All Channels
Popular
140°

Industry insider: iPhone is a disaster

Even as industry sources leak the news that 3 million iPhones will be ready for sale at launch, doubts are starting to surface that the iPhone will be as popular as it is widely expected to be.

Two sources, speaking to Peter Burrows at Business Week, revealed that Apple plans to have 3 million iPhones ready to sell in the US on June 29. Both Apple and US distributor AT&T have received more than 1 million iPhone-related inquiries each.

According to Burrow, analysts are predicting the Apple will sell around 3 million units this year (Apple hopes to sell 5 million) and 10 to 12 million in 2008 (Apple hopes to sell 15 million).

However, analysts, such as Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster, predict that iPhone sales will really start making headway in 2009 when it's likely that Apple will have launched low-cost iPhone variants, made deals with carriers to offer high-speed Internet access, as well as moved into overseas markets. Munster predicts iPhone sales of more than 40 million in 2009.

However, even as Burrows paints an upbeat picture of iPhone prospects in his article, he also raises some doubts:

"And with its touch-screen keyboard, powerful battery-sapping processors, and a panoply of new applications, the iPhone is far more complex than the iPod. Glitches could lead to costly recalls and returns if buyers find the phone buggy or confusing."

These doubts are echoed by iPhone-skeptic John Dvorak, who believes the iPhone will be will be popular in the short-term, but then go out of fashion. He's not convinced that Apple can jump into the "deep end of the mobile-phone swimming pool without knowing how to swim".

Read Full Story >>
tech.blorge.com
Dreamworker6921d ago

the competition is doing and shows up whit. I guess a cell phone is coming with bigger HD maybe a Keyboard & Touch screen

MK_Red6921d ago

It could be the next Newton but also has a chance of being next iPod.

tk6920d ago

It is an apple. It will be the next thing models and stars will be carrying around. It is a fashion statement. And more than 3 million will be shelling out money for it in 2007. I won't be one though. Will wait for the PSP phone. But dang - Apple knows how to make something look sexy....

codeazrael6920d ago

to get the slim and sexy goodness that is the iphone. and I could care less about a psp phone. are you kidding me? those things arent even that popular. i want my iphone...........oh, the smell of it, the taste of it!

dikturbo6920d ago (Edited 6920d ago )

Sorry, I placed my reply in the wrong place.

Xi6920d ago

the rest, are happy with having their mp3 player, and cell phone, or having a perl/pocket pc.

dikturbo6920d ago

As a business owner that consciously operates the entire company in Mac, my biggest problem with any type of pda and/or cell phone is the absolute lack of an effective convergent product with Apple. In my industry (printing/graphic arts and publishing) virtually every member operates in Macintosh. I will be adding this tool to the entire sales and management staff once it has been proclaimed stable and is readily available in Canada.

This is a business tool not a toy for children. Put me down for 20 iPhones.

Show all comments (10)
30°

Top Racers Need Top Gear – Introducing the Forza Horizon 6 Limited Edition Controller and Headset

Omar writes: "With the Horizon Festival coming to breathtaking Japan, you’ll need the essential gear to prove you’ve got what it takes to become a Horizon Legend as you cruise, drift and explore an open world full of spectacular driving experiences. That’s why we’re happy to announce the newest Limited Edition Xbox Wireless Controller and Wireless Headset collection, featuring inspired designs from Forza Horizon 6. The bright cyan and lime colorways celebrate the Horizon Festival’s recognition of iconic cars and hit music, with special features that are sure to impress any collector."

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Killer2020UK30d ago

Oh my, that is one gaudy design

40°

EasySMX D05 review

You can get Hall effect controllers slightly cheaper, but you'd struggle to find as feature-rich a package without some heavy, heavy sales.

70°

"It's Just So Lame" - RTGI Modder Thinks DLSS 5 Is Impressive But Shares AI Slop Sentiment

Pascal Gilcher calls DLSS 5 impressive but shares the "AI slop" sentiment, explaining the likely tech behind it and why he dislikes it.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
CrimsonWing6957d ago

I fail to see how this is AI shhhhlllloooop. Looking at the different games they showed, this has made many of them look far better.

isarai_lee57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

It's AI slop because it ignores the artists intent and changes the details ESPECIALLY when it comes to character faces. The scariest part of it is introducing it as the next stage of DLSS, a feature where the current iteration already has controversy surrounding it and for quite a lot of games cannot be fully disabled. So reasonably the precident is already set for what path this could take, and it's not good

blacktiger56d ago

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost and so on. Many of the lighting deletes shadow, including shadow on the face like eyes even chin.

Chard56d ago

Why stop at art when it comes to human input - why not just have AI play the game for us, remove human input altogether

theshizer57d ago

If you don’t like it, just don’t enable it. Personally I think it looks great from the videos I have seen.

isarai_lee57d ago

And what about when you can't? Cause there's plenty of games where you cannot fully disable dlss already, i mean we're well into an era where it's a major crutch for developers to cover up their cut corners, why would this be any different?

blacktiger56d ago

You are playing with people's money and allow Nvidia to scam you.

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost. This is all lie to raise the cost of the graphic card.

Andrew33657d ago

Making characters look more realistic not ok because we want the developer to decide on how the game was intended to look. - Internet

Change entire game through mods thus changing how the developers intended the game to be is ok. - Internet

isarai_lee57d ago

Something consumers can do to a product after they have purchased it, entirely optional and can always be undone with a fresh install

VS

The leading gaming hardware manufacturer making this the next iteration of the main AA/Upscaling technique that is heavily relied upod by modern devs and is not optional in most games.

Not at all the same but nice try

jwillj2k457d ago

At the moment you need 2 5090’s just to get an image on the screen so this is all vaporware until proven otherwise.

Andrew33657d ago

The good news is you can just not use it as well.

Christopher56d ago

It's all about choice in the end. But, I would say that calling it 'more realistic' is quite a stretch. It looks like AI art, and that's rarely realistic.

Urrakia3456d ago

All the comments I see are reminding me of how we got to the current state of gaming when microtransactions were first introduced: "It's completely optional guys, we promise! If you don't like it just don't buy it!"

I think we all know how that ended up.

Popsicle56d ago (Edited 56d ago )

I had the same exact thought the first time this was brought up in a separate article about a week ago. Took me straight back to the conversations surrounding “horse armor.” Just don’t buy it they said. Years later, many IPs I previously enjoyed are so infected with monetization schemes that I don’t even consider purchasing them anymore.

DLSS 5 and the like are the same thing wrapped in a different package. History rhymes but many of us never learn from it.

blacktiger56d ago

Biggest Scam. Overrides lighting and shadow. So why keep Ray tracing? It's all a scam to raise graphic card. We now see Nvidia with Microsoft downturn anything against them. Sony is next!