All Channels
Popular
270°

Microsoft Kinect vs PlayStation Move vs Nintendo Wii

With the unveiling of both Kinect and PlayStation Move at E3 2010, all three big video games console players are into the motion control business and, if you'd always quite admired what the Nintendo Wii could do, you might suddenly find yourself in a quandary as to which is the right system for you.

Read Full Story >>
pocket-lint.com
deadreckoning6665817d ago (Edited 5817d ago )

Wii wins for simple fact that Galaxy 2 is better than than any Move or Kinnect game that I've seen at E3. Its all about the games baby!

@Mushroomwig- I don't have to be at E3 to know that I would take Galaxy 2 over any Move/Kinect game that was shown. Its common sense.

mushroomwig5817d ago

So you were at E3, right? I mean you've clearly playe the Move and Kinnect games otherwise you have no fucking right to make that statement.

WhittO5817d ago (Edited 5817d ago )

Why Kinect will fail:

- It has to be light to play Kinect
- Have to stand up
- Large area required, especially for all the flinging around of your body lol
- Expensive to buy
- No Games worth $60! (Not even worth $30)
- STILL lag/Delay/Bugs which render most games unplayable..even though launching soon.
- Need a Hardrive to play (Sorry Arcaders)

randomwiz5817d ago

i dont think the lag is really that significant, since most of the titles shown don't require quick movement

Bigpappy5817d ago

Maybe I should have waited to see what you guy had to say before I spent my $150. /s But really, I just pre-ordered Kinect for $149.99 from Game stop. I will have one this holiday season.

WhittO5817d ago (Edited 5817d ago )

lol, almost every game requires quick movement, and 90% of MS "innovative" line-up are sports/party/dance games...quick movement might just be important for those.

Has anyone noticed aswell that the promo on Youtube has almost no lag input to what they are doing?! More acting and lying...

Watching the Gamespot Live on E3 floor and MS wouldn't let them film connect..

alb18995817d ago

is not more expensive the more witch is 99 plus two par of controls to play with friends and family is like 300!!

With kinect jus 149 so is not that expensive!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5817d ago
Trroy5817d ago (Edited 5817d ago )

I think Mario (meaning almost any Mario) is a good game regardless of motion control. SM64 and SMS were awesome too.

The Wii motion controls had nothing to do with it, IMO. The genious of Miyamoto did.

nveenio5817d ago

Absolutely true. And the same is true about any game from Sony that gets Move support. The game has to be awesome on its own...Move won't make a game a success (though it can certainly ruin it).

pippoppow5817d ago

Yes. It's all about the games and how well motion controls are implimented. The thing is Sony's Move will cater to more types of gamers.

MysticStrummer5817d ago

I think what you mean is, it's all about games you want to play. I haven't played a Mario game in about 20 years. I have no urge to start again now.

WildArmed5817d ago

+1
I completely agree.
But I can relate to those who still love mario.
But I'm definitely not one of them.
I think he is one of the greatest gaming characters ever.
but I think his games have lost their relevance to me.

So.. I simply can't go on saving peach anymore.
She needs to stop begging for attention by getting kidnapped every time! lol

But if there is a reason i regret giving away my Wii, it is:
Brawl (laggy online, but fun as hell in a ofline 4-way deathmatch!)
Zelda games (com'on!)
metriod
Dragon Quest (assuming it comes to Wii).

Nitrowolf25817d ago

Socom 4?
LBP2?
Heavy Rain?
GT5?

finbars755817d ago

You must be 16 years old with ridiclious reponse like that.Nice try Mario Gaylaxy2 plzzz same as playing mario galaxy1 you just have new drill.WHOOOOPIDY DOO DA DAY.Idiot.Play a real game that has balls in not a mario vagina.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5817d ago
Nitrowolf25817d ago

yeah sony already revealed a hardcore line up, Socom 4, LBP2, GT5, Heavy rain
i expect games like Infamouse 2 to get support and if it isn't already (whihch i think it is) killzone 3

SilverSlug5817d ago

I love PS3, not caring about Move at all. Too expensive.

WildArmed5817d ago

yeah i was hoping the controllers would be 30~40 bucks each, so buying two wouldn't force me to sell my last kidney

nickjkl5817d ago

isnt the wii motion plus plus wii mote and sub contoller 70 dollars

and the move is more precise and it only increases the price by 10 dollars

hoops5817d ago

Wii wins because every Wii comes with the controls and EVERY game has the motion support

finbars755817d ago

The wii loses because every game it comes with has lag even with plus.Im glad this machine is my wifes I would be ashamed to say I have actually played it.NOthing from what i have seen has 1-1 motion.Oh and the games that are out if thats what you call games.What a waste of money.Im glad my wife has a job as well because it didnt come out of my check.

Parapraxis5817d ago (Edited 5817d ago )

I understand the point you are making Hoops.
And if Nintendo hadn't bundled the Wiimote & Nunchuck with the Wii, motion controls as we know them today would NOT have existed.
It was a HUGE gamble and it paid off ten fold for them.

Kudos to Nintendo for making that giant leap of faith, just as Sony did with Blu-ray and the cell.

Sony is making the right move here and going after the hardcore crowd that they already have along with some casual crowd they are likely to pick up.

MS is going in direct competition with Nintendo (well the Nintendo of the first few years of the Wii, they are totally nailing the HC thing this year as they LEARNED they needed to at last E3), aiming MOSTLY at the casual crowd.

MS is going after the Nintendo leftovers with a device far less appealing and FAR FAR less precise than Nintendo's controllers.

Maybe MS hasn't realized it yet, but marketing and the "illusion" of a good product will only get you so far.

When the consumers actually get their hands on the device and realize that they've been had, not only will they be bitter, there will be little to no software sales generated for it, and it will die. Thus giving MS the honour of being the first company to dethrone Nintendo as having the worst peripheral for a console since the VirtualBoy.

Kinect is VirtualBoy 2.0 and right now it looks like it will fail just as hard, if not harder.

The only hope is if MS clues in before it's too late and introduces controllers to go with Kinect, if not....oh dear.

gtamike5817d ago

Have some bubbles Sir Ken, looks like you need some ;)

Show all comments (49)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia1579d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1579d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161579d ago (Edited 1579d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1579d ago
CrimsonWing691579d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1579d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791579d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1579d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1579d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1579d ago (Edited 1579d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1579d ago (Edited 1579d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1579d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1578d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1578d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1577d ago (Edited 1577d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1577d ago
Aloymetal1579d ago (Edited 1579d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1578d ago (Edited 1578d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101579d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1579d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101579d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1579d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101579d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721579d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1579d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1579d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1579d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1579d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721756d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1756d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1756d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901756d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1756d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1756d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1756d ago
TheEnigma3131756d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1756d ago (Edited 1756d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1756d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1756d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1756d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771756d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1756d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901756d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1755d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901755d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1755d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)