Mom and pop used to by little Johnny a ps1 (and Ps2) for Christmas, guess what they will get this year.....

Splinter Cell. On PC
Alan Wake. Who cares proabably wont even come out
Fable III. LOL
Mass Effect 2. PC
Crackdown 2. LOL part 1 was sh!t
Possibly a rumored Gears of War 3. Part 2 was a letdown and unplayable online
Project Natal. LMFAO EPIC FAIL
Halo Reach. Another metacritic flop inc (only game you got)

What a pathetic list but hey anything would be better than 2009 the year DLC right???? :DDD

@Saaking : it also had an 18 month headstart in europe even with M$ pretending they had 10 million when they hadn,t LOL

All three systems will be neck and neck.

Wii will win but who cares...it has no games compare to the PS3 and X360.

I've known the truth Since Playstation One.
That's why at the end of every console war it boils down to the most basic
ingredient. Exclusives.

Gear 2 budget $10mil.

got it?
shoddybox3fixme.

didn't ya'll learn your lesson never doubt Sony the king of electronic?

bu bu the sales!

is going great but it cant beat the Wii so i think at the end of this gen PS3 will be at 2nd place!

As with every year the ps3 will survive and co-exist with the xbox 360...domination in other countries is feasible but the ps3 needs North America as a stronghold, but as we see in recent sales data...its not happening....not even ps3 owners are bothering to purchase their biggest and best exclusives.

i cant see it happening, the ps3 has too much competition to monopolise this generation, at the end of the day its still in last place in terms of sales,and by the time it gets into its stride the next gen of consoles will be out

If you think Nintendo will support the wii after they release a new console then you don't know nintendo.
They will never support 2 consoles at the same time.

Sony will keep the ps3 on the market for up to 15 years & it wouldn't surprise anyone.
Well be old men saying dam why won't Sony let the ps3 die already!

Microsoft is in the ranks as the others who built 5 year systems & decide to make it add on gimmicks or a newer more powerful console for another 5 years. Since they did not commit to a handheld I'm thinking they've decided to go add on & natal is a big clue. People never liked adding $200 each time a system needs another add on to do what it can't all by itself.
Genesis 32x syndrome. Nintendo power glove fad.

If Microsoft came out with a hand held at E310, I would know they are in this for the long haul.
Even then they could still fail but they would have failed hardcore.
If I were Microsoft I would sell games to onlive & be done with it. Sony will embarrass them afterall.

Seriously, I ordered a ps3 bundle on Amazon. NO LIE. When it arrives, why keep it? From the beginning of 2010, I get Mass Effect 2. Then throughout the year, I get Alan Wake which looks astounding, Splinter Cell Conviction, Halo Reach, Crackdown 2, Fable 3 and any other multi-plats like BFBC2, Bioshock 2, Dead Rising 2, Lost Planet 2, and lets not forget about XBLA and NATAL. I`m almost positive that I`m gonna turn around and sell this bundle (KZ2, Infamous & PS3 slim) for profit. The only thing it`s worth keeping for is God of War 3 and blu-ray movies, which is what MANY people primarily use it for.

I've said this since the PS3 launched

jounalists, fanboys etc, have such short memories

thats why i maintain the fact, most of these so called gamers have actually only been playing games for 2 or 3 years

they dont appreciate zelda, mario, sonic, Final Fantasy , chrono trigger, Gran Turismo etc

dont even talk to them about the nes, mega drive, master system lol, they wont have a clue what they are! They dont appreciate what sega, nintendo did for the industry and what sony & nintendo have continued for the past 10-15 years

there outlandish doom and gloom comments, articles whatever, shows there lack of knowledge, especially from a historical standpoint.

Dude you are so right ill remember a couple of years from now how the p1 and 2 were one of the greatest consoles to ever come to this industry same thing with the ps3 wen sony retires from gaming to me ill stop gaming. Even tho I started gaming with nintendo but sony helped redefine gaming and revolutionise gaming as we noe them today with the likes of msg franchise resident evil final fantasy, god of war, the gt franchise and many more that's what the ps family is all about games bro and good ones. Btw the ps3 is one of the best gaming machines I have ever own it is a great investment u noe awesome console!!!!!!

PS3 truly can be huge by the end of it's life cycle, but considering the PS2 is the most successful console of all time, it has some work ahead of it.

Still, what's happening to the PS3 happened to the PS2 when it was it's age. Almost exactly the same situations, even with the huge spike after PS2 Slim's release.

So, the best option is either a 360 for those short on cash or a PS3/360 combo, but not a PS3

Xbox 360 is in the position PS2 was back then (cheap, huge game library, FF13 etc) and better, since it outperforms PS3 in 99% of multipltform titles

it is as some have said above....

"how do you doubt ps1 over 100 million(10 years),ps2 over 150 million(9 1/2 years) and psp over 50 million(5 years against a nintendo monopoly where all others failed)?"

that is not a fluke.that is success no matter how you look at it.all the ones that make excuses on other systems dying or it was inbetween systems coming out is just all bullsh!t.either your product sells or it doesn't.and sony's has again and again.

10 million systems sold a year for 10 years of production.it's not that hard to figure out.and so far it's heading in the right direction.those who DOUBT it are the ones who:

1.pay to play online
2.pay excessive prices for monopolistic practices
3.support 3 year warranties on a NO FIX.
4.pay through the nose on DLC passed as a game
5.paid for a doorstop called hd-dvd
6.were abandoned previously and told "jump in" or get left behind.
7.thought that a system made in a previous year would be more powerful than the system made one year later.
8.believe definitive-definitive-definiti ve means FACT.
9.told that small social services like facebook or twitter will win the consumers over GAMES made on the competing console.
10.believe that unreal engine is great for every game created including future motion control games.

sony has succeeded in surpassing themselves in graphics,features,online gaming,reliability,medium size,content,etc over ps2.those who believe that QUALITY like that doesn't have the chance of succeeding in lasting 10 years must have LOWER standards.

we all know this, this is in no way new news xD

If you take into account that this is only Microsoft's 2nd console and how late they came in with the 1 gen xbox against the PS name, then the 360 is doing amazing to put up this challenge this gen.

PS3 may win out, but xbox will have given it some scrap, bigger than expected. Imagine if Japan wasn't so loyal to Japanese products?

Next gen will be an even more level playing field now xbox is more of a houshold name and not seen as a hardcore gamer consolle. ie people who would never have bought a 1st gen xbox have found the 360 much more attractive.

In terms of games, PS3 is number 1 for me both in 2008 and 2009. 2010 looks like it'll be that way again.

Just out of curiousity, when was the XB2's year anyway?

lol THE PS2 had no competition.

In some countries the word for video games is Playstation. Sony reinvented gaming as we know it today, I've had all Sony consoles and I've used thousands of dollars on games, last month i used 400$ on games, over half of them were PS3 exclusives. I loved my PS1, I loved my PS2, but I gotta hand it to Sony, the PS3 is without doubt the best console to date, I've never bought so many games as I have the last 3 years.

lol Saaking is really a retard :D!

He mentions Forza3 which already sold 1.5 Million.. damn, KZ2 needed 12 months for that with bundles since the release, lol. Why do you think that SOny putt KZ2 and inFamous on Black Friday into the Bundles??

Cause this so much hyped games FLOPPED TOTALY. Now SOny will push 500k sales to that games because they are bundled, lol!

@ TheTruth.. i couldnt say it better!

It will do as good as the PS2, mostly because every little thing bad about the PS2 (No hard drive/ hard drive that can be bought anywhere and free online) PS2 didn't have all that an more then 2 controllers hook to it without another add on equip.

So in the long run, PS3 is giving us more right out of the box then the PS2 did and that is mostly what makes it do as good as PS2 in my book.

No matter what, I want a PS2, I got a PS3 that doesn't play the PS2 games an I'm happy because I only want a PS2 to play PS2 games. ^-^ kind like how I got a Playstation (Not a PSOne) to play all my old Playstation games.

Falls under the same reasons while I got a NES, N64, Genesis and so on.

Also look @ BUMP, the next droid here on n4g..

He didnt see ANY gameplay of the FF13 version for the 360 but he says that the PS3 version will be the superior one.. sounds really desperate and full of HOPE and dreams!

What will he say when the 360 version will look better in terms of graphics?? I know the answer already: !MS paid Square!

Guys, just look on Sony... IBM dropped the cell development because the SPU architecture is way too expensive.

Sony has now choosen a updated 360 CPU (Power PC CPU) for the PS4.

But 6 cores instead of 3 and 4x threating instead of 2x for each core.

What will SOny tards say when they will get great graphics after 1 year when the PS4 will be released?? Maxed out? like you said on the 360??

When PS2 hit the market it was a frenzy. People were buying classified ads(ahh the times before craigslist) to sell PS2s for twice the SKU because the demand was that high. PS3 had nowhere even close to that same buzz at launch. Penny Arcade even acknowledged that.

http://www.penny-arcade.com...

It's only now that the PS3 is starting to really kick the teeth out of the competition. What a dumb article.

pirate box is doomed

macroshaft wants you to pirate games so DOOOO ITTT!

its the only appealing thing on the console

LOL. Both the Wii and the 360 have surpassed their predecessors in sales so the ps3 will clearly not dominate this gen. They still have a long way to catch up to the 360 let alone the wii. The ps3 already released it's main gun in the Slim. 2010 only has about 2 big games while the 360 is bringing the farm with monster titles like Mass Effect 2, Fable 3, Crackdown 2, Alan Wake, Splinter Cell and of course the biggest game of 2010 in Halo Reach. Than their is all the excitement that Natal is bringing and you have an easy Microsoft 2010 win.

2010, God of War 3 and The Last Guardian. (for me) Some prefer the ps3, others the Xbox 360. Its all matter of tastes. Each his own ...

lol

ps3fanboys say this in:

2006,2007,2008,2009..

nothing new here people

move along ;0

Yeah i can remember what that was like. The ps2 was cr@p and sony dominated the competition with its overwhelming marketing power. Now consumers are sheep and they easily follow the forced trends. Today its different. Today we have another big @ss marketing company competing with sony. And they are all after your hard earned money, lol. So this is NOT the same as was back then.

you guys make blognews just to help you all sleep well :)

I can feel it, this war will end in 2010. by November 2010 we will have a winner

So to say PS3 will is unfair. HOWEVER, you never know =)

PS3 has literally owned this year, and it will own the next year too!!! So we'll just have to wait aND PLAY =D

Wait lets see 'NO ONE CARES' (N) (O) (C) turned the otherway round spells 'CON' so what you're trying to say is that the 360 is a con?

Nice job Truth!

Didn't they say this last year? And the year before?
...
Sigh....
Console war this...Console war that. What I wanna know is...
Where the hell Is my new Elder Scrolls game?

same scenario...whinny developers complain about the PS2 hardware and than we see games like God of War titles comming out late in the PS2 lifetime which ownz some of the next gen games....
same with the PS3...its owning the 360 (at least my wallet tells me so this year)

ROFL at the short memories of people ps2 had no competition my bottom it had N64, Gamecube, Dreamcast and at a later stage it also had Xbox, PS2 did not truly dominate before it reached the magical £200 price, and now that ps3 is £249 is touching that magical price, next year will be even better and all the fanboys can cry because in the end PS3 will be #1 again, it just has taken longer this time.

I used to have a original xbox and the 360, but currently I own all PS consoles on the market. (PSP go, PS2 and PS3).
My experience is
PS brand >>> Xbox brand
The reasons are honest truth
The original xbox left us gamers out in the dark when games stopped coming while the PS2 library was growing exponentially, then MS says " Here is the 360, Jump In or be left out". I did Jump In with the 360, but this time around MS made sure 360 owners suffer the consequences of their arrogance (and greed). RROD hit my console, as it happens to many gamers. WAY too expensive accessories (did you know that the oficial way to use HDMI and getting the audio to another source with the white/red output is by buying the 360 adapter? the other way is to damage your own adapter, but that can be risky). Ms greed shows all over the place, with $60 DLC games, Silver members get treated as if they do not support the console, no access to demos early, Live offers were only for Gold members, in summary if one does not pay for the Gold shaft, the 360 experience is tremendously crippled (no online Gaming).
I actually sold my 360 based on the reasons I just gave. Currently I Want to buy another 360 because the console does have good games, in the marketplace and in the stores, and im a gamer at heart. But when i look back at my experience with the 360, i remember why i sold it and why i cant put myself in that position again.

Now for the PS brand
The PS2 plays DVDs without the need of buying the controller (xbox required you to buy the controller, greedy). The PS2 library is amazing, i got it late, so i went on a buying frenzy and thx god i did. GoW, SoTC, RE4, RnC Up your Arsenal etc etc Great great library. I like my PS2 a LOT. The PSP Go is great, the 3000 does the same and more (UMD drive) so in general the PSP is awesome for great games on the go. And now with the PS one Classics is all good.
The PS3.
Out of the box everything you need for a great experience. Rechargeble controllers, Wi Fi, HDD, Blu Ray!, Optical Output, FREE online gaming, and very important a reliable console. The games speak for themselves, and i understand that game choice come down to personal opinion, but i like what i see coming for the PS3 on a monthly basis.
Gamer beware, the 360 has some of the best games around, and one of the most careless greedy companies behind it. If the 360 was reliable i would not have sold mine, which is dissapointing because as a gamer i want to play ME and Splinter Cell, but that is the way i choose it to be. Game on

I think Sony is more concerned about their whole gaming division in general than specifically the ps3 line up. They are suceeding in transitioning over to the ps3 as the main device. Had they dropped the ps2 immediatly like the competion they would have lost alot of market share..... Some fanboys are quite close minded cuz they focus on each generation

PS3 has been killing the 360 since that slim/price drop.and its going to continue because the ps3 does alot more plus offers better exclusives.

@ n to the b - that's funny did i mention ninty dominating either, no i didn't.
During the ps2's first year there was no clear outright winner, but it soon pulled away in it's second year when it got the much needed price cut, more or less the same thing has happened again ps3 was too expensive it has had a price cut and is now starting to pick up some amazing sales, we shall not see it dominate all three consoles until it's next price cut (it is already dominating the xbox, one more to go)

the PS2 had 70% marketshare while the PS3 heals only 22% market share at the same time.

Crap news.

Ok i will let u off lol
you are right about somethings tho sony was a little too up themselves when the ps3 first released but they have radically changed now and it's starting to work, this gen it is going to be very close between wii and ps3, but i still think ps3 will win because it has newer tech and has the chance to slog it out for longer.

Now only if they can get their multiplats up to snuff... I love sony but i grow tired of seeing screen tearing and FPS issues compared to other versions... I know it's not sony's fault directly but they need to get into the trenches with devs to iron those issues out because in the end there are way more multiplats for every one exclusive that launches and i'd like to use my ps3 for more then a exclusive playing system

please don't advertise in forums^^^

There definately is evidence Sony could do well sooon. But I still feel it wont be able to surpass the competition in the UK and northern America, in most of Europe it is more of a success however (because people there actually respect quality) and will continue to do well. Sony Europe need to stop being retards too... if they want the UK market.

600 dollars is cringe-worthy, but if MS and Nintendo don't pull out exclusives like we know sony will. Sony will win again. Sony has always has expectations for their devs to move forward in their craft and deliver quality. They won't make it easy for them. Nintendo I always kinda knew was going to sell alot (I think everyone kinda saw it coming), I just didn't know that they would totally sell out like they did. And as much as the fanboys refuse to admit it, MS could never compete with sony when it came to exclusives. Yeah they grabbed up quite a bit, but every single one of them came out lackluster compared to how they used to be. (Tekken, Star Ocean, DMC, GTA, Ace Combat, etc.) at least when Ninty gets ahold of a Sony franchise (RE) it makes huge improvements over past iterations.

can someone please tell me about DRM on sony's machine? I'm getting royally PO'd with MS and their bs DRM rules screwing me over just to protect themselves from pirates (which they apparently can't do anyway). tired of not being able to view my tv shows I've spent hundred$ on or use my DLC packs when not connected to XBL, all thanks to their faulty hardware.

so my question is, does sony do the same? or can u freely use any DLC even when not connected to PSN? even if it's not your 'originating console'?

as far as i know if you are talking about psn downloads i think you can use them on up to five different ps3's (you have to login to your profile from other ps3's to do this).
also you don't have to be connected to psn to play/view your downloads (unless its a multiplayer game that is lol)
i think you will find that sony is alot more giving than microsoft, give them a chance and you will find out all of the benefits of the ps3.

this site is crap,all they care about is my console is better then yours
bullsh@t,i want games news not this all the time.

He forgot to add White Knight to that list of titles. Sony is doing great with the PS3 like they did with the PS2 and Sonys ideas of adding new technology to a system is a good idea. But when the PS4 arrives I hope the titles are worth it thats usually the only problem Sony faces with any new console is a great launch of titles.

or the not the xbox. (well unless the 360 and wii stopped selling for the next decade and waited nicely in a corner for the ps3 to catch up). firstly the ps2's library cannot be matched. the ps3 games end up being fancy looking ps2 games that take forever to develop and sell like crap. secondly the ps3 is a slow console. it takes years for anything to happen, whether its psn or pressing the xmb button, its painfully slow and feels rushed all the time. makes u wonder if more time was given, would it even make a difference since the retards who created the damn thing has no idea what they just did or how they going to develop it (home). do not tell me about uc2, it looks great and thats it.

i am sorry, but sony ruined gaming by delyaing the greatest console of all time and the believing it will surpass the competetion no matter how many years go by.

This guy must not have been around for the PS2 launch, because the PS3's life has shown few similarities to date.

The PS2 was severely supply constrained for months after launch. In North America the PS3 was supply constrained for about 2 weeks with adequate supply by Christmas. The ability to make "big bucks" on eBay lasted approximately 2 weeks. The PS2 was sold out everywhere for months after launch.

The PS2 had a significant DRE hardware problem that affected a large percentage of launch units, the PS3 has shown no such hardware problems. Even with that, people were excited about the DVD drive and the storage capability compared to CD. It was a strong selling point of the console.

There were not significant complaints about its price. The Saturn previously launched at $399. The PlayStation 1 launched at $299. The PS2 launched at $299 and people accepted this price because the bar had been set in the previous generation.

There were not "doom and gloom" articles all over the place. The media and gamers were excited about the launch. PlayStation was already king of the hill when the PS2 launched and that momentum carried right on over. There was no other console on the market that was eating away at PlayStation's market share. There was nothing else like it.

The list goes on and on. This blog is drivel. I don't see how anyone takes it seriously. The PS3 is successful, but successful in its own right. But, as always, let the flamewar ensue.

True but they still have along way to go to sway dev's to make the PS3 the lead platform...

The PS3 launched at $499 and $599. People always want to say that it cost $599 when it came out. There was a $499 version too.

Sony are good at what they do and history is bound to repeat itself. There is no way that the Wii is going to compete with the hardcore systems. The 360 of course is a dying bread(physically as well.)In fact I was invite to my best friends LAN party last night, they all have 360s. We were going to play Halo 3, COD:MW2, COD:WAW and Left for dead. But one thing was stopping us from doing so. As soon as he turned on his 6 month old 360 he had gotten the RROD(this would be his 6th 360). We only had one 360 and that was barely enough for split screen on Nazi Zombies and team death-match. The only form of entertainment that we got was watching the 360 overheat from the "towel trick" they thought would fix the RROD problem.(It didn't work but was entertaining non the less). My friends mother said she would by him another 360 so He was relieved.
We ended up playing Battlefield Bad Company 2 Beta on my ps3 for the night.(sounded great on my friends surround Sound System)

I'm not trying to down the ps3 becuase I own one, but didn't they say that it was supposed to dominate this year, 2009?

and here is the other half

i didnt jump on the ps2 bandwagon right away when it came out so i cant say anything about the similarities between ps2 and ps3. but here is my opinion to this "console fanboy war" as a semi-neutral bystander with a hopefully objective point of view. ill try to break it down by logical arguments:

for me the blogpost goes along with some of my own thoughts about the decision to buy a console. i currently own the ps2slim/wii/ps3slim. my ps2 is a lot older and i just recently got the ps3. i DID consider buying an xbox360 between the ps2 and ps3!

the "gamer market" now cant be compared to the old one in the past anymore. nowadays the market is a lot bigger with other mainstream consumers than just "hardcore" gamers. those are:
1. hardcore gamers
2. casual gamers
3. family/party gamers
4. console media users

these groups arent that well devided and most of the console users are something inbetween. but breaking them apart in groups helps the next step to allocate them to each console.

wii: 2+3 with attempts to step into 1 though they are at there limits imo because of the old hardware

xbox360: 1/2 with their natal project set up to add the group 3 (if it succeeds which is not quite certain yet, im still sceptical since i never saw and felt by my own how that thing actually works)

ps3: 1-4, for those who dont believe it -> 1/2 is clear since thats the same market they are sharing with xbox (exclusives, multiplats blabla), 3 is definetly pretty much in nintendos hands at the moment but sony does have eyetoy and the upcoming motion wand technology (lets be honest they totally overslept that trend and i am sure that sonys motion controller will work since it just a better copy of wii...) and lastly 4 as mediaserver and blueray home-entertainment system.

now to the conclusion of that.
its clearly shown in this short list that the ps3 has the best possibilities to support all groups with the right games/features while the wii has a hardware blockage and the xbox is missing technology and motion(yet) features. so 2010 will see the fall of wii since the prices of the "better" consoles went down a lot and on top also getting ready to compete with nintendo over the 3rd group of consumers with the help of new "motion" hardware. so wether ms or sony will win over those is still uncertain. though it safe to assume that nintendo is going to loose shares. if not late 2010 then at latest 2011.

now that could mean that sony will not dominate after all if natal succeeds...
BUT!
a lot of people are still forgetting something. lets do the math: 150mil ps2s, according to sales about 32mil xbox360s and 28mil ps3s (thats just an estimate. dont take me literally plz). those are the gamers of the last generation, group 1+2. the 3rd group is represented by wii with about 75mil.
150 - 32 - 28 = 90mil. ok not everyone is going to get a console again. but its safe to assume "where are the up to 90mil casual gamers of the last generation?" (again dont take me litarally, i know that a lot of people bought 2 or more ps2 over time). i dont think it includes hardcore gamers since those usually are the first to jump to the next gen hardware.

i am for instance a good example of that group. since im not that into console gaming i was indifferent what i should get. the ps3 was too expensive the xbox360 unknown to me. back then i just played final fantasy, GoW, PoP, singstar and way back GT on ps2. usual casual stuff aight? the wii i got because my gf wanted it, she belongs partly to the 3rd group.

to sum up my train of thought: i actually planned to get a ps3 once FF13 would be released in EU. that was under the assumption that it wouldve been an exclusive like it always had been. after the announcement to go multiplat from SE it was open if xbox or ps3. but considering the other titles like GoW and GT as well as the additional BD and hardwarespecs: it became an easy choice. especially when sony came with the slim version + heavy pricecuts.

you get my point right? if someone like me is an example for the casual gamer group. you can bet on it that there are hell lot of others of those 90mil which have exactly the same idea and were waiting for the old classics to be released and the ps3 to get cheaper. they/i dont care about which console has the best graphics(multiplat) or new exclusives/franchises. FF13 is coming and so is GoW and finally GT5. all those ps2 owners in sleepmode are going to wake up soon. so expect the ps3 to stamp and crush any other console in 2010. believe it or not thats how it will play out...

i don't know why you fellas even bother arguing with these 360 owners... just sit back and let the sales speak for themselves. at the moment the 360 owners are really making themselves look stupid, so stupid (in fact) that eventually this site will be Sony only because they will not dare show their faces here at the end of next year

looks like i'm done with n4g, always ps3 this, ps3 that. I have both the 360 and PS3, WHO CARES IF ONE OUTSELLS THE OTHER. WHO HONESTLY CARES.

hard call to make but here is a forum link and a video from back in the day to sever as a trip down memory lane

http://www.goodcowfilms.com...

God who approves this sh1t!. Honestly do we need fifty identical fanboy articles.

You know who wins? It isn't Nintendo, Sony or Microsoft. The consumer wins.

Here's an article from when the PS2 launched, Forbes was saying the same things, and we know how the PS2 fared in the end. I thought it was an interesting read. It seems that journalists are just very quick to judge. You need to look at the entire lifespan of a console before you can declare it a "failure" or a "success".

http://www.forbes.com/2001/...

PS2 didn't take 3-4 years to dominate.

First 2008, then 2009, now 2010... When are you guys going to shut up about the ps3 take over? It hasn't happened yet since you started claiming it would in 2008. You guys search your hardest to find these rediculous articles to cure your disappointment. I'm sorry I own both consoles and there's not much to envy about the ps3. Maybe thats why you guys try to bash all the other consoles when your on bottom?

Get a grip please because there has been way too many people crying with their heads on their ps3s since they bought it. "I know your better ps3, I know you are! Please ps3 stay alive, I will never let them discourage you. I paid too much money for you to let you go. Shh ps3 listen this is what I'll do:D. I'll get a whole bunch of other friends and we will talk greatly about you to the people."

You guys think I'm blind? F*ck no I'm not blind! I own a ps3 and I see what you guys try to hide. Don't believe me, then go to my profile and add my psn gamertag. Hell I'll even respond to you to prove it.

Ok the xbox 360 console reliability is really crap. I'm not trying to hide anything it's the truth. It's actually the only console that has broken on me that much before. At least it doesnt collect dust though. Be sure to buy a warranty is all I'm saying lol. I have more fun playing the xbox 360 though because it has a better social network. Theres more to it than that but I think I had you guys read enough by now. I'm not trying to be biased, I just prefer the xbox 360. I guess it's just a preference of mine. Your not wrong for liking the ps3 at all. It's just you guys need to know the truth that your the minority and nothing better to do than hate blog. PS2 was an awesome console, but the ps3 isn't top console of this gen.

I think the ps3 is good because it's keeping competitors busy though. I'm happy that they chose the free route. Let's not be silly and say it has outsold other consoles though. Sony is still important, I hope their next console will have even better online for free. I want them to step on MS toes so they dont take advantage. Ps3 biggest accomplishment has been the blue ray hands down. As for games its had a few throw in here and there so far. The games just dont have as much logevity to them. P.S. COD games are better played on xbox 360.

Sony is heading for the top spot again

Come on guys, stop doing this to yourselves. Still living in the past glorious days of the ps2, afraid to accept the truth that the ps3 is Failing this gen and even worst a financial disaster for sony (5.7 BILLIONS SINCE THE LAUNCH) no profit. NOTHING, I SAY NOTHING LIKE THE PS2. Deal with it. PS3 IS THE GAMCUBE OF THIS GEN.

"Dude you are so right ill remember a couple of years from now how the p1 and 2 were one of the greatest consoles to ever come to this industry same thing with the ps3 wen sony retires from gaming to me ill stop gaming. Even tho I started gaming with nintendo but sony helped redefine gaming and revolutionise gaming as we noe them today with the likes of msg franchise resident evil final fantasy, god of war, the gt franchise and many more that's what the ps family is all about games bro and good ones. Btw the ps3 is one of the best gaming machines I have ever own it is a great investment u noe awesome console!!!!!! "

MGS came out on the original NES same with FF and the RE franchise isn't sony's it's Capcoms. Give sony credit for being sneaky and stealing Nintendo's original idea of going with cd base format instead of cartridge in the n64 era, Nintendo pretty much handed them the market by not going with cd as they had originally planed. Sony capitalised on Nintendo's F up and with a little help from Square (FFVII) sony took off. The Revolutionaries and Pioneer are still Nintendo. Even though I think the wii sucks. Sony did nothing but still an idea that worked for them in the end.

Funny seeing all the Xbox 360 fanboys in full damage control, because it's so f***ing true!

the dif. between MS and Sony. Sony has a 10 year plan. MS doesnt.

you can bet that MS will dump the 360 as soon as the 720 comes out just like the first xbox.