All Channels
Popular
300°

Nintendo is gaming, Sony/Microsoft are questionable

NintendoDpad writes:
"The video game sector has been a tremendous avenue for money in the business sense. Not only has gaming become popular, but it is approaching profits that the movie and music industry would love to have. Nintendo created the Wii as a result of the gaming industry shrinking by only catering to the 18-35 year old male demographic.

Sony and Microsoft have entered the gaming sector at an attempt to garner some of these profits made, so why is it that Nintendo seems to be the one solely focused on gaming in general?"

Read Full Story >>
nintendodpad.com
ChemicalWorld6070d ago

So gaming = mini games involving waggling a motion controller?

If that's the case I'll stick with my version of gaming on my non gaming PS3 /sarcasm

I Turned 10 Studios6070d ago (Edited 6070d ago )

I just turned 10 so in my opinion, I'd take waggle over buttons any day.

Microsoft Xbox 3606070d ago

If Nintendo is what you call gaming, I don't want any part of it.

Syronicus6070d ago

What this article will sound like when Sony releases heir motion controls and decimates the Wii in Japan and Europe next year. Mark my words, PS3 Slim + Motion Controls + Casual Games in HD = The Decimation of the Wii. The Wii is for those with SD sets and now that Sony is coming onto the scene with the same controller... Let's just be ready for the war for the Casual rite.

velcry6070d ago

Yesterday I played Uncharted 2 MP Beta for about 3 hours.

Last week I replayed Jeanne D'arc on the PSP, clocked in another 15+ hours.

Today I played about 1.5 hours of LittleBigPlanet with my cousins, and I'm getting ready to play another 3-4 hours of inFamous or Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 tonight.

Try telling my girlfriend that these 23+ hours ISN'T gaming. She'll give you an earful lol.

Boody-Bandit6070d ago

then I guess I am not a gamer.
The title in itself made me rub my eyes and do a double take because I honestly thought I was seeing things.

Panthers6070d ago

+ bubbles for that statement 360. Exactly how I feel.

JackBNimble6070d ago

The only reason the wii got anywhere is because they were the cheapest console on the market and their games are all kid orientated.
The wii should be considered part of last Generation considering it has about as much power as a PS2 and no hdd.

duplissi6070d ago (Edited 6070d ago )

HA! this article is laughable at best, the last time time nintendo was even relevant when talking about pushing gaming forward was a long time ago, it wasn't until the wii and ds that they even mattered again! hell Microsoft outsold them last generation.

Sony and to some extent Microsoft have done more for gaming than nintendo has in recent years.

yep so you can keep your super casual NO SUBSTANCE gaming and ill keep my thoroughly enjoyable and deep non gaming.

rbanke6070d ago

My distaste for waggle aside, How exactly is Nintendo doing anything great? 23 years after I first played super mario brothers after getting my first NES years ago, they are STILL making the same exact games.

Nintendo's game 'innovations' in a nutshell:

1. create game system for new generation.
2. release a mario game
3. release a zelda game
4. release a(many) pokemon game
5. release a metroid game

And a particular group of people eat this up and seem to think its fantastic...well thats great for those people, but I grew out of these games and nintendo never gave me anything for the adult gamer I turned into. The closest thing they've come up with is a minigame collection for their motion controler which just doesnt float my boat.

I wish Nintendo the best, but the games that come out on the PS3/360/PC are FAR more interesting to me than yet another mario game. In the end I could allways get a kiddie game on a PS3 or 360, but you are hard pressed to adult oriented games on a Nintendo system.

MEsoJD6070d ago

Sidar to stand up for his precious console or maybe he gave up?

^_^

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 6070d ago
Goomba126070d ago

Nintendo doesn't get enough credit around here from the business side of things.

Yoshiii6070d ago

why you care so much about nintendos money? should care about games

Goomba126070d ago

i do, money brings in the games. You think FF got on Xbox because they were lucky? It was money.

dredgewalker6070d ago

Nintendo makes a lot of money yet shells out very few good games.....that itself is an oddity.

Kushan6070d ago

"Nintendo created the Wii as a result of the gaming industry shrinking by only catering to the 18-35 year old male demographic. "

Sorry, what? I don't know what console you think you're referring to, but its not the Wii. The Wii's target audience is the under-18's and over 40 types, the "Casual gamers".
The hardcore market is the 18-30 category and that's exactly what the PS360 targets, with a bit of leeway here and there.

ndpad6070d ago

@ above
"Sorry, what? I don't know what console you think you're referring to, but its not the Wii. The Wii's target audience is the under-18's and over 40 types, the "Casual gamers".
The hardcore market is the 18-30 category and that's exactly what the PS360 targets, with a bit of leeway here and there."

Exactly what the sentence meant. Besides a "casual gamer" is not an age group.

Counter_ACT6070d ago

Right. :/ Not sure if I agree with that. You realise they have different divisions working on different things? It's not like they've slowed down development on, say, Uncharted 2 to work on those sparkly backgrounds for the PS3. They have a PSN team for that. Also, doesn't Sony have the most first party game development studios?

I don't see how focusing on both is equal to not caring about games. D: PS3 has a great lineup from first and third parties, same with the Xbox 360.

ndpad6070d ago

Well Nintendo being in the video game market means they have nothing else to fall back on. Sony and Microsoft just have a different business model than that of Nintendo meaning Microsoft and Sony got into gamign because they saw it as a growing and profitable venture. Sony and Microsoft could not succeed in this venture and they would still function, Nintendo on the other hand would be screwed.

I agree both Sony and Microsoft take gaming seriously (its a business), but to say they are trying their best to expand the market by adding features other devices already use instead of focusing on expanding the market like Nintendo with ease of use, would be a little overshooting what they do as comapanies with their business models.

As a company with a bigger wallet than Nintendo and most other companies they are used to taking features created by others and making them better through their resources. Their business models are not the type of models where they take risks at the expense of creating market share. Their business stragey is to take from others.

The article was not about bashing, but comparing the different business models and seeing how they differ. Of course some may take this in another direction though.

Show all comments (63)
50°

44% of games industry professionals have considered leaving the industry as a result of redundancies

New report from Skillsearch found that 22% of those surveyed had been laid off within the past 12 months.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Cockney32d ago

Well if that 44% left im sure there would be a lot less redundancies

40°

Stop Killing Games on the latest European Commission public hearing

It's a step forward for Stop Killing Games.

Read Full Story >>
rockpapershotgun.com
50°

"Be creative 99% of the time" – Glen Schofield on how creativity can help fix AAA industry woes

The Callisto Protocol director thinks the solution involves the right people, the right timing, and perhaps a little bit of AI

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
lodossrage33d ago

I don't agree with that. I WISH I could agree with that. But buying habits and customer opinions prove otherwise

We've seen developers in the AAA space try new things and ideas. More often than not, the customers aren't willing to give things a chance, or not enough people buy into the project for it to grow.

Creativity works better in the indie space because the budgets, pressures, and expectations aren't the same.

Scissorman32d ago

it's a nice idea and it worked during the PS2/PS3-era when AAA didn't cost hundreds of millions of dollars. smaller budgets and shorter development time left room for more creativity and more risk. a game didn't need to sell 4 million+ copies to break even. things are different now.

__y2jb32d ago

This is the guy who bragged about crunching his staff and having them work through the night. Crunch culture has lost more talent and done more damage to the industry than any other factor. Screw him.