An artical I read was talking about publishers. A developer will come to them with a PS3 or 360 idea and them not wanting to spend 15-20 million on it say come back with 5 or 6 Wii games and we'll talk. Cheaper to develop for faster too and it's not all mini games as well.

they are kiddie games like Elebits or Bioncles? After two or so years with PS3 installed in homes we will see this list become more even. The 360 is about where it should be.

I'm talking about gameplay and graphics not just what the game is about and shows. There is nothing on the Wii that can't be done better and look a thousand times better on PS3 or X360. Time will change the charts. As for the LBP, I'm not as geeked about that as others seem to be. I don't want to design things myself, thats why I buy games that have levels designed for me. I willing to try it though.

The Wii list would actually be much smaller if they only included games. I mean, c'mon, "Bob Ross: The Joy of Paininting"
WTF is that!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????? ??
I seriously doubt the execs over at MS and Sony are sitting around saying, "Damn, I wish we'd gotten that Hannah Montana game!".

Here's your hardcore Wii game.

http://video.google.com/vid...

But I don't know. The whole Wii appeal still seems very skiddish to me. Big question of wether or not this motion thing will propel it into true domination of the current gen of gaming.

Good for Nintendo! They deserve some time at the top after the last couple of generations and even though the console doesn't interest me in the slightest, I can still respect it for what it is and welcome the new gamers being introduced to the industry by it.

Ofcourse the Wii has the most exclusives.

The WiiMote will get specific games for it. Gamedevelopers see the growing number of Wii sold.

BUT

I dare to challenge some Wii/Nintendo fanboys to defend of what quality most games ARE and many games will be.

Because besides Zelda, RE4 remake and Wii sports, there isn't much at this time. And the upcoming games best ones are Mario and Metroid Prime 3. But besides that.... I can name many, many 360 top quality exclusives, and even (you all know I don't like the PS3, but even that one) better and more quality exclusives for the PS3 then the Wii has/will have.

Thus, like many times:

Quantity doesn't always equal Quality

double post

thats a whole other story

Is Wii having anything remotely similar to MGS-4, HALO-3, Mass Effect, FFXIII, Killzone-2 ??

All the exclusives cater to 8 yr olds or 40+

No thanks, Iam fine with my 360 & PS-3.

No matter how many times they rehash mario , kirby , zelda and the rest. They arent making quality games yet ps3 and 360 got more games I wanna play then the wii..Personally I HEAD THE WII SUCKS GROUP...

GIVE ME BUBBLES

ONLY MATTERS NUMBER OF EXCLUSIVE GAMES, WHICH YOU CARE FOR. =)

p.s. anyone to help return my 4th bubble back? thnx. =)

EDIT:
thnx. =) now we can go for 5th one. =))

When you look at future exclusives, the gap between PS3 and XBOX 360 isn't that much. When you look at the quality, I think the PS3 has more.

As far as the Wii, they can have 1 million exclusives, it still doesn't matter because it's not a replacment for next gen.

ITS QUALITY NOT QUANTITY. After i finished Twilight Princess i felt so bored man,seriously. When i put on the Wii my only reason is to get quick access to the web and check out N4G....if they dont bring good games and get more serious i think ill sell it(doubt my sis will agree)

A lot would be my guess.

damn the Wii? I thought they mostly 3rd party and the PS3 only has half of the other two systems at 47? Weird...

Wii better be ahead with its large fanbase, simple and slightly more advanced than XBL arcade games titles(I own a robot- XBL game made with the Unreal engine thats too advanced for the Wii). Personaly PS3 and the 360 are all that matters. To me caring about the Wii is like being intrested in the Hand-Held market, just my opinion.

seems like since there is no wii HD d/l for arcade games, many of these exclusives are just glorified $10 value arcade games... i mean, c'mon, how deep a game is Jenga going to be?

and of course Wii will get more and more games than other consoles, it takes very little money to produce a game in a short amount of time that will be bought by millions of mainstream gamers... as long as they package it with some cute designs and the game includes multiplayer modes with the wii remote.

yeah the wii will have more exclusives because they have mario xxxx. now lets see a chart of original exclusives or at least exclusives with less than 5 previous versions... i am sure nintendo is working on Mario eats dinner, mario vacuums the floor and mario take a dump (oh and the new original titles of wario gets breakfast, wario cleans the toiliet and the new ip, super dry eraser board wario, the sequal to the 100 paper mario games.. yeah it is easy and cheap to develop games with graphics from 2001 and a main character and story line from 1987.

They might have more exclusives but are they really games that you would want to play

I am not at all surprised by this for two reasons. Firstly, games for the Wii are cheaper and easier to make. Secondly, and also the reason why they are easier and cheaper to make, because the Wii is far weaker than the PS3 and Xbox 360. Porting a game from the PS3 or the Xbox 360 to the Wii would be nigh impossible, while Wii games ported to either of those two consoles wouldn't look that good. So, when a major game or sequel is being made for a multi-platform, it may only be made on the PS3 and/or the Xbox 360. The Wii, on the other, would get a spin-off or such. For example, where as the PS3 and the Xbox 360 got Sonic the Hedgehog, the Wii got Sonic and the Secret Rings. While the PS3 and the Xbox 360 will get fighting game Soul Calibur 4, the Wii will get action adventure spin-off Soul Calibur Legends. And finally, while PS3 and Xbox 360 will get Resident Evil 5, the Wii will get Resident Evil Chronicles.

everyone bashes Wii. It is more powerful than a PS2. And everyone seemed to love that console.

Wii will have its hardcore games as well. The new Mario looks great as well as other exclusives.

People keep saying give PS3 time to show it's potential. Why doesn't the same apply to Wii?

I think some people are just bitter.

It's better to have a confirmed than as TBA= To Be Announced right?

i agree with the mart - quantity does NOT equal quality

who wasnt expecting this. developers need a side studio to make games for the wii because none of the game devs even take it seriously. Notice how all the GOOD games are on the PS3 and 360 and all those side ones are on the wii.

50 bucks for cooking mama? wtf seriously

they cant count shivering isles as a 360 exclusive because its going to be in the oblivion game of the year edition for the ps3 this september
and sly 4.......i havent heard a single thing about that game, even if it is going to be made
so if anyone knows anything about sly 4, please post a link

They are counting many Xbox 360 as exclusives that are only timed: Culdcept Saga, Eternal Sonata, and Ace Combat. Many games shouldn't be included as 360 exclusives since they'll appear on PC (and even MAC). Rather, they should be counted as "Not on PS3 nor 360". Keep reading below and you'll understand why I say this.

The site is also counting too many NON-GAME applications for the Wii. There will also be many non-gaming apps for 360 and / or PS3 that are not being counted. And guess what? You don't need to buy them separately. But I guess they don't count, since they're "free", unlike the Wii where everything is an add-on. ($$ Good business, Nintendo $$)

The list is Wii60 biased, as it is not even informed about the tons of exclusives that were just announced at PlayStation Premiere Event in Japan. The amount of exclusives announced was sick. Where are these titles: Dynasty Warriors 6? Nobi nobi boy? Megazone 23? Sound Novel (Imabi Kisou)? Tears to tiara? Disgaea 3? Valkyrie of the battlefield? This is a total of 7 games.

I also love how "FFXIII" is a proven franchise, but FF Versus XIII is not which is odd, since Soul Calibur Legends for the Wii is being considered a PROVEN franchise, even though its gameplay is completely unrelated to its intellectual property; in fact, pretty much every unreleased "proven" franchise on the Wii should be labeled as unproven, since they will most definitely differ in everything from their IP they stem from.

Another thing I love is how proven franchise means only "High metascore", but not "high sales". The Getaway and Killzone are proven in that sense. Time Crisis is also a proven franchise with critical success in the arcades and playstation consoles. Okami was "proven" and it sold so little, yet critically underrated titles like "The Getaway" which sold millions twice.

More flaws: Why is "SOCOM 5" the title of SOCOM confrontation? And why is Sly Cooper 4 on that list when it's not being made? Again, how is Singstar NOT proven when it has sold millions of PS2 consoles around Europe, and millions of games?

The metrics are wrong too. It's worthless to have so many exclusives if most of your gaming library is either non-games for old people or to get some work out or to learn to properly speak english; it's also worthless to have many exclusives if most of them catter to FPS and PC game fans. I know I sound horribly biased, but being honest now, a good metric would be to compare which has the most games on which genre?

There should also be a mention for number of "promising titles", and ones that "delivered", either with sales OR metascore (or both).

Furthermore, Zelda and Ninja Gaiden should appear on those lists. After all, Wii rode the Zelda hype train, and Ninja Gaiden well... it's something I guess. Or well... let's say, make another list that measures "next-gen PROVEN ports of last-gen", for whatever it's worth. On that list, Bully for 360 and Wii should be included, or rather, not included on PS3 (read the following paragraph and you'll understand). Tomb Raider, King Kong, GRAW, Hitman, Oblivion... many games were "next-gen" exclusive (some timed); that's the advantage 360 had, and it should be noted on another list.

There should also be lists for titles that will appear everywhere else EXCEPT on a particular platform. THat would be a list to highlight the NEGATIVES of owning a particular platform. For example, Wii won't get Stranglehold, GTA4, next-gen mortal kombat, Crysis, Orange box, black site, darkness, condemned, fracture.... and so on. You know, Wii won't get ANYTHING related with Unreal Engine 3;then again, that might not be bad with all the bad press it gets lately, however, Wii won't get anything next-gen technology related; and so, if non-gaming apps can be added as exclusives, then you can be damned sure that Wii won't have Video on Demand and other multimedia uses. To throw the Wii a bone though, PS3 won't get Katamari Damacy, and 360 won't get japanese support when 2009 comes and all the heavy PS3 hitters kill 360 on the land of the sun (you have to admit that will happen in japan; I know it sounds hateful, but I'm just being honest here... hopefully it'll do better than the first Xbox).

There should also be a metric for quality of everything. 360 would beat PS3 in quality of ports, but PS3 would beat it on quality of hardware. Wii would win on price. PS3 would beat 'em on value. 360 would win on flexibility. And so on.

They're not even mentioning the quality of downloadable titles in each console. Wii games are not even remakes, they are games you already bought. We know nothing about WiiWare. Most 360 titles are remakes, or are so small they don't really take advantage of the machine (excluding Geometry Wars, Outpost Kaloki X and the one with the platformer guy I forgot; those three are pretty cool). Where is the consideration for, not only amount of downloadable titles (where Wii wins hands down), remakes (where Xbox 360 wins), and original quality content taylored specifically for the system (PS3 wins)? I'd like to see what can be pitted against PAIN, everyday shooter, Toy HOme, elefunk, pixel junk racers, flow, rub-a-dub, lemmings, super stardust HD, nucleus, blast factor's sequel... (yeah, many shooters on 360 and PS3; I think PS3 wins on this one, unless you're all about simplicity, where Geometry Wars might win).

How about odds of rumoured games coming out? You know, God of War 3, which is included on a list where it shouldn't since it hasn't been officially announced, even though it is extremely likely. Same with God of War 3. What about ICO's projects. What about Killer Instinct for 360. What about NIBRIS' projects. What about Sony and NCSoft's announcement. What about a Golden Eye remake on 360. What about a lot of things...

Seriously, gamers and fanboys, you have to admit the list fails to consider too many factors. A more exhaustive analysis is needed, not a shallow one like the one we're looking at.

"I'm talking about gameplay and graphics not just what the game is about and shows. "

Wtf! ins't graphics what it shows? and gameplay what the game is about?

Actual comment...

That is all