the biggest difference is in the foliage (wow never thought i'd use the word foliage lol) where Crysis is better but other then that its not that huge of a difference.

Well you have to think though...you have to have a "god" computer to run Crysis in its best! HAZE you can just pop into the PS3 and play.

Also, I think both titles are in the same stage of developments.

omg yeah dudz Haze looks worse than GEARS LOL!eleven fekin' crysis looks fotoreal, but haze looks worse than a game that ins't remotely able to be compared to it...hahw GearZ1!!1 is awwwweesomommeeee f4 liphe roxZorxz...Its just liek how I alwazy told youz guys that Vacation looks WAYWYAYWAY better than Platoon!111

Damn HAZE looks good!

heh, less then week ago, on one forum i also compared those two games, BUT only screens without foliage. And when comparing, Haze looked pretty good near Crysis. =) Sometimes even better. =]

you can make a computer that will run Crysis pretty good for 1500 dolalrs.

Also these pics don't take into account that every single object in Crysis can be destroyed in a realisitic fashion. There is and never will be a comparison.

Haze looks great but credit goes to crysis. Hopefully the job opening for ps3 developer ends up to be a port and a good 1 2. (More like dreaming actually:( )

Crysis looks better but that's not to say Haze looks bad. I hope Crysis comes out for PS3 as I don't have hundreds of pounds to spend on a powerful PC.

N4G is the new space for

Screenshot comparisons
Petitions

niiiiice

Both look good, but damn Crysis looks like real, especially the trees!

lets do a Haze vs Halo 3 vs Resistance vs Gears comparison! Unreal T-III also if you want to throw the odd man in ...

I'm not including Crysis because that would make an unfair comparison. Crysis is nextgen+ in my opinion. That and the FACT that you need to dish out a good deal of $$$ for a top of the line computer to run this thing.

Crysis does look better, but am impressed at haze, it looks great and can anyone confirm if crysis is still coming to ps3??

STAY OF THE DRUGS if ya'll think Haze can compete with Crysis in the graphics department. :D

Haze looks good...but its a PC game so who cares...Im a console gamer PC games dont appeal to me. at all..All i see is FPS and RTS and buying a new chip every six months to play the next best games my cpu wont b able to handle..just seems stoopid to me

Haze looks really good but Crysis is just on a whole new level. I almost want to say it's past "next-gen"...almost. Imagine in 2 years that Crysis might be the standard way games look. That is just unreal. Speaking of Unreal...I think Epic and Crytek will go at it alot graphically these next couple of years and make each other step their efforts up even more. :)

Haze is coming out on all systems besides WII i believe. Also can you travel around a huge area of land like Crysis? such as the island and fly choppers other things? Or while playing HAZE can you shoot down all the trees and plants? and blow up all the buildings? HAZE looks awesome buts its just a pretty game. But then again i don't need a $1500 Computer to play it. Also Crysis is coming to PC only i think i remember them saying that a while ago when all those rumors of it on Ps3 came around.

I think besides textures and lighting the biggest differnce is the scale of the games. The Environments in Crysis seem much more grand and elaborate. For some reason when I look at the screens for Haze, I think of Red Faction. I also think the yellow vizors are just a ploy so they don't have to do facial animation.

Besides the trees and foliage,where crysis is obviously gaphically superior,the games pretty much look the same.Which I have to say is quite impressive considering all the hype surrounding the graphics in crysis. kudos to Ubi Soft and Sony.And haze isn't even finished yet.

Haze will end up being a better game than socom and killzone 2, just a feeling....

Crysis looks better, but you have to take into account that Haze will look like that on ps3/360 which is not too shabby.
Crysis meanwhile will NOT look like on your pc, unless your pc is worth around $3000 bucks.

Haze is on e delayed release to 360 right?

no contest, crysis is an amazing looking game

wow, both looks really great..and ps3 is lead platform for haze too..this is great for ps3 owners..i wonder how the 360 version will look like when it release next year..

i just like to brag but then again i'm broke for spending money,

intel quad core 3.2ghz(x4) processor, 4gigs of ram, 24inch 1600X1920, 2x nvidia GeForce 8800, bluray,HD-DVD drives, 300gig 10,000rpm,

i love to look at it but not touch it

crysis which is a monster in the graphics department.

if you people think gears looks better then haze ur on crack. gears isnt better looking.

haze has huge enviroments - it has daylight (gears is mostly all in darkness or grey skies)

im very impressed with haze and its a 1st gen console game. now i cant wait to compare killzone 2 to crysis that would be a treat. theres 7,000 dev working on crysis and it shows..that jungle is sooo realistic its not even funny

but good stuff for haze - ill be grabbing it

power of green = was that a joke comparing cartoony hako3 to haze hahahahaah omg thats hilarious

for a joke some1 should compare crysis to halo3 lol

Crysis blows haze out the water. Why did anyone even make this comparison
did anyone even think it would stand a chance call to juarez looks better to me than haze.

but damn, HAZA is holding its OWN on Crysis. Please stop with Gears Of War, that game was dark as hell, hardly had anyone on screen at the same time. Gears of War got away with a lot, by making it so damn dark. Haze looks waaay better than gears of war. Crysis does look damn nice though. But, like I said, haza is definately holding its own against Crysis. i cant wait to see Killzone 2.

BTW, Thammer1, you suck B@lls.

Some of the Crysis screens look better, but some of the Haze screens seem more impressive.

i have never played 1 person shooters but i think i am going to buy haze a soon as it comes out it looks really good

Of course Crysis but Damn Haze looks awesome, I can't wait for that game.I can't run Crysis on my PC so Haze will do the job for me.

yep....

compare HAZE to CRYSIS!!!

i think Crysis is GOD of GFX right now.. I think they cant put ONE level of that in a DVD 9 .. its the reason they cant release it now lol..

there is no computer right now that be able to process this HUGE number of details (impossible if they'd been compressed ) another reason for not releasing ..

crysis has more detail but haze is on that ass crysis lol hhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

Not sure if you ppl know this about crysis, although worked on by crytek, microsoft and nvidia, both have numerous employes posted at crytek.

Each company pushing there product, using this game as leverage.

So with the help of ms,intel,etc. I'm not suprised this is the best looking game yet.

From looking at Haze, If compared to crysis dx9 part.

Both have lush jungles, i'm not sure if anything in haze is destructable, or to what extent.

I've not yet seen enough of haze, to fully judge its graphics, awalk through the jungle dosent do it for me. in either game.

I've seen much more of crysis.

on size of crysis content wise, i think you need blu-ray.

Why xbots are judging haze against g.o.w is beyond me, Always remmember this, G.O.W was produced with high quality streaming textures, to sell the engine.

Wheres the view distance in G.O.W if you want to be silly, oops there isnt one, because 360 would have melted.

Lastly this is for you xbox fans, If you really really want to judge gow with a ps3 game, then judge it against Lair.

And you'll find, Lair pisses all over it.

I bet you Haze will beat Crysis on 90% of the PC's where its played.

That's the thing I hate about PC games. The never look as good as the videos you see. The machine simply has to be so freaking elite to do that.

not by much. Console graphics are advancing rapidly and soon there will be no distinction between the two. :) Haze=Crysis!

I think HAZE looks better than GEAR OF WARS.

Crysis will not be beat by Haze, but Haze will still make for an awesome game.

The graphics on Haze is what i was hoping Halo 3 would look like... what'd you do wrong Bungie!!!!

The grass is very impressive in Crysis. The environments, in general, are impressive...but especially the grass.

I respect your opinion, but i think HALO 3 will look better than HAZE.
This year will be great, i own a 360 and a ps3. I will get HALO 3 as soon as it hits the streets, and don't forget about, HS, HAZE, GTA 4, KILLZONE 3, WARHAWK, and more, and i don't know if i will get CRISIS, because i don't like to play games on my PC. It's great to be a gamer, i don't get why you guys keep on fighting.

so many f'ken m'rons, these screens are low res, go HD at 720p or 1080p and Crysis will make Haze look like total last gen, and you dont need a 3000 dollar pc, I just bought factory oc 8800GTX for 520 and an X2 3800+ for 80(overclocked and running stable at 2.9GHz like a 5800+) and some memory for 130, a little more than ps3 if you already have a pc, but way much more powerful. besides you can get so many really good pc games for 30-40 bucks these days

@ALIEN, agreed, polished Halo 3 single player will look pretty good, halo3 mp while bland shows good potential

Look at the first Picture, There is a lot of lost details in HAZE.

*First Pic*
HAZE - The picture is too bright, I don't see really any sky or clouds. The shade under the trees and bushes are illuminated, and I don't see any shadows of the vegetation. Sun seems to be everywhere, even in the shadows.

CRYSIS - Total Opposite, The sun hits the foliage at certain spots and it shows. The shadows of the vegetation can be seen on the ground. The individual tree branches/brushes are very visible against the backround/depth. A lot more detailed.

HAZE is more bluured... I know, I know

I'm still not sold on HAZE gameplay, It is a new offering, and will need lots of hype to get it going, good graphics is expected, especially when the developers talk sh!t. The gameplay to me seems like just another FPS.

EDIT Below: PerezBros - Who you kiddin, I'm not disageeing, I still like FPS games for what they are. just my Opinion, thats all. While there are some new options like 4-co-op and such, it is what it is. Loved GEARS.

dude we've been playing "another fps" for years

Both titles look good. We can all agree on that. I just cant wait for Haze. It will be one of the first games I get for my 360 in 2008.

Haze looks good! Crysis, Awesome!

as we have said haze is multiplatform, meanining not just on ps3, so the graphics are split into denomonations of power shifts onto ps3/pc/180, now lets do a more fare comparison, you think your pc is greater than something greater than a supercomputer, then you are on meth, your pc cost much, but the ps3 is 600 dollars so you actually believe that more money can make better graphics, since thats how much your hardware cost, you are sadly mistaken, there are vehicles that cost more than otheres, but the cheaper car performs much better than the more expensive one, same thing with the ps3, the ps3 has things built into it that enable cg ingame, and besides haze looks GREAT compared to crysis, if you consider that crysis has been worked on well before e3 2005, same time frame as the weakling glitches of ware graphics, that didnt improve much over a nearly 1 year and a half extension, haze was just announced in 2006, so the haze game looks astounding, but how about we do a fair much more fair comparison, like killzone 2, im sure when the game is shown along with many others in e3 2007 crysis will dissapear from your lips, and besides ps3 aint no console, its a supercomputer+ in console form, the only thing console about ps3 is the fact that it comes in a box, cost much less than a pc(really the ps3 outta cost about 10 g's thats the least one of the newest supercomputers cost, but infact the ps3 includes things that normal supercomputers dont have like gpus and blue ray), and the ps3 hooks up to a tv, those are the only things that makes the ps3 in a console category, remember that please, and no motorstorm didnt use that much of the ps3s power, it used, the rsx for all graphics rendering, and that was without the utilization of edge tools, and it used 10-15% of 2 of the 9 processors on the cell and that was for physics, dynamics, frame rate, and a.i. that was all the power was used for, if they had used just one of the cells 9 processors to 50% with the help of rsx at the time, we wouldve had a game that may have surpassed the target render, or equalled it, those graphics are comming still for ps3, but requires money to make cg first of all, and even further than that to make a translation from cg into realtime, that is what supercomputers do, make cg, and it cost alot of money, the first games on ps3 are not using the supercomputer power in the machine, so i truely would not (pc fans) get so happy and confident about your crysis, not for long that is, cause when e3 comes, well you will be looking dumb, im not saying crysis isnt a nice looking game, but is it next gen, glitches of ware and crysis i would say are very close to looking middle gen, because thats what they are, until you reach cg ingame i truely dont believe you realise sonys idea of next gen, am i right? yes, i am right, i am tired of generation after generation of seeing cutscenes and then gameplay that looks nothing like the cutscene, like so many years with the past playstations, final fantasy for instance, the cutscenes were beautiful, but the games didnt look all that, but with final fantasy 13 with the supercomputer power of the ps3, the game will be cutscene ingame, the day i dreamt of is comming, the day of no more cutscenes, but you get to play the cutscene instead, i use to watch the cutscenes and wonder, what would it be like to actually play the cutscenes in a boss fight or all game long, but still for 2 generations, and a middle gen they still were the same cutscene for to watch and then gameplay was horribly a downgrade from the cutscene, but now with the ps3 that will all change, my dream will be realised, and it wont be by pc, good bye and piece out

god you guys are stupid Crysis is coming out on dvd no one in there right mind has a different player for their comp, and crysis is the first true dirextX10 game wait a year for PC to blow the PS3 out of the water.

P.S. you can build a top of the line PC for 1300 your a tool if you buy premade

Crysis takes the cake for this because it has the hight level of Graphics to run it.. but really a console game and a first gen one for the ps3 at that isn't too far behind.. there are some screens where the palm trees in Haze look marginally better or at least equal to crysis, and then there are some where crysis truely shines. i think realy free radical, has come along way... and it shows, they've worked the ps3 well and to tell you the truth when ever i see games like Lair and Drake, and games like this standing it's own against a graphics Beast like crysis, on the ps3 i only feel even better about my purchase and look forward to what will come next year and the year after. i wonder what will FFXIII look like if we were to just compare on a graphics comparions alone even though both Crysis and FFXIII are totally different in genre and design.... HALO3... yes the biggest over hyped game to come will look better than it's beta, but how much is to remained seen. to me if halo is going to sell it better have thd appeal to it as well because halo is soppose to be a second or 3rd gen xbox 360 game and it looks barely any better than resisntance, which stood toe to toe with alot of the second gen xbox 360 games with exceptions to Gears, and Lost planet. ... still there is hope maybe halo3 will go from good to better but interms of that i dont think theres much more we'll see from halo3, all we'll see is that it's sold 9 million copies in 1-3 days and it's the fastest selling game in history, then we'll see a review probably ranging from8.9-9.5, because the second one's story wasn't all that great. i'll say that even though i'm not a fan of halo i think the first one was the pinnacle experience for story, i'll give multiplayer to halo 2, halo 3 has alot to live up to and from the mixed reviews and latest screens the game barely screams Power of xbox 360 or next gen at that, especially with the more impressive stuff i've seen for the 360. mass effect, and Lost oddyssy. i must say though Haze came from nowhere and it's shout it's ass all over the place... making games like gears look well ok. i must say, this is gona be greatmy computer can run Crysis, but i dont need it because. a game like Haze looks amazing and holds it's grounds i'll leave it on that note.

ALIEN theirs no way in hell halo is going to be better than haze

i beg to differ i promise you that Halo will be better Haze is being hyped up like Killzone, and we know how that ended

I'll give the Jungle to Crysis, I thought the Industrial stages looked better in Haze.

Crysis is not done justice in these shots. Go view some proper images then compare

http://media.pc.ign.com/med...

There just is no comparison

http://media.pc.ign.com/med... Crysis

http://media.ps3.ign.com/me... Haze

both look amazing but crysis looks that little bit better i must say.

Ps is crysis coming to ps3?

.

It is future proof. I haven't played a game like Crysis since and probably never will. Wasn't the greatest FPS but certainly it was special

Crysis looked MINDBLOWING in 2007 (at least the few frames I could render on my PC did), still looks good today, which is an amazing feat. But has definitely aged when you consider the wow factor it once had. Braid is a game from 2007 that's future proof bc the graphical style is so simple. Looked good then, looks as good now.