All Channels
Popular
100°

Microsoft E3 2010 Press Conference Roundup

VGB rounds up all the details for the games shown at the Microsoft E3 2010 press conference. Included titles are: Metal Gear Solid: Rising, Gears of War 3, Halo: Reach, free ESPN Sports comes to Xbox Live, Kinect Forza, Your Shape: Fitness Evolved, Dance Central, Xbox 360 slim confirmed, and more.

Read Full Story >>
videogamesblogger.com
Theodore875799d ago

It's basically
"Kinectimals is demonstrated on-stage as a cute little girl interacts with an on-screen lion cub. The lion spins when she does, jumps when she does, etc. He also follows her voice commands. She plays jump rope with him by swinging the rope and other pet games."

So yeah, they hail the conference to heaven without any shame.

oldjadedgamer5799d ago

I understand that some people may enjoy the Kinect more than others. But to ignore the lack of a future for hardcore gaming on the 360 is ridiculous. I agree HR, Gears, and Fable all look good/going to be great games. But what about next year? This could be the last big Halo and Gears game. Only 1 new IP?

And you give them an A? Enjoy your casual games, as that is all you are getting from now on.

chiwoo5799d ago

360 owners[one myself] has nothing new to look forward to next year except Gears of war 3.its a bad time to only own a 360

Sheikh Yerbouti5799d ago (Edited 5799d ago )

OK show, I'd give it a B-, considering everyone's tastes and preferences.

I'm not going to say much about all the good games. Nothing Earth shattering was shown. Too few exclusives, and even next year seems dismal. I knew Gears III was coming, and I will play it. The internet is better than LIVE for my entertainment. Everything else I care about is also on PS3 (To me the Rising reveal was just a Sony intermission). So...

I was actually impressed with Kinect. Kinectimals would be fun for kids, although I couldn't stand the little girl hamming it up like she was actually being licked. Kinect Adventures was cool too, a better party game than Move's, and a repackaging oddly reminiscent of EyeToy (I'm just saying).

Yet there was demonstration that made me a believer, and it isn't Star Wars. To me Kinect is made for fitness games. The 3d camera is practically made for it, but that's not all. Size and weight obsessed women would love to have their dimensions measured to verify their self-esteem or lack thereof. Eddie Murphy's baby's mama, Mel B. from the Spice Girls is going to have a game too. So not only will little girls have issues with their Barbies, they'll have this too. Genius!

However this means that Kinect belongs between ads for Richard Simmons videos and the latest weight loss supplement. Actually it will probably work better than both of those and much better than the camera less Wii. But like all three these women will likely place them in a closet, likely out of guilt.

It was lack of independent movement that was a glaring fail for Kinect, though - something neither Move or the Wii have problems with, thanks to controllers. By a lack of independent movement, I mean you don't have total control over your speed and direction in a game.

It was evident in the Star Wars demonstration as you "force ran" forward to the next wave of assailants. You couldn't decide to duck behind some cover stopping to force push a couple of baddies on the way. I was hoping to see an ingenious way to allow for us to run and turn around. I guess KB was right about the buttons. I didn't even get a "pew pew".

It was evident in the Forza demonstration, where you only could pass cars that were slower than you unless you use boost (Did they have to make them look like Yugo's). Uhm...yeah, fun there. You want intuitive for racing controls, get an actual wheel. The only two games actually promising something for the hardcore will be quite shallow compared to what we're used to.

Kinect will be fun even if it is short-lived. They may even find some way to allow for independent motion, but if they haven't figured it out by now...I guess this is EyeToy 2010, just putting you in a frame or box and spitting red balls, or rails, or fuzzy cute tigers at you.

70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio1d 23h ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing1d 21h ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster921d 22h ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit1d 21h ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing1d 21h ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster921d 19h ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Tanktopmaster921d 19h ago

Let me be clear. This is sarcasm

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay3d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn24d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn23d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown4d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay3d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay3d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac3d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger4d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30004d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde4d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde3d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent755d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_3d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.