All Channels
Popular
320°

Thoughts on Microsoft's E3 Conference (Baxy-Z)

Baxy-Z have shared their thoughts on Microsoft's E3 2010 conference. They discuss the introduction of Kinect, Gears of War 3 and the show in general.

knight6265810d ago

i think the only part i got excited was the metal gear solid gameplay video

dachiefsman5810d ago

i am a fan (not boy) of xbox and this press conference was sh**.

Anarki5810d ago

The only things that impressed me here was CoD black ops, MGS rising and the new 360. Everything else was terrible..

You could tell most of the presentations where pre rendered...

dachiefsman5810d ago

even if the would have presented a ff7 remake you wouldn't have been interested.......so why even post?

bjornbear5810d ago

and dachiefsman - not true

if MS had shown something absolutely new and amazing, i would have contemplated it (like when they showed Gears in 2005 E3 ( ?)

Microsoft Xbox 3605810d ago

Agreed. MGSR actually caught my attention. Looks like they reused assets from MGS4 though. You can clearly see the same car and the area looks like Act 1.

vhero5810d ago

Quote of the article
"I was also excited by the new Xbox announcement. I will get one for sure. I think it looks really slick, and the built-in Wi-Fi is a nice addition. At the same time, I have the feeling of "Sony did all this four years ago.""

Brewski0075810d ago

I honestly can say ive never watched any of the e3 conferances live before. I dunno i just used to read the live updates. But for me, what i was seeing was a terribly presented and quite frankly boring in places mess. Halo, gears, mgs and forza. . . All ok , grand. . . but the kinect segment went on far too long with generic games and non-dazzling features and it dragged the rest of the show down with it if im honest, I just cant understand how anyone could say it was a huge success.

The sony conferance should be interesting tomorrow as its sure to have a degree of shock and awe and also its going to have the same show and tell aspect with the move as microsoft also had, but how they handle this is going to sum up how well they perform overall. The balls in their court now.

AAACE55810d ago

People spent so much time trying to hate on everything at the show it's pitiful!

Did anyone even appreciate the fact that ESPN will stream all of their content to gold members at no extra charge? If you like a team but their game isn't showing in your area, you will now be able to see it! Also, this could open up more opportunities to get content!

No that's right, it's just more fun to hate on other stuff!

cervantes995810d ago

Although ESPN is a nice addition to the console, I bought my Xbox for GAMES not ESPN.

NY_State5810d ago

Who fucking cares about ESPN. I but a console to play games! What do you have to show for it? Halo(old and tired) GOW3(old and tired) and a former PS3 exclusive dev Metal Gear. lol!

MS has to be the worst game developer the industry has ever seen. No thanks MS I'll stick with Sony/PS3 proudly!

huzzaahh5810d ago

Umm... It's ESPN *MINUS* NFL. Therefore, not even worth it.

TradingWarStories5810d ago

kevin butler to cheer me up from this crappy shit motion control crap or atleast some games which dont have movimals or move sports or whatever crap I want HARDCORE games not casual pieces of SH*t which I will get bored of.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5810d ago
B-Real2065810d ago

It was a pretty boring presentation COD timed exclusive DLC, Gears, Halo, Fable, Kinetic the only part I really liked was the addition of espn. Other then that this was probably the worst showing of microsoft that I've ever seen.

After last night I should have saw it coming. Next Year now on to Nintendo and Sony. All you guys have to do is show up and show some fun games and you could easily "win" E3.

hoops5810d ago

Gears and Halo was the only highlights. All else was shockingly poor.

Optical_Matrix5810d ago

Microsoft doesn't seem to get it. We don't want to see multiplats nor do we want to see timed DLC announcements and Wii rip offs. We want to see games...games and MORE GAMES. They under delivered on an unprecedented scale today. Sony has announced more games before E3 than MS had in their own CONFERENCE. That says a lot to me tbh. So much for "big surprises"

ForROME5810d ago

I disagree, I think SONY has just now begun to get it, they were so behind on the online market place, they are still 1 or so yrs behind in how to deliver content.

However I do agree on First Party Games, I loooooove UC2 but Gears and Halo esp if your shooter fan are my cup of tea, not just because they are great but because the life of them is extended through great multiplayer which bring me back to ONLINE arena which I think MS still owns

Silver3605810d ago

MS wants to sell consoles and looking over at Nintendo they see that casual games work. Nintendo launched a year after 360 and passed them by 33 million. how do you argue with 33million more consoles sold. You must remember this is about money to them, just like Sony and Nintendo. It may be your passion, but in the end a console manufacturer cares about profits first.

hoops5810d ago

That is EXACTLY what MS did. They saw Wii money and how they got it and like MS because its all about shareholders, went in that direction. Make no mistake. Natal will sell huge and most likely will push Xbox360 sales forward, however for us real gamers, what MS is doing is crap.

Silver3605810d ago (Edited 5810d ago )

Last generation the xbox was a failure. Sure they got some market share, but 24 million compared to 140 million plus for PlayStation is ridiculous. How do they justify buying or creating more studios when they just started making a profit. Sony did not gain all their studios overnight. They have had two successful generation to finance new studios. It would be nice to see MS have more studios and games, but how is that going to done when we have some people calling for the closing of the gaming division altogether to raise the stock prices. Sony can goto it shareholders and say we made billions by doing this, MS can't.

webeblazing5810d ago

they do get it xbox fans never complain they want more games and when somebody point this out they go off subject or call you a fanboi. why should ms put money in new ip when they get over on us by doing nothing this didnt jus now started what happen last e3 multiplats and a few games you knew about b4 e3. people talk like they didnt see this

Greysturm5810d ago

But havent you noticed certain ardent defenders of something missing in action, its like they all went cave exploring or something. I guess there isnt a better tell on the quality of the conference.

Pennywise5810d ago

They might still be mourning the MS of the past. Give them a few days...

I have money on them coming back Sony reformists. :P

WMW5810d ago

after weeks of saying wait for E3 they have something big to counter all of sony's announcements just to have it blow up in their face like always we won't be seeing the 360 fanboys for awhile.

andron5810d ago

You might be right there, not many bright spots to cling onto. I'm cheering myself up with the EA conference. Maybe they will show some real games...

Show all comments (60)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio12d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing12d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9212d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit12d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing12d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9212d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay14d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn214d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn214d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown14d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay14d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay14d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac13d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger14d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300014d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde14d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde14d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7515d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_13d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.