
GizmoGamer.com reports "AMD's very own self-proclaimed bad boy Ian McNaughton took a direct swing at NVIDIA and The Way it's Meant to be Played program today in a blog post that is worth taking a look at. Ian calls out some issues with several TWIMTBP titles, which is something you don't see being done everyday. If you already own or are thinking about getting Batman: Arkham Asylum, Need for Speed: Shift or Resident Evil 5 then you might want to see what Ian is upset about."

Circana data shows Resident Evil 5 as the best selling Resident Evil game in the US, ahead of Resident Evil 4 remake and Village.
So the most successful RE is the one where a white man is killing Africans.
This can't be real.

New leaks from Dusk Golem detail cancelled Resident Evil projects, including a Rebecca focused Revelations game, while stating no Resident Evil 5 remake is in development.
Capcom's willingness to invest in experiments and scrap them sets them apart form many other developers (Nintendo have a similar methodology). Far too often companies push a game setting or game mechanic that is just not that good and the final product is middling or poor.

Dusk Golem claims a Resident Evil 5 remake is not coming this year, with a Code Veronica remake expected instead.
Hopefully if and when they do a RE5 remake, they give it the RE3 remake treatment, because this is certainly one title that I don't want a faithful remake of.
That's news?
Nvidia seems happy to throw million in to the The Way It's Meant To Be Played scheme just to ensure an unfair advantage. As a business strategy it's brilliant - but as a customer I find it deplorable.
I have always been unbiased when it comes to GPU's (I buy whichever make/brand is the best I can afford at the time) - but since the whole 8 series debacle by Nvidia (which ranks up there with MS denying the RRoD issue) I have been favouring ATI much more.
My current rig uses a 4890, and although I know I'm missing out on some of the nicer PhysX effects I can't see me moving back to Nvidia while it continues underhand tactics and launches broken products (I have a laptop runing an 8 series GPU that I purchased before finding out about the substrate fault that is plaguing these GPU's)
BTW, I'm not saying AMD/ATI are above these sort of tactics - just that right now Nvidia is doing everything they can to push me away as a potential customer.
I have absolutely no use for the 3D-Vision or w/e crap that Nvidia is employing on RE5. And I find that delaying Batman-AA(PC) for PhysX is completely unnecessary. However, I had some strange issues with ATI cards on certain games, so I've decided to remain an Nvidia user until I find that the GTX-380 is a total crap. Then, I'll switch to ATI.
I have the same card and it kicks 4ss. I have always used ATi and they are great cards. The one exception was a 6800gt I had and it sucked.
Ran hot, and was loud as hell to the point were I had to install my own cooling.
Ati has better AA and better colour. FACT .
That is why 360 graphics and colours look more vibrant and brighter than ps3, Sony went with Nvidia and now have the good old slightly washed out look to their games.I'm telling you, Nvidia 'cooks' the benchmarks so their sh1t looks good, and blow tons of money on advertising etc, truth is, the Ati equivalent card is always cheaper and better and runs cooler and quieter.
So then Nvidia usually panics and then rush out a 'better' card, that runs even hotter, louder, and takes even more power......
screw Nvidia
That's unfair. Might be childish, but he's right. I'm super happy with my 4890 o/c edition, which was 190€ a few mont back, compared to those 280/285 ermm