40/40 from Famitsu, must be a great game.

im still getting the ps3 version as i dont have a xbox. shame though. they could have done it right.

Heh, looks like a POS anyways.

And its not only the framerate, but also less texture quality, the blurryness thats there always on the PS3 version etc etc etc.

B-b-but the cell?

this game does even look better then DMC4.

now, show me a 3fixme game that looks better than GoW3

This against god of war 3 i wonder what game i should buy...

Such a shame some developers are still being lazy and shoveling out a crappy port.

There is no excuse for putting out such poor ports this late into the PS3's life cycle. Many, many other developers have got it right now.

Seriously, if you can't develop for all platforms properly, then simply don't. Putting out such poor ports is an insult to your customers.

No spin from me, that's pretty sh!te.

Oh lord, this is like the 8th article about Bayonetta. So is the final build in Japan, the final build for the US? If not, why the hell do people keep posting about it?

Really don't see the point of hammering home the fact that 360 builds don't translate into multiplatform titles. In the case of Japan all they're saying is if you don't want to hurt sales on the more popular console there *don't* make a 360 build.

Keep in mind guys, this is not the consoles fault.
Just another bad port...... -sigh- :(

Fortunately for me I never have to worry about bad ports. That's the other sides worries.

The 360 fanboys care how well this game does on their console I doubt they are going to buy it.

While I actually care for Hideki Kamiyas work, and want this game regardless of how choppy the port is on the PS3

After I've seen Sega done Valkyria Chronicles and Yakuza 3 there should be no excuse for the frame rate issue. Either way if this game stays the same or not when its released in the U.S. I'll get it since I love Hideki Kamyias work

It's a shame that this game only comes up if its a PS3 vs 360 article

"It's the PS3's fault for having a terribly built architecture and slow disc reading speed"

Really, you need to grow up.

First of all, there is no decent PS3 engine by third party developers.
Second, The 360 architecture is just a gimped PC architecture.
Third, The most multiplats are just develops on PC architecture NOT PS3 architecture.
Four, Portend from PC architecture to PS3 architecture is asking for troubles.

And Five, your argument is old and useless.

when i heard 60fps etc it made me interested,but not now. anyway,chicks with glasses blow

Sega should have known better given their experience with the PS3, not only do they have exclusives on the platform that run well but a variety of multiplatform titles to boot.

If this were a smaller studio with limited resources maybe it could be acceptable, but it's Sega....

You guys do realise that nearly every game out on the consoles runs at 30fps anyways, right?

Any game that is not ported, or programmed correctly I boycott and dont buy period

Rather the 360 or PS3 is treated bad, if its on both system , they need to look 99% the same or I dont buy

Period

I will rent this game

...but the PS3, even though it's running at a lower AVG/FPS, is running at a more consistent AVG/FPS. There are some HUGE dips in the 360 version...

It's always a competition with you guys. The game was made for Xbox so this shouldn't be a surprise. And the port was made by a different company, and I would imagine weren't as involved in the development process.

the PS3 version of Uncharted 2 and Infamous and other games rather than that one. Bayonetta will have to wait until it's below the 20€ level.

I already played that pretty much exact same game 8 years ago on my PS2, anyway. The title was different and the hero was also a bit different, male with white hair and red garb, but otherwise, it was the same.