All Channels
Popular
90°

Driver: San Francisco named

A senior games industry source has confirmed to MCV the name of the new entry in the Driver series that Ubisoft will be unveiling at E3 next week – Driver: San Francisco.

piroh5824d ago

Driver: San Francisco, Motorstorm 3 San Francisco :P

i pray Motorstorm 3 rumor is true

N4G king5823d ago

i hope this one dont suck as the last one did

Homegamer5823d ago

The motorstorm 3 rumor is true and the name of the game is motorstorm acolapse (its not spelled right) it was announced on playstation blog

Darkstorn5823d ago (Edited 5823d ago )

San Francisco has always been a great setting for racers. This should be no exception (and frankly I'm tired of every big game being set in New York...)

poopface15823d ago

I used to love Driver 1 on my ps1 and PC too. Im excited to see more on this.

aaron58295823d ago

i'm no american..

but certainly know it will have epic uphill/downhill, railcar crashes & chases..

:P

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5823d ago
Dellis5824d ago

^The Reason they changed to APOCALYPSE is because of this

Ubisoft had the copyright on the IP name way before

Motorstorm did

Brewski0075823d ago

Man this is gonna own in a big way. Cannot wait to hear/see more about it. Roll on E3!!

galgor5823d ago

Hills hills everywhere so lets all take a jump :D

jay25823d ago

We've got to hope for the best now.

Show all comments (16)
50°

How Driver: San Francisco took the series in a daring new direction

Game Designer Andrew Willans looks back at Driver: San Francisco’s legacy.

LucasRuinedChildhood317d ago (Edited 317d ago )

Now we get The Crew games instead 🙄

Would love and much prefer a sequel to this.

40°

Ubisoft Confirms Work On New Projects For Driver Franchise

Ubisoft seems to have teased a new Driver game, with the company's CEO pointing to various projects being in development.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
scorpio_2049673d ago

I know Driv3r was hated but I liked it. I’d love to see more games like that.

350°

Ubisoft Is Shutting Down Servers For Older Titles And Blocking Access To DLC Content You Paid For

Immersed Gamer writes: "Ubisoft came out with the announcement that some of their classic titles are shutting down their servers. While this is not entirely surprising, the next bit is quite shocking. As Ubisoft states in regard to many of said classic games, “additionally, the installation and access to DLC will be unavailable”.

The wording is a little vague, so the actual paid DLC could be safe. But it doesn’t change the fact that multiplayer modes of Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood, Rayman Legends, and Driver San Francisco will surely be missed. Especially since no alternative exists in many of those cases. This happens to unveil right next to our story where I essentially beg Atlus to port SMT to modern consoles alongside Persona.

Seems like videogame preservation is on the down-low…"

Read Full Story >>
immersedgamer.com
MadLad1419d ago

This just in.
Ubisoft woke up and pulled an Ubisoft.

Mazgamer1419d ago

Reports say that they might continue to do an Ubisoft in the near future. Dreadful.

VenomUK1419d ago

Why would DLC stop working, because it requires a server for authentication?

Publishers need to find technical and legal solutions so that any digital product a user owns always works.

Mazgamer1419d ago

@VenomUK From what I remember replaying the Assassin's Creed II and Brotherhood, there were plenty of mission DLCs you had to download via UPlay. I think they are completely disconnecting UPlay from those games, thus you won't be able to download the DLCs.

I'm guessing obviously. And even that explanation just doesn't make much sense to me. Why would they just remove UPlay support for these games? Why will those single-player DLCs become unavailable? Which DLCs in particular? I truly can't wrap my head around what Ubisoft means by this mess. We will either have to wait and see, or someone will pressure Ubi via social media to make some statement explaining.

1Victor1418d ago

All hail the future of all digital games.
I would like to hear the excuses from the all digital future defenders about this

Rebel_Scum1418d ago (Edited 1418d ago )

Who’s playing any of these old garbage DLC’s/online modes in 2022?

NotoriousWhiz1418d ago

This literally has zero to do with digital games and is really just an Ubisoft issue. Either way, most people will tell you that "all digital" is not the future. Digital and physical should always be options.

1Victor1418d ago

@ notorious
🤦🏿 "Ubisoft came out with the announcement that some of their classic titles are shutting down their servers. While this is not entirely surprising, the next bit is quite shocking. As Ubisoft states in regard to many of said classic games, “additionally, the installation and access to DLC will be unavailable”.

What part of that makes it zero to do with digital today is Ubisoft tomorrow can be any game that’s digital only or have DLC from any publisher but hey whatever helps you sleep, remember kid the older your favorite digital games get the closer they’re to the big shutdown 🤷🏿

DOMination-1418d ago

They are shutting down multiplayer for PS3 games that nobody is playing. If you owned a physical copy, you'd also be affected? It has nothing to do with digital.

Presumably for the DLC, you'll still have access to it if you've previously purchased it. And if you're upset that you haven't already got the DLC for ACII, then I don't know what to say.. you've had 15 years to buy it.

Of course, we'd all love for everything to always be available and despite what you may think, I'm not really defending this - but maintaining multiplayer serves for games from two generations ago that literally nobody is playing takes up resources. And energy. And right now, that is very expensive. I guess the solution should be allowing console gamers to run their own servers.

NotoriousWhiz1418d ago

Please tell me which part of this: "additionally, the installation and access to DLC will be unavailable” doesn't affect their physical games. None. It affects all of their games equally.

NotoriousWhiz1418d ago

"the older your favorite digital games get the closer they’re to the big shutdown"

Funny, because I haven't lost a single digital title yet. I guess the big shutdown only actually shut down one digital game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1418d ago
Wintersun6161419d ago

They're doing a Ubisoft. Because that's what Ubisoft does.

CrimsonWing691419d ago

And you want us to go all digital? This is the bull sh*t that makes me apprehensive to an all digital future. You corpo guys don’t understand game preservation or it’s importance.

Majors1419d ago

Its all about the £££££ and if they can sell you the same item multiple times over... Also physical or digital makes no difference these days sadly because if you buy physical you only get 1/2 the data needed to actually start the game nevermind play it

XxINFERNUSxX1419d ago

Just torrent for PC and smile 😁

Majors1419d ago

Companies who withdraw support should be legally made to patch games to enable the 'owner' to create and host their own MP lobbies. This is theft

Inverno1419d ago (Edited 1419d ago )

Unfortunately we've allowed corporations to hold too much power and we don't own half of what we buy. The correct thing to do when shutting down servers, or better yet include it from the beginning, is to make it possible to access what we originally bought. This won't change until they're forced to cause greedy people don't like doing the right thing unless they have some incentive.

CantThinkOfAUsername1419d ago

We don't own anything. The company makes a product and asks for a one-time fee to give you a licence to access it. You agree to the terms that they can revoke that licence at any time for any reason. This is 'digital ownership.'

Maybe people should read some of what they blindly click to agree to.

Father__Merrin1419d ago

When this happens they should give ddlc free to download

Show all comments (41)