly, I just don't give a rats arse if there's a feature you really want and it's missing. You know what's the most annoying thing about not having X-game chat? Hearing someone whine about it missing from PSN each month.

The _only_ people who hype this feature, whether it's coming in X.X update or not are the same people who write bitch articles when a firmware update comes and it's not present.

Get over it. Go play XBL. Do something other than just continuing to complain about it. Let your money and wallet do the talking.

Microsoft Xbox 3605808d ago

The one hour trial offer for any game sounds awesome though.

AAACE55808d ago

Sony said it only does everything! So eventually it will. You never know... eventually it will probably be some gamers girlfriends and they will put a different type of hard drive in that slot! Lol... Just joking! It will come soon enough!

5808d ago
gtamike5808d ago

oh well what good is xbl if they have no games :)
Sony is the best!!!!!!

Raz5808d ago

How about giving PSN users around the world a uniform experience, instead of causing us to grind our teeth in rage at all the perks enjoyed by those outside of North America? Seriously...WTF?

Tomdc5808d ago

services > features.

They start offering to many features not offered to regular consumers people would feel cheated. It is a subscription model for games really that is great value if your somebody that plays a lot of psn titles.

You want to pay for features rather than them being dished out for free?

acere5808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

yea yea yea what u say yea ^^^we are the same ,thatz right baby we have a choice you guys dont.

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 5808d ago
CDbiggen5808d ago

Now entering N4G during E3. Abandon all hope ye who enter.

fr0sty5808d ago

oh yeah, because calling a company out on failed promises is such an immature fanboy thing to do. so typically n4g, huh?

pocketaces115808d ago

Why is everyone talking about these promises the only mension I've seen with promises of voice chat etc. were not official it were sites looking for hits. PS3's only official word I ever saw and sorry don't have proof right now was that there is copy write problems with the technology and they need to find a way around it that's why they can't have music build into their games with ought the individual developer putting it in manually unlike xbox which has it built into the system it's all copy right issues.

Christopher5808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

What promise? Show me one article or quote where Sony has said "we're going to bring cross-game chat to you."

unrealgamer585808d ago

It's been announced... chill

"Where are our TV network partnerships, cross game chat, party systems, and all the other things that make people think Xbox Live is worth paying for?"

Tv networks? You mean like sky tv or are you talking about tv networks on the video store

I'll give you the party system but the rest.... no

fr0sty5808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

ESPN? and no, it wasn't announced. they recently denied it is coming with the ps+ firmware update.

unrealgamer585808d ago (Edited 5808d ago )

Obviously Ps+ will have an expanded version of xgc while others will have a limited version.

Espn? That's you're argument, Dude Its netflix all over again give It a year ( And before you say "a year?", You and I both know why that Is)

Look I'm a little disappointed about ps+ too, but It's been stated that the service will grow with more features over time.

digoutyoursoul85808d ago

act like the womens rights movement lol

"we want this and that, some of this and fucking all of that and we want it now, not tommorow, now"

swice5808d ago

"....but....you PROMISED!!"

"I'm working on it! Sit DOWN!"

hardcorehippiez5808d ago

classic billy connelly quote right there but so fits the way things are in here. + bubble

Prcko5808d ago

ok man,now say me what would you say to xbox360??
Sony is a god man,so stfu and play exclusive games when you can!!!

digoutyoursoul85808d ago

they are a company, not a god.;-)

Show all comments (129)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio12d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing12d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9212d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit12d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing12d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9212d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
15d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted15d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8515d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele14d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk14d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay14d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14d ago
Athlon10115d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit14d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg14d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10114d ago (Edited 14d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14914d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay14d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn215d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn214d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown14d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay14d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay14d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac14d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger15d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300015d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde14d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde14d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)