
In that screenshot comparison Videogameszone checked the graphical and technical differences between CryEngine 3 and Unreal Engine 3.

Darryl Linington from Notebookheck writes: "Keebmon is a crowdfunded foldable workstation concept that combines a Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 PC, a 13-inch ultrawide touchscreen, and a low-profile mechanical keyboard in a single aluminum device."

bbno$ has temporarily shut down his website after receiving a legal notice from Blizzard Entertainment related to Diablo-themed content.

Standard controllers aren’t comfortable for everyone…
As an accessibility option for those that need it im all for it. As the standard control for ps6 helllll noo, touch controller would be the absolute worst.
This is interesting not only for accessibility reasons, but as a way to give players more control over their in game characters for core gamers.
I remember seeing the Tactus pop up buttons at CES 13 years ago and I was excited for the technology but I am not aware of any devices that used it.
The way gaming controllers are presented today is great, but I will always advocate for innovation in giving players more control and increased immersion.
Terrible idea. For most games, you need to feel the physical buttons because you're not looking at the controller. I hope they aren't serious.
More accessibility options is never a bad thing, but man I hate that all electronics seem to be pushing touchscreen controls on everything.
They are just garbage
well the difference is pretty large.
but comparing a new engine to a 5(?) year old one is a tad unfair.
UE3 has lasted, barely, now everyone should use CE3
Lets see some games already.
From afar the UE always looks good but once you zoom in, you can see some ugly mess. As for this comparison CE wins it by miles.
@ kaveiti
I hope they upped the lighting effect in the new UE, as it seems to be a major factor for the beautiful visuals in games nowadays
Cryengine ftw, please.
Now, let us have Crysis 2.
e.g