650°

MAG Graphics Impress Visually

Sony has released a new batch of MAG screens. With the release just a few weeks away, Sony seems to be hyping the upcoming title. These new screens are impressive.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
TheTruth20095893d ago (Edited 5893d ago )

This is all you need to judge on how "awesome" the graphics are for MAG.

http://www.gametrailers.com...

They are TERRIBLE. Only possible on the Playstation 3.

And this game is destined for the bargain bin.

The sooner that you PS3 Fans accept it, the sooner we can all move on to the next flop that PS3 will be releasing this year. Unfortunately, that flop will be a title I'm rooting for... Heavy Rain.

I tried to tell you that your year is mediocre.

2010 will be the death of you.

And just wait until Fall 2010. Ugh.

THE 2010 PLAYSTATION 3 MEDIOCRE YEAR CHECKLIST
M.A.G. (Will flop in reviews and sales.) CHECK!
Heavy Rain (Next victim...)
Modnation Racers
White Knight Chronicles
God of War III
Gran Turismo 5
Yakuza 3

Not looking too good... :-)

Microsoft Xbox 3605893d ago

Nice try bot. MAG's tech $hits on every 360 online game.

happy_gilmore5893d ago

the crapbox is dead. pack it up, bots. the sales gap is now down to 3 million. and the ps3 will surpass the crapbox sales when gt5 is released in 3 months.

PS3ALLDAY1225893d ago (Edited 5893d ago )

u cant judge the gfx by that video duuuuuuuuuuh. i just played 2 hours straight and amazed. i fell sorry for you haveing nothing to play so u troll. stupid xbot 2010 = death of xflop hahahahahahaha

Rockox5893d ago (Edited 5893d ago )

Truth, I hope you're wrong about Heavy Rain. I really do. That game looks utterly fantastic and it would be a damn shame if PS3 owners didn't buy that game.

As for MAG, an online-only game? Meh, who really cares...

PimpHandHappy5893d ago

Truth is
those last 4 on your list are on my must buys
but hey
not like i care about you

Major_Tom5893d ago

I don't understand if this is troll.

LordMarius5893d ago

.....mhmm who gave you a bubble

xbox3flopteen5893d ago

This is just a troll that remain here and what not, i like the way he make ps fan(count me in)spin over his stupidities all the time, he just has win some award here, ok getting off of the greeting boat.

this bot here is quite blind-stupid, first he has mentioned a few games coming next, but to add in top of, he has forgotten lot of them coming too!!!!wont start another shtty list, but this game is set to at least get a 8 of a score and it is good to me, he just doesnt bear the fact that the game is doing some new stuff into these ultimately and always repetitive shooter-kind of games and that really does hit his tard-ness, yes delusional but that is thethruth, keep it on dood, wouldnt like this site is bot werent by.

Chubear5893d ago

you guys have been holding gaming back this gen. We've been robbed of great experiences cause of the 360fanbase who embrace mediocrity.

What's the best online only game the 360 has? yes, Shadow Run. One average game but the PS3 has over 3 online only full games and they boast high quality with MAG pushing anything we've ever seen on consoles but no, the 360fanbase will say "WE DON'T NEED SHOOTERS WITH MORE THAT 8V8" "WE DON'T NEED BLU-RAY CAUSE DVD9 IS GOOD ENOUGH"

MS tells developers to "downgrade your games on the 360" and you all go "YES YES! MS know what they're doing giving us high quality" you're all fools.

You don't want MAG to succeed cause it's a PS3 new exclusive and show up any shooter that's exclusive on the 360.

btw, how many exclusive FPSs does the 360 have? Only halo. The PS3 has 3 in Killzone, Resistance and MAG but you want to dogg on them in hopes they'll be killed off so not to show up the 360 with just 1 FPS exclusive. You're all just so dumb but hey, if you like 360 gaming then fine but stop holding back gaming for the rest of us.

TheTruth20095892d ago (Edited 5892d ago )

It's obvious to me and everyone else in the Gaming Community that the game is a flop. Not only will it fail in sales figures, but it'll fail in reviews also.

I am just waiting for a "prominent" PS3 Supporter to give a little honesty, staying on topic, criticizing the game thoroughly. Without being hindered by the handcuffs of being a PS3 Fanboy.

It's an opportunity for a PS3 Fan to see the light and actually give an honest critique of a crappy PS3-exclusive.

(Holds hands of the PS3 Fans and starts humming "Kumbaya"......)
http://cache2.asset-cache.n...

"Tell the truth.
Let the XBOX360 spirit overcome you.
Be unbound by the shackles of Blind PS3 Fanboyism.
It'll burn you like RROD,
But in the end, the truth shall set you free."

M.A.G. Sucks.
And you know it.

Now SAY it. :-)

Trebius5892d ago

So whenever you see TheTruth2009 dog on a game, chances are he's just 100% hating on it cause he cant play it.

So BUY it.

Dev8 ing5892d ago

What you guys don't like games with dedicated servers? How about a game where people that use lag switchers are banned? Games with more than 24 players? No, you prefer to have peer to peer where a host can quit and you lose your progression, or have to wait for a new host to be chosen. That is lame. Any you pay money for this kind of service. Wake up. Demand more.

lh_swe5892d ago

Have you played it?

Your complaints rely on a simple principle that anything from Sony sucks but the fact that you haven't actually played any of the greats negates every argument you try to make because you are actively denying to even try them out.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 5892d ago
Mc Fadge5893d ago

They're very different in scale, detail, and even play style

LukaX235893d ago

Dude, for 256 players online with NO lag - THEY'RE AMAZING. Add in all the stuff going on around you; exploding aircrafts, grenades going off, bullets flying overhead, airstrikes coming down, etc. It's just incredible!

Consoldtobots5893d ago

any game that shows places the 360 will never be able to go will be heavily attacked. nothing to see here.

Tanny922255893d ago

Anyone know if the newest build runs better than the private beta build did? Frame rate wasn't very solid in the private beta build, especially when you get to a high point on the map and are able to look out and see pretty much everything thats going on, I found it usually dropped down to 20-25 fps.

And then when you would sometimes get a close-range fire fight going on for an objective where you had 30+ players crammed together all throwing grenades and firing their weapons. In these firefights, the lowest I experienced it go was probably 18-25fps. Which is next to unplayable and I was forced to leave the are to get rid of the lag.

I think one of the main problems with the game is that theres way too many audio streams going on at once. Hence why the sound quality isn't that great and all of the weapon sounds appear to be highly compressed to accommodate for the sheer amount of audio being generated by the players in a 256 player game.

But like I said, I haven't played the public beta build so they may have fixed some of the frame rate issues. And I do agree with the article, the game is quite visually impressive, especially considering the fact that it can handle 256 players in one game, and support such a massive draw distance. My only complaint about the graphics is that it seems to run in sub-HD. Not as low as games like MW2 or Halo 3, but it does seem to run at a lower resolution to help keep a solid frame rate. Other than that, textures are surprisingly good, and the particle effects, while they seem to be fairly low-res, look quite nice too.

OrganicMachine5893d ago

the framerates have improved and the animations have improved but still not mo-cap smooth

the textures are ugly when you zoom in on them but looking at them overall they look nice..

the public beta is laggy since their servers have been flooded by many players (I think part of the reason why the release an open beta as demo is to stress out the servers)

umair_s515893d ago (Edited 5893d ago )

Visually? How else are graphics suppose to impress, aurally?

Chubear5893d ago

All I know is, no one ever talks about the online graphics for games like halo3, ODST, L4D1&2 etc and these games don't look as good as MAG online and they aren't even doing 1/10th what MAG is doing.'

If the graphics for ODST online and L4D2 are great for people then how the hell would anyone have a problem with MAG's graphics when it looks better and has way more things happening on screen by far.

Resistance2 has similar graphics online and I didn't see complaints. So why with MAG? ... oh I see, it's a never been seen before never been done before new exclusive IP for the PS3 so - KILL IT! b4 it gets popular and sequels.

to those with this mentality I say - FU! FU all to hell!

Chubear5893d ago Show
akiraburn5892d ago

I've mentioned this before, but I was in since beta phase 1 (though I didn't get a chance to play a lot until phase 2). I've played a decent amount on the most recent build as well. My highest level character is 22, and I generally take one of the MVP slots for whatever platoon I'm in. I would say that the this build has evened out a lot of issues, and I am really excited to see what the final release will play like.

As for your issue specifically Tanny, I would say it is much more stable now, as I often have been playing full Domination matches, and have experienced hardly any frame rate issues. Though I'm not sure what problems you are having with the audio, or what may have caused it. It may have been resolved since the last time you tried it though. Also, remember that since this was just the beta, a lot of things had to be compressed to fit into that smaller amount of download space. Having the 25GB BD-Rom disc gives them the room to not have to compress sounds or visuals (or at least not as much).

I'm a sound designer myself, and I think they did a stupendous job with everything. As Zipper mentioned before, there are no sound effects in the environment that aren't user-generated (minus a very quiet ambiance of an open outdoor area with no noise). In other games, many times they will put an ambiance of shooting, explosions, planes, tanks, and all the like in the background to fill space. But with MAG, every sound you hear is coming from a player's actions. That's actually really cool in my opinion, and I think the samples they created and used were really good and well crafted. At least, that's my opinion. Things may have also sounded different for you depending on your audio setup. Personally, I'm running my PS3's optical output through to a Onkyo 5.1 surround setup, and I think it sounds great.

And Chubear, I gotta agree, there is a lot of unnecessary anger towards this game's visuals, when they're actually pretty much on par with other online games, or better. I'm really tired of the "it's like PS2 graphics" comments, because it's just mindless complaining with no basis or truth to it. Even if there was some basis for the claim, who cares? How the game plays, sounds, and feels is what really matters. That's why I still thoroughly enjoy replaying games like Deus Ex; because the story, gameplay, audio, and many other aspects about the game are top-notch.

-Alpha5892d ago (Edited 5892d ago )

No one says Halo's graphics are "great". In fact, they are acceptable. So is MAG's CONSIDERING the 256 players. However, MAG is slightly less of the standard we've come to expect from Sony.

Also, MAG has "great" gameplay? A FPS doesn't differentiate from all the other FPS's and MAG is no different. What MAG has going for it is execution in the number of players and how Zipper planned out the game. As for the core gameplay of shooting, etc. it's standard.

KZ2 was dogged on because of gameplay, not graphics. So don't try to call shenanigans on people who criticized K2 because it wasn't about graphics.

K2 was great, but like a lot of other shooters it had the typical lame action story with annoying characters and it lacked co-op. Those were the main faults with K2, but everything else like the atmosphere and multiplayer were generally praised.

Also, why are you comparing this to Halo 3, which is 3 years old? Halo has aged.

The concern with MAG goes much farther than just graphics, but graphics are known to be nothing special.

It's not that they are terribly bad, it's just that they don't do much for the game. However, considering the game as a whole, it's not that big of an issue.

I personally find the animations (reloading, the way the guns feel and look when fired, etc) to be all too average and underwhelming.

MAG is clearly not the best looking game, and considering the new standards its understandable that people are underwhelmed. The scale and # of players doesn't excuse or change the fact that MAG has average graphics, but it is taken into consideration when considering MAG as a whole.

DelbertGrady5892d ago

FPS of the year for sure. BC 2 will have nothing on it.

5892d ago
OmarJA-N4G5892d ago

Why you always keep embarrassing yourself?

jjohan355892d ago

MAG actually isn't chaotic at all. Plus like one of the comments below me stated, there's less lag in MAG than in MW2. The entire game is very team oriented, based primarily on completing objectives.

I disliked the first 2 hours because I had no idea what was going on. After 2 hours and understanding the gameplay (plus having squadmates who communicate), the game was really fun for the next 18-20 hours. It's very revolutionary for the FPS.

But after 25 or so hours of gameplay, the game starts to fall apart very quickly. You see in most other FPS games that rely on deathmatch or capturing zones, it's you pitting yourself against another player. The maps don't get old too quickly because the challenge is primarily your skill against another player's skill.

The problem with MAG is that it's not necessarily up to individual skill. It's teamwork skill. But that's not the problem either. The real problem is that the game depends heavily on the order of objectives laid out for each game mode and each map. Therefore the maps get old VERY QUICKLY (after 20 hours of playing) because you're using the same strategy over and over, whether you're attacking or defending. There isn't much room to vary your strategy because the maps are set up to work with only a few different strategies. The maps get old, the strategies get old, and it just feels like attacking the same thing over and over again. Imagine playing the single campaign of any FPS over and over, but condensed in less time. In fact I'd say imagine playing the same few levels in a single campaign of any FPS game over and over forever. You'll catch my drift.

I don't think Zipper foresaw this problem. In the process of revolutionizing the FPS genre, they created new problems that seriously need to be addressed before this type of game reaches critical success. And please don't tell me that I haven't found a good team to play with. All 8 of us play together regularly, all with mics, all communicating very clearly on enemy position as well as FRAGOs. I've also played all three factions, all three game modes, and on all maps both defending and attacking.

ikkokucrisis5892d ago (Edited 5892d ago )

Gfx better than MW2? Uhh, no...

Heavy Rain's gfx on the otherhand...get TWO THUMBS UP!

ape0075892d ago

didn't like it, maybe I'll like it with time

maybe I'll pass it up and I just can't wait for battlefield:bad company 2

bc2 looks stunning

and omg@ how addicting mw2 online mode is, I've never been this hooked on a game since gta 3 or perfect dark

mw2 is a true masterpiece

bruddahmanmatt5892d ago

Eh. As a PS3 gamer even I can admit that MAG's strong suit isn't its visuals. That being said, I'm willing to accept a hit in the visual department in exchange for a massive battlefield and an unprecedented number of players for a console shooter. If I want ridonkulous visuals I always have KZ2 and UC2.

Proxy5892d ago (Edited 5892d ago )

40 or 60 USD?

darkmurder5892d ago

How many delusional fanboys are in here? The graphics don't impress visually, sure considering what they are doing with the 256 online they need to make setbacks but it is far from impressive visually. God you Sony fanboys can't just accept ONE exclusive not being better looking than a 360 or PC game sheesh.

Another One5892d ago

I think Alpha Male's comment summed it up best of all. I have to agree with absolutely everything he said.

I had a pretty good time with the beta, but didn't come off impressed greatly. It's an OK shooter that does one thing better than average and that's the number of players.

HomoMeal5892d ago (Edited 5892d ago )

No other console can handle the sheer magnitude of this explosive massive action thriller. If you disagree prove it. I triple dare ya :)

I like to see the other so called competition just try it.

And yes im a very proud playstation lover. They have the best rumbling controller too.

RememberThe3575892d ago

"mw2 is a true masterpiece"

lol

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 5892d ago
NoOoB1015893d ago

MAG isn't graphically impressive but neither was MW2 and everyone praised that game. MAG is on par with MW2 even with 256 players at once. You wouldn't know though since you watch little low rez videos and call it a flop, why don't you actually play some games rather then watching them, and then coming here and typing all of that BS?

Belasco5892d ago

No sir, MAG is nowhere near MW2, you are a LIAR. Fact.

evilmonkey5015892d ago

have you seen mw2? have you seen the chairs and building interiors?
Mw2 is a great game, but in no way is a coup de force for graphics whores...with that said , neither is mag. I would have to say they are around the same visual fidelity, with mag having a higher resolution and 238 more people playing simultaneously. Im gonna go out on a limb here and say your crazy.

arakouftaian5893d ago

I mean in this last beta
the game know look like a ps3 game
in the other clisé mag betas
the game did not look this good
im glad mag look this good know

i may buy it when it hit
$30 $40
i mean the game is fun
but i still like killzone 2 moré

many of my friends aré buying it
so that may make me buy it on day one
who knows

I want heavy rain!!!

LukaX235893d ago

Why do you writé liké that?

Elvfam5115893d ago

Mag is going to be 40 at launch because its only multiplayer unless they bundle it with the headset like Socom Confrontation

and he might be talking like that because english may not be his first language

deshon095893d ago (Edited 5893d ago )

but wen has any of zipper game had mind blowing Graphics they look good i want good game play

red2tango5892d ago

Completely agree. Socom 2 was my favourite game because the gameplay was awesome. Can't wait for Zipper's next-gen SOCOM :)

Show all comments (134)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil2222d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_2222d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid2221d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy2222d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva692221d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants2221d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA2221d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz32221d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2221d ago
Muzikguy2222d ago (Edited 2222d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon022222d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy2222d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon022221d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova2222d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy2221d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok2222d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil2222d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

2221d ago Replies(1)
2220d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2220d ago
PrinceOfAnger2222d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin2222d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight2222d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0242222d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka2221d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor2222d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff2347d ago (Edited 2347d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

2346d ago
TheGamez1002347d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne2347d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9092347d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE2346d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster2346d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

2346d ago
moomoo3192346d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx2346d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO2466d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_2466d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3572465d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil2465d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv722465d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1002466d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie2466d ago (Edited 2466d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt2466d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie2466d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt2465d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss2464d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2464d ago
Profchaos2464d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil2466d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow2465d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer2465d ago (Edited 2465d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca2465d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq2464d ago (Edited 2464d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie2464d ago (Edited 2464d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)