another?

Getting this for PS3, because I have more friends in PSN than Live to play with. Besides the exclusive content.

Now this is just becoming ridiculous.

How Snooty.

Its all good though, after the fun i had making fun of ALan Wake Its okay that 360 gamers get some too. even though I cant see what the difference is.

Its just too bad im not as upset as 360 fans were with alan wake the exclusive 5 years in the making, rated 8.0 survival not-so- horror dvd game.

Im playing red dead redemption on a 46" HDTV with Free PSN online. It Looks wonderful. Its Graphics are on par with Playstation HOME yet for the xbox360 its the best looking game to date. Standards? Dont cha wish your console was hot like ps3? Dont cha?

Well I'm gonna rent RDR first and see how it is and if I like it. Anyway I never depend and never will expect multiplatform titles to take advantage of the PS3 hardware or what it can do. From the standing point 3rd parties are complete bs when it comes to porting over to the ps3 least most of them. Not gonna bash the 360 I put the blame completely on Rockstar.

Its NOT acceptable to have sub-HD resolution, period. But the point is, this game was made to generate some revenues while they work on GTA5 and Agent, and essentially used the GTA4 engine. As GTA4 was superior on the 360, RDR would be superior on the 360 as well - if Valve made Half Life 3 based on the HL2 engine, the PS3 version would continue to be as awful as in case of orange box.

We should just be thankful that, for a game that wasnt the main project for Rockstar, it turned out to be so much fun.

The real question is, rather, how much better Agent would be. I would expect that game to tap the PS3's potential, run at 720pand show some decent graphical improvements over GTA4/RDR.

ps3 fans want games to reach their full potential.doesn't matter if it's graphics,online or psn game downloads.we know gameplay matters most.but we want developers to push themselves.if developers don't push themselves,what's the point?

which is why we respect sony in house developers.sure they can just create games.but isn't the point of next gen(current gen) is to outdo last gen gameplay AND graphics?if it isn't,then there was no need for this gen.

ps3 fans know there are developers who haven't caught up to sony exclusive games.but ps3 fans aren't defending them.we know they are not up to speed.we want them to catch up.the only defense i see is against 360 flip floppers.

first graphics mattered when ps3 released to 360 fans.when the graphics crown was taken,they jumped sales.when sales was taken away,they jumped to reviews.when reviews were taken and shown by metacritic,they jumped to online.when online was taken away by 30-60-256 players,the only think 360 fans have left is multiplatform games looking slightly better OCCASIONALLY.

i know microsoft wants you to jump around,jump in,jump for joy for sales and such.but you really need to stop jumping.when you can't name games that are exclusive that are beating ps3 exclusives,you have nothing to hold on to.when you laugh and snicker about multiplatform engines not up to speed,but neglect exclusive games not even hitting 720p,you go nothing to hold on to.when the last graahic awards you received was back when gears 1 launched,you got nothing to hold on to.

RR doesn't hold up on ps3 slightly.tell us something new.but also tell us why ps3 exclusives aren't the case?and why more 360 first party games fall into the catagory of sub-hd?

Shut up and play games. Buy which everyone you want and enjoy it.

I'm glad RockStar is trying to make the best games as possible so they can compete with other developers not letting the lowest common denominator console hold their work back, they got to eat too. They also want a chance at GOTY, they need every advantage they can get.

Sir may I please have some MOAR!!
This site is turning me into a fanboy...*sigh*...i hate you guys, really, i do.
But more sub-hd RDR PS3 articles please. :)

what many just dont get its NOT a knock on the PS3 its a knock on RS...
they are the ones who blew it...we all know what the PS3 is capable of...
just another case on a lazy developer and what irks me about RS is they knew it and showed all 360 stuff up until the games release.
slimbags....

like when FF13 came out. It was day after day of trashing the 360. Article after article of it. PS3 owners (I own 2 btw) lined up on N4G to denounce the 360 and its sub-HD port. Now yet another multiplat game gives the 360 higher resolution, better AA and better frame rates. What do we hear? Quotes like "shut up and game" or "how many articles do we need?". Cry fanboys, you sad pathetic whiners. Both systems are great, both have great games. Lining up behind one, and only one just makes you look stupid.

Im playing on the ps3 and having a blast. People would rather argue about a game than play it. You guys are not gamers. You are ppl who belong at these big sites like ign that say they play games.

and cyborg6971 reported for personal attack. pointing out the hypocrisy is NOT childish but personally attacking someone when you have no argument is. you lost that one cyborg.. u 2 should have your bubbles swapped and I will do my best to see that it happens.

where were all these when FFXIII released? or heck even AW when it was being thrashed because of sub-HD resolutions?
now everyone says it doesnt matter? WTF kind of double standard hypocrisy is going on here? i will bet my lab coat that the next 360 subHD game is going to be thrashed and not one of these apologists claiming it doesnt matter will be found..
is consistency when it comes to these sort of things too much to ask?

You can't achieve anti-aliasing on the RAGE engine because its deferred rendering
if this is to be correct then its only 720p on 360

lmao....please no more thead conparisons of RDR we all know the 360 version is superior in every way.

I completed both version of GTAIV atleast two times. I have to say PS3 version is more blurry, but the texture are more detail. The XBOX360 version looks sharper but the texture is somewhat more plain. The color is a huge difference. The 360 color is more vibrant and PS3 color is more dark which makes it have a more realistic look.

EVIDENCE:
Choose first person view when you ride in the car and you see 360 version does not have the dirt on the hood of the car but PS3 does.

The face of NIKO is obvious more blurry on PS3 but sharper on 360.

CONCLUSION: You guys hear this so many time, but its more about preference. I like the 360 sharpness but prefer the color of the PS3. So its up to the controller and which console you have. Both copy cost $59.99 when it came out.

I get a laugh from all the fanboys that are screaming " It doesnt matter". This is after they spent 10 minutes writing a 2 page story crying about it. Obviously it matters alot more than you wanna admit. Stop your fanboy crybaby ways and get both consoles, you guys are the ones missing out.

Come on Rockstar this game shouldn't even challenge the PS3, work with naughty dog or Santa Monica do something the PS3 has been out for four years you should be alot better than sub hd. I'll still be getting it though, you never know we might get a patch.