I'm not sure I really understand you.

Why should I remove my article if it was posted first?

as I previously said, I had subitted my story before yours, but I just went back in to edit it.

I clearly remember that there were no other stories on the 'awaiting approval page' relating to this game.

say November 03 2007, that would be 2 digits. ;)

Few (if any) multi platform games on the PS3 have yet to outshine it's rival, they are always a step up on the 360. (not a fanboy comment, just truth) That's okay though, the PS3 will tear it up on their exclusive titles that are built for the PS3 from the ground up.

Totally agree, if the PS3 would be the lead platform then I would say that the chances are it would be a much better game on the PS3 as opposed to the 360 counterpart.

But the reality is that there isn't that many games in the pipeline that are using the PS3 as the lead development platform.

Let's hold off all judgment until the game is released since you have no real reason to be saying that (no evidence at all to support your "hypothesis").

If you know anything about Assassin's Creed, you know that it was first a PS3 exclusive, and then was started in the porting process about 6 months AFTER it had already been through quite a bit of the development phase. I believe also that the Devs working on this game stated that it would be easier also, to port the 360 version down from the ps3 version. I am not trying to be an ass here, I am just a tad more than pissed, because after seeing this game featured in a video at a Gameschlock store, I pre-ordered it.....what, last MAY. PAID FOR IT LAST JUNE! IOW, I have owned this damned game for coming up on a year now, and they just keep pushing it back...it gets frustrating. Bastards.