All Channels
Popular
240°

Global Illumination: Video comparison with CryEngine 2 and CryEngine 3

Video comparison with global illumination light effects in CryEngine 2(inofficial) and CryEngine 3(official).

Read Full Story >>
de.babelfish.yahoo.com
Nihilism6080d ago (Edited 6080d ago )

the 'colour bleeding' effects were pretty cool, but overall i expected more, the light seemed pretty 'hard', there wasn't alot of soft ambient lighting etc, just fixed hard lighting and a tiny bit of global illumination, there's not exactly a massive jump from cryengine 2 to 3

There's only one logical explanation for this halt in crytek's phenomenal progress on the tech side....i'm looking at you console's

@aty

All the demo's they show are things that actually happen in their games, you must not have played crysis because that's what the lighting is like in game. You say that they have no games running on this engine, I think you'll find crysis 2 will look very similar to what you saw here

ATY6080d ago

"There's only one logical explanation for this halt in crytek's phenomenal progress on the tech side....i'm looking at you console's"

LOL...

And, yawn, at more silly Crytek 'engine demos'. Who do these clowns think they are fooling with stuff they don't have running in their actual games? Booring.

Put up or shut up. Show it an actual shipping or soon to be shipping game or stop wasting everyone's time with the pathetic hype CryTek.

saint_john_paul_ii6080d ago (Edited 6080d ago )

I have to disagree with you.

dirthurts6080d ago

such as radical new tech, such as DX10 and DX11, they do help in one way. If they can make it run decent on a console, it will run amazing on a computer. While Crysis looks great, it's not well optimized. Hopefully the consoles will force them to look in both directions.
I just hope the console version don't hold back the pc version...

saint_john_paul_ii6080d ago (Edited 6080d ago )

CryEngine 3 is not much of a jump. its just a more refined engine. Optimized compared to the Cryengine 2.

Keep up the Good work CryTek. Push the Consoles to its limits. Especially the PS3.

jack_burt0n6080d ago

Crytek are first and foremost pc devs imo they are just looking to make a living on the consoles. Its always gonna shine on pc.

For ps3 tech its ICE and PD to get excited about.

SuperM6080d ago

Even if you say its just "to make a living" they have still put more work into the consoles and PS3 in particular then any other 3rd party developer. It is very impressive what they have achieved on consoles and its definately gonna be interesting to see what games can be made on the engine.

Nihilism6080d ago (Edited 6080d ago )

watch this in HD, educate yourself fool

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

the writer of the "top 5 graphics engine articles" said that he purposely didn't include cryengine as it would deserve it's own article

@piroh,

whatever little sh!t, every single multiplat looks 1000 times better on pc, keep dreaming

anyone up for a laugh here's a quote from the fool below

"PS3 games will always looks better. killzone 2 is far better than crisis and dirt 2 is piece of junk in terms of graphic quality. the best game engines are Uncharted engine, Killzone engine and MGS4 engine. PS3 destroys PC"

dirthurts6080d ago

Maybe you need to play these games...
Have you ever even played games on good pc? Note I said a GOOD pc. Not the crap your grandma passed down.
Cryengine and Crysis utterly destroys anything on any console. I own a ps3, xbox 360, and yes I've played Killzone. Not that impressive. Just a lot of eye tricks. There really isn't anything special going on in that game visually.
Now Crysis, that's an amazing game. Physics, graphics, draw distances, it's all just in a league of it's own.
Anything you run on a computer is going to look 10 times better than its console variant.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Can you run Crysis in VR? Crysis VR Mod Available for Download

Holger Frydrych has just released a cool VR Mod for the 2007 version of Crytek's first-person shooter, Crysis.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
PrinceOfAnger475d ago (Edited 475d ago )

Playing it right now looks amazing! :D
so much fun, i hope they make a vr mod for crysis 2 / 3 too!

DivineHand125474d ago

This is amazing. This is the direction VR should go in to boost adoption. Since I have beaten every Crysis except 1, this is now a good excuse to correct that problem.

200°

Crytek Wanted Crysis To Be "Future-Proof"

According to Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, "I want[ed] to make sure Crysis does not age, that [it] is future proofed, meaning that if I played it three years from now, it should look better than today." Yerli and the team designed Crysis' highest graphical settings for the PC hardware of 2010 and beyond.

While Crytek has officially announced Crysis 4 is in development, nothing new has surfaced. For now, gamers' only way to scratch that itch is to play the Crysis Remastered Trilogy available on PC and consoles.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
RaidenBlack479d ago

OG 2007 Crysis (not the remastered weirdo), is & will forever be a legend amongst the PC community.

PrinceOfAnger479d ago

This video will always be impressive to me, even for years to come. Some things here are better than games we have today, OG crysis is the best version!

https://youtu.be/SVg63_aNr-...

RaidenBlack479d ago

OG Crysis physics, man ... amazing! Thanks for the reminder!

PrinceOfAnger478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

Looks really nice with VR mod too

FinalFantasyFanatic479d ago

I'm still shocked that it looks as good as it does today, puts some modern games to shame.

Profchaos478d ago

I thought the remaster was fine tbh some rough edges at launch but after some patches it's decent

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 478d ago
isarai479d ago

I mean the lighting and physics still hold up extremely well. I still revisit it from time to time.

RedDeadLB479d ago

That CPU performance thing is preventing it.

isarai478d ago

Yeah unfortunately Crystek's decision to bet on the linear progression of clock speed in CPUs was derailed by the unforseen shift towards multicore CPUs. It just wasn't built with that in mind because that wasn't even in the conversation at the moment

DivineHand125478d ago

I remember when I tried to play Crysis with my Intel Pentium Dual core E2200 @2.2GHz , 4GB ram and GeForce 9400gt. I was a kid back then and that was the best I could do. I would get about 15 to 20 fps. When I over clocked the CPU to 2.8GHz I would get about 40fps. The experience wasn't good at all and it was the only PC game I could not run back then unless and put the settings on low. At that point the game went from cutting edge graphics to PS2 graphics. To this day I haven't completed the OG Crysis. I was able to complete Crysis 2 and 3 after building a new PC when I got my first job.

HyperMoused478d ago

Never played it, worth a try you think?

Profchaos478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

Worth a try just because it's the only game that lets you pick up a turtle on the beach and throw it at enemy soldiers that should have been a back of the box feature.

But nah seriously unless you're nostalgic for it I'm not sure if it will hold up

Show all comments (17)
180°

Crytek went so overboard on the Crysis tech and sent devs to photograph leaves in Haiti

"The shader work that came out of this was mind-blowing at times."

RaidenBlack492d ago

Amazing, often misunderstood
The dumb AI was deliberate, so that the players can explore and experiment with the world and all the features.

vTuro24491d ago

It really is. Most people only remember it for its graphics but the gameplay was equally amazing.

RaidenBlack492d ago

Hope they try to pour nearly same amount of dedication to the new Crysis 4

DefenderOfDoom2492d ago

Well worth the extra work ! I enjoyed all 3 Crisis games and would also love a new one .

JunonZanon491d ago (Edited 491d ago )

Still wish game development was overall this passionate and minutious about their projects. Obviously, there are still some great studios as exceptions.

LikAChicken491d ago

I’ll never forget Far Cry 2 and the amount of details they packed in.

Yea there were some issues with the gameplay loop and the sickness aspect but you could tell they really tried to nail details.

DivineHand125491d ago

I haven't beaten the first Crysis but I did play Crysis 2 and Crysis 3. I know some PC players were annoyed by the last 2 games being developed with consoles in mind but I believe it was an improvement. I had a great time with Crysis 3 to the point where I believe it was too short.