N4G... rebuttal blog central.

No game is perfect, even if the original article is nitpicking.

Oh god its been approved!

*Hears the stampede of fanboyish hate rolling in from the distance*

They are coming...

First off, the initial article was not designed to "bash" ME2, and it doesn't. Second, it was designed to be part of a series of articles involving ME2, with a follow up being "5 Reasons ME2 Kicks Ass", seen here:

http://n4g.com/NewsPending-...

People need to relax. It shouldn't get this out of hand, especially when INSULTS are being thrown.

Read James' review, which praises the game. If that's not enough, read the 5 reasons it kicks ass.

they keep saying that the other article is a joke but its just an opinion just like every stupid article this site rights. and further more your even less credible than them, your name is planetxbox360 and your cheering on a 360 exclusive wow what a shock. you guys dont even review ps3 games boy and your making accusations what a joke.

They make fights fun.

"By the end you will see that the only reason this site wrote and posted such a junky article was to garner traffic."

Yeah like you do. Lmao. hypocrite

i am not sure who i hate more this site or hhg its a tough one.

And both sites are doing a damn good job at it. This article in particular looks like a post you would see in a PS3 vs. Xbox360 forum. Lol journalism? Please? We'd all be journalist if we can post crap like this and link it on N4G to our blogs or forum post.

Pretty obvious they're Mass Effect space geeks. This is the nerdiest game I have ever seen. I could only imagine the sleuths that will line up for the midnight launch, eewwww!

It is abundantly clear that this author didn't care to actually read the original article and merely skimmed the headers before churning out responses to the questions these headers seemed to imply.

For instance, the original article questions the usefulness of the "secretary" woman's verbal notifications--showing a picture of her and everything, making it very clear who and what is being described--but this author's response is to talk about the computer's functionality and even the onboard AI; while the secretary's statements are indeed tied to the computer's functionality the complaint was specifically about her, not the computer she assists with.

Similarly, the original author pointed out that dynamic conversations (things squad members say in response to certain sights while exploring) are immediately cut off whenever another dynamic conversation begins (in fact in the cities the only way to prevent this is to stand still until it finishes), but the author of this article instead waffles on about the normal, non-dynamic conversations, which are completely separate from the dynamic ones and don't even have this cut-off issue.

The original article was titled that way to score a few hits, sure, but at least it had some original content and had some valid points. This article, however, responds to complaints that weren't even being made in the first place.

those who says ME2 sucks are sony fanboys,FF13 sucks,most japs later complain that FF13 is a piece of carbage,ME2 on other hand,average score from most reviewers are 9.0 to 9.6,thats great,funny how sony fans complain about ME2 n later post saying ME2 will come to ps3,hahahahaha,keep dreaming,bioware says ME2 is a 360 n PC game,sorry lads,wait till ME3,oh imagine if ME2 comes out on ps3,i bet this sony fanboys will praise it innit,but it wont happen,anyways,ME2 is boss.

Guys go play the damn game first then come up with your negative or positives.

Mass Effect 2 is the greates Game ever made! I totally love it!