All Channels
Popular
390°

Who Do You Think Won E3?

Now that we have all seen the press events from Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo – who would you say is your clear cut winner of E3 right now?

We’re interested in hearing your thoughts on each company, so be sure to cast your vote on our poll & let us know what you think!

The best comments will be read on our Vice Weekly E3 recap show tonight.

Read Full Story >>
gamingvice.net
Nitrowolf25811d ago

def not MS

SONY had huge announcements so i say that they won
Nintendo did an awesome job

you know now that i sit here typing this i can't help but feel like MS is trying to swap with Nintendo

targetting casual gamers, and usually its nintendo that have a bad show

Nike5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

I think we can all agree that Sony and Nintendo both had arguably the best E3 conferences imaginable. Great looking games, features and hardware all around. Sure, it was a bit disappointing not seeing Resistance 3 or Uncharted 3 (hell, for that matter, I didn't hear anything about the multiplatform ventures of Bungie, Insomniac or Respawn), but the announcements that were made were great.

I repeat once again, Microsoft: TAKE NOTES. This has unabashedly been the worst Microsoft conference ever. EVER.

@Nitrowolf: Agreed. It feels like MS is going in the opposite direction while Nintendo gets back into form. I honestly don't know WHO Microsoft were trying to target. Gears 3, Halo Reach and MGS Rising looked great, but that was about 15% of their total conferences time, and was lost in all the Kinect psycho-babble.

ForROME5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

Ummm no not ever, worst cfc ever belongs to this statement

launching at a price point of "599.99"

Thats the worse cfc I ever saw

SONY, IMO won this E3

SillySundae5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

I mean c'mon.

They have a TIGER!

logikil5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

Whats sad is that MS has traditionally had pretty damn good conferences. It seems like they have just had a crisis of identity. That Kinect component of the conference should have been what got separated out with Mondays conference being the one that concentrated on the Core and 3rd party relationships. That to me was the biggest oddity. MS always totes their 3rd party relationships, and that all went to Sony this year.

Either way, welcome back Nintendo. Thanks for making me a kid again :).

FlipMode5811d ago

Nintendo won.

Nintendo: A - Not a perfect score just because the Zelda presentation sucked, but the game still looked great, the pacing was fantastic and they really catered to the hardcore announcing game after game, Kirby Epic Yarn I liked the most, followed by Kid Icarus, Donkey Kong and Epic Mickey. Plus the DS looked great

Microsoft: D+ - Just too much of the conference had Kinect in it, Halo Reach looked fantastic, Gears for some reason didn't impress me much, I felt like I've seen it before.

Sony B: - Bad pacing and a lot of boring moments of Sony just droning on, and I don't care about your ad campaign or your partnership with Coke, but at the end they had a big surprise, Portal, looking forward to that, loved the first one, TM was great, the Killzone 3 footage had me like , LBP looked cool and Kevin Butler cracked me up.

darthv725811d ago

MS didnt do anything surprising except maybe the reveal of the slim 360. We knew the natal/kinect was going to be shown and it was with more than just the red ball game. Other than that it wasnt as big as some hyped it to be.

Sony had some big reveals with so much move/3d stuff but again it wasnt unexpected as we knew that was their focus leading up to e3. The big thing for me was twisted metal.

Nintendo had many surprises and lots of games. Ones we were expecting and ones we werent. The 3ds was a show stopper for them much more than the slim 360.

Nitrowolf25811d ago

ForROME
at least that conference they still had announcement of first parties game
this was wtf is this crap nothing interesting at all, Sony 05 conference was wtf that expensive as he11 i'm not buying that

N4g_null5811d ago

Was really expecting more games with move in them and not a lot of trash talking. MS lost a lot of respect for having trash talkers in their camp yet SONY has done the same thing with their actor and to make matters worst he was not funny and it was all like a bad inside joke. Then all the marketing talk, it was like they had nothing to show.

So you come out with twisted metal, the sorcery game which was a lot of waggle, and portal that's it! really and some GT5 video! wow!

I wonder what they will show next E3, this is going to be a long 5 years for the PS3 and it seems the xbox has already ran out of games.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5811d ago
Will-UK5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

Ms conference was boring, nintendo had great annoucements but sony did the best with twisted metal and GT date.

lelo2play5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

Only possible winner ... EA with their show.

MS and Sony had disappointing shows. Nintendo did not see and don't really care. Ubisoft show was OK (was expecting to see beyond good and evil 2).

Surprises so far... Crytek's game for the X360.

... but since this is N4G... the majority will say Sony won.

LycanSoldier5811d ago

It's nice to see someone else that thinks this site is very Sony bias.

andthensum5811d ago

XBoxkings.com is---> that way.

Anyway, before the Xbox fanboy rudely interrupted our celebration, yeah, Sony and Nintendo did great jobs. The Xbox fanboys on this site are absolutely delusional. I've never seen nothing like this. Every other site is saying Nintendo and Sony destroyed the conference this year.

Oh and Portal 2 on Ps3!!! Woot!

Redempteur5811d ago

pff you're missing information

"i didn't see nintendo presentation but that couldn't have been good "
is basicaly what you're saying ...

And that make your comment pointless

logikil5811d ago

It goes to Nintendo in my eyes, though Sony had a strong second. Ms while interesting, just didn't get it done....and they could have left the Cirque at home.

FlipMode5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

wrong spot

TheDeadMetalhead5811d ago

Sony and Nintendo both won. Seriously, both conferences were just too awesome to pick one winner.

ABizzel15811d ago

Sony: A-. Sony had everything you could want, albeit some games that were RUMORED to show up didn't. But Sony's conference was still full of announcements and every demo was played out perfectly. Talking was constantly interrupted with videos to keep viewers interested, and all the speakers got straight to the point. They showed plenty of games, and showed how most of the good Wii 3rd party games are going to hit PS3. Sony had complete developer support from EA, and Ubi, which shows that things are going to be bright for Sony over the next couple of years. Not a perfect show, but very good. PS Gabe moment was priceless :)

Nintendo: B+. Nintendo showed a lot, but that's because they haven't shown anything over the last couple of years worth getting excited over. I'm glad that putting out new versions of almost all their franchises, however, I don't like the fact that most of them are going to be side scrollers, nothing wrong with side scrollers, but come on. 3DS is basically an upgrade to the DS, and not exactly what I was expecting, but I'm excited none the less. It's about time Nintendo.

Microsoft: C+. MS had good games there, it's just that the huge focus on Kinect without the emphasis on hardcore games, caused a backlash among most gamers. Halo Reach, Gears 3, and Metal Gear Rising looked great, but that was it. Better luck next year guys.

Redempteur5811d ago

no real winner for me ..but TWO losers ...ubisoft and microsoft

NO beyond good and evil 2 ?
kinectimals ? ( seriously ??)

WTF ..

Ubisoft and microsoft tied for the worst show ..

siyrobbo5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

i'd say nintendo>sony> > > > > > > > > > > MS

Nintendo showed off new hardware and quite a few new games, not just casual rubbish either for a change!

Sony had a good line-up of software, move showing wasnt too bad, a bit too many third party games shown for my liking.

MS showed halo reach and gears, announced 1 new game and then showed off kinetic. Despite my thinking the move was a more of a wiimote rip-off than kinetic, it was way way way too similar to the wii. Liked the slim 360 announcement. overall for all the song and dance made pre-show it was a total bomb. Kinetic didn't really do anything that was shown in the video last year. They showed no arcade games, nothing about indie games, nothing about LIVE improvement, nothing about windows phone gaming apart from a little tidbit, i hope to god for MS's sake they are holding stuff back for gamescom and TGS, but im not going to hold my breath, not anymore

also im in the opinion that RARE should officially be renamed SHOVEL-RARE

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5811d ago
ThatCanadianGuy5811d ago

Honestly, i made get flamed for this..

But i really think Nintendo came through this year.Just amazing game after amazing game! Compared to last years joke of an E3, they have my vote for front runner.

Sony did really good too.Gabe newell on stage praising PS3 was more of a megaton than anything i've ever seen MS pull off.Twisted metal sealed the deal too.

Microsoft..just..lol (Shakes head in disbelief)

Rainstorm815811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

I agree but.

Nintendo = A- They win because of the 3DS im not a handheld user and i want one & look at the games coming for it! i mean wow!

Sony = B+ They showed the most games relevant on any home console.
and Gabe Newell on stage was a megaton!

MS = D- Showed Kinect.

LordMarius5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

Nintendo => Sony >>>>>>> MS

Nike5811d ago

I was shaking my head so much from shame after MS's conference I thought I'd snap my neck.

Sarcasm5811d ago

It's a good toss up between Sony and Nintendo. I however, being the Sony supporter I am, is most impressed by Nintendo. They have turned things around this year. *gasp* it's like they're actually thinking about the Gamers!

Microsoft on the other hand, is full of crap.

Nintendo - A
Sony - A-
Microsoft - Kinectdeeznuts

zoks3105811d ago

I see where you are coming from, but to me Nintendo is hit or miss and people grow out of them. I did not care for their games because they are games i had fun with 10-15 years ago (Golden eye, DK, and Kerby), Zelda to me was good but nothing to really brag about.

I'm an HD, 5.1 surround sound guy/hardcore gamer, i want what Sony is offering. HD hardcore games, even their motion games looks hardcore, and that's why they won for me. Everything they showed was meant for the HD gamer of this gen, not some game i played when i was 9 years old.

But for people that stuck with Nintendo all these years, i can see why you would view their show as the best, if i was 9 years old and i saw Nintendo's E3 show my jaws would be on the floor.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5811d ago
PandemicPrawn05811d ago

Sony in my opinion. As they gave gamers what they wanted.

Nintendo did very well also. The 3DSI is going to dominate the handheld market without question.

Microsoft? Ummm yeah. Not so much.

Fiona5811d ago

For me
1. Nintendo
2. Sony
3. MS

And Nintendo and Sony are kind of tied, but i gave nintendo the first place because of better pace.

phantomexe5811d ago

I agree i love sony. Sony had a good E3 and sony came out fireing but all and all i think nintendo did. Nintendo learned from last year and droped in alot of very cool stuff. My picks nintendo,sony, and omg wtf MS.

Otheros005811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

Because of TWISTED METAL, gabe newell, and a release date for GT5.
Edit: and Kevin Butler's epic speech.

Show all comments (99)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio14d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing14d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9214d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit14d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing14d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9213d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
17d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted16d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8516d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele15d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk15d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay15d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 15d ago
Athlon10116d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit15d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg15d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10115d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14916d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay15d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn216d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn215d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown16d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay15d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay15d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac15d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger16d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300016d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde16d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde15d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)