All Channels
Popular
640°

Square Enix Comment On FFXIII PS3, 360 Comparisons

CC: Final Fantasy XIII producer Yoshinori Kitase has commented on the comparisons between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of the game.

Read Full Story >>
connectedconsoles.com
SpaceSquirrel5945d ago

I'm sure the game will look great on both platforms.

mjolliffe5945d ago

As long as all is in good shape with the game (on both platforms) I'll be happy!

silverbeld5945d ago

Swap discs and OOPS! I just crashed the disk. :(

DavidMacDougall5945d ago

Yeah it will look good on both but better on PS3

: )

blitz06235945d ago

More BS from Square. First they say that the PS3 version will look better. Now, after being caught doctoring the pics, they say both versions ARE EXACTLY THE SAME graphics-wise? Are they saying the screenshots posted before were really real? Gimme a break

Immortal3215945d ago

I swear man this site is run by Jerks

NOOBKILLA5945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

I'm sure the actually gameplay will be identical. However, the cutscenes and audio won't be at all. I anticipate the cut scenes on the PS3 version to look similar to the way FF7: Advent Chrilden did on blu- ray. There is no way Square Enix would be able to fit that type of video quality onto a DVD without the game being on like 8 dvds. And we aren't even going to talk about the audio.

I have both a 360 and a PS3, I plan to get FF 13 on the PS3 because I like the feel of a playstation controller when I play FF games and the cutscenes will look amazing on my 52" 1080p TV.

snaz275945d ago

360 fans/owners they wont show what your getting! and as they have lied already whats to stop them lying again? can you trust them now? ps3 fans/owners they have treated you like the s**t on the bottom of thier shoe! i mean arent you all sending out a message, not just to SE, but to every developer saying "hey do what the hell you like, we gamers are pushovers and well buy your game regardless of what you do! here ill bent over for you now shall i?"... shouldnt they show us all some respect? i mean they want our money right? anyway im not getting this game, to be honest probably never was, but i feel bad for everyone concerned here, apart from SE ofcourse.

presto7175945d ago

It is just a minor inconvenience. I mean come on . How long does it take you to swap a disk.

But it is an inconvenience nonetheless. Ideally, the game should be on 1 disk. Which it is... on one platform.

Its just that when I hear that content had to be CUT OUT then that troubles me. Especially when I get this gut feeling it was to keep the disk count down to three. Again....on one platform.

MasFlowKiller5945d ago

no one can argue that the the final product has been dumb down, and if ur stupid enough ill probably refer you to the advent children demo.

i thought that the reason the game got dumb down was to make both copy's equal so wat happen?

97gsx5945d ago

That check must have been big if they aren't even allowed to comment.

snaz275945d ago

those are some more reasons to pass this game up, just to send SE a message, but you know what gamers just wont do it, if i was a FF fan though id show my feelings by turning my back on this game! SE need to know, there will be ramifications! but bet it sells millions still, its such a shame, and so the screwing over continues!

Saaking5945d ago

Yea, they didn't alter it at all. Weren't they claiming that they took so much stuff out that they could make and entirely new game? Where's my English/Japanese voice option? Why do the graphics look so cheap?

SE hyped this up to be the greatest JRPG ever, but the moment it went multiplat we all knew that would not come close to happening. It's evident that they have not delivered and this WILL be the lowest rated FF in it's history. Really pathetic Square, really pathetic.

If they screw up FFvsXIII, I'm through with the FF series.

morganfell5945d ago

Do people realize that what he is saying is not the same as and should not be confused with "The PS3 and 360 versions are the same."

sikbeta5945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

Hilarious, This guys @ S-E are so dumb, just Shut UP!

Instead of shut their mouths and let the whole Photoshoped/Doctored-Pictures/ Comparison from the 2 Version slowly stop, still talking... what a crowd of idiots lol

Anyway, I want to know WTF they're going to say when comparisons starting to Appear

Immortal Kaim5945d ago

Really looking forward to this game, who's with me? :)

Anyone care to discuss the actual game, you know, like real gamers would? So I'm looking forward to specifically reaching chapter 11 as that is where the game apparently really opens up, mmm sounds familiar to FFX doesn't it....

What are people's thoughts on the Voice acting? I prefer the way SE have done the English VA in FFXIII, I think it's more important that they actually went to the trouble of synching the facial movements with the English Dub than put in a Japanese track that the majority of people will never use. Thoughts?

Fanboys need not reply :)

snaz275945d ago

your more of a gamer because your willing to take the crap that SE are dishing out to you? and anyone that doesnt like thier underhanded tactics, and money grabbing antics are fanboys? really? SE have lip synced the english voices, yeah and? they do want your money you know! so they should lip sync the bloody voices! your saying they are doing it cos they love you or something? oh lets just gloss over all the lies they have told too! wow just wow!

kwicksandz5945d ago

this is one game i cant wait to see the eurogamer and lense of truth comparisons on! i predict 2000 degrees for those articles =)

Immortal Kaim5945d ago

What underhanded tactics? Bringing the game to the Xbox 360? Who cares, I'm buying it on PS3 anyway, it doesn't affect my enjoyment of the game.

What is with the sense of entitlement of some of you guys, if you aren't happy with the product, don't buy it, simple. The thing is though, you hypocritical whinges will buy the game anyway...

commodore645945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

@ kwicksandz

YEah, I am also looking forward to those comparisons.
There are going to be be 3 possible outcomes, with respectively predictable comments on n4g.
Read below.

Outcome 1: The PS3 version is superior.
On n4g, this will be taken as irrefutable proof of the ps3 power and undeniable superiority. The 360 will be labeled as second rate and heavily disparaged.

Outcome2: The 360 game is superior.
On n4g, LOT and Eurogamer will be called biased liars and disparaged heavily. PS3 fans will get very angry and mention UC2 and KZ2 a few hundred times as irrefutable proof of the ps3 power.

Outcome 3: Both versions are remarkably equal.
On n4g, this will be seen as evidence that the ps3 game was gimped due to multiplat release. It will be forgotten that the game was developed and maximised on ps3 first and then ported to the 360. The 360 will be blamed for the poor performance of every ps3 multiplat so far. UC2 and KZ2 will be mentioned several hundred times, as part of the automatic n4g damage control, in events such as these.

... did I cover it all?

AKNAA5945d ago

""The development team created the PS3 version first, of course, but they didn’t alter the content at all in order to bring it to the 360."

That rite there is enough to convince me that the PS3 version will be great! and that's all I really care about in the end...

MGSR THE HD VERSION5945d ago

@ 1.2 -

................so you're saying that you're incapable of holding a fvcken disc correctly?

what the fvck is that, is that seriously beyond you?

so what you do you do when you wanna swap out ff13 and play some killzone2 on your ps3?

it's going to happen some time....unless you have it stuck in your fvcking console.

most RPGs that have multiple discs have 17 to 20 hrs of game content spread out on each disc......most regular games are barely 13 hrs of game content for the entire game. so it's gonna happen anyway...if not for the same game it's gonna happen when you wanna play something else.

wquach5945d ago

...that this official statement doesn't even touch upon the clearly doctored screens.

It isn't even a response to them. It's essentially saying, "Yep, the two versions are pretty much the same."

That may be the case, that they are "comparable" but to look EXACTLY the same? Not a chance, especially when Square themselves said they are running on two different engines.

The comment should be on the purpose of the doctored screens and just admitting outright that they were doctored. Seriously, same explosions and positions but only different button layout? Gimme a break.

The issue is not of fanboys or of superiority of one system over the other as other comments are focusing on, but of false advertising and suspicious advertising tactics.

If Kitase is so certain that the two versions are "comparable" and near equals, then why the need to photoshop the button layout? Let the REAL screenshots from both versions speak for themselves.

So the question still stands,

"Why doctor the screens and not provide an adequate explanation?"

snaz275945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

please show me where i have said im pissed its gone to 360? just one comment please... ive already said in this thread that i wasnt gonna buy the game anyway... do you really need me to tell you the underhanded tactics? well ok, once they signed the deal with MS they held back the ps3 version, so the 360 version could catch up! why not just release the ps3 version? it was near finished! they release some pics, and they turn out to be doctoered! then they come out to make excuses saying it was a mistake, ok it was a mistake, so where are the real screens then? surely they could just send the real screens no? its been like 2-3 days now! honestly if you cant see any of this as being wrong then i think you need your brain checked seriously!

EDIT: AKNAA so your willing to take the word of PROVEN liars?? really? lmao fair play mate, fair play!

Immortal Kaim5945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

It is clear by your comments that you aren't being rational about the situation. Please provide proof to these claims that the Xbox 360 version Held back the PS3 version from being released... It has been stated (several times) that the 360 port was being handled by a different team whilst the localisation process was occurring. Plus, check out the release date... less than 4 months from Japanese release to BOTH the US AND PAL releases...A first for the series. SO where is this supposed delay?

Link http://www.1up.com/do/newsS...

Regarding the pictures which a clearly photoshopped, not a smart move (knowing the mentality of some of the fans), but hey. What's done is done. It isn't like they haven't showed the 360 version or let previews go out. In-fact a couple of publications have claimed that the 360 version looks better in gameplay, and others have claimed the opposite. I think we can gather from this that it isn't going to be a shoddy port (bayonetta style) in the very least.

It's clear where your loyalties lie, and that's fair enough, but you have to look at the situation objectively.

EDIT @ SNAZ

I just provided you with a link outlining exactly what I described. No need to go looking for proof, it's right there. Also that link below supposedly detailing proof that content was cut to fit on 360, you didn't read it did you? It says nothing of the sort. Again, you aren't looking at it objectively...

snaz275945d ago

im not gonna go trawling the net looking for your proof, its prtty common knowlegde what happend, but no matter what i say or what proof you see you wont change your mind, yet you say i have to look at it in a different way! a guy down below provided a link too showing this same guy said that they cut stuff out the game cos of the 360! honestly i dont care about this game, i dont like turn based games, its just i hate companies like this, who think they can treat gamers like mugs! but well with people like you buying thier games i can see why they feel they can get away with it... trust me if this was the other way round id be the same... and the pics that were lied about were the 360 ones! i still shout about that! but why should i care if im a sony fanboy as you think? i speak my mind mate thats all, i say it how i see it!

snaz275945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

but all you gotta do is type content cut into google, here is one link... ok it doesnt show the guy saying it, but read between the lines mate! its gonna be on 3 dvds already, you know ms charge to have it on more dont you? it seems you cant use common sense mate, ive read enough articles about this game to know fishy stuff has no doubt been going on! the pics were the final nail in the coffin! they are proven liars so why would i listen to them now? even you admit what they did was wrong lol http://www.escapistmagazine...
edit http://www.itwire.com/tech-... heres anpther link about the delay, saying they would release the 2 versions the same time, but they hadnt started on the 360 one yet! lmao come on use some common sense... anyway im not gonna get anywhere with you as your clearly a SE fanboy, by all means enjoy your game, show them you will take it lying down

we won5945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

Still think SE is trying to hide the superior 360 gameplay visuals. Letting PS3 fanboys think their version is the same or superior, is a much smarter strategy than letting people know the PS3 version is inferior causing massive backlash and poorer sales

Immortal Kaim5945d ago

Unfortunately that comment doesn't back up your claims that they cut content specifically to fit on 3 DVD's. Developer's 'cut' content all the time for almost every game, sometimes it just doesn't fit the overall vision, the might have time or resource constraints etc etc. There is a precedent that MS charges to have games span multiple disks, but significantly smaller studios have managed to produce even larger games (LO is on 4 disks), so it shouldn't be an issue for a studio like SE.

As Kitase has stated, the game as seen on PS3/360 is the overall vision they had for the product.

P.S Please don't be condescending with the 'use common sense' comments...

snaz275945d ago

they cant even admit releasing those screenshots on purpose! but where are the real ones, why is it taking so long... it isnt that just one thing happened during this development, that has me thinking this way... im not alone in my thoughts either... all these things add up mate... but like i say you wont look at it realistically, you keep quoting those proven liars lmao. its fine you buy the game, most people dont even know what they buy anyway, which is a shame, people should research what they buy more... for instance i met this guy at kick boxing, he has a ps3... hed never heard of killzone 2 or uncharted 2 lmao i couldnt believe it. just goes to show, SE know this, every dev knows this, thats why they take the piss!

Immortal Kaim5945d ago

It is not a matter of me being suckered in, or not seeing the bigger picture, the things people claiming are out of order etc just don't bother me. I only care about playing a game I have been waiting years for, one that I have followed closely over the year. It isn't like I'm blindly buying the game based on past loyalty, I'm a fan of the series yes, but I have also checked out enough preview/vid/article information to determine that it is a game a want to play. The assumption that buying the game means you are getting 'suckered in' is a false one, I should have the right to purchase what I like, irrespective of other's opinion on the developer.

snaz275945d ago

but your right you have the right to buy whatever you want, i cant stop you, but also i have the right to discuss how SE and MS have acted over this, without being called a fanboy! or having it implied im not a gamer because i voice my opinion over thier shady dealings... like i said no matter what happened you would buy it regardless, just dont be suprised when that dlc shows up! you know the stuff they deny lmao

Traveler5945d ago

I am getting the game anyway. I don't buy any of that nonsense about it being downgraded because of the 360. I'm sorry, but if you look at it rationally it doesn't make a bit of sense.

Immortal Kaim5945d ago

Fair enough, you're entitled to your opinion as am I. I apologise for implying you're just another mindless fanboy for your initial comment, it is hard to tell the 'good' from the 'bad' around these parts ;)

I'm out of bubbles so I'm done. btw, I didn't disagree with your comments, just so you know.

Regards, Immortal Kaim

snaz275945d ago

to the traveler, dont bloody start weve been through all this lmao... i guess you dont buy the faked pics either, oh well what can you do.... oh btw immortal kain i dont hit disagree either, for a start i wouldnt bother, i dissagree with words and secondly i cant as i come on here with the ps3 browser, and for some reason you cant use the agree or dissagree, take care anyway.

Darrius Cole5945d ago

Which is more likely,...
Square is hiding the fact that the 360 version looks worse?.... or Square is hiding the fact that the PS3 version looks worse?

While I am not sure which one it is that they are trying to hide, I am sure that it would be a bigger deal if the 360 version has better graphics. That would set N4G and the gaming internet community on fire. PS3 fans would feel completely sold-out by SquareEnix (and they would be right.) It would probably affect their sales on PS3.

If the 360 version is inferior it doesn't matter to 360 fans, if they want it on 360 they will buy it regardless.

snp5945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

I am getting the game anyway. I don't buy any of that nonsense about it being downgraded because of the 360. I'm sorry, but if you look at it rationally it doesn't make a bit of sense.
------

Actually, 'rationally' you can make a case either way. Ultimately people will decide on hunches, bits of conjecture, interpretation of tech strengths/limitations (and possible effects on design), reliability of the PR involved, and where those fail to convince them they'll probably just decide to believe whoever they'd prefer to believe.

It's just plain fact that no-one can actually 'know' either way.

I'll state up front my 'hunch' is the day SE signed the deal is the same day they probably rushed back to the code and said to themselves 'how can we retool this to fit on three DVD's, and what do we have to amend of what we've created so far' (be it structure or content).

But i can't know. It may be they just got lucky and the 25 gig of contiguous data they had "finished" squeezed nicely onto three compartmented sets of non-contiguous space, in such a way that these three areas could be more or less linear and not involve any more than single disc swaps many hours apart.

I'll say again, i (personally) find that very 'unlikely' - i think design decisions top down on using one block of 25 gigs are probably quite different to using '3/4x's ~7 gigs' - but i just don't know. No-one does.

jadenkorri5944d ago

thats hilarious

to outcome 1, yeah that'll happen, no way MS gonna pay money for this multi-plat game and have it look worse compared to its counter part.. So, no won't happen. I'm already calling it now.

to outcome 2, this is most likely, IMO - just another extension of MS deep pockets to make their competitor Sony look bad. Yes N4G will up in arms and prob blab about UC2 and KZ2 and claim squareenix was bought by MS, which they were already, just surprised people haven't figured it out yet.

to outcome 3, if they resemble exactly the same and can't tell the difference, then yeah, everything you said will come to pass especially on N4G.

But their is one thing out there, the FF13 demo, that's what I'm basing my comparison on. The ps3 version should look better than the demo, obviously. Logically any game should always look better than the demo. FF13 is not a day one purchase for me until it is proven better than its demo. If not, will be a bargain bin pickup for under 20 bucks.

mastiffchild5944d ago

Square Enix:Talking loud but saying nothing since the installation of Wada.

Whatever the eventual outcome of the comparison between the two versions the facts are SE have consistently contradicted themselves, lied, led people on, abused parts of their fanbase(at different times it's been PS3 owners and always Japanese 360 owners), gone back on their word, published timed exclusives as if they were actual exclusives(which, like advertsing FF13 for years as a PS3 exclusive meant people had unnecessarily bought systems on the strength of their lies)and showed total cowardice(post all the aggro from 360 owners in Japan over the tiomed exclusives)by not wanting to upset PS3 ownes in their own back yard and therefore denying ther own countrymen who bought 360s largely because of the afrementioned timed exclusive debacle access to FF13 when the reast of the world gets it).

Now we've had an attrempted, insulting to our intelligence, falsification of comparison pics and cover it up with yet another statement fdull of ambiguity. Are they saying the versons are identical or identical to what they AIMED for on each platform. Seriously, these guys are so slippery these days it's jhard to trust a word that comes out of them and when so much of it is contradictory why would anyone?

I've no issue with MS taking FF13 multiplatform but the game was never going to be as good as it would have been as an exclusive(and the same's true had it been started as a 360 exclusive too)and if they wanted it multi they really shouldn't have been trumpeting "only on PS3" for three bloody years. Of course people were gfonna be pi55ed at them but even since then they behaved in a crappy manner to just about all of us and it's getting a little bit daft now.

Just release the damn game, let everyone make their mind up and take whatever crap or praise is due for it, SE. You only make things worse with your mealy mouthed BS.

mega BIG time5944d ago

i like switching discs.. brings me back to ffvii - ix. i wish i had a 360 :(

N4Flamers5944d ago

I personally hope the game sell's better on the ps3 than 360. The only reason I say that is because ff vs 13 is still exclusive and is one of the reasons i bought my console.

If you actually read the article he says that it is the same experience but he doesn't say that the graphics look exactly the same. I tend to believe that the 360 version wont look quite as good as the ps3 but almost as good.

Unless youre a little slow its obvious they said those shots were from the ps3, so they docctored the images from the 360. There are only 2 reasons I see for this

1. 360 version looks worse
2. Some lazy person didnt want to take screen shots of the 360 version

Either way I will judge the game on what it is, not what it could have been. At the end of the day what you play in your machine isnt a concept its a product, so base your opinions on that.

dabri55944d ago

Actually they said the doctored shots were old from old PR stuff from before the 360 version was in production but already announced. The comparison shots were taken from old material by accident. As to why they didn't release new shots? Well that's because they don't have to do anything because we ask for it. they can media blackout any details for 360 version until after release. It's their choice. It's a little scary as to why they may be doing it but I would hope for their sake and anyone else who is buying the 360 version that it isn't because the 360 version is far inferior to the PS3 version.

thesummerofgeorge5944d ago

You lie, you mislead and you doctor screenshots. You're not fooling anyone ya bunch of clowns. Now they've managed to piss off fans on both sides. What exactly did we wait all these years for. A better developer could have used all that time and money to make an amazing new game. Too bad.

+ Show (40) more repliesLast reply 5944d ago
ClownBelt5945d ago (Edited 5945d ago )

Here we go again...

Why don't you SE give us the right screen shots? Why did you have to doctor the last one? If they're not hiding anything then surely they can give us the ss of both version.

Anyways, the credibility of this company went down the drain after the last issue. We will only get to see the real comparison once the game arrives.

kneon5945d ago

which implies that they are not the same, only that they are close. The question is how close. Not that it matters to me, I won't be buying either version.

table5945d ago

The previews suggests that both versions are pretty similar apart from the cutscenes where the ps3 version is slightly improved. The problem is, if this is true then why would they even bother with the fake screenshots?

dabri55943d ago

...Because like the press response from SE to address this very issue said, those shots were released as press kits from before the 360 version had began production. They weren't meant to be up to date or to be used as comparison shots.

themafia5945d ago

i know the ps3 version will be better. 1 disk the advanced adaptive luma looks better when used on the ps3 version.

SpaceSquirrel5945d ago

The PS3 version does have better sound and CG videos.

nightelfmohawk5945d ago

It's already been confirmed that the PS3 version's cut scenes will run in full 1080p while the M$ version will use compression that maxes out at 720p.

happy_gilmore5945d ago

they have the exclusive bundle. m$ must be showering SE with business aka bribes.

Wrathman5945d ago

full HD or 1080p?

my tv doesnt do full HD anyway.the problem with adopting new tech early.

i cant believe this is such a big deal anyway.and regardless,the game is clearly optimised to run on the xbox first.and the limitations of that set the benchmark for the ps3 version.

so to put it simply.the ps3 version is the gimped version.

the difference is the amount of discs its on.

5945d ago
trancefreak5945d ago

If you believe the ps3 has the gimped version why would it matter since your tv is gimped into the stoneage.

composite cables FTL???

Btw i like my 360 I really do but, 6 discs, huge power brick, controller batteries. Just feels like to much clutter to this.

Ps3 slim, small pwr cable, 1 hdmi, 1 disc, and a a 46 " 1080 p samsung. Personally more appealing is the latter.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5945d ago
movements5945d ago

There's so much talk now. Let's hope this all ends well.

Show all comments (137)
120°

Final Fantasy and SaGa series veteran Kazuyuki Shindo leaves Square Enix after 27 years

Kazuyuki Shindo, who worked on games including Legend of Mana, Final Fantasy XIII, and SaGa: Emerald Beyond, has left Square Enix.

Read Full Story >>
automaton-media.com
70°

The 7 Best Final Fantasy Characters: Unveiling the Legends

While FFVII ranks highly, there's more to the series than one game. Here's Chit Hot's picks for the seven best Final Fantasy characters.

220°

The older it gets, the more I respect Final Fantasy XIII

Alex Donaldson: "Hindsight is a hell of a thing, however, and in the years since Final Fantasy XIII, my respect for the decisions its developers made has skyrocketed. In the two Final Fantasy titles since we see both the brilliance and the folly in alternative approaches - and in Final Fantasy VII Remake, we get a more nuanced understanding of what FF13 was trying to accomplish from many of the same development leads."

Einhander1972887d ago

FFXIII is actually one of the best Final Fantasy games.

I also sort of was disappointed at the time, never as much as the bandwagon. But really all the fantastic 3D rendered cutscenes and I actually liked the characters and the story though convoluted was actually fantastic and the ending was extremely emotional. So much budget and time were put into that game Square had such big plans, I actually have always felt kind of bad for how things played out.

I have been thinking for years how great it would be to get all three games on one disk for PS4 or 5.

Nyxus887d ago

I always liked this game, and I agree, a rerelease for current gen would be nice.

Shane Kim886d ago (Edited 886d ago )

Gotta take off the nostalgia glasses. It's the worst FF. Shiva as a bike, I mean come on.

Elda886d ago

Shiva as a bike is strange but saying FFXIII is the worst FF is not at all a fact, that's simply your opinion.

Terry_B885d ago

*One of the 3 equally bad FF's

DivineHand125885d ago (Edited 885d ago )

When I got my series X a year ago, I bought FF13 for nostalgia reasons but ended up being disappointed. When I first played it around the time it launched, I didn't have a lot of experience with final fantasy games, so I enjoyed it. Fast forward to when I played it again, I found that the game had many unnecessary filler moments instead of just giving us meaningful content.

The game is also very linear and a quote on the article said it best. "It is like a sewage pipe that leads to the ocean until it opens up on Grand Pulse."

The story didn't make much sense either and I believe it is my mistake as I played the FF7 remake on PS5 prior which is a night and day difference in terms of pacing, storytelling and likeable characters even though cloud is aloof.

FinalFantasyFanatic885d ago (Edited 885d ago )

Probably was a mistake to play any of the golden era FFs first (e.g. FF6 through FF10), it makes it harder to enjoy some of the FFs that aren't as good. I think FF12 was where major issues with the series started becoming apparent, and it just got worse from there.

FinalFantasyFanatic885d ago (Edited 885d ago )

I didn't really care for it that much, the only saving grace was that it had a better story than 15 (overall it was better than 15) and possibly 12, and even then, you had to read some of it through primers, like reading a book. Plus the battle system was reasonably fun for what it was, even if it was more the spectacle that was exciting for me (e.g. summoning). And to be fair, the 13 trilogy got better with every games, I still don't like Snow though.

Gamingsince1981885d ago

Ff13 is only good if you haven't played a ff before, or any other games that are decent for that matter.

-Foxtrot885d ago

It is in fact no way the best Final Fantasy game, it's one of the worst

Linear corridors, Cutscene, Fight, Cutscene...rinse and repeat

Dialogue and characters are pretty bad, especially Lightning as the main FF hero, they literally said they tried to make a "Female Cloud" and they failed.

Story was pretty awful

I could go on

I think the only alright thing that came from the game was the music.

Elda885d ago

That's not a fact that's your personal opinion. The game sold 11 million copies between its 2009 release up until 2014 including critically reviewed as an 8 out of 10 or an 80 out of 100. The game does have some issues but it's not at all a fact as one of the worst FF games.

-Foxtrot885d ago

Elda

Not just mine mate

A large majority

So….

Traecy884d ago

N4G commenters such as yourself aren't the majority. The game was well received.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 884d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 884d ago
gold_drake887d ago (Edited 887d ago )

i liked the game alot but i didnt like how they handled the terminology.

i dont mind reading data logs but it had soo many.

but i always loved the music and how it looked. the battle system wasnt too bad either.

but i like 13-2 more :)

i still dont understand why we never got a remaster of the trilogy

Eonjay885d ago

Xbox kinda did. Besides the video files of course which are still best on PS3 due to bluray.

Snookies12887d ago

XIII is a pretty solid game, but XIII-2 is WAY better. XIII-2 was one of the few games I decided to go for a Platinum trophy in, early on. Had so much fun the entire way through getting it too!

Eonjay885d ago

Totally agree. FF 13 was okay but 13-2 is my favorite FF game ever.

shinoff2183887d ago (Edited 887d ago )

I hated this to when it released. I haven't much liked a ff game since ff10 as much , aside from ff7remake. I decided to give it another shot on my series x since it's not on a current ps and was liking it quite a bit(just takes me some time to get over things ) until star ocean 2 remake came out I was all over that.

Square should definitely remaster it or something for ps4 ps5

KillerB886d ago

my favorite jrpg trilogy ever

Show all comments (44)