All Channels
Popular
250°

Peter Moore: Natal will "help democratise gaming"

EA Sports President Peter Moore has told GamerZines that he thinks Microsoft's upcoming motion control interface, codenamed Project Natal, will "help democratise gaming", saying that "breaking down the barriers to accessibility has always been an issue for Microsoft", and that he doesn't think the Xbox 360 is "the 'shooterbox' that it once was".

Read Full Story >>
gamerzines.com
blizzard_cool5821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

Please people, please forgive me for this but..... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

DarkFinalGod5821d ago

man let him say his opinion weather its wrong or not doesnt matter lol i havent heard of him lately :P

DelbertGrady5821d ago

And I'm sure more nervous laughter will ensue as E3 and the big Natal showcase draws nearer.

MNicholas5821d ago

Then again, he was smart enough to leave Microsoft before the future failure of that division became obvious to everyone.

MajestieBeast5821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

He is right its not the shooter box anymore its the big red ball shooterbox.

hamoor5821d ago

Look at the bright side... Atleast you won't get any shooter with natal (:

madkrazygames5821d ago

I'm still on the fence about Natal so I'm going to wait to see how this new device works out for them.

Optical_Matrix5821d ago

To be honest, I agree with Moore. IF Natal succeeds, along with a possible rebranding, Microsoft can change the image of their systems. It won't be known as the console for Shooter Junkies anymore and, you can see MS already laying the foundations for this with their huge push for JRPG's this generation for example.
It'll be interesting to see how Natal effects the Xbox image. It personally hasn't convinced me yet but if it succeeds, more than anything it may change the Xbox image. Which is a good thing for Microsoft.

zorglub5821d ago (Edited 5821d ago )

The problem is Xbox brand is associated with preteen shooter fans and it won't change tomorrow.

This is another reason why Natal has around zero chance to succeed, it's ignoring completely what makes the 360 crowd.

Grannies or rich educated adults like me had zero interest in the 360, so there's no chance they sell a 360 peripheral to them...

It wouldn't change "gaming" at all anyway, since all Natal does is copying Sony Eyetoy. Ricochet existed more than 5 years ago, it's called Eyetoy games (check videos, it's exactly the same). It wasn't fun by then and it still isn't fun today.

Omega45821d ago

"Grannies or rich educated adults like me had zero interest in the 360, so there's no chance they sell a 360 peripheral to them"

Natal is about expanding the 360s audience and selling consoles to new people, not just selling the peripheral to current owners. You really think Nintendo had casuals buying SNES's, NES's, N64's and Gamecubes? NO!

If MS gets the advertising right they can change their image and have a chance of becoming just as successful as nintendo has.

wicked5821d ago

You say you are educated, and yet you say copying the eyetoy, Sony has done very little with the Eyetoy.

hamoor5821d ago

LOL rich educated adult my ass
You're just a sad immature troll

zag5821d ago

People say the 360 is for the hardcore crowd.

MS is wanting it to be a casual fest, with people running around using natal.

In real life though, these things generally don't work as your running around the cleared out room so the 5 year olds don't smash anything while using it.

Adults won't use it as they will stand around not move enough do crap at the game and get fed up with the whole thing.

Companies think people running around in front of their tv is the next big thing but it's not really, Sony have tried this a few times and it's not worked out in the long term.

How many people does anyone know who got a Wii and still use it after 3 months.

I only know of 1 and their kids us it not them and everyone else has sold it to get a PS3 as that's getting the new new stuff in terms of games etc.

IdleLeeSiuLung5821d ago

As far as I can tell the same type of games released prior to Natal is still scheduled to be released in the future... so I don't think Natal is a threat to the hardcore demographics.

I'm pretty sure Treyarch, Infinity Ward, Epic Games, and all the other big game makers aren't going to stop developing hardcore games for the Xbox 360 (and the PS3) just to focus on Natal.

So this point is moot! Xbox Live is known as the premier (wether it is or not) online network for gaming and has arguably the largest shooter under it's wings. I doubt they will let their most lucrative market disappear.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5821d ago
hamoor5821d ago

I don't agree with you
Microsoft dont care about their image atleast not about that the Xbox 360 is for shooter's
And by the way the Xbox 360 have a lot of jrpg's because Microsoft wants to win the Japanese market and not for changing their image

5821d ago
Show all comments (28)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio18d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing18d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9218d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit18d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing18d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9218d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay20d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn221d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn220d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown20d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay20d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay20d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac20d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger21d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300021d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde20d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde20d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7522d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_19d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.