All Channels
Popular
160°

Sony's 3D revolution

CVG would love to give you a taste of 3D gaming on PlayStation here.

You know the sort of thing; we'd throw out evocative adjectives while recounting our experiences with the tech - and, voilà, a murky picture will arrive in your brain-zone.

Problem is, it's nigh on impossible. Whether it's the peripherally-visible mania of Killzone 3 or the did-I-just-see-that protrusion of Wipeout HD, the PS3 3D 'experience' is just that; something you can only understand when you're in the driving seat.

What we can report, however, is that 3D gaming is far more subtle than you might expect. It creeps up on you - allowing you to adjust to its presence - before it makes itself known.

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
piroh5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

including 3D, motion sticks, motion camera and DualShock 3 :)

God bless Sony

D4RkNIKON5850d ago

It's as futuristic or Noweristic as it gets

Parapraxis5850d ago

Noweristic, lol thanks for that.

WildArmed5850d ago

Now if Heavy rain did 3D and Motion Gaming (move)..
I think we got an epic win combo there.

Chris_TC5850d ago

They code PS3 games on PS3s? Wow, didn't know that.

RAZORLAND5850d ago

Sony led the way with CD, DVD and definatley Blu-ray. This seems like a natural progression for Sony

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5850d ago
MiloGarret5850d ago

For it to be a revolution someone actually has to be a part of it. Let's talk in 3 years.

OC_MurphysLaw5850d ago

LOL... ok that is just funny. 3D has come and gone many times. It was all the rage back in the 50's with movies like the Blob releasing in 3D.

Then slowly people got tired of putting on glasses to watch a movie...and 3D went away.

Tech gets better... People get excited for 3D again in the movies, gaming, etc.. but they will also get tired of wearing glasses again... and it will fade back and be just a novalty again.

cobraagent5850d ago

"PEople got tired of putting the glasses"
1Avatar sales say otherwise
2I find it more "tiring" to put a blu-ray in my ps3 that put on my sunglasses

Arnon5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

There's a pretty substantial difference between the 3D quality in Avatar, and the updated firmware 3D quality of a video game. For one, Avatar was developed with 3D in mind, so you will not experience anything like that on a console that's simply adding an extra layer to the screen.

Secondly, watching Avatar didn't require you to go out and repurchase a new $2000-$3000 HDTV with 240Hz and 3D in mind, as well as a pair of $150 glasses.

THIRDLY, 3D glasses and sunglasses are completely different. Simply for the fact that the glasses themselves are layered with two separate colors to have the image "pop out". My eyes were numb after watching Avatar in 3D for 3 hours straight. I guarantee you that there's going to be issues with this, not to mention that it wont take off for a while.

OC_MurphysLaw5850d ago

Sure Avatar sold great...did you not get what I meant by.. "People get excited for 3D again in the movies" bit?

YES, people and tech companies all think 3D is the next big thing for now...but as consumers realize they have to wear glasses constantly to do it ...and it costs a bucket load to upgrade the TV's we all were just buying last year... you are gonna see bunches jump back off the bandwagon as sales lag...

Oh and sure Avatar was a hit...but how did Clash of the Titans do? Animated cartoons and a few exceptions will be the niche for 3D movies.

As for your last comment...well heck you are gonna be really tired then cause you will have to put your blu ray in AND put on your 3D "sunglasses"! You are gonna be too tired to even game at that rate!

BattleAxe5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

I would find it tiring to continually have to insert multiple DVDs to play a game on a 360, rather than put 3D glasses on.

TotalPS3Fanboy5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

You got it wrong. Avatar is done using layers. And without Shutter Glass, it hurts your eyes after a while.

3D gaming with Shutter Glass is not done using layers. It will be more like real-life, with real depth. A 3D sphere will be a 3D sphere, with volume and depth, on the PS3, whereas as a 3D sphere in Avatar is just a 2D circle in a layer that pops up.

You haven't seen true 3D on the PS3. You have only seen layered 3D at the movies, so you think that's how 3D on the PS3 will look. But 3D on the PS3 will actually be like real life, and nothing like the layered 3D of Avatar.

Arnon5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

I'm sorry, but I honestly am not able to believe that Sony is able to create a more accurate 3D image with a simple firmware update compared to a movie that had to be made using technology that was built specifically for the movie itself. The movie was built with 3D in mind. Also, Avatar uses RealD, which I believe is a more accurate depiction than Shutter 3D.

There's a reason why Avatar cost $500,000,000 to make.

TotalPS3Fanboy5847d ago (Edited 5847d ago )

Avatar cost $500,000,000 to make. But it's displayed using ReadD, which is a very bad 3D technology. Explains why the glasses is so cheap at the movies (a few dollars). ReadD is like layered 3D. With RealD, you can only do 3D by using the pop-up book effect. Watch Avatar and you can see that everything are just on different layers and are actually not real 3D, with real depth/volume diminsion.

Shutter 3D, on the other hand, uses the Shutter Glass, and is a better technology. It can do more realistic 3D, making things looks volumetric and have actual depth. Go to your local Best Buy store and try on the the Shutter 3D Glasses. You'll be surprise that the 3D is way better than those cheap RealD glasses at the movies.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5847d ago
mrv3215850d ago

We've seen Motion controls come and go since the start of gaming... so does that mean motion controls will fail? Try telling that to Nintendo, oh wait you can't BECAUSE THEY ARE ROLLING IN MONEY!

HD probably came and went... so does that make HD a novelty.

Aikuchi5850d ago

The day I can watch 3D without glasses is the day I will buy in to it.
The glasses just give me a big headache.

zoks3105850d ago

That is what Sony is known for, taking it to the next level, same goes for the PlayStation, and Bravia.

Show all comments (20)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
50d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted50d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8550d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele49d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla49d ago (Edited 49d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk49d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay49d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 49d ago
Athlon10150d ago (Edited 50d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit49d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg49d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10149d ago (Edited 49d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14949d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
63d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_63d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle62d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit62d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog63d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog63d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad63d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_63d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage63d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda62d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

63d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong89d ago

looks god awful on the base systems