30°

PlayStation 2010 Preview

January 27, 2010 - While 2009 was a great year for the PlayStation 3, 2010 is practically guaranteed to be its biggest yet. A simple look at the games library tells you that this'll be a banner year for the system. From God of War III to Gran Turismo 5 to The Last Guardian to Heavy Rain, the first-party lineup for this year is nothing short of incredible, but that's only the start of it. When you start adding in the third-party titles like Final Fantasy XIII, Max Payne 3, BioShock 2 and countless others, well, you should get started on some loan paperwork right now because your bank account will be hurting by year's end.

by IGN Staff - 1/27/2010

-Alpha5932d ago (Edited 5932d ago )

And it's almost February! :P

I'm starting the year off with Bad Company 2. I am not interested in picking up any of the big PS3 titles this year shockingly enough.

Both Heavy Rain and God of War 3 are too short for my liking. Believe me, I want them, but I can't drop $70 bones for something that I can just rent... but I also like owning my games so I'll likely wait for massive price drops meaning I'll probably purchase them early 2011.

I'm not a racing fan so GT5 is unlikely, though I am open to it.

Mod Nation Racers seems to be one of the more forgotten PS3 games this year. After playing the beta I think it's nice, but I am still uncertain with this game. It is nowhere near LBP of course, and I find the mechanics to be a little too simple, but what the hell else should I expect from a kart racing game?

I am likely purchasing this game though-- split screen racing is actually one of my selling points.

I am also likely picking up Final Fantasy 13 though it will be admittedly the first FF game I own (but not played).

White Knight Chronicles is also seeming likely but I wish Level 5 just made Dark Cloud 3 instead. I'm not appealed by the premises of WKC at all. A boy that transforms into a giant knight? Dark Cloud games were the greatest thing on the PS2.

The Last Guardian is an insta-buy! I keep forgetting about this game and I feel like punching myself everytime I do.

On the 360 side of things I am dying and very anticipated for Halo Reach. Easily the biggest game for Bungie since #3 and easily the most anticipated game of 2010.

I may end up just backtracking and picking up games I've missed: inFamous, Valkyria Chronicles, etc. I need to still play those games-- also, Demon's Souls is still in my PS3.

Bioshock is a game I still need to play, and I do plan on playing #2 too.

As for Agent, I want to hear more news on it first, but R* are gods so that may end up being a purchase.

cLiCK_sLiCK95932d ago (Edited 5932d ago )

Im actually picking up a 360 this year, now that i have more time on my hands. Alan Wake and Halo Reach are easily my most anticipated games this year on the 360.

As for the PS3, Just wow. Im going broke this year because of this console. Heck, i still havent played all the games i wanted to play last year.
No borderlands, havent finished Demon souls, No Assassins Creed 2.. =[

Star Ocean International, WKC, Final Fantasy 13, Heavy Rain, GOD OF WAR 3! >] Bioshock 2, maybe even MAG.... The list keeps going. Its Exciting! Thats already a guaranteed "6+ games these first 3 months" added to my 40+ PS3 games collection!

Anyways, Happy Gaming everyone!

PS:I always enjoy reading reading what Alpha male has to say, even if I often dont agree with him. Bubbles! =D

TooTall195932d ago (Edited 5932d ago )

I wish Level-5 did a Dark Cloud 3 as well. I'm still playing WKC, but I'm going to rent first and then buy. If it were a DC game I would have it pre-ordered the day it was announced. Agree with pretty much everything else you say.

Edit: I'm starting Valkyria Chronicles today

@Click- I really enjoyed Borderlands. If you don't care about the story and understand what the games about it's a blast.

GiantEnemyCrab5932d ago

Too much! Looks like Sony is continuing on it's roll from 2009 into 2010.. Gotta give it up to Sony for their what seems like limitless exclusives coming to their system to mix in with all those multiplats.

My poor wallet.

Son_Lee5932d ago

If Sony wanted our money all along, they should of just done this in the first place. (That was meant to be a joke against Sony's bad marketing till last year, but...whatever. Not important.)

There's bound to be some games on this list that will be looked over just for the sheer amount of games that are coming out.

I've recently discovered extra money that I can spend, and am deciding between Star Ocean 4 and WKC (you may have noticed my forum posting). And I'm leaning towards Star Ocean. Something about it suits my taste, and I'm not appealed to WKC. Even though I'm renting WKC to try it out.

Final Fantasy XIII, Star Ocean The Last Hope International, Heavy Rain, God Of War 3. Those are my choices in the first 3 months. Nothing too shabby, eh?

40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer5d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde3d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy4d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand1253d ago (Edited 3d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.

90°

PlayStation legend Shuhei Yoshida says Jim Ryan fired him because he didn't listen to him

Why did Sony push Shuhei Yoshida out of his role leading PlayStation's first-party games? He'd overseen some huge successes. Well, apparently, he didn't listen.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Relientk775d ago

Yeah I can see that for sure. Shuhei Yoshida should have been in charge not Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga5d ago

It should be free highway for him now.. but Sony are too stupid to see this, especially that moron Hulst

S2Killinit5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Wtf why all that anger. PlayStation is dominating on every level. Besides I think there is a little more to hiring a CEO than just who is available. Its not like its a athlete your team wants to buy.

neutralgamer19924d ago

S2Killinit

live service failures, chasing trends, closing studios. yes dominating

Cacabunga4d ago

Sony is Dominating because competition is not existing. Compared to previous gens this is the poorest in terms of software offerings.

Last gen we got Uncharted 4 Lost Legacy and TLOU2 from ND alone.

This is so far a remasters gen, with no competition to lift up the quality

1nsomniac4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

..."PlayStation is dominating on every level"....

...Really???

PlayStation are soon heading into a new generation in the not to distant future. They currently have the worst customer satisfaction they've ever sustained as a company. The company is heading for a huge crash while at the same time they'll need to be planning how they are going to try and win back that favour and the build up to their new releases.

Yes financially they're winning but they're going to have to ride out this complete public corporate disaster. No one has faith in the company or the product anymore. They've damaged their public image so much this generation. Greed can kill anyone.

medman4d ago

Hulst is a disaster......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
blacktiger4d ago

He would've done the same thing and fire Jim Ryan and Shuhei would be the villain. Why?
Because Elite creates the narrative and distraction for gamers, users and citizens.

Outside_ofthe_Box5d ago

More confirmation that Jim Ryan is the culprit for what has happened to Sony. Hulst needs to go too. What sucks is that a lot of the good top heads at Sony are no longer there. I wish that guys that were forced out prematurely by Dumbo Jimbo like Shuhei and Layden came back.

robtion4d ago

Yep. Yoshida was responsible for bringing one of the best games of this generation to playstation (Stellar Blade). He is an actual gamer and is in touch with what gamers want (creative, fun games, not GaaS and agenda pushing). He also seems like a genuinely nice guy if you watch some interviews. Of course they got rid of him.

darthv725d ago

Makes you wonder if MS even thought about hiring him after Phil and Sarah were leaving. He certainly couldn't make their situation any worse.

Agent755d ago

Microflop. After Windows XP and Xbox 360, it all went floppy.

S2Killinit5d ago

Floppy 😆
No pun intended

badz1495d ago

Yoshida for President! Jim Ryan was and always be a hack! Sony should get Shu back

Lightning775d ago

All the gamer/consumer lead heads are gone across PS and Xbox. shuhei gone phil's gone (questionable) but gone. The future of gaming is somewhat uncertain across the board.

Show all comments (30)
50°

Ex-Naughty Dog Dev: Big Studios Are 'Forced' to Hire Like Factories

Former Naughty Dog artist Gabriel Betancourt explains why the "sweet spot" for game teams is under 200 people and how AAA "factories" kill creativity.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
5d ago
phongtro123_com5d ago

There’s definitely some truth to this. When teams get too large, coordination starts to outweigh creativity—layers of approval, risk aversion, and tight deadlines can turn bold ideas into “safe” ones. Keeping a team under ~200 people sounds ideal for maintaining clear communication and a shared vision. That said, massive AAA projects also come with huge technical demands and expectations, so scaling up isn’t always avoidable. The real challenge is figuring out how to keep that small-team creativity alive inside big studio structures.

DarXyde5d ago

More than that, it's logistically untenable. Inevitably, when teams get too large, how do you keep tabs on accountability? I suspect this massive team size is a consequence of the perfectionism streak Naughty Dog has.

I wish we could have so many people working on something and it turns out great because I'm all for collaboration in spirit - the problem is too many people as part of the larger team and smaller units. Suppose for example that you have too many people in the art department; you will very often come up against fiercely competing visions for how things should look. That competitive vision will cause friction between team members, team doesn't work as a unit, the back and forth can further delay parts that the other departments are waiting for, etc etc.

A 200-person team says, to me, that we need to scale back game development. Even if it means we go back to PS2 era costs and scale, why not? Those games are still great fun, the budgets were in check, and you could literally break the 200-man team into like 10 20-man teams working on different projects.