All Channels
Popular
420°

Rumour - PSN premium service called "Service Pack"

VG247: A VG247 source has claimed that the premium service to be announced for PlayStation Network at Sony’s E3 press conference on Tuesday is named “Service Pack”.

Godmars2905824d ago

Should have kept is simple and called it "PSN+." Though Service Pack suggest other levels. Service Pack 0, Service Pack 1, Service Pack 2. Start it at $4 a month building to $9.

Jamegohanssj55824d ago

PSN+ sounds cool. They should have called it the stimulus package, but this would be something that actually works.

TGSI

Focker4205824d ago

Does everything have to revolve around MW2?? Plus 'Stimulus Package'?! How is us giving them money a stimulus package??

PSN+ was good, 'Service Pack' not so much.

deafwing5824d ago

PSN+ better is sounding and easier to understand :D ... Service Pack sounds I don' know, not so cool :/

King Hippo5824d ago

But as long as it has features that are worth the money then I will pay for it.

kneon5824d ago

Service Pack just sounds lame. I wouldn't even use it to distinguish between different offerings within the PSN premium or whatever it will really be called.

AssassinHD5824d ago (Edited 5824d ago )

I agree. "PSN+" is sexy. "Service Pack" just leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5824d ago
DarkFinalGod5824d ago

Sony whatever you do just bring cross game chat and ill be happy to pay but NOT like XBL where its overpriced.

tatotiburon5824d ago

lol overpriced us$3 by month? hahahah you want cross game chat and pay us$1?? LMAO

DarkFinalGod5824d ago (Edited 5824d ago )

id rather pay less and get the same things on PSN but if u can tell me whats exclusive on XBL that its worth paying and no mate im in Asutralia and i pay 80$ every year.

edit:let me guess exclusive demos lmaooooooo

Elvfam5115824d ago

Last time I remember its $7.99 a month for Live. Where do people get $3.

Chubear5824d ago

have X-game chat as a paid feature on PSN. Unless the bundle includes other things I really really find value in, I can't see myself paying for X-game chat and I can't see many of the people on my friends list doing that either.

There are about 80people on the friends list now and it'll be interesting to see how many of them use paid X-game chat.

I'm guessing X-game chat will be disabled for competitive online MP gaming though... it better be.

poopface15824d ago

I know that on 360 the party chat is disabled for some of the competitive playlists in games like COD and halo.

Im guessing that most devs know about it, and if they dont, people will probably complain. Then they could patch it.

Prototype5824d ago

I don't care what it's called, just as long as the online stays free I'll check out their prices and what they have to offer.

Christopher5824d ago

It's not going to charge for something that's already available for free. The new premium service will be new features only. They've mentioned this a few times.

Chubear5824d ago

exactly. They aren't going to make you pay for stuff you already have now for free. This is just added content; if you find value in them, you pay; if not, you don't.

Paradise5824d ago

I think it will be called PSN+ but have different service packs you can get.

Myst5824d ago

Hmm, despite it being called that with enough people wanting it to be changed it probably could be. Anyway this is stated as rumor so who knows if it is to be true.

Show all comments (24)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
24d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted24d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8523d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele23d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk23d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay23d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 23d ago
Athlon10124d ago (Edited 24d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit23d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg23d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10123d ago (Edited 23d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14923d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
37d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_37d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle36d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit36d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog37d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog36d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad37d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_37d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage37d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda36d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

36d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong62d ago

looks god awful on the base systems