All Channels
Popular
200°

Dragon Age: Origins: PC vs. PS3 video comparison

A video comparing the PC version and Playstaion 3 versions of Dragon Age: Origins.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
xg-ei8ht6054d ago

Close, would like to see in HD.

hotgamergirl6054d ago

Where's the 360 version in this comparison?

Darkstorn6054d ago

@1.1-
They already did a 360 comparison, it's on N4G I believe.
The PC version will always have better graphics, I don't see the point of comparing them in this way.

jjohan356054d ago

Why did they not support keyboard/mouse for the PS3?

Chris3996054d ago

Very impressive for Bioware's first (that we know of, ME 1 or 2 is probably in the works) PS3 title.

Great developers. I was iffy on this game until the reviews started pouring in, and while I usually don't give an iota of weight to a reviewer's opinion, the sentiments seem to be unanimous in this case.

Waiting for damned EB to call! (Canadian, we always get cross border shipping delays.)

peeps6054d ago

"Why did they not support keyboard/mouse for the PS3? "

i guess it would mean having to develop both the console interface and k&m interface when it's much easier for them to just dev the console interface for both the 360 and ps3

6054d ago
Harry_Manback6054d ago

Both the Ps3 and PC each have their own games which are graphically superior while compared to this game.

HDgamer6053d ago

On consoles certain individuals feel that their version is superior because of graphic comparisons and derail from the fact the gameplay is pretty much the same as well.

TheSadTruth6053d ago

WOW THE CELL IS AMAZING, the power of the cell with its advanced emotion engine capabilities blow the PC out of the water

only on n4g...

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 6053d ago
Delta6054d ago

LOL PC owns PS3 graphically.

Godmars2906054d ago

And the open zone is that way >>>

Typical-Guy6054d ago

you do realize that PS3 is a console with limited RAM and processing powers. if not then so much for your time in school.

Delta6054d ago (Edited 6054d ago )

Its the truth I'm not bashing or nothing. I'm getting it for PS3 cause i don't have a good PC.

Delta6054d ago

Durr, im just stating the obvious. PC is always better 99.9% of the time.

Tony P6054d ago

Everyone knows the PC handles and plays the game best. The devs infer it, reviews state it, and video confirms it. No one EVER wants to admit the PC version looks better. It's always "unfair" and PC gamers are "elitists" for saying so.

Geez. Just give credit where it's due and enjoy your game. It's pathetic to read everyone try to take away from certain versions so they can feel they bought "the best".

sorceror1716053d ago

Yeah, the PC is for the best graphics, the most complex and responsive interfaces... and the highest cost, most technical issues and, all too often, most obnoxious DRM.

The consoles are for decent graphics, standardized interfaces... and lower cost and trouble.

There are people who prefer the PC, and people who prefer the console, and even those who don't care. The PC is always going to have better graphics, and you're always going to pay more for that. If it's worth it to you, and you have (or are) decent tech support - go for it, Mazel Tov!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 6053d ago
xg-ei8ht6054d ago

If you call that owning, i just gotta ROFL.

It's close even in the low quality vid, PS3 eats the 360 version alive. 360 = old tech.

PC = expensive tech. look at the machine u need to run it decently.lol.

Fishy Fingers6054d ago (Edited 6054d ago )

PS3 holding it's own just fine. Of course it would be a different story comparing their respected highest resolutions.

Bioware seem to have a good handle on the PS3 seeing this is their first game.

Edit: Unintentional reply, meant to be a stand alone post. Sorry.

TheIneffableBob6054d ago

A great PC isn't that expensive anymore. You can get a machine with a quad-core, 4GB of RAM, and an HD 4850 for around $600.

Mantiz6054d ago

Which is only twice as much as the current gen consoles LOL, and with them you get the benefit of not missing out on games like Uncharted 2, !nFamous, MGS4, HALO 3 ODST, Ratchet & Clank, etc... etc... with that extra 300$ I would buy a netbook and have the best of both worlds, or a sound system for that matter. Fact is if your looking for the most fun Playing a game ( Not staring at it ) then consoles have, and will always win, hands down.

LONEWOLF2316053d ago

lol, i feel bad for you REALLY i do.
Till i see a comparison between the PS3 and 360 version i call your words fanboy foolishnes!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6053d ago
Godmars2906054d ago

Any reason they just didn't combine video of all three versions?

BeachBar696054d ago

Still would rather play it on my couch on the flatty. I even got a badass pc (played AoC on highest settings) its alright but im not into the keyboard and mouse deal, always liked the controller console deal. Although i do miss the CS days on 56k lol.

And ya where is the 360's, not that i care but if your gonna roll out the carpet. Lets get them all out there.

Show all comments (71)
220°

EA Turned Down BioWare's Pitch For A Dragon Age Origins Remake Or A Remastered Trilogy

EA turned down BioWare's pitch to work on a remake of Dragon Age Origins or a remastered Dragon Age Trilogy, according to a new report.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Terry_B295d ago

Thats a pity. A remaster Trilogy would sell a lot better than the game they released last year.

TheEroica293d ago

Speak for yourself... Some of us are tired of remastered/remakes. Maybe this industry could show a little originality or progress a thought forward. Pass on dragon age remastered. Make a competent dragon age game or fold up shop.

FullmetalRoyale293d ago

They did speak for themselves.

jambola293d ago

At what point did they indicate they were speaking for anyone else?

Lionsguard293d ago

No, they would have just ruined it by retconning things with their agenda.

Ristul293d ago

Exactly, while I love the orginal game (origins) they would have censured the hell out of it and replaced it with wokeness.

-Foxtrot295d ago

I would have rather seen a remake of Origins which added onto it with more content than Dragon Age 4

If successful they could have continued on from it ignoring the other DA games.

Christopher295d ago

Lore dump in Veilguard was very good and I enjoyed the game for that.

I would not at all be opposed to more of a 'remake' of the first game, though. Not sure a 'remaster' with better graphics and whatnot would really pull me in if it didn't include more updated controls and gameplay.

Armaggedon293d ago

Yeah, your right about the lore, and thats the reason I like dragon age in the first place. I think thats why theres such a divide with veilguard. Those that fell in love with dragon age for the rpg mechanics were gravely disappointed.

pwnmaster3000294d ago (Edited 294d ago )

Honestly I tried getting into dragon age 4 but just couldn’t man and it wasn’t that political BS, annoying yes, but not game killing. It just wasn’t it for me.
I would rather they just remake the original and stay true to the original

anast294d ago

It's not a good game. But if a few trans and gay people upset you, then you have some issues with stuff beyond politics.

pwnmaster3000294d ago

Didn’t care for it.
Annoying yes, because it’s dragon age.
That whole trans and binary just didnt fit in and felt force.

But like I said it wasn’t game killing. I just found it boring.

andy85294d ago

Ill always have the argument you only see it if you go looking for it. Im not gay or trans, it was a 2 minute scene you can literally skip and then you dont see any more of it in the game. Didn't bother me at all.

pwnmaster3000293d ago (Edited 293d ago )

@andy
It really wasn’t 2 min and it was pretty much one characters identity lol.
Like I said it wasn’t game killing.

But to pretend it wasn’t stupid the way they went about it.
Sounded like something from our world would say.
Like wtf, i want fantasy to run away from our world.
I think it’s dumb asf to use real world terminology for real world problems in a game that isn’t set in ours world/altworld

Armaggedon293d ago

Understandable, it is a very different game in many ways.

@anast
I think it was a good game. Who is actually right here?

anast293d ago

It's not a good game. People people liking something is not always a good metric. People like sh%& games, I even like a few sh&% games myself.

Armaggedon292d ago (Edited 292d ago )

Thats the understanding people lack.

People set standards of what is “good”. Interestingly, it is a strange form of confirmation bias, in which people look for evidence to support what they deem “good or bad” about a title. That is why we have so many people that say that starfield does nothing new…when that is literally what it does..something new…for Bethesda at least.

I have had people call me trash before, moments before I obliterate them in whatever it is we are playing. Broaden your awareness, and you will know of what I speak.

isarai294d ago

That's ok, they probably would've sullied it somehow anyways

LucasRuinedChildhood294d ago

What was wrong with Mass Effect Legendary Edition?

Terry_B294d ago

Miranda Lawson..and a bit more.

franwex293d ago

Right? I’m actually glad they left it alone.

Show all comments (42)
100°

Next Year, I Promise I Will Play A Different Character In Dragon Age: Origins

I've played the exact same Warden in Dragon Age: Origins for years. In 2025, I will finally make a different one. Maybe.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
CoNn3rB517d ago

Tried it before, doesn't work. I tried to to play a Dalish archer but ended up being a Dwarf Noble warrior again, must be a bug

OtterX517d ago

Next year is tomorrow, so you'll start a new character tomorrow, right? 🤔

OtterX516d ago

It's not now, at least where I live. It's 2025 as of 2 hours ago. :P

Bercilak516d ago

Seriously? I play every playable character there is: a male human noble.

TheColbertinator516d ago

My preferred origin is Dalish Elf Archer that recruits the Templars, Baelen's Dwarves with Golems and Dalish Elves. Took me 3 playthroughs to lock down a "true" file for me. What a game.

516d ago
130°

Does Dragon Age: The Veilguard Top Dragon Age: Origins?

How does BioWare's latest stack up against its best offerings?

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
LordoftheCritics573d ago

LOL

DAO pioneered a new era for cinematic rpgs while Vainguard pioneered well shampood hair.

VenomUK572d ago (Edited 572d ago )

I bought Dragon Age: Origins at launch and I enjoyed it. It didn't pioneer diddly squat. What did it do that Mass Effect hadn't done already?

Armaggedon572d ago

People miss variables easily.lol

TheNamelessOne572d ago

Long story - no
Short story - no

Armaggedon572d ago

Depends who you ask. For me it did, and dragon age origins is still to this day my most replayed single player game.

MeatyUrologist572d ago

Wow, so sounds like you would put Veilguard up there as an all time favorite? Just curious what you love about it. I'm about 10 hours in and nothing has really grabbed me other than the gorgeous environments and animations

Armaggedon572d ago (Edited 572d ago )

What I liked about dragon age has always been the lore. Origins introduced concepts, but they didn’t really start toying with it until dragon age 2. Veilguard still has the lore and sense of mystery for me, but it also has the combat. I am more of martial arts kind of player. Games like Devil may cry, wo long fallen dyansty sekiro, or fighting games are what Im usually playing if I am not playing an rpg. I usually like role playing a super strong warrior, which this game lets you do, and it lets me concentrate on my specific character. One of the things keeping me from playing Baldurs Gate 3 offline is the fact that I have no choice but to control all of my team members. For me, that takes me out of the role playing experience when I am a gallant knight that has to always use a mage or rogue in combat. It was alot better playing with friends though.

For a game to be “good” for a player, it has to have a hook, and veilguard has several things that hook me in from combat, loot, to lore, and even the characters. Some games just dont have a popular hook that rakes in alot of people, so I always understand if someone doesnt like a specific experience. But when people start saying things are trash, thats when I say it gets borderline disrespectful.

SoloZelot90572d ago

In what way is the combat and build diversity good?

Devil may cry has the style meter that encourages good combat. It also has enemy variety...veilgaurd doesn't. Veilgaurds builds are pretty much non-existent. The itemization is boring due to its extreme linearity.

As far as lore goes...I guess you're fine with them butchering the qunari.

Armaggedon572d ago

. If people can have fun with souls game combat, they should be okay with the combat in veilguard? Learn to view a games attributes in respect to the entire game instead of viewing everything in isolation. Devil may cry, all you do 98 percent of the time is beat the crap out of stuff….. of course its going to have more enemy variety and deeper combat. Thats the whole game😂
I dont too much care for what they did with the qunari, but Im not going to get caught up on it. Only an empty cup can be filled.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 572d ago
Armaggedon572d ago

In terms of traditional rpg aspects, origins wins. In terms of scale, presentation, and refined simplicity, Veilguard wins. Its not as simple as game A is better than game B, we have to set parameters

For example: Are there people that think origins is better? Yes, alot of them. Is it though? That is debatable.

SoloZelot90572d ago (Edited 572d ago )

Huh?

Okay in terms of story and choices as well as outcomes and character progression and writing...origins does it better.

In terms of combat decisions, diversity in encounters and strategies as well as meaningful power progression and itemization...origins does it better

In terms tone...that's more a preference...I'm not a fan of the change in direction....prefer dark fantasy and gore that origins brought.

I will give you the simplicity and eye candy vistas though the graphics have less to do with the game and more to do with videogames graphic progression. As far as simplicity...yes 100% veilgaurd wins there. The combat is so simple and mundane it is made for the casuals too busy on their phones to care too much about complex systems.

And before you tell me that the writing being bad is my opinion ..first maybe go check what actual writers have to say about it. People go for degrees about this type of thing.

Armaggedon572d ago (Edited 572d ago )

They follow a certain set of rules that is decided upon by the supposedly fallible, as to how things are supposed to be done. Does not make them untouchable because they have a degree. What they say is of interest, but it should not be considered gospel by anyone with awareness of how things work in this existence. I have bested opponents that are considered professional level, and Im not one myself. I have likewise learned from those not considered to be at my level in a specific area. Alot of that is subjective. In terms of character progression, Im seeing more in veilguard. In terms of story, it was simply gather treaties to fight darkspawn. This game is very similar: collect people to help stop the evanuris. Im more invested in this. The evanuris debit, is akin to Madara Uchihas build up and subsequent appearance in Naruto. They have been building towards this for three games. For me, what I am experiencing is hooking me in far more than origins.

And what is meaningful power progression? I never get to make the Sage of Strength true to form in these rpgs because warriors are always so normal, never possessing the herculean strength to role play the way I want. This game is one of the only rpgs I have played where the warrior feels superhuman. Whos to say that causing an earthquake with a stomp is not more meaningful to me than what origins has? Origins is more tactical, but more meaningful? Debatable
When setting these parameters, it is of paramount importance to detach oneself from personal bias, otherwise it will defeat the purpose.

SoloZelot90572d ago

Only for those with tremendously low standards and/or who are trying to push an agenda into gaming.

I'm thinking it's really just the former...that's what I hope anyways.

In no way, shape or form does this game come even remotely close to the nearest galaxy far away from dragon age origins or dragon age 2 for that matter.

Armaggedon572d ago

Lets not get hyperbolic now.

jznrpg572d ago (Edited 572d ago )

I really disliked 2 so I doubt it’s worse than that one but I am haven’t played Veilguard yet so I can’t say until I do

SoloZelot90572d ago (Edited 572d ago )

2 is my favourite for 2 reasons. Companions were all incredible...it's where we got varric after all.

And the events after each act actually have meaning. Sure the end state doesn't vary much but the storytelling surrounding each act ending as well as the possible outcomes is magnificent. I won't get into spoilers but loved that about the 2nd. I'm willing to have my mind changed but I've yet to encounter anyone able to tell me specifically what was so horrible and detrimental to the second that you don't also get in something like inquisition.

Inquisition is up there with it for me. I can recall all companions or most from both games and remember them fondly. Same for Kotor. But with inquisition I can't recall a single character outside of solas and the woman templar but only slightly to be honest.

jznrpg572d ago

I’d guess it doesn’t top it for me as I really enjoyed the first game but I can’t say for sure without playing both of them

Armaggedon572d ago

Depends on what you liked about origins. If it was the story and lore buildup, then you will probably be fine. If its the roleplaying aspects, veilguard is probably a hard pass because the rpg aspects seem extremely light, especially compared to dragon age origins. Choices and consequences do exist, but they seem to be small scale so far.

Show all comments (25)