
IGN- "Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising has proven one thing: I would not last long in a modern war. Not only would I die quickly, I'd die in embarrassing ways. Nobody remembers the heroics of the soldier that stuck his head up in the midst of a hail of gunfire or the idiot that ran out into the open field without checking for enemies on the perimeter. Keep your head down. Keep your adrenaline in check. These are the lessons you'll have to take to heart if you want to survive on the battlefield; in real life or in Operation Flashpoint."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Rating Description
5.0 Presentation
Don't come looking for bells and whistles, or even any cutscenes introducing a level.
7.0 Graphics
A wide open world that occasionally looks underwhelming.
6.0 Sound
Rarely will the gunfire or explosions pack the punch you'd expect. The voice acting could be a lot better.
8.0 Gameplay
Unique, realistic, and fun. The hardcore will have a ball. Just be prepared for some technical shortcomings.
8.0 Lasting Appeal
The open nature of the quests and co-op play offer great replayability. The multiplayer needs to be cleaned up to really take off.
7.8
Good OVERALL
(out of 10 / not an average)

Twinfinite's Henry McMunn revisits Codemaster's military simulator and realises it was actually really great all along.
Ugh I just remembered this game and it makes me want to me sick in a bowler hat and drown myself in it....
The only good thing about this game was borderlands was out a week later!
Dragon Rising was a really great idea but with Codemaster's typically shoddy execution of anything not racing related. Their poor handling of the criticism, bugs and outright lies on the packaging was eerily similar to EA's BF4 flustercluck. The game was a breath of fresh air in many ways and was really the only truly tactical, open map shooter of it's kind on consoles. Anyone who played the original Flashpoint or ARMA games would feel pretty comfortable with Dragon Rising. It's just a pity Codemasters dropped the ball completely on the online portion, allowed several annoying bugs to remain to this day and lied about features in the game and later charged for these promised features as DLC. With the way they handled the whole situation, Codemasters earned the first spot on my ever expanding list of developers that I refuse to buy anything from them. Again, much like BF4, you can easily see the awesome game it could have been and yet it's still totally out of reach.

There are games wich shine with light. However, not all games have the same opportunity to receive support from their editors.
This results in remarkable games, even outstanding, which have been forgotten or, unfortunately, were never known by the mass audience. Even their reviews, do not capture the true quality of the title, since most anticipated games, are unfortunately better received in the newsroom.
Part I: Hidden gems in First Person Shooters

"I’m tired of the need for more 'realism' in games. I don’t want to hear about how realistic Call of Duty is while you’re cowering behind cover watching the red Kool-Aid disappear from your screen. I don’t care if Battlefield 3’s bullet drop somehow makes it a better shooter. Does it really matter if you play Forza Motorsport, Gran Turismo, or Need for Speed? They all look and feel fantastic; why does it matter if one is more realistic?
"You want to see a realistic game? Go play Operation Flashpoint on the hardest difficulty. After you’ve gotten out of the fetal position, tell me how enjoyable it was. Unless you happen to be a masochist, I’m going to bet you didn’t have a very good time. That’s realistic.
"We use video games as an escape, just like movies, literature, and music. They tell us stories, let us make our own, or let us live out an experience. I can’t drive a race car (heck, I don’t even have a license), but that doesn’t stop me from playing Need for Speed. The cor...
Exactly. I love the fact that you can jump and shoot with a .50 cal sniper rifle in COD. That adds to the fun whereas realism reduces the fun and makes the gameplay boring. Games aren't suppose to be realistic, we as human beings are very limited when it comes to abilities and powers and such and having game designers implementing what we fantasize the most in terms of technology and surreal action in video games make us people happy cause we get to experience our own "world", the world of fantasies and joy in those games which brightens our imagination and give us something to think about. If I wanted realism, I would rather stick to the life outside of home and drive a real car instead of playing GT5/Forza for instance. Realism ruins the fun, fun is surreal or simply like our folks at Epic Games call it, Unreal.
Doesn't an escape from one reality into another make all the more magic though?
Operation Flashpoint on hard is BOMB! I loved it! Intense! One of the few games that was genuinely hard and not just cheap like playing COD on veteran.
Most of my favorite games this gen are unrealistic
Valkyria Chronicles
Tales of Graces F
Disgaea 4
Atelier Meruru
Mass Effect 1
After I played this game, and with the expectations that I had..
I gotta admit. It kinda reminds me of Brothers in Arms: Hells Highway. Not that those games can be compared, but that game let me down big time - and so did OP: Dragon Rising. It looked so much better when they showed it off.
I expected more. It's not a bad game, and it will probably keep me busy until MW2. But i'm still dissappointed. And the multiplayer doesn't work that well either. *Sigh*
7.0 Graphics
A wide open world that occasionally looks underwhelming.
WHAT?!? lol... Give me a few minutes to dig up a post claiming superior graphics over KZ2.
while ofp2 isnt as good as i wanted it to be...
"5.0 Presentation
Don't come looking for bells and whistles, or even any cutscenes introducing a level.
7.0 Graphics
A wide open world that occasionally looks underwhelming.
6.0 Sound
Rarely will the gunfire or explosions pack the punch you'd expect. The voice acting could be a lot better. "
these guys clearly missed what the game is all about. its a SIM not some fancy storytelling adventure like game like COD or similar war action movie games.
Those dam PC guys came here saying this game is what its all about and how I need to get my PC running for it.
then I looked at video of the game and came back to N4G saying, how can you say this is better than killzone 2. cod4 or battlefield bad company?
Those PC guys were so confident in thier ways that I actually considered upgrading my useless web surfing pc even though I havent seen 1 PC game outdo console games in 10 years.
all they talk about is crysis graphics and i played crisis on not so optimal settings and the core game is crap.
looks like the PC is going to need Bluray much sooner than everyone expected.
And thats the last time i take anything a PC gamer says seriously.
On second thought, have i just been brainswashed by IGN? I think I have. I didnt even click on the link. I looked at the score, made my rant and dismissed the game in 10 seconds. im still passing on the game but I never do what I just did or have I?
(Confused and disoriented)
I know PC gamers that dont even know what an HDMI cord is. The truth is though, true hard core gamers know that the pc is best when it comes to multiplats because of community support. Alot of PC gamers think they are hardcore, when in fact they are as hardcore as a Wii addict.