All Channels
Popular
230°

Amazon Prices Kinect At $149

Kotaku: While Microsoft has yet to release pricing details for the Kinect motion control camera, retailers are having no such hesitation, Amazon now joining GameStop in charging $149 for the device.

UPDATE: It's $149 at Walmart as well.

GWAVE5821d ago

*sigh*

So, Buy a 360 S and Kinect for $450?

360 Kinect is now the most expensive console on the market. Plot twist!

tdogchristy905821d ago

kinect will work with old 360s....so for most it's still only 150.

Al Bundy5821d ago

MS's target audience for Kinect don't have old 360s.

eggbert5821d ago

$210 to play kinectimals if you already have a 360

$510 if you don't have a 360.

crazyclown5821d ago

I agree will Al Bundy

The end result is that this will not succeed as management intended

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5821d ago
Raptura5821d ago

PS3 299 + 129 for the full Move bundle = 430.

Ain't much cheaper. Plus who HAS to buy these things?

falviousuk5821d ago

itll be $180 for MOVe as you need a second move controller on some games as well, and this only covers 1 person playing, continue spending money for each additional player.

poopface15821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

it is now the number 2 bestseller in videogames.... I cant beleive people are buying it right now. WTF.

I understand the new xbox at number 1, and the arcade at number 3, but kinect at number 2?? Thats weird

But GWAVE, PS3 and Move would be more expensive if you want to play with more than one person, or play one of the games that requires 2 of the glowing controlers. They are both expensive , and Im not looking forward to either.

peeps5821d ago

"I understand the new xbox at number 1, and the arcade at number 3, but kinect at number 2?? Thats weird"

does seem crazy. I'll prob pick it up eventually but right now it looks terrible. I wonder who is actually pre ordering it cus the line up is pretty poor imo. Full of casual games. So you may think, well the casual gamer of course! but in all fairness the 'casual' games on the wii actually look much better in terms of content and value

mrv3215821d ago

PS3+MOVE= $400
360+Kinect=$300 at it's most basic
360S+Kinect=$450

falviousuk5821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

PS3+Move bundle+Navigator+second MOve controller = $480
which only gives you a single player experience

Wikkid6665821d ago

Add controllers for the family.

$80 for each addition family member... oh wait. Don't for get the $30 charger station.

So is $150 bad for an all in one device... Nope.

Blacktric5821d ago

Yeah 150 dollars is not bad for an all in device but considering it can only works well with "casual" games it's not worth it. Go bury your heads in the sands now.

OSU_Gamer5821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

@mrv321
PS3+MOVE (without secondary controller and only for one player) = $400

I'm not saying Kinect pricing is any good, but don't ignore the facts.

Blacktric5821d ago

Flopect should be more appropriate. A new 250 gig 360 + Flopect = 450 dollars. A new 250 gig PS3 with Move starter kit along with Navigation Controller = 430 dollars. For 450 dollars you get a newly released revision of a console that's been infamous about getting errors frequently with an outdated dvd drive and you have to pay to play online and get newest demos and you also get an accessory that lets you play just casual games only for few exceptions. And for 430 you get a brand new PS3 Slim with free online and blu-ray drive and a motion controller that gives you 1-1 tracking.

poopface15821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

Go have a look at amazon.com and see that its already selling like crazy.

Also, the 250GB PS3 is 350(not 300 like you seem to pretend) + 100 for move starter kit is 450. That doesnt even include the subcontroller( an extra 30$), and some games require TWO GLOWING CONTROLLERS, which is another 50$. All that for only one person... thats not exactly a good deal either.

Your math is pretty bad. 350 for a 250GB PS3, 100 for move starter kit, and 30 for the sub controller = 480$. And you still cant play the games that require two main controllers, like the archery game that it shows on the front of the game box that you get with the starter kit, cant even play archery until you get another main control(which costs another 50$).

edit see archery needs 2 glowing remotes to even be able to play it:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Blacktric5821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

My math is bad? Are you a retard? If my math was bad I would've done a bad calculation. Instead of saying your information is bad you are trying to make people look like retards just like yourself. Typical. Let's take a look at the matter at hand. You got 1-1 true tracking that works with "every" hardcore game and casual game out there on one hand, and the other hand you only got a friggin camera that is works meh with casual games and will never work with hardcore games. Oh and BTW most of the people that shops at Amazon as you may not know are Americans. And since most of them are big supporter for Xbox, no surprise there. They'll even buy the sh*t of Aaron Greenberg.

MNicholas5821d ago

I'd be very impressed if Microsoft sells any at $150.

That's a heck or a price for a webcam.

Claudinho695821d ago

with no blu ray and no free online play

Parapraxis5821d ago

I'm sure they'll have a cheap bundle @ 299$.

Megahurtz19865821d ago

You have to buy a seperate power supply for the old 360's to use Kinect but not with the new one. Hahahaha O Microsoft you guys are the Worst

OSU_Gamer5821d ago

if you buy Kinect by itself, it comes with the power supply. You don't have to make a separate purchase for it.

Xeoset5821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

What if all these kids want to play Wave?

To play four players on the 360, with Kinect: 1 x ~$150 (One camera)
To play four players on the PS3, with Wave: 4 x ~$80 + 1 x $~40 (One camera + 4 pairs of controllers)

Face it, this argument is more than invalid. The 360 is now the cheapest console to play on if you're looking for this pointless, motion based gameplay.

What's more, the hell are you arguing about it for in the first place?

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5821d ago
-Mezzo-5821d ago

Thats almost as much as a Wii, SKIP

kaos_fish II5821d ago

where the hell do you buy your Wii's that cost more than $400?

-Mezzo-5821d ago

i was talking about Kinect, not the whole package.

Vip3r5821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

Ouch. Bit much just to flap your arms.

tdogchristy905821d ago

When looking at the ps3 items the controller, eye toy, and navigation thing.....it's about 150 as well. In my eyes having both ms and sony items at 150 means it'll be all about content instead of price point....at least initially.

5821d ago Replies(2)
jack_burt0n5821d ago

@tdog
look how much wii accessories are and how much they sell, u can get into it with a full game for $99 thats all people will care about.

and for us hardcore its just another controller like a dualshock.

jay25821d ago

This price is getting too soilid for my liking, no deal.

Show all comments (62)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia1584d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1584d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161584d ago (Edited 1584d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1584d ago
CrimsonWing691584d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1584d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791584d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1583d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1584d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1584d ago (Edited 1584d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1584d ago (Edited 1584d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1584d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1583d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1583d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1582d ago (Edited 1582d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1582d ago
Aloymetal1584d ago (Edited 1584d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1583d ago (Edited 1583d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101584d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1584d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101584d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1584d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101584d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721584d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1584d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1584d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1584d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1584d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721761d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1761d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1761d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901761d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1761d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1761d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1760d ago
TheEnigma3131761d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1761d ago (Edited 1761d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1761d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1761d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1761d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771761d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1761d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901760d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1760d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901760d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1760d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)