...the ChatBots are getting bored waiting for a Game that is made by this!!! ;-D

PS3 don't need it, i got Next-Gen Looking games NOW!!! ;-P

go to 1:17 in the embedded video below, and you can see compared with the 360, the PS3 runs Cryengine 3 better than the 360

NEEDS TO BE SEEN IN HD

as the Ps3 version of the engine loads textures in Slower, and the 360 versio of the engine begins to chug with mor ethings on screen. it can produce the visuals but until i see games being made on that engine tailoring to consoles strenghths then it's just a tech demo. i'm not going to be proclaiming it as the new beast, because we've seen already 4 games with 2 already released on teh PS3 that at this moment no other console has touched. with 2 other's possibly 3 about to release.

Uncahrted 2 and Kz2 made the biggest splash and thats all everyone is talking about. the next 2 games that are sure to raise the bar even further in visuals are definately GT5 and Heavy Rain. and the possiblely God of War 3, to be quite honest. those middle war like Tech 5, they look amazing on PCs and tahts it. Rage looks Ok on consoles, in fact COD4 on PC looks like Crysis but just look ok on the 360 and PS3... so lets just beclear... multiplatform games will built on Multiplatform engines will never look as good as 2nd and 3rd gen optimized engines made for 1 platform and one only. it's the reason why Games on PS3 look progressivley better than there predessors. i'm thrilled though that there is a new graphics/physics engine on the middleare market. lets see if the developers can use it the way Crytek intended it

overhyped and overrated engines are cryengines

This truly looks like the Engine of choice. I can't wait to see games made with it.

Too bad Crysis is not a fun game, but graphics look nice.

Lets be honest here.

It looks excellent and i'm hoping the gameplay will live upto it.

As i've said before crysis was great looking, but got boring for me, i do like open world, the physics were nicely done, but gameplay i found lacking. And i'm a pc gamer at heart.

Most pc guys attack me for speaking my mind, and said cryengine 3 is crap compared to 2.

Well you just got owned.

Cryengine 3 offers more, runs faster then 2, adds alot more tech shader wise, can be done on each platform and run to the strength's of each platform.

Yes of course on PC you've got the choice of more AA or more AF or even rez.

But 16aa is not needed and will never be. 4aa is the max needed imo and unless your zooming x300 on a pic you wouldn't even notice it.

But i'm not upgrading my pc for quite awhile, until something so special comes along that makes me want to. Atm there is nothing.

I've played all the greats on PC, from the Halflife's, to the crysis, from the bioshocks, to the cod's.

I've got my PC,PS3.

But my PS3 is getting more lovin, because of the games it offers.

I'm glad cryengine 3 is coming and i'm looking forward to some great games that it will offer.

Well done crytek.

"Next Gen Ready" just means PC. :)

Cry Engine 2 Vs Cry Engine 3 Consoles
Cry Engine 2 is better

Cry Engine 2 Vs Cry Engine 3
Cry Engine 3 is mind blowing

The thing is the Consoles Cry Engine 3 will not have DX10, DX11, Tessellation support, Shader model 4 and shader model 5, this is because they did not exist when the 360 and PS3 was released and there for can not be compatible with it.

So consoles Cry Engine 3 will look Par to Cry Engine 2 on medium to High settings but not very high or modded Ultra high.
Very high is DX10 and shader model 4.1

Real time all the time.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

As Cevat Yerli said at games con the Graphics level was just an example of Cry Engine 3 potential on consoles and my not be the same at games releases.

Rumored, 3 Xbox 360s RROD at Games con.

Come on, use it, please, im tired of ue3 looking games

I remember that the engine was made in the 2004 the same age that source engine

Crytek in the same time has released three awesome engines

Its time to let it die

you guys are missing the point of the damn article (as usual)

ps3 fanboys: why do you act like you feel threatened by this? it is becoming the big joke of this generation. every article that shows potential and PS3 fanboys are all over it... uncharted this killzone that.

the games i play the most at the moment are skate 2 and BF1943, have you seen the glithes and rubbish graphics in those games? doesn't take a single thing away from the awesome gameplay in both games. give me this experience over pretty graphics any day.

I am looking forward to seeing this in action within an actual game. They made a hell of a beautiful game and if they can help others do the same thing and make it easier, that can only be good.

man,nobody make game whit this,she is beaty,realistic etc etc but where the game anounced?

How is it that Cryteh can make something like this for what is now current gen consoles, and Epic needs "Next Gen" for UE4 and gears 3?

I have nothing against infity ward I love the company and Im get modern warfare 2 the day its out but I hate greedy as activision and if crytic delivers this with a better multiplayer than COD4 I really hope it does to teach activision to stop being so greedy because they dont want a piece of the cake they want the whole damn thing and what they don't know is that there is always a bigger dog in the yard and they need to learn that.
Activision deserves to die

By worse you mean, textures?

But why attack the PS3/360 in the first place?

And you cannot compare PS3/360/PC.

Unless you know how to write for all 3.

I don't count poor ports as PS3/360 power.

Drop overbloated code into most consoles, and even some pc's and they run like crap, heck the ps3 running normal pc code is like a 1.6ghz pc.

But run it with full spu support and it comes to life.

And Stoney that was never stated to me. Although i knew that already to be true, that ce3 would look better then 2.

Modded is not the point and never was, because the majority of gamers just play the game, i played through crysis and crysis warhead twice.

There were parts i loved and some i didn't like so much.

I've never knocked crytek tech wise.

I played through farcry day 1 and thoroughly enjoyed it.

To be honest, Farcry looked more like a console game because of the bright colours and overuse of bloom. Crysis looks more realistic.

Kinda like Uncharted 2, looks amazing. But goes for a different art style.

I just hope someone puts the tech to good use, either in pc/ps3/360.

Where is dx11?

This is the engine that will make you CRY!

pc graphics will always be better than consoles. the hardware of the consoles are wway less powerful and hardcore pc users will optimize pc's to put out even more power. consoles are limited by their hardware. the crytek engine might NOT be as powerful on consoles (i am guessing) because there will always be better hardware and better graphics cards. It will most definitly shatter every console's graphics and what people perceive as realistic.

While the UE 3 is great, I think is been used a lot because is easier to develop a game. There are other engines out but is not been use as much. For example I think that "The Evolution Engine" is better then the UE3. http://www.digitalextremes....

i dunno what it is but even though i've been well intrigued by the cryengine, if find that while the forests and wildlife exteriors look phenomenal, whenever they show industrial areas like buildings and citys they look ugly as hell, found that to be the same in the demonstration they did a few months back. animations on that girl were amazing tho!

The thing that sets apart this game engine above all others besides that it looks the best is its physics and interaction. NO game looks like Crysis Warhead for example with its destructible environments. No game

the gap between console versions and Pc version ("next gen ready") is f*cking huge! O_O

Unfortunately, only a select few will play that beast at it's maximum potential, I will have to settle with the console's version for now :/

if it was faster Nvidia And ATI would be using it on the PC video cards which they still aren't because it's crap it can't even keep up with GDDR3 and the new ATI cards just moved on to GDDR5 PC nvidia cards still use the GDDR3 and it runs circles around XDR

This engine seems to be the best thing since cooked food

Tell me again how the multiplatform strategy was supposed to fix everything. Look at your results and compare them to Nintendo, which keeps thriving with exclusives. Your loyal fans are gone. And let’s not forget the pile of IPs you purchased only to let them rot.

The worst thing is this is down from last years numbers/expectations which was down from the previous years numbers/expectations. You think about how long “down” has been a consistent part of the communication and you realize those subscriptions are what’s holding that boat together. The price cut of gamespass is still a price raise in a string of price raises. They are trying to use players to offset the missing revenue. Now call of duty is out of gamespass, which is literally WHY they bought the company. To draw people to the subscription. They realized they missed a boatload of money and that wasn’t sustainable. Now you pay for it like you would have if they never bought the company… so why buy the company? Mind you those billions still need to be paid back. Yeah it gives you a chance to say we make the biggest FPS… but the internal conversations must be brutal at high level on topics that really matter. Like revenue. Profitability. And ROI for the shopping spree.

Is this like the 10th quarter in a row they're down 33% on hardware how is that even mathematically possible. You would think their mediocrity would Plateau