All Channels
Popular
180°

iPhone: No iPod can do this...

New commercials showing main features of Apple's iPhone.

Read Full Story >>
gameplanets.blogspot.com
gta_cb6924d ago

yeh looks good, maybe when if the price becomes "ok" i mite get one.

gta_cb6924d ago

this kinda reminds me of the thing that MS is doing... Surface i think its called.

ya know with the table and being able to move pics around etc.

Balance6924d ago

i am usually not a fan of apple products but that was pretty darn cool. if it takes and receives phone calls well that would be an awsome device however the price point is way high for the mass market. if it were more on par or slightly above other smart phones (the price) i would actually consider it. maybe in 6-12months after production stream lining happens they will be able to drop the price some. The interface is somewhat inovative but it doesn't have any features every other smart phone has, just that this one you use your finger instead of a stylus so basically it is a normal smart phone with a really cool UI and control concept.

Babylonian6923d ago (Edited 6923d ago )

that does look sweet. But the only problem is that it'll cost 600 bucks or more (don't know how much it will be in the EU), I rather buy a PS3 as I like to play games more. Still looks amazing if ask me. Apple products always look top notch.

ITR6923d ago

I'm abit more social so I would go for the phone over the PS3.

razer6923d ago

but waaay too expensive and unlike other phones I doubt this will drop in price much. Apple tends to keep their prices high for a long time(see iPOD). Other companies are about to offer similar comparable phones to the iPhone so hopefully those will be priced for the average consumer. Another big problem with this phone is going to be battery life. Like with other Smartphones a full charge when using all it's features lasts less than a day. If you actually talk then it's even less. I can't imagine how much battery power is needed to power that display.. And if you are going to play music, watch video, etc I'm thinking while it's a great "show-off" type of device it won't be very practicle to anyone who actually want's to use it.

sloth4urluv6923d ago

Ive yet to understand peoples obsessions with phones.
I use my phone for talking, whats the point of a phone if the battery is dead.

While there at it making cell phones do extra worthless stuff that they dont need to why dont they make cell phones that can open a garage, or turn on my tv, why buy a universal remote when you can just use your cellphone....

Make the cellphone so it turn on your car, and so you can use it as a credit card, so when you drop it or lose it your just totally screwed then.

Show all comments (26)
30°

Top Racers Need Top Gear – Introducing the Forza Horizon 6 Limited Edition Controller and Headset

Omar writes: "With the Horizon Festival coming to breathtaking Japan, you’ll need the essential gear to prove you’ve got what it takes to become a Horizon Legend as you cruise, drift and explore an open world full of spectacular driving experiences. That’s why we’re happy to announce the newest Limited Edition Xbox Wireless Controller and Wireless Headset collection, featuring inspired designs from Forza Horizon 6. The bright cyan and lime colorways celebrate the Horizon Festival’s recognition of iconic cars and hit music, with special features that are sure to impress any collector."

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Killer2020UK27d ago

Oh my, that is one gaudy design

40°

EasySMX D05 review

You can get Hall effect controllers slightly cheaper, but you'd struggle to find as feature-rich a package without some heavy, heavy sales.

70°

"It's Just So Lame" - RTGI Modder Thinks DLSS 5 Is Impressive But Shares AI Slop Sentiment

Pascal Gilcher calls DLSS 5 impressive but shares the "AI slop" sentiment, explaining the likely tech behind it and why he dislikes it.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
CrimsonWing6954d ago

I fail to see how this is AI shhhhlllloooop. Looking at the different games they showed, this has made many of them look far better.

isarai_lee53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

It's AI slop because it ignores the artists intent and changes the details ESPECIALLY when it comes to character faces. The scariest part of it is introducing it as the next stage of DLSS, a feature where the current iteration already has controversy surrounding it and for quite a lot of games cannot be fully disabled. So reasonably the precident is already set for what path this could take, and it's not good

blacktiger53d ago

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost and so on. Many of the lighting deletes shadow, including shadow on the face like eyes even chin.

Chard53d ago

Why stop at art when it comes to human input - why not just have AI play the game for us, remove human input altogether

theshizer53d ago

If you don’t like it, just don’t enable it. Personally I think it looks great from the videos I have seen.

isarai_lee53d ago

And what about when you can't? Cause there's plenty of games where you cannot fully disable dlss already, i mean we're well into an era where it's a major crutch for developers to cover up their cut corners, why would this be any different?

blacktiger53d ago

You are playing with people's money and allow Nvidia to scam you.

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost. This is all lie to raise the cost of the graphic card.

Andrew33653d ago

Making characters look more realistic not ok because we want the developer to decide on how the game was intended to look. - Internet

Change entire game through mods thus changing how the developers intended the game to be is ok. - Internet

isarai_lee53d ago

Something consumers can do to a product after they have purchased it, entirely optional and can always be undone with a fresh install

VS

The leading gaming hardware manufacturer making this the next iteration of the main AA/Upscaling technique that is heavily relied upod by modern devs and is not optional in most games.

Not at all the same but nice try

jwillj2k453d ago

At the moment you need 2 5090’s just to get an image on the screen so this is all vaporware until proven otherwise.

Andrew33653d ago

The good news is you can just not use it as well.

Christopher53d ago

It's all about choice in the end. But, I would say that calling it 'more realistic' is quite a stretch. It looks like AI art, and that's rarely realistic.

Urrakia3453d ago

All the comments I see are reminding me of how we got to the current state of gaming when microtransactions were first introduced: "It's completely optional guys, we promise! If you don't like it just don't buy it!"

I think we all know how that ended up.

Popsicle53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

I had the same exact thought the first time this was brought up in a separate article about a week ago. Took me straight back to the conversations surrounding “horse armor.” Just don’t buy it they said. Years later, many IPs I previously enjoyed are so infected with monetization schemes that I don’t even consider purchasing them anymore.

DLSS 5 and the like are the same thing wrapped in a different package. History rhymes but many of us never learn from it.

blacktiger53d ago

Biggest Scam. Overrides lighting and shadow. So why keep Ray tracing? It's all a scam to raise graphic card. We now see Nvidia with Microsoft downturn anything against them. Sony is next!