All Channels
Popular
250°

MAG servers are offline, Zipper currently patching the server

Zipper writes:

"Hey everyone. As you have likely seen, users cannot log into the MAG environment currently. This is because we are patching the server (started a little earlier than anticipated, so sorry for the slightly-late notice).

Gamers already playing will not be affected in the beginning, but new players cannot access the server until the patch has been completed.

Players already in the game will receive in an in-game message letting them know the servers will be restarted. After that restart, they should be up and running with the upgrades."

Note 1: The servers will be back and running with new patch by 7pm Pacific (likely earlier)

Note 2: You will not have to download anything additional for this patch, since it is a server-side fix

Read Full Story >>
forums.mag.com
LordMarius5969d ago (Edited 5969d ago )

I thought this is why they had a Beta for

or maybe its selling better than they expected

TOO PAWNED5969d ago

excuses, game is a disaster, this is second patch in 2 days, come on now. They run beta since last year. Developing game for 4 years and then delivering glitchy, bugy broken experience, i mean get real people.
I am Sony fan, but i call it as i see it, always.

OGharryjoysticks5969d ago (Edited 5969d ago )

You're on crack homie. Last MAG match I had before I decided to take a break and drink some beers had a few moments as action packed as the most action packed moment in Modern Warfare 2's single player or any game I can recall. Had you seen it and been in it you'd agree there's nothing that can match MAG multiplayer. Bullets everywhere. Explosions. Total sh+tstorm war zone at the peak moment. But it never went into choas. It's been fun as hell. All the reviews complaining about lack of teamwork are full of sh+t too because there's so many players in each game that even if your squad doesn't communicate, the game's announcements tell everybody what's up so everyone can figure it out. So seriously, stop the hate because you sound like a idiot. Maybe the haters and sh+theads that that don't know any better might hit agree for you because it follows the strange internet anti MAG campaign, but I'm telling you if you believe the hate along with everything you read on the internet you're the dumbest person in the entire world.

PoSTedUP5969d ago (Edited 5969d ago )

no need to pick it apart though. im sure they will have the problem resolved in no time and turn this "oh, such a horrible piece of crap, game" around in a jiffy to make it play like normal, like most patches do.

edit: "servers currently back online"- oh man i think i counted to a whole 57 seconds b4 they FINALLY got there crap game together, stupid zipper and there stipud inability to work fast and efficently. ; )

chanto235969d ago

i agree with you and i'm also a loyal Sony fan. The game is just MEH!!
256 player online might be a technical feat, but the game is just not fun enough. It's lacking something and i can't figure out what it is. Currently level 7, RAVEN

Rush5969d ago

Am currently rank 12 hufflepuff and its awesome!

SilentNegotiator5969d ago

OH NOES! WHAT A MAJOR UPSET!
The servers were down for a little bit and it was quickly patched.
That NEVER happens with online games....ever!
Now we can commence hating it!

raztad5969d ago

@Dirty

Oh man, you made me so jelous. I'm waiting for my copy to arrive in a couple of days. The beta was so much fun.

WildArmed5969d ago

so.. lemme get this straight..
the server goes offline for less than 40mins and people go all crazy over it?

great..
GJ N4G :)

40cal5969d ago

I saw the message pop up during my game, caught us all of guard.

Anyone ran into lag yet? I ran into none my first two hours fighting this war.

Oh, and I loved the recruitment videos they did for each faction.

morganfell5969d ago

Too pawned, how long did it tale to get the first Gears of War 2 patch?

OGharryjoysticks5969d ago

No lag. None. Not even for a split second.

Not even when there seemed to be a million things blowing up and shooting around me as I ducked for cover against some sandbags as the other team made a strong push to take our vehicle.

40cal5969d ago

I know its crazy. I almost cant wrap my head around it.

Delive5969d ago

I chose to pass on the game for now. I played the beta and enjoyed it, but the gripe I have it that this game had what I feel to be a limited experience for $60. I'm sure the game is great fun. The experience I had in the beta has me wanting more, but financially, there are more games I want to play than I can afford. So it boils down to: Had MAG released at $39 for an Online only game, I sop it up. It releases at $60 in a crowded window, it gets passed up until it's cheaper to buy.

I hope to see you all one day online. Until then, Have fun for me.

-Seven-5969d ago

on N4G that works from 8:30 am - 5:00 pm, and has school 3 times a week - plus try fitting in your social life.

Where do you guys get the time to play all these kick a$$ games-Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Chubear5969d ago (Edited 5969d ago )

have we forgotten about how Gear2 online was unplayable for 3weeks on launch? Have we forgotten how CoD4 you couldn't get into a game for 2hrs at a time at launch? we forgotten so quickly that a 40min update to a game that's pushing 128v128 with less lag than these games I just mentioned all on day one is really something to pick a bone about? really? lol, wow.

Keep on hating, MAG has been sold out of so many gaming stores today. that's a great sign. So many people online for hours so keep lol on gaming forums about teh reviews while gamers are actually on this 1st time ever game playing it.

Looks like PS3 gamers have largely ignored the reviews for the game and have gone out to enjoy the experience.

Pennywise5969d ago

LVL 7 S.V.E.R. This game is action packed with the fastest 128 man set ups I've ever seen. I played all night with no problems.

I'm having a hard time figuring where all the hate is coming from. Zipper did a good job.

baum5969d ago

Microsoft and Epic's failures shouldn't be used as an argument in favor of MAG. MAG should be up and running all the time, another SOCOM fiasco is unacceptable. And I don't know why everyone said that SOCOM was fine after all the patches, I bought it to a former SOCOM fan after many of the patches because many guys said it was working and it was still crap so the guy I gave it to as a present never really played again.

FamilyGuy5969d ago

This is Killzone 2 ALL OVER AGAIN?

Mixed BS reviews, many people gushing over how great it is while others (ESPECIALLY the gaming media) downplay it with excuse after excuse that don't match up at all with what the people playing it are saying.

It's SO ANNOYING!

Jake11115968d ago

I played the beta and thought Sabotage was ok... Geez... Was I wrong... This is insane!!!! This is the best first person online shooter I have ever played in my life... NO LIE!!.... I am telling you all! Get into this!!! And if you do, get into a great party group and plan games together. It is a BLAST!

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 5968d ago
Dellis5969d ago

FAIL

this is the reason why you never do Online only games, atleast

Socom had single player

Dev8 ing5969d ago (Edited 5969d ago )

The servers were down for the 10 minute update that they mentioned would happen yesterday. They're up now.

And I would rather they focus all their resources and making an awesome online than tack on some BS campaign like Modern warfare 2 did.

Chubear5969d ago

correction; that's why the 360 never has any online only games. What's one full online only game you can mention in the 360 library? Shadow Run? yeah, gem of a game that turned out to be

Real Gambler5968d ago

"that's why the 360 never has any online only games"

Well, did you ever simply thought that it could be because networking wise, the 360 is not up to par?

Best online games for the 360 are still 8 VS 8 (a whoooping 16 players online at the same time). Not exactly impressive.

Gears 2: 5 VS 5
Halo 3: 8 VS 8
Shoot I think the most online players is still Perfect Dark Zero with 32 players (thanks to Rare!).

Looking at this, I do understand why Microsoft would not allow online only games : )

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5968d ago
SPECTER5969d ago

I have been playing all day and havent encountered any problems other than the LMGs sniping across the map. seems like they fixed every thing I ran into in the beta (freezes,no scope crosshair,couldnt move,wrong loadout)

No its not the best,coolest FPS ever but its far from broken

40cal5969d ago

I have played MAG for the past two hours and I can say that I am out of my last game and into a new one in under 5 seconds most of the time. It has been blowing my mind.

The game looks great, animations are solid, the lighting is good, the 5.1 surround sound is wonderful, and the communication seems clean and tight. Just waiting for my wife to go to bed, I scheduled myself off the next two days.

Dev8 ing5969d ago

The sounds are THX certified.

Paradise Lost5969d ago

The fact of the matter is Zipper put in so much love into this game. It's a great team based online game, and if you're saying this game "sucks" well let's just call you antisocial.

SCEA_RULES5969d ago

all these xbox fanboys are trashing this game because, they can never play it.

sack_boi5969d ago

LOL you submitted the article.

40cal5969d ago

There trashing the game based on Zipper giving everyone a heads up. When the message popped up it did not interrupt my game.

I just cant wait until the larger war starts unfolding in front of me.

Show all comments (66)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil2316d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_2316d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid2316d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy2316d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva692316d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants2316d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA2315d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz32315d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2315d ago
Muzikguy2316d ago (Edited 2316d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon022316d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy2316d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon022315d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova2316d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy2316d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok2316d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil2316d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

2315d ago Replies(1)
2314d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2314d ago
PrinceOfAnger2316d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin2316d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight2316d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0242316d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka2315d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor2316d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff2441d ago (Edited 2441d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

2440d ago
TheGamez1002441d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne2441d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9092441d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE2441d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster2440d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

2440d ago
moomoo3192440d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx2440d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO2560d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_2560d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3572559d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil2559d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv722559d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1002560d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie2560d ago (Edited 2560d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt2560d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie2560d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt2560d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss2559d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2559d ago
Profchaos2558d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil2560d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow2559d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer2559d ago (Edited 2559d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca2559d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq2558d ago (Edited 2558d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie2558d ago (Edited 2558d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)