All Channels
Popular
Godmars2905864d ago (Edited 5864d ago )

So are people who bought PlayTV getting free or at cost replacements, or are they just plain screwed?

Crap like this is why the current console generation should have come 1-2 later than it did...

@sjeen66:
Been out in Europe for at least a year, with trone in Japan since 3 at least.

E3 is likely to announce a US version that uses Google TV.

Anarki5864d ago

I kinda feel jipped.

I've got playTV and I use it everyday... I'm happy that they're upgrading but I want some sort of discount or something..

Trilogy2k5864d ago

Why do you feel as though you're owed some kind of discount or allowance just because the technology has moved on?

I've got 4 separate Freeview boxes in the house and I don't feel 'conned'. Hey- that's life, it moves on.

It was pretty obvious that this was the next logical step as the uptake of HD was nearing saturation and most broadcasters (in the UK) are jumping on the same bandwagon..

When Sony announce the PS4, can someone please give me a shout so I can let them know how hacked off I am just for being forward thinking!

HolyOrangeCows5864d ago (Edited 5864d ago )

So......is THIS one ever going to come to the US?

Dom63905864d ago

I feel owed something because the technology hasn't moved on like people are claiming! the HD technology was available when PlayTv was release and for then to not use it originally and now ( if they are indeed making an HD version ) put it in a new upgrade is just annoying! they could have at least put out 2 tiers originally an HD PlayTv or a standard. I bought the standard as it was all that was available I wanted HD. I hate how all big companies do stuff like this and try to monopolise and take our money .

kharma455863d ago

It's not Sony's fault PlayTV can't do HD in the UK over Freeview, that's the fault of OFCOM and the government and their decision that Freeview HD would use DVB-T2 and not DVB-T.

mac_sparrow5863d ago

hurrah, someone who knows and understands why this is necessary. Bubble for not spouting crap and actually knowing what you're talking about. I've been annoyed about this since the day the decision was made.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5863d ago
Milky Joe5864d ago

How is someone paying for the next iteration of a piece of hardware make them in any way screwed??

That's like saying Sony screwed me because they didn't buy my PS3 for me...

Theonik5864d ago (Edited 5864d ago )

Depends on if they discontinue the original service or not.
I hope thy release PlayTV 2 in other countries too and not just in Britain. Kinda annoying that Britain gets everything while the rest of Europe gets shafted usually.

Milky Joe5864d ago

That'd only happen if freeview just stopped one day.

Godmars2905864d ago

The feature was first mentioned when the consoles were first announced, yet its been 3-4 since they actually started popping up. Now less than a year they're talking about the 2nd generation of the technology, when this whole console generation proabbly has 1-2 years left before the next is announced, which will likely have DVRs built into them.

Compare that to the life of VHS, DVDs and even Blu-ray, even though its just a sub0set of DVRs, and you're talking 3 generations of technology in as many years. With consumers expected to buy and support it discarding the older versions.

No wonder we're in the mess we're in...

Milky Joe5864d ago

If you're not bothered about viewing Freeview HD, then you don't need to buy it. That would apply to any DVR. It's not Sony's fault that the broadcasting technology has moved on.

Why would they continue to sell a product that doesn't conform to the current standard when they could release an updated product that does? Giving people who bought the old one the chance to update if they're bothered about HD channels and not selling obsolete hardware to new buyers.

If they were making it so you had to update to continue using PlayTV then that would be wrong, but people who have the current one can keep using it until freeview is 'switched off'.

IdleLeeSiuLung5863d ago

I partly agree with Godmars here, but reality is that we get a new game every year, and most probably get a new cell phone every other year so this isn't that big of a deal if they continue to support the older device.

Finally, if you don't like how the company treats their "valued" customer, do NOT buy their products!!!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5863d ago
ALFAxD_CENTAURO5864d ago (Edited 5864d ago )

It's normal developing a new system in this kind of cases, the Technology is always changing, and PlayTV it is from 2008 or 2007.

It is like the games and developers, they finished with a Title, after a short of time, they start with the plans to make a sequel.

masterg5864d ago

Are you guys kidding.
Anytime you buy technology you know something better and cheaper will come out next year. The consoles are just about the only thing where we have years in every circle.

The people who buys iPhones get screwed every 6 months according to you.

silvacrest5864d ago

i dont no why you guys are complaining, playTV has been out since 2008, thats long enough before a sequal can make an apperance

technology is always moving forward, what ever you buy now will be out dated eventually

vhero5863d ago (Edited 5863d ago )

Why would people who bought Play TV want a replacement or feel they are entitled to 1? The second version will obviously be different/an improvement . That's like saying when PS3 came out you was entitled to PS3 for free because you bought a PS2. This one is gonna be more advanced and it may be the box that connects to SKY for Sonys new deal with SKY. As long as your play TV is still gonna keep working you got what you paid for so shut up whining already.

SuperStrokey11235863d ago

Why should they get a new one? The old one works exactly the way it was advertised, better infact.

This is just a new piece of tech thats not needed. They are neither screwed nor do they deserve at cost replacements.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5863d ago
sjeen665864d ago

i wonder where is playtv 1 ???

tdrules5864d ago

a sequel to a set top box?
wat.

Raf1k15864d ago

It's a PS3 add-on. Allows you to record TV and stuff. The Japanese ones really cool from what I've seen in the promo video. PayTV 2 should be pretty good.

oliverasadi5864d ago

I worked at spong.com :) go me

mushroomwig5864d ago

"Worked"

Being fired isn't really something to be proud of. ;)

silvacrest5864d ago

thats kinda rude, dont assume he was fired

jack_burt0n5864d ago

it will just be freeview HD which u cant blame them for everyone has to buy a new digibox dont they!?

Show all comments (57)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
53d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted53d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8553d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele52d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk52d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay52d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 52d ago
Athlon10153d ago (Edited 53d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit52d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg52d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10152d ago (Edited 52d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14952d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
66d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_66d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle65d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker66d ago (Edited 66d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit65d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog66d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_66d ago (Edited 66d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog66d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad66d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_66d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage66d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda65d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

66d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong92d ago

looks god awful on the base systems