All Channels
Popular
340°

PlayStation Plus Release Date Announced

Sony has just announced that the highly anticipated PlayStation Plus and has just revealed when it will launch.

UPDATE: The source now has a link to the official website for this service!

Read Full Story >>
thegameraccess.com
Nitrowolf25860d ago

sweet i was expecting like a 10 day trail thing but 3 month thats awesome
I think this is well worth it
So qore is free with this right?
thats 24.99 thats half the price of the sub, plus free games every month people would be crazy not to call this a great deal.

dangert125860d ago

my gold runs out next month which i am dead happy about i no longer see the value of xbl

Philaroni5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

I never expected anything great from PSN+ Unless the firmware update we know will need to come with it has cross game chat and other stuff this just makes Live look better for the same price.

Discounts and what not are great as long as it is for stuff we care about and not second hand content.

karan86245860d ago

What about free games, beta and early demo access? 200 Pounds, or over 300 dollars in free Themes, games and other content each year?

Or, if not, thats fine. If you dont want to play, you can still play for free

AngelorD5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

that's where it's a thousand times better than XBL gold - either you pay and get another console-worth of content each year for free,
or you don't pay, and keep doing everything you can do now.
in XBL - pay the same amount of price and you can play online (free on PSN)
or don't pay and you can't play online at all.

Heartnet5860d ago

Who knows why ur getting disagrees lol!

lpsquall5860d ago

Here is my problem with the service and I hope someone can answer this for me. Currently, when we purchase a new game, its ours and it's available to us forever. What will happen if I sign up as a member, and purchase a new game. Once I stop my subscription its no longer accessible. How can I purchase a game within my subscription and still have access to it outside of subscription. Because I fear once I become a member, any game I purchase, will become disabled once I stop my subscription.

Neoicelord5860d ago

it sounds like a stupid service if you ask me (which you probably will not)

i'll stick with my gold account.

Adva5860d ago

If you are a PSN+ member and buy a PSN game or anything, even with PSN+ member discount, you get to keep it.
Only thing you don't keep is the FREE content you receive.

lpsquall5860d ago

ADVA. Thanks for answering my question.
50 bucks a year to receive 4 games a month for free, if that's the case, it doesn't sound all that bad. Granted I'm pretty sure they are going to give us crappy games for the first few months but things will pick up.

lpsquall5860d ago (Edited 5860d ago )

They need to provide more details for the service. For a 2 hour presentation and only spending roughly 2 minutes on this new service, I don't think Sony was ready to introduce this service.

Show all comments (15)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
66d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted65d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8565d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele65d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla65d ago (Edited 65d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk65d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay64d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 64d ago
Athlon10165d ago (Edited 65d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit64d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg64d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10164d ago (Edited 64d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14965d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
78d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_78d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle78d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker78d ago (Edited 78d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit78d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog78d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_78d ago (Edited 78d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog78d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad78d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_78d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage78d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda78d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

78d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong104d ago

looks god awful on the base systems