Make games I actually want to play first, then complain when I don't buy your shit. Thanks.

was your game a shooter? no? that is why it did not sell well on the 360

They may have offered it as a special of the week....but you could offer Bruce Lee the videogame & Ico 2: Revenge of the collossus as specials, but because most everybody has heard of Bruce Lee, & like Ico nobody has heard of the sequel & it doesn't sound like a videogame, let alone a good one to the casual consumer as opposed to Mortal Gears of Modern Battlefields or Unreal soldier makes bad German Nazi Quake in his boots of Destruction. Also it is more than likely that there games were not offered as deals of the week upon launch day.

In my opinion it seems that MS has mismanaged & screwed up more development houses than is neccessary. Oddworld Inhabants regretfully switched teams from great success as a exclusive developer for Sony's PS1 over to the Xbox & released what seemed to be a rushed 1st game in Munch's Odysee (which was pretty ordinary compared to other 3d platformers like Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank on PS2, & even PS1, N64 & Saturn games in same genre). They then released Strangers Wrath, but there reputation had already taken a hit for sub-standard Munch.
But the biggest problem was that they made the switch at the worst time as they switched at the end of a gen, ready to start anew, also they were switching at a time when some developers like themselves had little to no experience with 3d, as all previous Abe PS1 games were awesome 2d side scrollers with state of the art graphics, awesome sound & unique in every department none moreso than story. For this reason they had a large fanbase that were PS1 owners, & most wouldn't make a console switch till much, much & (for the most casual) much later down the line when machines are at cheapest, with largest library of games, the others that bought up early, especially launch & close to gamers, were the hardcore that usually had a preffered brand,& in this regard Sony had TOO many awesome IP's for the new kid on the block to compete with, hence Abe was never gonna sway a large base alone. I could not understand why the hell Oddworld Inhabants switched to MS exclusively, when they should have gone multiplat for MS, Sony & possibly even Nintendo if Ninty gave them a better deal with all the catridge rip off scam they played with NES, SNES & N64, or at least just Sony & MS, then switch to MS exclusively when they have gathered a following that unsures success as an MS exclusive developer. They just did it so dumb that it pains me, as they literally left the business. But not before MS sold them off to EA after Munch failed at the cash register. If Sony played by MS's rules, then Shadow of the Collosus would not be, & games like Motormstorm & Resistance, etc, etc, wouldn't have been, as Sony would have pressured them for another WRC & Ratchet on launch, and Sony encouraged Evolution & Insomniac to make new IP's. Awesome in my book for the developer as they feel they have complete artistic & creative freedom, so the games ends up better for it in most cases as quality exudes in these titles due to passion & the fact the developers do not feel trapped, as there over bearing "owners" force them to make Halo 4 by September 2011, or COD5 by September.

Continued from senseless, mad, insane, luney tune rant above>

Back to point....Unless you have made MS the next hugely mainstream, hugely marketetable, Beers of Swar, then MS don't give a toss about your XBL exclusive....all they want you to do is make a decent downloadable game at your expense & they will throw it up on the marketplace, along with the 1000's of other (often over looked) arcade titles. Now if you want a good marketing stategy, then MS says good luck. Now Sony need a boot up the ass in this department as well,s shown how they did no favors for Insomniac, especially with the awesome sequel to there awesome Resistance series by throwing it out amongst at least 2 other giants in the same genre at the same time, one being Killzone 2 & the other a COD game I think)......But is Sony's defence though, at least they offer the pub scheme thingy where they offer PSN developers the same money they have spent on there game, to either make the game even better production wise, or to give the game a good marketing push, due to decent $$$ being spent on advertising & other smart, aggressive, hype assaults to lure consumers in.

Im not understanding why they expected microsoft to go the extra mile for them , what makes them special in comparison to the other indie developers who produce games for XBLA. It doesnt matter attempting to exclude a market due to emotion is terrible business practice seems like a rookie move

They should not work with Activision either, because they are Greedy B*tches too.
They should work with Sony, EA,or Ubisoft

I tried that game on steam a while ago. It is one of the worst games i ever played.

Good.
Darwinia sucked ass.
Keep your shitty games off my system.

Games like Darwinia and Multiwinia have a much bigger audience on the PC platform than on consoles.

there are way more people on steam than xbox360

xbox360 at 17-19 million

Steam at 30-35 million

plus all games are cheaper on steam, have wayyyy better graphics and run better

xboxlive is so 2005

It's a strategy game on a console....need I say more?

for a 360 game to sell, it has to have a huge amount of gunfight or battles otherwise the sales would be underwhelming like alan wake and tales of vesperia.