All Channels
Popular
250°

XBOX 360 Model Guide & Hardware Chart

With the introduction of a new XBOX 360 model, it's time to take a look at how things have progressed over the last 5 years. Unlike Sony, who remove features with each revision, Microsoft has been adding features (for the most part).

Should you wait a week and buy a New XBOX 360, or head to the stores now and get an Arcade for $150?

Read Full Story >>
hardcoreware.net
GreenRingOfLife5803d ago

This is definitely how a new console should be

You should ADD features not take them away

good job Microsoft

Dragun6195803d ago (Edited 5803d ago )

Well,Sony took out PS2 backwards compatibility in order to lower the cost. And Sony took the Other OS out in order to prevent hacks from happening which both are understandable, I mean, People were calling for Price cut and Sony doesn't want to go through a Hacking breakthrough scene like the PSP. If you want those features so bad, Go look for a Original 60gb PS3.

You know Microsoft's pretty late for the party. Every PS3 already has Wifi and a Hard drive. Plus you can upgrade your hard drive to any size you want, even up to 1TB.

Cueil5802d ago

how about several usb slots and multi card slots? They did it for the price and that was alright since it didn't take away anything significant from the experience. However they did continue to take away from the system and I think they are the only company whose ever done that in a major way... Sega took out the front headphone jack on their Genesis but that's the only one I can think of off the top of my head.

MetalZombie5802d ago (Edited 5802d ago )

As far as removing the PS2 BC it wasn't a cost reducing measure, shortly after they did it, one of the Sony execs admited the cost savings from removing the ps2 hardware were insignificant and the real reason was to spur sales of PS3 titles, becuase they found that more people were buying more PS2 games, including the cheaper PS2 counter parts and playing them on their PS3s. I wish I still had a link to the article.

Sony seriously needs to stop removing functionality and if they put PS2 BC back into a slim, I would buy one tomorrow.

Close_Second5802d ago

...that the general consumer won't be buying either console because of what use to be present. They'll be buying it for the features it still or now has.

On another note, I wonder how many people are sitting there with the wireless adapter and optional larger HDD for the existing 360 and saying they think its great its now all included. Keep in mind the wireless adapter and larger HDD came to around $350 NZD.

SOAD5802d ago

Dude, as far as cost goes, it sucks to live in New Zealand and Australia. But that's only as far as cost. Also, there are huge lethal spiders.

PS3 Supremacy5802d ago

Ha the sad thing is even after the stripping of the features, the new 360 still isn't on par with the capabilities of the PS3.

Alcon Caper5803d ago

composite and hdmi and i will give them a cookie.

lowlight5803d ago

For games, you won't notice a difference since their native resolutions are low enough for Composite bandwidth to be totally sufficient.

But for anything that is true HDTV (1080p), you are definitely going to want a pure digital connection.

Independent_Charles5802d ago

i notice the differance between HDMI and COMP. on my xbox(HDMI) my picture is really crisp on my hdtv but and my dads xbox(COMP.)the pixels seem to not be as sharp no matter what setting the tv is on HDMI makes the differance. plus playing through hdmi you can select the native resolution on the tv which cuts down on the jaggies a bit, so overall i see a differance.

Kalowest5803d ago

Off topic: lmao, time to give lowlight a cookie, or at least a piece. Now let me try, Composite can go up to 1080i,but looks better at 720p, while the HDMI can get Full-HD(1080p).
ON topic: i cant wait to buy the 360S, i can finally upgrade from my 20GB.

Cueil5802d ago

it's not a bandwidth issue it's a license issue... VGA can go far higher in resolution and so can either of those connections

Red-Dead-Roar5802d ago

composite can do 480i
component can do 1080i
hdmi can do 1080p +++

GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT!

M-Easy5802d ago

Umm you guys are all wrong. Composite (the yellow video connection from the standard yellow, red, & white cables) can only do 480i. You meant "Component" (the red, green & blue) video that can go up to 1080p but loses quality do to its analog nature. I seriously hope I don't have to explain what HDMI can do in 2010.

ElementX5803d ago

I'm buying one this week if I can find one.

Philaroni5802d ago

Ok this is what I do not get, they said the Xbox can do 3D but I thought you needed HDMI 1.3 to do it. ATM Xbox has 1.2 so is the fact that you will need a new Xbox S to do 3D the reason they are quiet on it?

If anyone can clear this up that would be great I can't seem for the life of me to find any hard details on the subject.

Ri0tSquad5802d ago

It doesn't seem MS is focused on pushing native 3D games on their console any time soon. I wouldn't look forward to it if I were you.

Philaroni5802d ago

I'm not with MS, I know 3D won't be a huge deal till around 2013. Just wondering after hearing it at EA's event it seems odd for MS to not at least say it can.

SOAD5802d ago

It's not the same level of 3D that the PS3 can do. There's a debate as to whether the 360 can do stereoscopic 3D as opposed to the to a basic 3D whose name escapes me at the moment.

Show all comments (33)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio5d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing5d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster925d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit5d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing5d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster925d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay7d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn28d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn27d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown7d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay7d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay7d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac7d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger8d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30008d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde8d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde7d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent759d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_6d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.