All Channels
Popular
240°

Did Heavy Rain Fail?

Has Heavy Rain failed as a game in its pursuit of a film-like experience? What is the essence of gaming and should gamers and the industry continue to pursue the film medium?

Read Full Story >>
gametunes.net
Noble Spartan5917d ago

Yep

MAG = FAIL
HEAVY RAIN = FAIL
INFAMOUS = FAIL
RESISTANCE = FAIL
HAZE= FAIL

Shall I continue?

Mass effect 2 96% metacritic, PS3 users though uncharted 2 was top the game, wasn't even months and got owned. Microsoft to easy for them lol.

CernaML5917d ago

I don't think the PS3 can top Too Human as the biggest flop of the century.

LiViNgLeGaCY5917d ago

May I ask for an explanation as to why you think those other awesome games failed?

Sonyslave35917d ago

LOL this game flop harder then R2 and Infamous combine

XabiTheHumble5917d ago

@the ding dong duo right because selling over a million and averaging AA reviews on metacritic is a flop right lol

LarVanian5917d ago

Well it certainly didn't flop as bad as Xbox 360 did in 2009.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5917d ago
taslo5917d ago

I guess the divisive comment made in the article is bearing itself out :)

kenpachi5917d ago

"Alan silent hill siren blood curse Wait 6 years" will flop even harder

DarkTower8055917d ago

I really like the fact that he brings up the Destructiod review of Heavy Rain. Any time you use a laffable website such as Destructiod as a basis for your article, the fail has already began.

Destructiod gave Deadly Premonition a 10/10, because they said that one shouldn't score games in comparison to other games, instead review it for what it is. Yet, when reviewing Heavy Rain they compared it to a movie at some times and a video game at other times. I don't know if Heavy rain has a name for it's genre, but when you compare it to established entertainment genres it will excel in some and fall short in others.

That's why when playing a game like Heavy Rain you have to play it with an open mind and review it for what it is...an entertainment experience. You have to ask yourself, "Did Heavy Rain entertain me?" With this question, many reviewers around the globe unanimously answered "Yes".

I will approve this article for one reason though. One of the major signs of a "game's" success is the amount of water-cooler talk it creates. Heavy rain will prompt you to talk about it for days after experiencing it, and that's where this game will find major success, by word of mouth. So, if you haven't picked up Heavy Rain yet, I encourage you to do so ASAP, it's an experience you don't want to miss.

taslo5917d ago

You bring up some very valuable points concerning entertainment and the experience of the game.

However, I don't think throwing out the article based on a Destructiod story is worthwhile. It was not the Heavy Rain review but rather an article titled "Why Heavy Rain proves Ebert right." Sure I don't respect them very much but the article linked to is actually quite well put and succeeds despite the blog that hosts it.

Bungie5917d ago

i don't think it Failed , it wasn't that awesome

i'll say it's decent at its best

DarkTower8055917d ago (Edited 5917d ago )

Again though, Destructoid's article, "Why Heavy Rain proves Ebert right", while well written, is based on the quote of Ebert, "Video games by their nature require player choices, which is the opposite of the strategy of serious film and literature, which requires authorial control."

What I got from the article is that Heavy Rain compromised it's story by giving the player the choice to choose the outcome of the story. This is where Destructoid failed once again. Part of the beauty of HR is giving the player the ability to choose the outcome. And imo, it worked.

So again, some say HR fails as a game and others say it fails as a movie. That's because critics constantly compare it to one or the other, or both instead of reviewing if for what it is, an entertainment experience.

taslo5917d ago

"So again, some say HR fails as a game and others say it fails as a movie. That's because critics constantly compare it to one or the other, or both instead of reviewing if for what it is, an entertainment experience."

I would have to agree with that statement. So it seems we have entertainment in Heavy Rain that is neither a game nor a film but rather defining its own genre.

Sarcasm5917d ago

Bungie, you need a PS3 first to even play it. Watching videos on IGN or Gametrailers doesn't mean you've played it. Now go back to your mother's basement and play with your 360.

mastiffchild5917d ago

Heavy Rain really HASN'T failed at all. As a mainstream, if new and niche, title it really was a new phenomena and that it tackled themes usually found in film, tackled them often with a cinematic bent has seemingly confused some people into thinking way too hard while holding the wrong end of the wrong stick.

Much is made of the filmic tendencies of Cage's efforts with the game but game it stays and game it proudly is despite whatever Cage himself might say to promote it to people who really aren't going to look as deeply into it as this. D'toid making WAY too much of Ebert in order to pre empt Sterling's hatchet job(and a tactless, buffoon like attack at best), further self aggrandisement article in spurious "review" form was not the best reference this piece could have used either, imo.

Fact is there's a little something to simplifying "game" down to it's component parts and, yes, "fun" is a vital part of what makes a game a game. Yes,HR succeeds because it's fun. It's a fun game and I've enjoyed playing it through a few times now and it's heightened my appreciation of what QD managed with it if anything.

It's no film because of the pacing of everything. Even though, and this is where it's REALLY impressive in it's own right, the game can vary in length because of your failings and/or successes the pacing is still right. It's still paced like a game and doesn't fall into the MW2 trap of pacing itself like a film and then needing to twist and turn nonsensically to fill it's longer timeframe. That it does this with variable length and content is truly a work of some small genius in my eyes too.

It offers a new glimpse into control and mundane things become interesting and important throughout the the length of any playthrough and serve to immerse you in new ways to the medium. It's not as clever as some of the people criticising it(not saying that here, mind)seem to think they are and maybe not as much as Cage would like to think either-but it's both fun and engrossing and that's all I ask from most of my SP gaming.

It was never going to be a game that appealed across the board and in an industry where anything off the beaten track is viewed with a degree of mistrust the sales it's getting and reviews it garnered are impressive to say the least. I dare say it will end up selling a fair bit better than Sony or even QD might have thought it would as many people I know who baulked at IP and the thought of HR initially have been blown away, at least in part, by what QD did with the ideas.So, no, it really didn't fail, either actually or in the area of fulfilling it's medium's obligatory rites.

Obviously, as it's a very new way for writers and actors to work and at times both must have questioned what the characters motivations were at ponts where the neccessity of gameplay switched from type. These are the times when acting and/or storytelling/writing were less than stellar and some places (Hello GR)took themselves to town over these hiccups with nary a mention of why it might have happened and just went with "hammy" in the absence of anything constructive, or actually, sensible, to say. Fact is those times are it's worst points and where Cage must hope to work out the kinks in future and they ARE important as they're when it "game" qualities forced it out of the filmic comfort zone it otherwise inhabits with confidence. They're jarring because they don't quite ft as well and take youout of the thing you're involved with in game to question it all and that's not great.

However, for me, those moments are fleeting and the game flows pretty well from mundane to exciting with superb flair in the most part and while it relies more on writing than anything else I can think of it still supersedes the accusation that it's a "movie" in so many ways and fulfils the criteria for being a game by having fresh control ideas as well as fresh QTE type events which are both fun, require some skill or thought at times and, most importantly, it's engrossing fun. It shows a glimpse of what may one day be possible and if Cage follows this road after getting so much good attention with this who's to say he can't add to and expand and perfect the genre himself and open the door to all kinds of similar games in the future. Thye'll all be games as well, imo.

deadreckoning6665917d ago (Edited 5917d ago )

Can someone define what 'failiure" is? Im seeing comments and people have different definitions for the word.

If a game is a failure or not depends on the person. PS3 fanboys thought ODST was a failiure, yet I got many hours of enjoyment from it with friends. 360 fanboys thought KZ2 was a failiure, yet I thought its multiplayer was second to none for about a year or so.

Failure is SUBJECTIVE, no ones ever gunna be able to PROVE that Heavy Rain failed or didn't fail. It's opinion. Even if a person says Heavy Rain fails SALESWISE, failiure would STILL be subjective because everyone has a different opinion of what failiure in sales is.

Edit: lol, the EPIC BATLLE OF OPINIONS rages on.

taslo5917d ago

Thank you so very much for your well thought out reply. You know what your are talking about and I, for one, greatly appreciate that.

Anorexorcist5917d ago (Edited 5917d ago )

I could go on and on with the more reasonable reasons why Heavy Rain succeeds, but DarkTower85 and mastiffchild pretty much covered that side of the argument fully with their comments up above.

So I'll go with another more extraordinary reason why Heavy Rain doesn't fail: If it really was a failure, you wouldn't see these many types of articles being written about it.

Call me crazy or even unreasonable, but I am one to believe that there is some kind of cult-like discrimination going on against the PS3 and it's exclusives within certain channels in the gaming media, and the more non-encouraging, doom-and-gloom articles I see coming only proves to me that this discriminating cult following isn't quite secure in whether they have gotten their partisan hyperbole out to the mass gamer populous.

Saaking5917d ago

Not even close. In fact, it exceeded my expectations. Something that's hard to do given all the amazing PS3 exclusives. I can safely say, Heavy Rain is currently my favorite PS3 game.

kneon5917d ago

Otherwise why would every second article I see on N4G be about HR :)

sikbeta5917d ago

Eh... NO!!!!

The Game is Awesome, the story is Great, no Perfect, but is Great, BETTER than any of the Lone-wolf shooter plot flooding the Gaming Market..

Why this site is asking that, need some fvcking hits or something, Thanks NOW Bungie and his multiple Accounts will start to flood the Comment section....

Ah..Too Late...Bungie, GET A LIFE!

Lykon5917d ago

and so far would say ....

graphics 9/10
gameplay 7/10
value for money 7/10
replay value 6/10
emotional involvment 9/10

my biggest issue is that for 40 quid i haven't really got much of an actual game to play. so i feel it is poor value for money. a movie on dvd costs about 10 quid , i'd be happy to pay 20 for heavy rain. great for what it is though.

kneon5917d ago (Edited 5917d ago )

I think you will find that the replay value is better than you might expect, which then should increase the perceived value for money. You may also find your emotional involement score getting bumped up as you get further into it. On a relative scale as compared to other games it's an 11/10 for me, nothing else even comes close. But then I had to go through 2 unexpected character deaths on my first play through.

While you'll not likely still be playing it a year from now, you will probably replay it at least a few times. I've already gotten to 3 very different endings and that was just by changing the outcome of one segment for each ending. There are still at least 4 or 5 other decisions I want to retry and see what happens so I'm getting my money's worth.

I don't know how many endings are possible, I've seen numbers ranging from 5 to 70+. Does anyone know the real number?

aaron58295917d ago

Got the 4 heroes trophy yet i've only completed 47% of my trophy list and i was like whoa.. wtf... alright... select "New Game"

This game is just awesome... fine if you wana call it interactive drama/movie... , then it sure is the best of it all...

Story is insane... I DIDNT EXPECT THAT AT ALL !!!

:D

Those who talk sh1t about it without playing it.. is missing it all...

Its so intense !!

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 5917d ago
Show all comments (76)
70°

Death is Not the End: 7 Games Where the Story Continues Without You

Ben from Netto's Game Room takes a look at 7 video games where dying doesn't mean the end, as the story and world simply continue on without you.

Read Full Story >>
nettosgameroom.com
218d ago
80°

5 Horror Games With Depressing Endings

We present a list of horror games with depressing endings, each known for its unique experience and storytelling.

Read Full Story >>
relyonhorror.com
P_Bomb276d ago

I’m reminded of some of the alternate endings in the Suffering games.

100°

Please stop comparing video games to movies

"Many video games catch not only great commercial attention but remarkable critical attention as well. We have seen games like Heavy Rain, The Last of Us Part II, and even entries in the Metal Gear series described as fantastic interactive experiences, even heralded in the same way as Hollywood's greatest films.

I would suggest that not only is this an unfair comparison but also a harmful one. Video games, by their very nature, are an intricately different medium and should be weighed against one another rather than another form of media," Phillip writes for GF365.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Fist4achin2004d ago

Yes, please stop. They're better than most hollywood drivel nowadays.

BLAKHOODe2004d ago

I think Hollywood films will becoming increasingly more like video games in the future, especially as the world embraces the "new normal" from the pandemic. It makes sense, as games like Spider-Man: Miles Morales showcase just how realistically we're reaching in graphical capabilities, as well as showcase extreme action sequences in spectacular ways. And as time goes by, it'll get easier and cheaper to produce such "art", as well as create new star "actors" that never age, never die, never complain, never gets involved in scandals, etc. Technology is amazing and we're only just getting a taste of what it'll eventually be.

sourOG2004d ago

No. Some games are like movies.

medman2004d ago (Edited 2004d ago )

No. For the money spent, a quality game provides far more entertainment value than a quality movie. Especially when looking at what is going on in the world, and how a studio can attempt to pilfer from consumers by charging 30 dollars for Mulan via streaming. Ridiculous. There is no comparison....games all day.